Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_4.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=CCAG FASTA(n).Sequence=CCAG
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:23:31
Evaluating how sequences fit models
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.22, deficit  0.01, CutoffScore  68.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  88.68, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.22, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  68.24, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.44, deficit  5.24, CutoffScore  44.89, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AGCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  57.10, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.39, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  87.51, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.60, deficit  4.40, CutoffScore  53.73, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCCA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.88, CutoffScore  48.63, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.53, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.30, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  88.40, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.53, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.54, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.20, deficit  4.00, CutoffScore  57.91, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.06, deficit  3.86, CutoffScore  59.37, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  34.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.25, CutoffScore  86.81, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.49, deficit  0.39, CutoffScore  64.31, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCAUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.06, deficit  3.86, CutoffScore  59.37, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUAUA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.91, deficit -0.21, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.89, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AAAAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.13, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.53, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.80, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  76.17, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.50, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  75.74, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  48.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGGAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.50, deficit  1.40, CutoffScore  53.64, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGGUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.92, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  60.05, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAGCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.93, deficit  1.83, CutoffScore  49.15, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.08, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -6.05, deficit  0.93, CutoffScore  58.64, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUGCC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.55, deficit  1.34, CutoffScore  85.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CAACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.35, deficit  0.04, CutoffScore  67.99, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGCUU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.22, deficit  1.28, CutoffScore  54.93, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AGCUU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.22, deficit  1.28, CutoffScore  54.93, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -6.05, deficit  0.93, CutoffScore  58.64, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UCCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.17, deficit  0.96, CutoffScore  26.74, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UAUUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -6.92, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore  69.35, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, CutoffScore  96.19, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGGUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -6.05, deficit  0.93, CutoffScore  58.64, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGCUC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.12, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  55.92, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUACG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.39, deficit  0.29, CutoffScore  65.34, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.30, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  75.13, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  48.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.60, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  53.78, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.19, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.32, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.38, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  87.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -4.95, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  95.61, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUAUA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.91, deficit -0.21, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.58, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.16, CutoffScore  66.68, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -4.58, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -6.47, deficit  2.14, CutoffScore  77.43, ed  1, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -4.32, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AACGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.98, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  55.85, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.96, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  53.39, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGCGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.08, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGGCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -6.98, deficit -1.08, CutoffScore  79.81, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAGAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.67, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore  69.63, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCCCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.24, deficit  0.56, CutoffScore  30.91, ed  2, 2 cWW-F                                   
CGGCUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -7.50, deficit -0.56, CutoffScore  74.33, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCCGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.62, deficit  0.70, CutoffScore  29.44, ed  2, 2 cWW                                     
CAAAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAUGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_52953.3,  6 NTs,                GGAAAC,score      -5.16, deficit  0.96, CutoffScore  58.36, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -7.82, deficit  1.72, CutoffScore  50.36, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUGUGA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.86, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  53.79, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUUCUU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.30, deficit  4.10, CutoffScore  56.81, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.89, deficit  7.13, CutoffScore  25.69, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.47, deficit  6.71, CutoffScore  30.06, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -5.21, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  45.29, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAGAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.20, deficit  1.31, CutoffScore  54.58, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
GGUUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -5.52, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GCCCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -7.32, deficit  1.48, CutoffScore  52.83, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAACA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score     -10.80, deficit  8.41, CutoffScore  25.51, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUCUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.23, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  62.62, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUUCGA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.36, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  92.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGUUC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.30, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUUAG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.09, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  62.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUAAUA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.12, deficit  0.52, CutoffScore  62.93, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.28, deficit  2.52, CutoffScore  73.77, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.48, deficit  1.00, CutoffScore  57.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGGUUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -8.47, deficit  3.99, CutoffScore  57.95, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAGUUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -7.81, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  37.67, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
UCACAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.30, deficit  0.62, CutoffScore  61.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAGAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.92, deficit  2.16, CutoffScore  77.49, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.86, deficit  2.13, CutoffScore  78.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUGGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -7.98, deficit  3.45, CutoffScore  63.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAAUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.28, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  98.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.82, deficit  2.73, CutoffScore  39.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUCUC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.07, deficit  3.87, CutoffScore  59.30, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAGUGU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.50, deficit  1.56, CutoffScore  51.96, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.00, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore  60.05, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUAAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.11, deficit  0.63, CutoffScore  61.78, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GACUUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.48, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  62.66, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGCUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -8.65, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.21, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAGAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.15, deficit  2.22, CutoffScore  45.08, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -5.74, deficit  0.86, CutoffScore  59.39, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
GUAUGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_86883.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.07, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.80, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  57.90, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUAGAA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  66.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGCAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_71391.1,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -4.77, deficit  0.97, CutoffScore  58.19, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.23, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  62.62, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAAGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.90, deficit  3.15, CutoffScore  67.21, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAUGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.39, deficit -0.85, CutoffScore  45.76, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUCUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.62, deficit  0.68, CutoffScore  61.26, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAACAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.03, deficit  2.09, CutoffScore  78.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GACUGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.23, deficit  0.76, CutoffScore  60.40, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUGGAGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -9.66, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  34.78, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
ACCUAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.97, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  34.23, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUUCAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.88, deficit -0.35, CutoffScore  40.54, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUCAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -7.85, deficit  1.75, CutoffScore  49.97, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.30, deficit  5.54, CutoffScore  42.27, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCUUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67667.2,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.34, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  53.74, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGCCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -9.04, deficit  2.94, CutoffScore  37.51, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUAAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.40, deficit  5.64, CutoffScore  41.22, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUUGUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.30, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUGGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.27, deficit -0.13, CutoffScore  38.16, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCAUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.91, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  67.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCCGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.82, deficit  1.35, CutoffScore  22.63, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGUCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -8.22, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  52.17, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUGACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -7.19, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  29.27, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUAACAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score     -10.27, deficit  8.51, CutoffScore  11.26, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAGCUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -7.28, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  28.55, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAUGCCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -4.11, deficit  0.38, CutoffScore  96.17, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUAUAGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_59735.5,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.91, deficit  1.57, CutoffScore  51.93, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAUUAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -7.11, deficit  1.59, CutoffScore  51.70, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUACGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.43, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  55.78, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCUGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.69, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  55.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUCUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -6.75, deficit  3.03, CutoffScore  39.41, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAACGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.13, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.81, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUAAUGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.66, deficit  0.99, CutoffScore  26.38, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUAAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.36, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.17, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUUCUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCGGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -10.19, deficit  4.25, CutoffScore  55.22, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGCGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -4.97, deficit  1.63, CutoffScore  65.04, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CAGUCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -10.09, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  15.48, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUCUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -11.94, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  27.55, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.25, deficit -1.15, CutoffScore  48.92, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAUCAUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score      -9.22, deficit -1.18, CutoffScore  49.30, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUUUGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -5.42, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  67.02, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAUUAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.87, CutoffScore  80.27, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAUUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -10.49, deficit  4.56, CutoffScore  52.01, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.13, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.81, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUCGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -9.02, deficit  3.42, CutoffScore  32.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUCUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUACGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.99, deficit  0.32, CutoffScore  65.08, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CCAUUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -8.42, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  43.85, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.28, deficit  2.18, CutoffScore  45.46, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAUUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.20, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  61.70, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
UAUGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -11.11, deficit  5.18, CutoffScore  13.93, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUCGAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAUAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_59735.5,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.89, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  52.11, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCCUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -8.06, deficit  2.39, CutoffScore  43.25, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CACCUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -7.98, deficit  3.55, CutoffScore  47.03, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CGAUCAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -7.85, deficit  1.75, CutoffScore  49.97, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUCAAAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.03, deficit -0.36, CutoffScore  40.67, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.92, deficit  1.91, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUAUCUGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.90, deficit  4.14, CutoffScore  36.85, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCUCAUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.62, deficit  4.05, CutoffScore  25.23, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUGACUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score      -9.53, deficit -0.87, CutoffScore  77.60, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUGAACG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.34, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  65.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUUAACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.11, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  67.07, ed  1, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
GUCGAUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -10.66, deficit  2.64, CutoffScore  48.21, ed  2, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
AGUUUGUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.32, deficit  1.30, CutoffScore  41.32, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
AUUACAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.90, deficit  5.73, CutoffScore  10.90, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
ACCUAUCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score     -11.56, deficit  4.05, CutoffScore   9.67, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUAAGUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score      -9.25, deficit  4.51, CutoffScore  68.34, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUAUGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -8.26, deficit  1.84, CutoffScore  38.87, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GCACCCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score     -11.00, deficit  5.41, CutoffScore  24.01, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCGCCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -11.79, deficit  1.38, CutoffScore  22.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAUCCCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -11.09, deficit  4.59, CutoffScore   6.93, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCGUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -12.20, deficit  3.95, CutoffScore  17.94, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CUAUGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.67, deficit  3.28, CutoffScore  33.88, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGUGAUAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -7.28, deficit  1.50, CutoffScore  58.01, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CCGUAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score     -10.26, deficit  4.68, CutoffScore  46.04, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGCAAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.12, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  50.15, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAUAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -8.93, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore  29.30, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCGAAGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.72, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  68.46, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAUGAAGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -8.55, deficit  3.26, CutoffScore  55.34, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUAAUGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -6.76, deficit  0.52, CutoffScore  63.76, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCGCUAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -9.68, deficit  0.95, CutoffScore  58.41, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAGAAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_00914.1,  6 NTs,              GGUCAAAC,score      -7.69, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  26.79, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUUGUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.49, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  59.98, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
UUUAAGAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -8.05, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  50.91, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGACGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.08, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  59.95, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUGGGUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -8.62, deficit  2.37, CutoffScore  44.68, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGGACCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -8.06, deficit  1.64, CutoffScore  40.43, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CUUGUUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.95, deficit  4.02, CutoffScore  26.13, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAGCGAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score     -11.26, deficit  7.91, CutoffScore  17.57, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
GAGUCUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.57, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  38.91, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAUGAUCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.77, deficit  1.52, CutoffScore  53.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAUCAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -3.52, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  69.59, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUGAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -6.24, deficit  0.45, CutoffScore  67.77, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
AGAAGAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.75, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  75.78, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCGAGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.68, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  52.25, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCAAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -10.47, deficit  3.40, CutoffScore  33.36, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUCAUGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -7.73, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  41.19, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCGCUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.94, deficit  5.51, CutoffScore  27.17, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGCUGUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.03, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  13.99, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCAUGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -12.59, deficit  4.34, CutoffScore  14.72, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CUAAGGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.77, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  53.84, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGAAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.19, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  61.97, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.22, deficit  0.65, CutoffScore  61.60, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGCAAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.07, deficit  2.68, CutoffScore  40.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCUUCGAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.32, CutoffScore  59.25, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGUCUACA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score     -10.65, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  13.17, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGCUGGAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -14.41, deficit  6.27, CutoffScore  38.44, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGUGCGUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.90, deficit  3.16, CutoffScore  29.96, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGCAAGGCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -12.66, deficit  5.27, CutoffScore  12.97, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGCGGCUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -14.15, deficit  6.80, CutoffScore   3.47, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
UUUAGAUCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -6.73, deficit  3.64, CutoffScore  64.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CGACAUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -8.02, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  60.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
AGAUGACCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -9.69, deficit  2.84, CutoffScore   8.47, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AGAGUGAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -14.17, deficit  6.03, CutoffScore  20.08, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAGGAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.38, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  11.15, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUUCUGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -11.39, deficit  3.14, CutoffScore  24.58, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CGCUUUUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.68, deficit  3.31, CutoffScore  17.89, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGGGCUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -10.48, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  27.72, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCUAAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score     -10.65, deficit  2.62, CutoffScore  20.82, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CACGGACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -9.12, deficit  4.49, CutoffScore  34.69, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CUCGAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.69, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.28, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GUCAGAAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -7.83, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  58.62, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CGUCAGUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score      -9.98, deficit  0.23, CutoffScore  39.02, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAACACCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.26, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  36.29, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAGUUUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -10.48, deficit  3.14, CutoffScore   7.52, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
GUGGUGACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.29, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  19.32, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUAGAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -5.87, deficit  0.58, CutoffScore  95.85, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUGCCAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.79, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  69.99, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW                                 
CGUUAAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score     -12.50, deficit  6.79, CutoffScore  34.80, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
UUUAUGUCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -12.67, deficit  9.58, CutoffScore   1.61, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GGGAUCAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.88, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  15.20, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUUUAAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score     -10.52, deficit  2.50, CutoffScore  49.50, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCUUUGUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.54, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  66.99, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAUCACCA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.27, deficit  6.99, CutoffScore  21.86, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGCAGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.61, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGUAGCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -7.47, deficit  2.13, CutoffScore  52.58, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
GCGCUUUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score      -8.77, deficit  1.03, CutoffScore  34.32, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUAAAAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score      -9.24, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  33.72, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUGGGACAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score      -7.17, deficit  2.43, CutoffScore  40.84, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUCACGCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -8.75, deficit  1.68, CutoffScore  45.53, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
UAACUUAGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.89, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  15.17, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUAACAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score     -10.06, deficit  4.27, CutoffScore  32.11, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGUGGACGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.68, deficit  1.94, CutoffScore  39.28, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCAAAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.55, deficit  3.16, CutoffScore  35.17, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGCAGGAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -9.66, deficit  5.03, CutoffScore  31.34, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CUUGGCGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -12.61, deficit  4.53, CutoffScore  33.26, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -7.78, deficit  1.34, CutoffScore  62.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAUGUCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -13.99, deficit  6.61, CutoffScore  18.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUGCGAUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.15, deficit  4.34, CutoffScore  34.66, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GUCUUAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -8.09, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  56.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
AUGGGAGCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -9.38, deficit  3.95, CutoffScore  23.81, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CGCAGAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.69, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  23.17, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAGAAAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -8.29, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  31.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUGCCAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_06059.6,  9 NTs,             CUUCCCAAG,score      -7.74, deficit  3.00, CutoffScore  77.50, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGCGCCACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -11.18, deficit  6.11, CutoffScore  14.23, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAAUCAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -14.33, deficit  5.41, CutoffScore  11.57, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
GGGGAUUAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.77, deficit  3.69, CutoffScore   4.79, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
UAAAAUAUAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.18, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  20.25, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GUAAAGGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.55, deficit  4.40, CutoffScore  30.88, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGAAUCAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -11.85, deficit  2.56, CutoffScore  30.12, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
GGACUUGUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -11.25, deficit  3.87, CutoffScore  35.90, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAACCGUCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -13.55, deficit  6.41, CutoffScore  20.72, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GGUGGUUGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.20, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  25.23, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAAUCCAGAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -10.20, deficit  5.13, CutoffScore  19.82, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUGGCGACCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score      -9.74, deficit  1.67, CutoffScore  17.07, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAGAAAACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.66, deficit  3.75, CutoffScore   9.79, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
AUCUAAAAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score      -9.87, deficit  1.84, CutoffScore  27.95, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGAUGUAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.68, deficit  4.09, CutoffScore  28.88, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGACAGGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -10.73, deficit  2.65, CutoffScore  29.31, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAAGCGUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04642.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -12.54, deficit  4.67, CutoffScore   7.06, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGGUGAAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -6.21, deficit  0.50, CutoffScore  76.71, ed  2, 1 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
UGGCAGUAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_23010.1,  8 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -13.95, deficit  6.14, CutoffScore  10.73, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAGGUAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -14.32, deficit  7.27, CutoffScore  23.32, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
UGAAAGAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -14.30, deficit 10.02, CutoffScore  10.65, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
AAGCCGGGCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -14.39, deficit  4.15, CutoffScore  39.17, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AAAUCUGAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_58224.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.19, deficit  4.49, CutoffScore   5.73, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUUACACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.79, deficit  7.50, CutoffScore   0.72, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUAAUAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -11.02, deficit  4.37, CutoffScore  38.54, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CUAAAAGGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.02, deficit  6.20, CutoffScore   3.88, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GACCCGGAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80411.1,  9 NTs,           CAGCCCGGUAG,score     -15.31, deficit  7.04, CutoffScore  27.38, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F                       
GUUGUUAAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -16.46, deficit  9.47, CutoffScore  14.09, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCACUGAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -12.66, deficit  2.65, CutoffScore  23.15, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAAAGACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score      -9.75, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  23.27, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCGAAGUUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.40, deficit  6.59, CutoffScore  20.43, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CCAUCCCUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -14.20, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  14.73, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUUUACCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score      -9.47, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  47.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUAAAUAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.83, deficit  1.49, CutoffScore  21.47, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUAAGUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -12.82, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  40.53, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGGUGCCCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.33, deficit  4.96, CutoffScore   9.34, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
ACUCGACAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06059.6,  9 NTs,             CUUCCCAAG,score     -10.92, deficit  6.17, CutoffScore  31.12, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGUUGUCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -13.48, deficit  5.40, CutoffScore  12.61, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CACUGGGCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -10.82, deficit  3.68, CutoffScore  18.99, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GGCAUCCGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -14.86, deficit  9.27, CutoffScore   3.36, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAUUACAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.42, deficit  4.13, CutoffScore  20.97, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
ACUUGGAGAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.36, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  49.49, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGACGCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04642.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -13.53, deficit  5.66, CutoffScore   1.53, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAUGAACAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score      -9.30, deficit  4.22, CutoffScore  41.97, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUAACUAUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -9.94, deficit  5.66, CutoffScore  18.22, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CAGGAAGCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.39, deficit  1.64, CutoffScore  25.20, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCUUUCAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -13.17, deficit  3.16, CutoffScore  19.79, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUAAAGCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.91, deficit  6.62, CutoffScore   5.98, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCCAUUUGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -12.88, deficit  4.11, CutoffScore  11.58, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGAGUCGAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -13.44, deficit  6.98, CutoffScore   0.25, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAACGAGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -15.23, deficit  5.88, CutoffScore  11.04, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAUGGAAGAUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -12.16, deficit  5.69, CutoffScore  24.72, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
CGAUCGAUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.72, deficit  4.11, CutoffScore  36.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAUUGGCAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -10.93, deficit  3.12, CutoffScore  46.73, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAUCCGUUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -12.14, deficit  1.90, CutoffScore  16.73, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAGAAAAACGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -17.97, deficit  9.89, CutoffScore   4.47, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGAUGAACAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.46, deficit  4.41, CutoffScore   5.47, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCAUUUCUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -10.93, deficit  3.63, CutoffScore  23.34, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUGAAAUAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -10.25, deficit  5.02, CutoffScore  29.89, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAUUCAUUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -12.92, deficit  3.92, CutoffScore  12.12, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUAGAGUAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -15.48, deficit  9.01, CutoffScore   7.71, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
CUAACAGGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.33, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  23.51, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUAAGUAAAGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.96, deficit  4.97, CutoffScore   5.77, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UCAAGAUCAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -14.96, deficit  4.71, CutoffScore  16.22, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CUAAAGGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.73, deficit  6.66, CutoffScore  19.24, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CUCCGGUCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.96, deficit  9.89, CutoffScore   2.60, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CUGGACGAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -13.75, deficit  4.80, CutoffScore  14.08, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUGAACUAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -13.03, deficit  4.03, CutoffScore  11.51, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAACGUUUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_07480.2,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score      -9.70, deficit  2.45, CutoffScore  39.04, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
AGUAGAGAUAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -17.52, deficit  6.78, CutoffScore  11.52, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UGAAUAAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -14.21, deficit  5.21, CutoffScore  21.56, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGAUAUUCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.46, deficit  4.41, CutoffScore  22.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUGCAGAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -15.09, deficit  6.36, CutoffScore   5.50, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAGGAGUUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23115.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -13.16, deficit  6.44, CutoffScore   3.09, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAUUAUUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -14.44, deficit  5.44, CutoffScore  20.27, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CACAGUACACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -12.79, deficit  5.75, CutoffScore  14.79, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
CAACGUAUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -13.75, deficit  6.70, CutoffScore   9.27, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
UUAUAAUUCAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.72, deficit  4.43, CutoffScore   0.65, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
AGAUCUGGACU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  4.49, CutoffScore   8.78, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAUUUCUAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -10.37, deficit  0.82, CutoffScore  38.30, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAUGGCUGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.90, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  24.89, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGAGAGUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.33, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore   6.23, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAUGUUGUCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -12.58, deficit  4.50, CutoffScore   8.81, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGGCUUGAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -14.90, deficit  4.66, CutoffScore   0.15, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCAAUAUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -16.22, deficit  5.44, CutoffScore  24.49, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUGCGUUGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.15, deficit  3.16, CutoffScore  32.48, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAUAGAAAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.80, deficit  6.40, CutoffScore   4.77, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
AGAGCGACGAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.33, deficit  4.22, CutoffScore   2.95, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAGACGGGUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -13.02, deficit  2.78, CutoffScore  29.43, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUUGACUGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -14.89, deficit  6.02, CutoffScore  16.59, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUAAGAGUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -17.57, deficit  9.49, CutoffScore   6.50, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGUCAUAAAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -15.53, deficit  7.45, CutoffScore   1.66, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUAAAGAUGACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.34, deficit  5.27, CutoffScore  41.88, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GGAUUUGUGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -14.09, deficit  3.84, CutoffScore  21.56, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CUAUAAGAAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.44, deficit  6.18, CutoffScore   4.61, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
UUGAAAGAAACA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.13, deficit  4.01, CutoffScore   4.16, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUGGUCCUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.24, deficit  9.42, CutoffScore  22.89, ed  2, 2 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGAGAUAACCAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.83, deficit  4.97, CutoffScore  14.59, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGAGAGCAUAUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.27, deficit  3.61, CutoffScore  11.76, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
AUAAAUUUUAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -13.59, deficit  4.82, CutoffScore   7.73, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUUGCUUAGUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04725.1,  8 NTs,          GUUACUUAGUUC,score     -11.94, deficit  6.91, CutoffScore  36.15, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS                     
AGAGUUUUUAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -12.69, deficit  2.43, CutoffScore  11.81, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CGACGAGCAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_11542.1, 10 NTs,         CGAGCGGCCAAAG,score     -15.13, deficit  5.60, CutoffScore  18.71, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUAAAGUUGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.53, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore  12.76, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUUAAGUAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -15.11, deficit  8.46, CutoffScore  14.28, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CGAUGAGGAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -16.75, deficit  8.97, CutoffScore  10.13, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
UGCAUCUAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -14.17, deficit  4.16, CutoffScore  13.23, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAGAAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score      -9.61, deficit  2.75, CutoffScore  28.16, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAGCGGAAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -14.10, deficit  7.05, CutoffScore   7.23, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
CAAAAAAACUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score      -7.88, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  57.07, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGCUAUUGUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -14.96, deficit  5.56, CutoffScore   1.15, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAGUGAAGCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -18.13, deficit 10.36, CutoffScore   9.90, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUAAACACACAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.45, deficit  3.33, CutoffScore   8.22, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUUUUAAGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -11.80, deficit  2.39, CutoffScore   2.08, ed  7, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGCUAUGGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -17.23, deficit 12.00, CutoffScore   9.98, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGACGUGGGACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -13.94, deficit  7.21, CutoffScore  18.97, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GACCCAGAAGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -12.80, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore   7.59, ed  6, 4 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUAGAGAAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -13.45, deficit  2.71, CutoffScore  17.51, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GGAAAAGAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.81, deficit  5.75, CutoffScore  39.43, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CGGUUUGGAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.95, deficit  6.55, CutoffScore  19.52, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
UAUAUAAUAACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.32, deficit  6.91, CutoffScore   2.11, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CUCAGAGACAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -16.59, deficit  5.85, CutoffScore  16.73, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CAAGUUUAUAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -15.28, deficit  8.99, CutoffScore   3.07, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAAUUCUAAUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23509.1, 11 NTs,          GAAUUCAUUUUC,score     -12.44, deficit  6.98, CutoffScore  20.08, ed  3, 3 cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUCGUCGACAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12870.1, 12 NTs,         GUCCUUGGGAAAC,score     -12.43, deficit  4.97, CutoffScore   6.52, ed  4, 4 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
CUUCAAAAAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -12.41, deficit  4.15, CutoffScore  17.35, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
UUGAGUAAAUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.06, deficit  6.66, CutoffScore   3.43, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
UUUUGCGGCGCAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -19.93, deficit 11.05, CutoffScore   5.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAGGAUAUCUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.35, deficit  5.28, CutoffScore  10.87, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
AGAAAAGAAUACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.23, deficit  7.16, CutoffScore  32.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CGUCCGAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.15, deficit  5.75, CutoffScore   8.16, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
GGAGAAGCAGAGAGUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73183.1, 14 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -19.17, deficit  8.95, CutoffScore   7.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F           
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 94.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[11 11]	 76.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 66.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 22.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 82.0000	 72.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 94.0000	 46.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 86.0000	 40.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 54.0000	 14.0000
[8 8]	100.0000	 44.0000	  4.0000
[9 9]	 96.0000	 20.0000	  4.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence   9 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence  27 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence  27 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence  43 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 244 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 251 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 265 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 271 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 297 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 300 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 303 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 351 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 360 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 402 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 413 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 425 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 436 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 464 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 470 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 8.2500%
Number of models giving false positives is 230 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     1.73
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     3.69
