Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_8.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=UGAG FASTA(n).Sequence=UGAG
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:23:58
Evaluating how sequences fit models
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  88.68, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.53, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -5.63, deficit -1.04, CutoffScore  47.79, ed  2, 2 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.84, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.89, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  88.68, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
ACUU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.34, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  67.05, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.53, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.29, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  67.48, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.16, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  43.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.30, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  88.40, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.20, deficit  4.00, CutoffScore  57.91, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.28, deficit  2.08, CutoffScore  78.07, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGUGC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.10, deficit  1.57, CutoffScore  51.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGCAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, CutoffScore  96.19, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.99, deficit -0.14, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.44, deficit  0.91, CutoffScore  58.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.80, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  92.55, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGGGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.43, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  55.98, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGAAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UCAGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -6.67, deficit  1.37, CutoffScore  22.47, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUAGC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCACC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.81, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  35.41, ed  3, 2 cWW-F                                   
AGAGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  52.09, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGCCA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.06, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  34.56, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.60, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  85.36, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.89, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.35, CutoffScore  64.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGUCA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.08, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.80, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  92.55, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGAAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.58, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, CutoffScore  70.35, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUCAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.68, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  63.39, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.96, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  53.39, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCGUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.30, deficit  5.10, CutoffScore  46.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.83, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  50.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCGUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.30, deficit  5.10, CutoffScore  46.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.65, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUUUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.41, deficit  0.40, CutoffScore  95.80, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, CutoffScore  70.35, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.86, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.22, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  48.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.96, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  78.67, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UAUUA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.00, deficit  0.99, CutoffScore  89.61, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.62, deficit -0.06, CutoffScore  69.04, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.25, deficit  2.05, CutoffScore  78.39, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAUCC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.00, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore  60.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.50, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  75.74, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.50, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  75.74, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.44, deficit  0.91, CutoffScore  58.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.89, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGCUA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.20, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  55.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.25, CutoffScore  86.81, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.67, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  68.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.38, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  87.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAGUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -4.98, deficit -0.62, CutoffScore  74.95, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCACGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -6.72, deficit  4.77, CutoffScore  52.15, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GUUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_71391.1,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -3.80, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAGAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.20, deficit  0.60, CutoffScore  93.64, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.38, deficit  0.28, CutoffScore  65.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AAUUCU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.32, CutoffScore  56.52, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAGAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.15, deficit  2.22, CutoffScore  45.08, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.56, deficit  1.80, CutoffScore  81.22, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAGUCC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.77, deficit  2.65, CutoffScore  72.14, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUUUUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.23, deficit  4.03, CutoffScore  57.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUCGG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -7.37, deficit  1.53, CutoffScore  52.35, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGUUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -8.47, deficit  3.99, CutoffScore  57.95, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUUUAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.12, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  61.64, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.16, deficit  0.95, CutoffScore  26.84, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUUCG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.48, deficit  1.75, CutoffScore  82.37, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUACC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.88, CutoffScore  59.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GACUUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.48, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  62.66, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.00, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore  60.05, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAGUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.38, CutoffScore  64.46, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  36.84, ed  2, 2 cWW                                     
AAAACU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.79, deficit  5.03, CutoffScore  47.57, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.59, deficit  0.53, CutoffScore  62.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AAAAGU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.34, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGCGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.72, deficit -0.20, CutoffScore  70.53, ed  1, 1 cWW                                     
GGAAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.69, deficit  3.93, CutoffScore  59.03, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGCCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.26, deficit  0.16, CutoffScore  66.71, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_82710.2,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -5.89, deficit  1.56, CutoffScore  52.01, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCCCGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -7.26, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  53.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGCGAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -6.59, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.66, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.62, CutoffScore  61.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.27, deficit  3.75, CutoffScore  63.99, ed  0, 0 cWW-cWS-F                               
GUUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.48, deficit  1.00, CutoffScore  57.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUUAG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.09, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  62.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCAAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -9.72, deficit  7.78, CutoffScore  22.03, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CAAACG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.28, deficit  3.52, CutoffScore  63.27, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUUGC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.87, deficit  3.93, CutoffScore  60.58, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGAUCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -6.32, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.55, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCGAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -6.36, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCAUC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.81, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGUUC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.30, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.63, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.07, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.47, deficit  1.37, CutoffScore  54.00, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GACCCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_62934.1,  6 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.16, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  50.23, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
UGAAAA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.30, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  83.96, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUUAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.62, CutoffScore  61.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.58, deficit  4.82, CutoffScore  49.71, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGGACA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.25, deficit  2.13, CutoffScore  46.03, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUUUUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.61, deficit  2.68, CutoffScore  71.81, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAUUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -6.56, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGCCGAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -8.45, deficit  3.98, CutoffScore  58.16, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUACGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -7.76, deficit  2.16, CutoffScore  45.72, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGACAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.21, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  52.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CAGUUGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.10, deficit  2.16, CutoffScore  45.65, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUCCGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -10.14, deficit  1.91, CutoffScore  48.36, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUGAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -10.14, deficit  2.12, CutoffScore  25.45, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GCUCAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.15, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  62.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAAUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -7.65, deficit  3.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUCAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.54, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  60.74, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CGCAUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCACCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.58, deficit  2.99, CutoffScore  18.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCUAAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.00, deficit  0.40, CutoffScore  64.17, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUCUAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -6.56, deficit  0.11, CutoffScore  67.24, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCACUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.56, deficit  2.43, CutoffScore  42.84, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUGAUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -5.48, deficit -0.76, CutoffScore  76.94, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGACAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.21, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  52.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGAUCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -8.29, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  19.79, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUGCGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.35, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  62.19, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CAUUCUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -6.82, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  38.72, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_59735.5,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -5.67, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  64.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUUUCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_67667.2,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -3.78, deficit -0.62, CutoffScore  77.73, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUCUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.51, deficit  2.87, CutoffScore  51.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.87, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  81.66, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAAGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.45, deficit  4.69, CutoffScore  51.08, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAAUUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.62, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUACCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -7.50, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  36.61, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CACGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.56, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  30.84, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GAAAAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.13, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.81, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGAAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.38, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  44.43, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGUAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.80, deficit  1.33, CutoffScore  54.42, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAUAAAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.89, deficit  0.49, CutoffScore  63.31, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AAAGGCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -6.93, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  32.55, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAGAUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.01, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUUCCGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -10.35, deficit  2.12, CutoffScore  46.11, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUACGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -9.04, deficit  3.44, CutoffScore  32.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCAGUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -7.01, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  53.61, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGCUUUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -9.39, deficit  1.34, CutoffScore  54.37, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUUCUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -9.70, deficit  5.27, CutoffScore  33.11, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
AACGGAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.80, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  28.55, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CGAGGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.57, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAACAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.13, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  79.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGUGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67667.2,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.34, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  53.74, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGGCGCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -8.43, deficit  5.08, CutoffScore  38.96, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
AUCCAAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -8.80, deficit  5.46, CutoffScore  36.14, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CUGAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -9.79, deficit  3.66, CutoffScore  29.91, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -9.79, deficit  3.66, CutoffScore  29.91, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UCUGUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -9.00, deficit  0.91, CutoffScore  38.70, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCAGCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -7.27, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  28.62, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAAACCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -8.41, deficit  3.50, CutoffScore  23.23, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGAAACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.82, deficit  1.25, CutoffScore  55.26, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCAUAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -10.30, deficit  1.58, CutoffScore  51.81, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCUUAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.21, deficit  3.59, CutoffScore   7.24, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CAAGAGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -11.06, deficit  4.61, CutoffScore  33.82, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGAGGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.34, deficit  3.96, CutoffScore  26.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUAAUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -7.36, deficit  2.07, CutoffScore  63.85, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAUUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -8.09, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  47.39, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAGAGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.11, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  33.73, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUAAGCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -6.96, deficit  1.53, CutoffScore  42.34, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CUGUACUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -11.74, deficit  6.41, CutoffScore  27.67, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
CGCCCGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -12.17, deficit  6.60, CutoffScore  12.54, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
GUCCGGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score     -11.94, deficit  5.74, CutoffScore  26.61, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CGCUGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.96, deficit  1.52, CutoffScore  52.46, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGACGGAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score     -11.36, deficit  2.96, CutoffScore  37.26, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGGGAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -5.83, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  91.41, ed  0, 0 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CUGAACGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score      -8.93, deficit  1.72, CutoffScore  25.74, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUAUGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -6.61, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  44.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAGGGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.87, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  27.04, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAUAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.02, deficit  3.40, CutoffScore  52.84, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGUCGUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.96, deficit  4.51, CutoffScore  20.94, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUGAUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -8.85, deficit  2.60, CutoffScore  42.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUAGGAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score      -7.73, deficit  2.99, CutoffScore  36.91, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUUCAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -8.21, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  34.14, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
CUUCGCUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.18, deficit -0.22, CutoffScore  70.79, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAACGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.95, deficit  1.56, CutoffScore  52.01, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUCAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.44, deficit  1.71, CutoffScore  25.61, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUGAUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score     -10.21, deficit  4.78, CutoffScore  17.44, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CCGGAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score      -9.82, deficit  1.11, CutoffScore  12.92, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCUCGAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.00, deficit  2.41, CutoffScore  51.11, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGUUAUCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -7.89, deficit  0.16, CutoffScore  40.54, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAUAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.53, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  24.79, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUGUCAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.27, deficit  3.51, CutoffScore  59.46, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAAAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.88, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAGUCGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score      -9.26, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  17.74, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCUAAUAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.58, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  66.55, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCCUAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.74, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  33.32, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGGUAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -9.40, deficit  4.64, CutoffScore  38.97, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GAAAUAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.11, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  33.73, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUUCAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.43, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  40.44, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
CUCCGGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score     -11.95, deficit  5.75, CutoffScore  26.53, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
AACGAAAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -10.05, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  53.82, ed  2, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CACCAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.92, deficit  2.53, CutoffScore  10.18, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUCAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.53, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  67.01, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUUUGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -5.74, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  66.17, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
CAAAUUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.12, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  41.36, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
CAAAAGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.74, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  43.62, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAAGGAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.20, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  32.96, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGAACAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -8.83, deficit  3.05, CutoffScore  43.55, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
UUUGUUCA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -9.28, deficit  3.23, CutoffScore  34.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAGCGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score     -10.32, deficit  3.83, CutoffScore  27.22, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GGAAAAGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score     -10.21, deficit  3.36, CutoffScore  27.64, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUCACGUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_06059.6,  9 NTs,             CUUCCCAAG,score      -9.43, deficit  4.68, CutoffScore  64.87, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UACGAGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.98, deficit  5.69, CutoffScore  29.63, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAGCUAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.61, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGGGUCUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -13.99, deficit  5.90, CutoffScore   9.56, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CAAACGUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -10.95, deficit  4.50, CutoffScore  15.75, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCCCCAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -9.03, deficit  4.23, CutoffScore  29.36, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
AUAAACAUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.04, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  29.35, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
CAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -7.78, deficit  1.34, CutoffScore  62.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCGCAUCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score     -10.87, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  42.76, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGAAGAAGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.46, deficit  2.73, CutoffScore  10.31, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGAUCGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score      -9.73, deficit  3.54, CutoffScore  33.17, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
AUCAUAAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -13.89, deficit  9.26, CutoffScore  23.46, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAUUUCACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  43.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAACCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -11.61, deficit  5.18, CutoffScore  12.78, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GUUGAAACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_06059.6,  9 NTs,             CUUCCCAAG,score      -8.62, deficit  3.87, CutoffScore  48.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAAUCGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score     -10.19, deficit  3.35, CutoffScore  27.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUGUAAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score      -8.13, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  99.08, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUAUCACAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32735.2,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -10.24, deficit  6.61, CutoffScore  25.32, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CACUGUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.03, deficit  3.90, CutoffScore  17.64, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GUAAAAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score      -9.24, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  33.72, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAGUUGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.60, deficit  1.75, CutoffScore  40.08, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUCGGACUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -11.05, deficit  0.65, CutoffScore  30.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGCGGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -11.99, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  57.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCCGAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.23, deficit  6.95, CutoffScore   4.03, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAAUGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.86, deficit  3.50, CutoffScore  36.67, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAGAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -10.24, deficit  5.61, CutoffScore  27.73, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CGGAGCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -12.30, deficit  2.57, CutoffScore   5.78, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
CAUCCGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -12.13, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  31.58, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUCGAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -10.49, deficit  2.24, CutoffScore  32.00, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CAACCAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -11.34, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  13.56, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGCUGUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -11.05, deficit  3.67, CutoffScore  17.71, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAAAUCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.50, deficit  0.76, CutoffScore  33.88, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUAUUGAGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -12.79, deficit  5.40, CutoffScore  11.57, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGUAAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -13.13, deficit  4.82, CutoffScore  47.74, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCGUUGGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score      -8.84, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  47.21, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGAAAAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -9.86, deficit  4.42, CutoffScore  21.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUUAAUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_32735.2,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -10.20, deficit  6.56, CutoffScore  43.38, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCAAAGAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93383.1,  9 NTs,             GCCCUAAGC,score      -7.79, deficit  4.32, CutoffScore  25.70, ed  3, 3 cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUUUUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.57, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  31.78, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUCAAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_06059.6,  9 NTs,             CUUCCCAAG,score      -6.33, deficit  1.58, CutoffScore  65.56, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGAAAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.11, deficit  0.36, CutoffScore  37.73, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCAAAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.74, deficit  3.35, CutoffScore  33.16, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAGGGCUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -9.67, deficit  2.53, CutoffScore  64.66, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CAAAACCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -9.58, deficit  3.16, CutoffScore  51.96, ed  3, 1 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CGGCAAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.99, deficit  2.60, CutoffScore  41.00, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGCGAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85993.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score     -11.33, deficit  5.98, CutoffScore   3.31, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAAACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -8.83, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  26.94, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAGAGAGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -10.55, deficit  2.47, CutoffScore  30.40, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGACCCAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -14.34, deficit  6.26, CutoffScore   7.40, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAGAAUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -11.93, deficit  6.59, CutoffScore  20.86, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCAUCAUAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -12.29, deficit  3.98, CutoffScore  13.25, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGGCAACCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score      -8.89, deficit  1.60, CutoffScore  54.27, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCGGUAUUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04642.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -13.77, deficit  5.90, CutoffScore  16.92, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGAUGUACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.15, deficit  5.11, CutoffScore  18.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGGCAGGUUA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.54, deficit  4.25, CutoffScore  20.26, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCUAAAGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.23, deficit  5.60, CutoffScore  41.84, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGACUGUUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -13.24, deficit  5.17, CutoffScore  21.73, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAACCUCUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.07, deficit  4.34, CutoffScore  12.70, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUCCUGAUAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.97, deficit  5.98, CutoffScore  16.80, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGAGCGCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -11.31, deficit  3.24, CutoffScore   7.54, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGUGACGAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.81, deficit  4.67, CutoffScore  29.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAAUGUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -15.21, deficit  4.96, CutoffScore  14.69, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
GGCCGUAAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_24792.1,  6 NTs,            GCCCGUUAUC,score      -9.22, deficit  2.79, CutoffScore  33.57, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F-F                           
GGAAAAAAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score     -12.81, deficit  6.37, CutoffScore  18.37, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGCAUGUAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -13.44, deficit  5.37, CutoffScore  20.62, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUUGACGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -15.11, deficit  6.24, CutoffScore  15.37, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGCCAUGUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -14.65, deficit  7.53, CutoffScore  15.52, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUAAAGGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -11.26, deficit  6.45, CutoffScore  31.16, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUAACGCUUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -13.11, deficit  4.58, CutoffScore  17.53, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUCUGUAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.94, deficit  4.95, CutoffScore  39.19, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAGCGAAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.33, deficit  5.56, CutoffScore  20.11, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GACCAUGUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -13.41, deficit  5.34, CutoffScore   4.20, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCAAAGCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.57, deficit  5.28, CutoffScore  32.09, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUUAAAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -8.23, deficit  2.51, CutoffScore  43.30, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
GGGGUCUAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.76, deficit  3.67, CutoffScore  23.08, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GUUACAAAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.80, deficit  7.15, CutoffScore  22.04, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CUUGGCAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -11.01, deficit  2.93, CutoffScore  27.61, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAAAUCAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.76, deficit  1.42, CutoffScore  44.47, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUUGGACAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score     -10.02, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  11.38, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
CUCUUCAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score     -12.38, deficit  5.89, CutoffScore  11.95, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CAAAAGUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -14.14, deficit  8.32, CutoffScore   9.46, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GCAUGCGAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -12.65, deficit  4.58, CutoffScore  17.64, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUUGAAUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -8.64, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  40.58, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
CUUAAGAUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -8.55, deficit  4.27, CutoffScore  59.46, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
UAAACAGAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score      -9.41, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  32.13, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AAUCAUAAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -12.97, deficit  4.64, CutoffScore  40.32, ed  4, 2 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CACAACCACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -12.49, deficit  5.98, CutoffScore  17.92, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUUUUACCCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.05, deficit  6.71, CutoffScore  20.22, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AAAAGGAAAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.36, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  49.49, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAUUUAACAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score      -9.30, deficit  4.22, CutoffScore  41.97, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGUUGUUCAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -13.01, deficit  4.70, CutoffScore   8.44, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAACAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score      -9.22, deficit -0.12, CutoffScore  33.52, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUUAGGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_58224.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.99, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  29.71, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGCCGCAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80411.1,  9 NTs,           CAGCCCGGUAG,score     -13.45, deficit  5.18, CutoffScore   4.36, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F                       
CGUUGAGGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -14.54, deficit  5.66, CutoffScore  18.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUCCAAGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.79, deficit  4.50, CutoffScore  36.81, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGGUGUGAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.64, deficit  1.90, CutoffScore  16.64, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUGGAUUUGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.65, deficit  6.61, CutoffScore  10.12, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCUAAUAGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -10.12, deficit  4.89, CutoffScore  15.55, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUGGCAGAUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -14.89, deficit  5.95, CutoffScore  25.61, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAGAAGAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -12.24, deficit  5.19, CutoffScore   0.67, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
UGGGCACGCUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -13.46, deficit  6.34, CutoffScore   6.31, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGCAAGACCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -15.90, deficit 10.56, CutoffScore   0.70, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGAGUUAAUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -11.61, deficit  2.61, CutoffScore  19.33, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CACGGUCCUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04642.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -13.10, deficit  5.23, CutoffScore   3.95, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGACGGCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23115.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -13.16, deficit  6.44, CutoffScore   3.09, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUACUGGACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.69, deficit  4.07, CutoffScore  18.02, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUGUAUGACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.52, deficit  6.48, CutoffScore  10.85, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGCCGAAAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -10.95, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  23.84, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAGUCAGGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.47, deficit  1.13, CutoffScore  24.19, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUGGGACCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -10.68, deficit  5.86, CutoffScore  17.83, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGCCAAAUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80411.1,  9 NTs,           CAGCCCGGUAG,score     -11.88, deficit  3.61, CutoffScore  13.08, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F                       
UGUGCUUCGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -14.04, deficit  6.92, CutoffScore   3.31, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAAGAAUAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -10.26, deficit  5.92, CutoffScore  40.42, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
UAAGGAAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -15.83, deficit  7.91, CutoffScore  22.78, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CUCUAGGCAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -12.92, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore  18.67, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCGAGAUCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -13.23, deficit  4.29, CutoffScore  17.26, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
AAAUUCUGAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.75, deficit  5.00, CutoffScore  39.15, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UAACGUGUCAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -12.55, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  30.99, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CUUCGAUUCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -13.66, deficit  8.84, CutoffScore  34.51, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAGAAGAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.89, deficit  6.12, CutoffScore   0.59, ed  5, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UAGUCUGCGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -13.65, deficit  3.41, CutoffScore  43.62, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAGUCAUUUGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04642.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -12.59, deficit  4.72, CutoffScore   6.80, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAUGAGAUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -11.14, deficit  3.32, CutoffScore  28.01, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUGAAUAAUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.46, deficit  4.41, CutoffScore  22.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUAAGAACUUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -12.07, deficit  2.51, CutoffScore   8.83, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCCCGCACAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -12.08, deficit  4.96, CutoffScore  13.33, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAUUUCAACGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.16, deficit  2.55, CutoffScore   8.78, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGGAUGGGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -14.55, deficit  6.40, CutoffScore  17.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAAAACUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -12.70, deficit  8.35, CutoffScore  13.24, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
CCCCCGCCCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -10.62, deficit  3.50, CutoffScore  36.15, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAACAAAUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -11.46, deficit  2.46, CutoffScore  20.15, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGACUCCUUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -13.00, deficit  5.88, CutoffScore  23.98, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCUUAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -12.57, deficit  4.75, CutoffScore   2.12, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGUUGGAGACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -11.98, deficit  4.17, CutoffScore  23.08, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGUUUAAGGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.84, deficit  3.55, CutoffScore  24.11, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
ACAUCAGGAGCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.43, deficit  5.65, CutoffScore  11.73, ed  6, 4 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CUAAGAAAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -14.04, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  31.02, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GUUGAAACCUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.55, deficit  3.94, CutoffScore   0.04, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUAGGCUCAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11542.1, 10 NTs,         CGAGCGGCCAAAG,score     -14.73, deficit  5.20, CutoffScore   4.23, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGGAAUAGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41902.1, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.68, deficit  5.06, CutoffScore  14.69, ed  5, 4 cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F                   
AGAAAGCGAAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -12.45, deficit  4.67, CutoffScore  16.65, ed  6, 4 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CCUUGAAUUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.24, deficit  4.63, CutoffScore  14.52, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAUUUCUUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -11.12, deficit  4.83, CutoffScore  25.48, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UGGCCUAGGGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -12.12, deficit  1.88, CutoffScore  52.79, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGUUUCAAUUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.73, deficit  2.12, CutoffScore  11.45, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAAGAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score      -9.61, deficit  2.75, CutoffScore  28.16, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAACAAGCUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -14.72, deficit  3.98, CutoffScore  10.43, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
ACCACCAUGCAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.32, deficit  3.21, CutoffScore   8.99, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCCAGAAUAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -12.96, deficit  4.88, CutoffScore  14.66, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCAUACAGAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -16.77, deficit  8.69, CutoffScore  10.54, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUAAAAGAAGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -14.55, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  11.35, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GCAAGCAUAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -16.61, deficit  7.17, CutoffScore  18.90, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
CUUAAAAGGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -14.21, deficit  0.99, CutoffScore  33.32, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CUAAAUUAUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -14.79, deficit 10.44, CutoffScore   2.78, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
CGUACUUAUUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -15.47, deficit  4.69, CutoffScore  12.70, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUUAAAGUUUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.30, deficit  4.56, CutoffScore   7.14, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CUUUAAGAUGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -16.07, deficit  5.33, CutoffScore   2.86, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GGAAGUAAAGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -15.14, deficit  5.70, CutoffScore  11.25, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
GGACAGAAAAACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.92, deficit  5.85, CutoffScore   7.96, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GUCAACGAUCAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.19, deficit  9.12, CutoffScore   6.58, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CAAGAUUAGAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -14.63, deficit  2.48, CutoffScore  15.15, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAAGGAUACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.77, deficit  8.70, CutoffScore   8.70, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CGUCGGUGAGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -12.72, deficit  5.98, CutoffScore  25.08, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GAAAAGUGUCAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.45, deficit  6.38, CutoffScore   5.20, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CGAGAAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -13.78, deficit  1.63, CutoffScore   2.59, ed  7, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAUGAGAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -15.90, deficit  7.60, CutoffScore  12.09, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
ACUCAGGAAUGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -18.60, deficit 10.52, CutoffScore   1.28, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCCGAGUCGCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -17.76, deficit  8.99, CutoffScore   1.27, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGAGAAUAGCUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -14.10, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore   0.67, ed  7, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAGUUUUUAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -13.15, deficit  4.38, CutoffScore  10.15, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGGUUCAAAUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -12.77, deficit  2.37, CutoffScore  56.67, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
UGGUGCGCUCAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -15.62, deficit  1.49, CutoffScore  19.14, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGGUGUAGAUAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.45, deficit  5.05, CutoffScore  11.74, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CUGAGAGAUGUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -18.20, deficit  7.43, CutoffScore  14.10, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
AGAUUCGAAGUUCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -18.95, deficit  8.55, CutoffScore   9.16, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
AAAUAAAUGAAACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.86, deficit  9.79, CutoffScore   3.09, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
UUGAAUUAACGGUUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -16.29, deficit  3.06, CutoffScore  19.49, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GGGAAAAUUUGAAAGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73183.1, 14 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -16.90, deficit  6.67, CutoffScore   4.03, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F           
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 98.0000	  4.0000	  0.0000
[11 11]	 80.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 46.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 26.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	 10.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 88.0000	 84.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 94.0000	 58.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 92.0000	 42.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 56.0000	 12.0000
[8 8]	100.0000	 30.0000	  2.0000
[9 9]	 98.0000	 14.0000	  4.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  25 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence  50 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence  69 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence  72 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 238 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 245 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 254 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 259 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 275 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 289 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 293 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 301 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 313 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 334 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 365 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 379 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 383 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 402 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 411 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 434 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 448 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 459 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 485 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 503 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 522 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 548 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 590 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 590 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 613 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 703 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 704 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 800 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 801 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 854 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 887 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 945 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 954 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Overall false positive rate is 4.1442%
Number of models giving false positives is 232 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     0.97
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     1.84
