Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_5.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=GGAC FASTA(n).Sequence=GGAC
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:23:37
Evaluating how sequences fit models
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.60, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.28, deficit  2.08, CutoffScore  78.07, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.29, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.60, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.84, deficit -0.37, CutoffScore  40.78, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.20, deficit  4.00, CutoffScore  57.91, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.50, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.47, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  76.08, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -5.63, deficit -1.04, CutoffScore  47.79, ed  2, 2 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -3.88, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.29, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.19, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  79.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.93, deficit  0.72, CutoffScore  60.80, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.49, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.38, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  87.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.60, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  53.78, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUUU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -7.23, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  66.11, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUAUU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.12, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  34.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAGAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.44, deficit  0.91, CutoffScore  90.46, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
ACGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  55.85, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAUUU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.11, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  88.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  91.48, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -10.47, deficit  4.53, CutoffScore  52.31, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUCCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.27, deficit  2.06, CutoffScore  46.76, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.35, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.35, CutoffScore  64.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUUGU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.61, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.86, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.22, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.38, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  87.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.29, deficit -0.01, CutoffScore  68.56, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUACG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.39, deficit  0.29, CutoffScore  65.34, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUCC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.00, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore  60.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  34.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -4.44, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
GUGUC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  97.91, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGUC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.65, deficit  1.76, CutoffScore  81.44, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-cSH                               
CGGAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  34.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGCGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  34.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.46, deficit  5.26, CutoffScore  44.68, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUGGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.30, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  75.13, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
AGUAU 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.91, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  91.43, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.96, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  78.67, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UACGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.97, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  55.98, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.46, deficit  5.26, CutoffScore  44.68, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.44, deficit  3.24, CutoffScore  65.87, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -5.70, deficit  2.49, CutoffScore  42.21, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.50, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore  63.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCGGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.77, deficit -0.15, CutoffScore  38.39, ed  2, 2 cWW                                     
GAACAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.36, deficit  2.43, CutoffScore  74.47, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UACUGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.06, deficit  1.12, CutoffScore  25.01, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAUCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.80, deficit  1.13, CutoffScore  56.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCUAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.28, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  62.05, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCUGCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.91, deficit  2.70, CutoffScore  40.05, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCGAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -8.29, deficit  5.28, CutoffScore  44.43, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAACGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.68, deficit  0.58, CutoffScore  62.33, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGACGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.49, deficit  7.73, CutoffScore  19.40, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.82, deficit  5.42, CutoffScore  51.99, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GUAACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.97, deficit  4.21, CutoffScore  56.09, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCAUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.79, deficit  5.03, CutoffScore  47.53, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGAUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -8.26, deficit  4.25, CutoffScore  55.26, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.62, CutoffScore  61.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCGCUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.65, deficit  0.44, CutoffScore  32.22, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCUUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.13, deficit  2.95, CutoffScore  68.98, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGACGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.71, deficit  6.95, CutoffScore  27.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAACCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  83.10, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGAGAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.81, deficit  3.05, CutoffScore  68.24, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCCCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -5.34, deficit  0.86, CutoffScore  90.92, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.38, deficit  0.28, CutoffScore  65.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUGCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  36.84, ed  2, 2 cWW                                     
UGACGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score     -10.38, deficit  8.62, CutoffScore  10.16, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCCGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -7.08, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  60.93, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
ACAGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -6.07, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  64.99, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGAAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.19, deficit  2.44, CutoffScore  74.62, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.15, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  47.08, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGUGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -8.77, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  60.91, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCCCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.23, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  31.04, ed  3, 2 cWW-F                                   
GAAUCC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_62934.1,  6 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.55, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  67.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
GACUUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.48, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  62.66, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -5.97, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.13, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -4.48, deficit  2.54, CutoffScore  74.52, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
AACGAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.30, deficit  0.70, CutoffScore  92.59, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAUCC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_62934.1,  6 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.55, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  67.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
GGACAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.35, deficit  4.59, CutoffScore  52.19, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUGUA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.55, deficit  0.43, CutoffScore  63.89, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UCUCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -9.17, deficit  2.49, CutoffScore  73.77, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.52, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  90.29, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUAGG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.64, deficit  4.88, CutoffScore  49.18, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGAUGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_52953.3,  6 NTs,                GGAAAC,score      -5.36, deficit  1.16, CutoffScore  56.23, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.80, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  57.90, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUCCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score     -10.74, deficit  8.35, CutoffScore  26.03, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GUGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -7.58, deficit  3.05, CutoffScore  67.93, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.84, deficit  6.08, CutoffScore  36.66, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.23, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  62.62, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUACGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -6.15, deficit  4.21, CutoffScore  57.82, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GAAUAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_52953.3,  6 NTs,                GGAAAC,score      -4.82, deficit  0.62, CutoffScore  61.90, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGACAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.35, deficit  4.59, CutoffScore  52.19, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGGUUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -9.50, deficit  1.45, CutoffScore  53.19, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAGAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_82710.2,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -6.29, deficit  1.96, CutoffScore  47.79, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAGGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.57, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUACAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -8.41, deficit  5.07, CutoffScore  39.08, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CCGCCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -7.86, deficit -0.87, CutoffScore  77.55, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGAGAAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.70, deficit  7.94, CutoffScore  17.22, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
ACCAUGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -8.41, deficit  2.66, CutoffScore  40.43, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUUGAA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -7.12, deficit  0.63, CutoffScore  65.73, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.87, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  81.66, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGUAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.71, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  35.24, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F                               
CGUGGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.37, deficit  0.97, CutoffScore  26.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUCAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.43, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  55.78, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGACUAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -7.34, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.81, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCAGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.76, deficit  1.09, CutoffScore  56.98, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
UGGAUUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -10.08, deficit  4.15, CutoffScore  24.77, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -9.98, deficit  5.22, CutoffScore  34.34, ed  2, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  86.40, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCGACGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score      -8.88, deficit  1.68, CutoffScore  55.00, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGGUAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -8.08, deficit  1.98, CutoffScore  47.58, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCAAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -7.93, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGAUUAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.98, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  64.00, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
GGAAACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.96, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.82, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
GGAUAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_59735.5,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -5.80, deficit  0.45, CutoffScore  63.68, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCUAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.44, deficit  0.85, CutoffScore  65.22, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAUUCCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.20, deficit  1.48, CutoffScore  85.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.23, deficit  1.78, CutoffScore  49.67, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGAACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score      -7.13, deficit -0.07, CutoffScore  42.98, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUCAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.80, deficit  3.46, CutoffScore  73.90, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CUGCAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.44, deficit  1.97, CutoffScore  47.70, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGUUAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -7.08, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  57.64, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUGGGGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -11.49, deficit  5.04, CutoffScore  15.35, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAACUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -5.99, deficit -0.46, CutoffScore  77.82, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGGAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.98, deficit  0.96, CutoffScore  36.16, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
UGUUGAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.46, deficit  1.82, CutoffScore  84.97, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
GUCGCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -8.94, deficit  2.57, CutoffScore   9.77, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAUGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.20, deficit -0.36, CutoffScore  72.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
AUGCUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.84, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  19.90, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAGGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.57, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUAUCAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.85, deficit  0.62, CutoffScore  30.34, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.90, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  53.01, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUCCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score     -10.05, deficit  6.32, CutoffScore   6.27, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.18, deficit  2.58, CutoffScore  22.39, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUAUCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -8.68, deficit  4.62, CutoffScore  51.36, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGCGAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -8.76, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  43.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAGAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.16, deficit  6.40, CutoffScore  33.26, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGCAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.71, deficit  4.27, CutoffScore  23.52, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUACAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.64, deficit  0.41, CutoffScore  32.51, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGCAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.44, deficit  1.97, CutoffScore  47.70, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAAAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.13, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.81, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAUGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.21, deficit  0.65, CutoffScore  29.97, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F                               
CGAAUUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -7.74, deficit  1.69, CutoffScore  50.65, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCGCCGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -9.87, deficit  1.14, CutoffScore  56.39, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCACAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.40, deficit  1.70, CutoffScore  15.34, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
UUGUUAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.03, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  13.99, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAUAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score     -11.10, deficit  5.08, CutoffScore  35.07, ed  1, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
GGCUUGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.37, deficit  3.74, CutoffScore  44.41, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
CAUUGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -9.76, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  25.29, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAUGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -10.43, deficit  4.00, CutoffScore  21.99, ed  3, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
ACACUAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.21, deficit  1.51, CutoffScore  40.61, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
AUGAAAAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -6.84, deficit  0.26, CutoffScore  97.24, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GACGUUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.01, deficit  0.99, CutoffScore  63.40, ed  2, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GAAAUGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.30, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore   6.23, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUAAAAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.82, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.60, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUAAAAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.82, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.60, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUACGAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  28.30, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCGAAUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -11.61, deficit  3.79, CutoffScore  31.34, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUUGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.34, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  65.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCUCACAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -9.45, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  61.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AAAAAGAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.55, deficit  2.16, CutoffScore  45.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGGGCAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_85993.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score     -10.87, deficit  5.53, CutoffScore   7.00, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAUCAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -3.77, deficit  1.04, CutoffScore  67.58, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGUCUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.12, deficit  5.69, CutoffScore  26.02, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGCGACAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.95, deficit -0.07, CutoffScore  45.59, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CUCCGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.71, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  34.96, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAAAUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.33, deficit  1.32, CutoffScore  54.50, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCUCGGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.90, deficit  2.51, CutoffScore  41.96, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUCACGGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.44, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  25.77, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGCAAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.12, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  50.22, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AAAUAAGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.84, deficit  5.48, CutoffScore  23.47, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GCACUCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.19, deficit  1.49, CutoffScore  40.78, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
CUCAAAUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -7.58, deficit  2.83, CutoffScore  29.48, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GAACUGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -9.56, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore   4.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UCUGACGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score     -10.22, deficit  1.51, CutoffScore  35.31, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUUUUCGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.30, deficit  4.87, CutoffScore  31.23, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAGAGGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -9.53, deficit  3.11, CutoffScore  28.97, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GGAGAGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.58, deficit  0.85, CutoffScore  33.89, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.22, deficit  0.65, CutoffScore  61.60, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGAAACAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -6.72, deficit  2.80, CutoffScore  53.79, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUUGCCAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -8.11, deficit  1.53, CutoffScore  20.71, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCUCCCAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -10.47, deficit  3.40, CutoffScore  33.36, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUAAAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -8.66, deficit  2.41, CutoffScore  75.15, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAGAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.79, deficit  2.35, CutoffScore  75.30, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAUUUUGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score     -11.14, deficit  7.41, CutoffScore  25.46, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUUGAAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.12, deficit  0.68, CutoffScore  29.72, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUAUUAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -9.02, deficit  2.54, CutoffScore  19.51, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUGAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -6.71, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  63.37, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GUUCAGAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.05, deficit  0.66, CutoffScore  29.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGAAUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.82, deficit  1.25, CutoffScore  23.69, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUUCAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.26, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  41.81, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
CUCAUUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.21, deficit  2.51, CutoffScore  32.66, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
CGUUACAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06059.6,  9 NTs,             CUUCCCAAG,score     -11.69, deficit  6.94, CutoffScore  25.35, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGGGGGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -11.85, deficit  2.11, CutoffScore  33.91, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUCGCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -12.00, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  19.27, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AAAUACGAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -6.65, deficit  0.23, CutoffScore  74.82, ed  2, 1 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
ACAAUUUAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -10.04, deficit  1.96, CutoffScore  29.46, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUAUUUGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -13.87, deficit  6.50, CutoffScore  18.83, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UAUGAGGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.86, deficit  2.12, CutoffScore  49.94, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCAUUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -11.94, deficit  6.64, CutoffScore  29.22, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCCAAAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -13.40, deficit  9.12, CutoffScore  15.69, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GCGACGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score     -11.16, deficit  6.36, CutoffScore  14.64, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
CGGCCGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -12.13, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  31.58, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAAGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -13.84, deficit  4.49, CutoffScore  43.89, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCAGACCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -8.31, deficit  1.89, CutoffScore  61.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GUUUGGCUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.40, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  36.84, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CACACGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -11.68, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  10.83, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCGUAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score     -12.31, deficit  7.52, CutoffScore   6.69, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
GUAGGGAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score      -8.97, deficit  4.23, CutoffScore  28.23, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAUCGUAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score      -9.85, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  40.30, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUGUCAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score      -7.07, deficit  1.49, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAUUUUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.13, deficit  2.31, CutoffScore  46.34, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCGUAAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93383.1,  9 NTs,             GCCCUAAGC,score      -6.70, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  48.56, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUGGUUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -10.19, deficit  4.57, CutoffScore  41.51, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAUGUUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.51, deficit  3.14, CutoffScore  39.03, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UAAAGAAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -9.22, deficit  4.58, CutoffScore  52.79, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
GUGAAGGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -10.55, deficit  5.53, CutoffScore  17.15, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
GUCUCGAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -13.15, deficit  4.90, CutoffScore  10.08, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
GGCCUGGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score     -10.62, deficit  4.41, CutoffScore  34.89, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CGGGGAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -10.88, deficit  5.86, CutoffScore  15.27, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
AGAUCUCGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.63, deficit  3.27, CutoffScore  38.20, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGAUUAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -8.61, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  32.25, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
CGAGAAUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.13, deficit  0.94, CutoffScore  39.48, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGACAGUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.05, deficit  4.23, CutoffScore  16.35, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CGAACUAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.27, deficit  3.91, CutoffScore  33.94, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUGAAAGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -7.67, deficit  2.24, CutoffScore  59.85, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
UCACAAAAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -6.41, deficit  1.62, CutoffScore  47.39, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
CUUCCAUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32735.2,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -6.53, deficit  2.90, CutoffScore  65.09, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
AGUAAACGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.49, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  35.74, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.61, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GGGAUGCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -13.64, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore   3.20, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUGACGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score     -13.19, deficit  5.46, CutoffScore  18.34, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCCAACCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -11.64, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore  37.76, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUUAUAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_33983.1,  7 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -8.84, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  40.50, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCGGCACAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -11.43, deficit  2.51, CutoffScore  34.04, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
GGAAUCUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.88, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  15.20, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAGAAGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -7.89, deficit  1.47, CutoffScore  65.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
AUGAAGACU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.66, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore   8.81, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCUAACACUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -13.46, deficit  6.40, CutoffScore  12.12, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGAUGCUCUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.99, deficit  4.71, CutoffScore  17.52, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUGAAAAAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score      -9.80, deficit  1.77, CutoffScore  28.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAUGACGCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -11.12, deficit  4.67, CutoffScore  14.69, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCCGAUGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score      -9.57, deficit  4.94, CutoffScore  30.10, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUCGUGGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.24, deficit  2.66, CutoffScore  39.00, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCGCCAAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.58, deficit  4.29, CutoffScore  20.03, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAGAAGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score      -8.82, deficit -0.53, CutoffScore  36.57, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAAAAGCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.34, deficit  4.05, CutoffScore  21.46, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGACUUUGAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.56, deficit  4.26, CutoffScore  19.79, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
GGCCAUCUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -14.03, deficit  6.91, CutoffScore  18.69, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCGUUAAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.47, deficit  5.70, CutoffScore  19.34, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGCUUUUCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.31, deficit  4.94, CutoffScore   9.48, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAAGAAAGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.03, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  99.16, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CGGGUGGUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -13.07, deficit  5.00, CutoffScore  22.66, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUUGAUCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -10.70, deficit  2.39, CutoffScore  23.86, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAUGGGUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -10.98, deficit  3.84, CutoffScore  17.98, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CACGCAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.14, deficit  5.85, CutoffScore  28.70, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCCAAAACGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -11.00, deficit  2.69, CutoffScore  41.94, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAUAAUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -13.49, deficit  5.75, CutoffScore   3.44, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGUCUGCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -11.56, deficit  4.19, CutoffScore  14.36, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGUGAAUGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -12.33, deficit  2.58, CutoffScore  16.02, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCUCGAUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -9.69, deficit  5.41, CutoffScore  36.34, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CUCUAAACGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.97, deficit  4.68, CutoffScore  35.72, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUUUUGUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -14.79, deficit  4.79, CutoffScore   9.10, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAAGGUGGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score      -9.07, deficit  4.05, CutoffScore  42.70, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
UCGGUUUUGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.61, deficit  3.52, CutoffScore   5.77, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
UGCCAACCGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score      -9.60, deficit  2.32, CutoffScore  49.96, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAACGUCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -17.28, deficit 10.16, CutoffScore  17.41, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGUGUGAAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.64, deficit  1.50, CutoffScore  50.20, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
UAAGUUAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -14.83, deficit  6.24, CutoffScore  13.71, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCGACGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -11.05, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  15.16, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGCAGGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -14.32, deficit  4.59, CutoffScore  13.72, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAACCUUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -19.00, deficit 11.88, CutoffScore   8.66, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUCAAUGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -11.41, deficit  6.08, CutoffScore  23.46, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAUCGUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.44, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore   5.15, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUAAAAAAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.40, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  24.73, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGACUUGAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -11.07, deficit  3.69, CutoffScore  37.04, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUGAUGAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  24.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUGUUUUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -13.21, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  19.94, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAUAAGGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score      -9.75, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  23.27, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGAUGCUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -11.18, deficit  5.84, CutoffScore   9.41, ed  4, 4 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAAGCAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  24.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUACGAUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -5.10, deficit  0.82, CutoffScore  78.70, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GUAAAAUGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.62, deficit  7.39, CutoffScore  33.06, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUGAAUAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -8.78, deficit  3.17, CutoffScore  49.28, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCAAUGAACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.37, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  25.00, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCUGCGAUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -10.26, deficit  2.19, CutoffScore  50.31, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAUGUUUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -12.92, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore   0.45, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUUGACGAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.94, deficit  5.95, CutoffScore  16.97, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUGUAAAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.63, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  55.98, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAUAUUAUUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -13.60, deficit  6.31, CutoffScore   7.10, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F                         
UUCGUAACCAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -14.89, deficit  9.55, CutoffScore   5.80, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAUCUUUCCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.80, deficit  3.19, CutoffScore  23.57, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAAUUUGGACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -10.12, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  31.57, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAGGAUUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -11.88, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  28.84, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGAAAUCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.42, deficit  5.38, CutoffScore  17.18, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUGGAUUCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score      -9.66, deficit  4.84, CutoffScore  40.05, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUGGAUCAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -12.47, deficit  6.86, CutoffScore  28.87, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUCAAUUAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -9.74, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  46.11, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
UAAAAAAUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -11.26, deficit  1.96, CutoffScore  15.55, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
CAGGCACAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -14.06, deficit  6.94, CutoffScore  18.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAUCCGUGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -14.36, deficit  5.48, CutoffScore  19.56, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAAUGAACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -12.74, deficit  4.96, CutoffScore  23.11, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAAAGUCUCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -13.58, deficit  5.81, CutoffScore  18.44, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UGACCGGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23010.1,  8 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -12.34, deficit  4.53, CutoffScore  20.20, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUUGAAGGGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -16.48, deficit  7.61, CutoffScore   7.75, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUUGCGAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score      -9.05, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  75.28, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUGUGAUUCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -16.28, deficit  6.87, CutoffScore  10.65, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUUUCAUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.65, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  11.98, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAAUUGGGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.63, deficit  1.38, CutoffScore  36.60, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
GUAUGCGUAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.90, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  24.89, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUUUCGCUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -15.30, deficit  9.12, CutoffScore  19.46, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
GAAAUUUCCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -12.94, deficit  5.82, CutoffScore  24.28, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUUUAAAUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -7.80, deficit  1.14, CutoffScore  57.66, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
UGAAACAACUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -12.06, deficit  3.06, CutoffScore  16.85, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAACAACGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -12.45, deficit  7.38, CutoffScore  24.07, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAAAAAUCAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.06, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.62, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAAUCAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -13.29, deficit  4.29, CutoffScore  10.05, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUAAAUUGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -13.06, deficit  8.71, CutoffScore  11.43, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
UGUAUGCAUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -13.18, deficit  4.18, CutoffScore  43.79, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAAAUAAACAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -12.66, deficit  4.89, CutoffScore  23.52, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUUUUACUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -12.93, deficit  4.05, CutoffScore  10.82, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCUAAAGGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.17, deficit  7.94, CutoffScore   0.30, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGAAUCAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -14.62, deficit  5.62, CutoffScore  19.29, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCAAGUAAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -14.16, deficit  4.72, CutoffScore  46.23, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
GGGGCCCUGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.04, deficit  1.93, CutoffScore  16.65, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUAGAUAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -13.75, deficit  5.42, CutoffScore   2.28, ed  4, 4 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAGUCCGGUUGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -14.01, deficit  3.77, CutoffScore  23.50, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GACGAUUUGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.72, deficit  5.95, CutoffScore   1.53, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
AAUAGAAACCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -15.10, deficit  5.70, CutoffScore   0.37, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCUAUCAGUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.50, deficit  4.84, CutoffScore   4.82, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAAAAGAUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -10.59, deficit  2.52, CutoffScore  40.60, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
AUGAAAAGAAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -16.55, deficit  7.51, CutoffScore   4.91, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGUUCAUUAAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -12.22, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  10.84, ed  6, 4 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAACUGCUGAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -14.51, deficit  4.26, CutoffScore  18.98, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CUCAACCGUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.31, deficit  6.24, CutoffScore   5.93, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GGGAAGUGAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -16.53, deficit  9.79, CutoffScore   6.03, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GACGAAUGAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -12.73, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore   8.02, ed  6, 4 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGCAAAAGUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -12.35, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  31.50, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GUAAGGGAUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.40, deficit  4.66, CutoffScore   6.60, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGUUAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -12.13, deficit  3.87, CutoffScore  19.14, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GAAUAUAGUCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23509.1, 11 NTs,          GAAUUCAUUUUC,score     -12.03, deficit  6.58, CutoffScore   7.12, ed  4, 4 cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGGUCUCUAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -15.38, deficit  7.61, CutoffScore   8.55, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UGAAGGAUACCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -13.64, deficit  4.20, CutoffScore  33.83, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
GGAAAGAAAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.96, deficit  7.10, CutoffScore   1.53, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAGUCGUAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -15.01, deficit  7.96, CutoffScore  19.34, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
CUUAAGGUCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -16.33, deficit  5.59, CutoffScore   1.41, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GGAAAAUCGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.16, deficit  7.38, CutoffScore   3.09, ed  6, 4 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CUGUGGGAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.13, deficit  6.25, CutoffScore  10.34, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CAAGUGCGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -14.90, deficit  4.65, CutoffScore  16.61, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CUGAAAACCCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.82, deficit  4.71, CutoffScore   0.01, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAACGUGGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -12.14, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  11.31, ed  4, 4 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGUUCACAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -13.31, deficit  4.98, CutoffScore   4.72, ed  6, 4 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGCUUCGAAACCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.82, deficit  4.42, CutoffScore  46.09, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
GUGCGGACCUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -17.15, deficit  6.37, CutoffScore   3.92, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAUCAAACAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.87, deficit  6.61, CutoffScore   1.93, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAGUAUUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -15.00, deficit  4.23, CutoffScore  15.15, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGGUGUGUUAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29958.1, 10 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -13.33, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore   8.47, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAUGGAAAAUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.33, deficit  6.07, CutoffScore   5.33, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GUUAAGAAGAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -16.01, deficit  2.78, CutoffScore   1.33, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GCAGUCUGGAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -17.76, deficit  3.63, CutoffScore  42.26, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAAGACUCGAGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -14.38, deficit  2.23, CutoffScore  34.21, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAAAUGAAGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.71, deficit  8.64, CutoffScore   9.05, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CGAUUCUGAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -15.02, deficit  8.29, CutoffScore  13.53, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GGAACGGGCUUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -16.83, deficit  2.70, CutoffScore  11.91, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAAGCAGAAUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -18.33, deficit  4.20, CutoffScore   2.91, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAAAUCAUGUAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -18.84, deficit 10.54, CutoffScore  12.42, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 96.0000	  8.0000	  2.0000
[11 11]	 76.0000	  6.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 56.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 22.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	  6.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 88.0000	 74.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 88.0000	 62.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 86.0000	 54.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 52.0000	 16.0000
[8 8]	100.0000	 34.0000	  8.0000
[9 9]	 92.0000	 14.0000	  0.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  13 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence  33 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence  35 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence  51 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 234 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 247 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 249 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 252 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 273 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 274 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 278 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 300 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 309 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 324 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 328 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 371 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 374 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 377 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 434 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 436 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 500 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 512 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 533 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 539 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 587 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 592 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 6.5231%
Number of models giving false positives is 231 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     1.66
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     2.89
