Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_7.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=UGGA FASTA(n).Sequence=UGGA
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:23:51
Evaluating how sequences fit models
UGGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.38, deficit  2.17, CutoffScore  45.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.22, deficit  0.01, CutoffScore  68.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.28, deficit  2.08, CutoffScore  78.07, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -3.88, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.54, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.54, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
ACCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.94, deficit  2.06, CutoffScore  46.76, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score     -10.13, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  37.67, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.16, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  43.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -6.70, deficit  2.69, CutoffScore  40.10, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUCA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.98, deficit  0.97, CutoffScore  89.83, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.28, deficit  2.08, CutoffScore  78.07, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score     -10.13, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  37.67, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.22, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  68.24, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.22, deficit  0.01, CutoffScore  68.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUCA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.96, deficit  2.76, CutoffScore  70.98, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.55, deficit  1.34, CutoffScore  54.28, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.46, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.77, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -6.19, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCUUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.33, deficit  3.13, CutoffScore  67.08, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.67, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  53.00, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -4.58, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  34.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UUGCA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.51, deficit  1.30, CutoffScore  86.28, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.19, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.32, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.29, deficit -0.01, CutoffScore  68.56, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.46, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.77, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.12, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.37, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  34.79, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.08, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.81, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.51, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.50, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  75.74, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGUU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -6.05, deficit  0.93, CutoffScore  58.62, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.80, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  92.55, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  91.90, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.35, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  55.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.89, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAUUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -6.92, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore  69.35, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.04, deficit  1.03, CutoffScore  89.14, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUCG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.33, deficit  1.32, CutoffScore  86.11, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  34.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAGUC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.65, deficit  1.76, CutoffScore  81.44, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-cSH                               
GUUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.81, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.51, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.81, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.51, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CCGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.39, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  55.97, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.92, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  60.05, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.81, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.51, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGUC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  97.91, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.86, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.22, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUCG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.33, deficit  1.32, CutoffScore  86.11, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCCUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.20, deficit  4.00, CutoffScore  57.91, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCUAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.38, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  76.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCACG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.76, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  35.99, ed  2, 2 cWW-F                                   
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUAGC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.46, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.77, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUUGG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -4.95, deficit  3.01, CutoffScore  69.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GGCCUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.42, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.10, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
UUAAAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.47, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  64.52, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.66, deficit  3.90, CutoffScore  59.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCUUGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.17, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  97.33, ed  0, 0 cWW                                     
GGAGCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -6.87, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  43.20, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGAUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -8.26, deficit  4.25, CutoffScore  55.26, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUGUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.67, deficit -0.25, CutoffScore  71.07, ed  1, 1 cWW                                     
AGGGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.39, deficit -0.53, CutoffScore  42.38, ed  4, 2 cWW                                     
GUACGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -4.31, deficit  2.37, CutoffScore  76.23, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUUAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUUGCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -6.20, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  57.06, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.66, deficit  3.90, CutoffScore  59.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUUUGU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.97, deficit  4.03, CutoffScore  59.63, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGUGAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -6.88, deficit  4.94, CutoffScore  50.47, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
UGUGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -8.77, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  60.91, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCAGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAGGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.24, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.93, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAUCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.75, deficit  1.07, CutoffScore  57.11, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUGCGU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_99040.1,  6 NTs,                UUGCGG,score      -7.03, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  66.50, ed  2, 0 F-F-F-F-F-F                             
AGUUGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.79, deficit -0.12, CutoffScore  69.73, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
UGAAAA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.30, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  83.96, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCUUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.30, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGCUAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score     -10.96, deficit  9.01, CutoffScore   9.65, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GUGCAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_71391.1,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -4.77, deficit  0.97, CutoffScore  58.19, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUCUAA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.28, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  62.00, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGGCCA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.39, deficit  0.29, CutoffScore  65.38, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGACCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -5.81, deficit  1.34, CutoffScore  54.35, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCCAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -8.50, deficit  6.11, CutoffScore  45.89, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUAUUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_86883.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.47, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  78.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UAACUA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_82710.2,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -7.10, deficit  2.76, CutoffScore  70.91, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.28, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  98.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score     -10.69, deficit  8.29, CutoffScore  26.52, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CAUCGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.77, deficit  0.83, CutoffScore  59.66, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUUUUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -9.15, deficit  5.95, CutoffScore  37.41, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUAAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.49, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  81.96, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.09, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  94.03, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCUUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.13, deficit  2.95, CutoffScore  68.98, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAGAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.20, deficit  0.60, CutoffScore  93.64, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCAAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.45, deficit  4.69, CutoffScore  51.12, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.13, deficit  1.37, CutoffScore  85.67, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.28, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  66.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.53, deficit  0.47, CutoffScore  63.51, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAGUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.16, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGGUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -8.43, deficit  3.96, CutoffScore  58.37, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCGAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -7.08, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  60.93, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.47, deficit  6.71, CutoffScore  30.06, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUUAG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.09, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  62.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.02, deficit  1.35, CutoffScore  54.19, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUCAAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -7.93, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UAGCUUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -5.61, deficit -0.44, CutoffScore  41.48, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGAACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score      -7.13, deficit -0.07, CutoffScore  42.98, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUGAUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -5.48, deficit -0.76, CutoffScore  76.94, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUAAGUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -8.83, deficit  3.36, CutoffScore  64.67, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCUCGAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.85, CutoffScore  61.85, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCUCCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.65, deficit -0.08, CutoffScore  37.63, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGCAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.21, deficit  0.74, CutoffScore  29.01, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAUUUAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.47, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  52.22, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.08, deficit  6.32, CutoffScore  34.08, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGACAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -8.08, deficit  1.98, CutoffScore  47.58, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAACUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -5.92, deficit -0.14, CutoffScore  38.27, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAUUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -10.16, deficit  4.22, CutoffScore  55.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAUUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.20, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  61.70, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
UCGUUCA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -7.24, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  55.92, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUAUUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -6.72, deficit  0.23, CutoffScore  41.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCAAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -7.93, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUUAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.90, deficit -1.49, CutoffScore  52.56, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAUGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.20, deficit  3.27, CutoffScore  34.02, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UCGUCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -9.54, deficit  0.82, CutoffScore  28.26, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCGUUCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -7.16, deficit  1.11, CutoffScore  56.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCGAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score      -7.18, deficit -0.03, CutoffScore  71.43, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAUAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.64, CutoffScore  82.70, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  86.40, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAGGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score     -10.67, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  44.50, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAAUUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.62, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAUCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -8.29, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  19.79, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCGUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -8.01, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  24.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUGUAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.25, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  33.67, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GGCAUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -8.01, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  55.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAGUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.67, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  67.71, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAUAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.96, deficit  0.56, CutoffScore  62.51, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.76, deficit  5.00, CutoffScore  47.84, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUUGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -7.02, deficit  1.92, CutoffScore  51.19, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGGGAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.87, deficit  0.86, CutoffScore  37.08, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CGCAUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.89, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GACCUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.40, deficit  1.93, CutoffScore  16.54, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAAGACA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.31, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  56.36, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAUAAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.83, deficit  0.43, CutoffScore  63.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCGAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -8.96, deficit  2.60, CutoffScore  41.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUGCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.63, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  53.74, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAAGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.49, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  57.71, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGUCAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.70, deficit  1.03, CutoffScore  25.97, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSW-F                               
CAAACGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -5.99, deficit -0.46, CutoffScore  51.68, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUCAGCA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.54, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  35.30, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAUUUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.36, deficit  3.42, CutoffScore  63.95, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CCGCUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -7.24, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  24.29, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCAAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.05, deficit -0.35, CutoffScore  40.50, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUCCGGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.97, deficit  2.58, CutoffScore  41.29, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUGUUGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.38, deficit  1.56, CutoffScore  23.52, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUUGUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.39, deficit  0.56, CutoffScore  33.63, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGAAUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -12.33, deficit  1.92, CutoffScore  48.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAAAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.55, deficit  1.11, CutoffScore  56.71, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUAAGGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.09, deficit  0.70, CutoffScore  61.03, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAAAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -6.99, deficit  4.26, CutoffScore  41.71, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUUAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -13.24, deficit  7.88, CutoffScore  27.47, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UGAAAGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.36, deficit  0.97, CutoffScore  58.20, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUGAAAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -6.73, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  98.40, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCGAUGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.43, deficit  1.69, CutoffScore  54.68, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUUCAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -8.21, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  34.14, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
GCAAUUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.19, deficit  1.49, CutoffScore  40.77, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
GACUCUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -8.71, deficit  4.95, CutoffScore  31.78, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UCAAUGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.34, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  16.29, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUCAAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.54, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  66.90, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAACAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -6.44, deficit  0.38, CutoffScore  95.95, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
ACCACAUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -10.05, deficit  2.99, CutoffScore  36.30, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCCUAGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score     -11.89, deficit  3.18, CutoffScore  20.92, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GACUUGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.09, deficit -0.31, CutoffScore  40.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCUUUUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.02, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  47.41, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCGUCGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.00, CutoffScore  37.58, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CGUGUAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -9.31, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  25.32, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
ACCGAAGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score     -10.68, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  37.71, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAUGAACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score     -11.23, deficit  3.75, CutoffScore  41.32, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUACCCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.69, deficit  2.23, CutoffScore  13.41, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUGAGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -9.07, deficit  2.83, CutoffScore  40.00, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAGACGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -10.58, deficit  4.15, CutoffScore  20.81, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAACGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.20, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  28.28, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAUUUUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.30, deficit  2.66, CutoffScore  53.25, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
CGAGUUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.90, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  35.15, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
GGCUAACU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score     -16.09, deficit 14.33, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGAGACUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -8.20, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  18.10, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAUAGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.56, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  24.56, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCUAAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score      -9.30, deficit  2.09, CutoffScore  51.05, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGGUGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score     -10.90, deficit  3.69, CutoffScore   6.78, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUUAAUUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -6.81, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  94.15, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGGUGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -12.21, deficit  5.07, CutoffScore  29.27, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GAUGACUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -8.02, deficit  1.77, CutoffScore  50.87, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUUACAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -8.85, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  44.42, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCAACUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.09, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  17.80, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
CUAAUCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score     -10.04, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  19.86, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAGUGCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -12.30, deficit  5.17, CutoffScore  28.68, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GUCGGGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score     -10.39, deficit  4.96, CutoffScore  16.07, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CUUGGACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -7.98, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  69.50, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCGGUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.71, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  34.96, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAUGGUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -15.23, deficit  7.88, CutoffScore  33.53, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
CCUUUGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -7.69, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  60.36, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AAGUUAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -9.06, deficit  4.27, CutoffScore  39.26, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUCCUUGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.27, deficit  2.88, CutoffScore  38.08, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAUGAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -9.70, deficit  2.85, CutoffScore  31.59, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGCAAGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.52, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  33.71, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCCAAAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -8.96, deficit  4.17, CutoffScore  29.79, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
CAUCAGAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.32, deficit  4.75, CutoffScore  42.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCCAUGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -11.44, deficit  5.87, CutoffScore  33.47, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
AGGUUUUGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -9.17, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  35.61, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAAAUAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -8.76, deficit  3.14, CutoffScore  32.64, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GGGAUUUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -10.43, deficit  2.24, CutoffScore  28.20, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGAAACAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score      -9.85, deficit  1.83, CutoffScore  28.10, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGUGAGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -12.29, deficit  6.11, CutoffScore  19.51, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
AGAACGAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -13.92, deficit  4.58, CutoffScore  20.83, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUCGCAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -12.68, deficit  4.43, CutoffScore  38.70, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CACAAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -11.75, deficit  7.12, CutoffScore  37.00, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
GGGUGUGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.09, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  44.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAGAAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.36, deficit  6.07, CutoffScore  27.35, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAGGCCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.90, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  15.11, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCUUUCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -10.39, deficit  3.97, CutoffScore  22.27, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CGGGUUUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.38, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  37.29, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCCGAAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -8.90, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  45.19, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
AGAAUCACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -7.60, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  71.92, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCGUCGUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -11.85, deficit  4.03, CutoffScore  28.92, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGGCGAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -10.04, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  48.60, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAGCAAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -11.29, deficit  6.21, CutoffScore  30.67, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUCUUUCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -12.26, deficit  5.83, CutoffScore   7.71, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CGGAAGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.52, deficit  2.79, CutoffScore  32.80, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUAAGUCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score     -11.91, deficit  7.17, CutoffScore  28.62, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUAAUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.48, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  24.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGGAAAUUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.03, deficit  0.85, CutoffScore  40.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUGUUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.07, deficit  3.97, CutoffScore  47.18, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GGUUGGCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.18, deficit  3.74, CutoffScore  29.10, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAUGUCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score     -11.49, deficit  6.75, CutoffScore  10.50, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAGGAAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.45, deficit  3.54, CutoffScore  32.51, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CUCUGACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.54, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  35.41, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAGUUAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.61, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GGGGUCGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score      -9.80, deficit  3.62, CutoffScore  32.77, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
UGAAAGCAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.52, deficit  0.78, CutoffScore  33.68, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUUUCCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.55, deficit  0.32, CutoffScore  33.52, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
AAAGGUCCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.31, deficit  4.17, CutoffScore  35.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GAUGCCUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.99, deficit  5.25, CutoffScore   6.70, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUGUGUGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -9.86, deficit  4.56, CutoffScore  24.10, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUAAUGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -14.37, deficit  5.03, CutoffScore  17.41, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGAAGAUGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -15.36, deficit  9.54, CutoffScore  20.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CGAUCAUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32735.2,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -9.42, deficit  5.78, CutoffScore  30.22, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGGUAUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -12.63, deficit  8.35, CutoffScore  19.95, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
UGUGGAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.35, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  18.87, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAAACGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -6.93, deficit  0.48, CutoffScore  69.64, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGUAGCAUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -12.56, deficit  2.55, CutoffScore   4.02, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGCUCAGACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -13.56, deficit  6.49, CutoffScore  11.44, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCGUCUCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -10.33, deficit  4.76, CutoffScore  39.69, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
CUGGGAGAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -11.87, deficit  4.99, CutoffScore  17.73, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CCAAAAUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -13.08, deficit  4.76, CutoffScore   7.99, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCAGAGUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -12.11, deficit  4.03, CutoffScore  20.94, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUGCUCAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score     -14.05, deficit  7.53, CutoffScore  15.39, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
CGUAAGUCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -11.23, deficit  5.66, CutoffScore  13.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCCGCGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -11.59, deficit  6.02, CutoffScore  15.78, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
AGCCUUCACU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score     -13.63, deficit  7.11, CutoffScore  17.56, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
CUUGAAACAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.22, deficit  7.40, CutoffScore  25.88, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCACUGAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.35, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  49.55, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAUGAAACUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -10.91, deficit  5.83, CutoffScore  32.83, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAAAAAUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.27, deficit  3.40, CutoffScore  52.85, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCCUAGGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.10, deficit  5.47, CutoffScore  42.49, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAGAUUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.69, deficit  9.87, CutoffScore   5.64, ed  4, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUGAUUGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.93, deficit  2.89, CutoffScore  48.80, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAUAAGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -11.36, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  42.83, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GUUGAAGGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -10.65, deficit  2.57, CutoffScore  11.59, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAGAAUCUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.64, deficit  2.90, CutoffScore  22.09, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUGAGAAGUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.15, deficit  3.33, CutoffScore  41.01, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
UCUAGCAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -11.51, deficit  4.43, CutoffScore  36.38, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCGUUUUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -14.78, deficit  4.77, CutoffScore   9.17, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAUCAAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.69, deficit  8.04, CutoffScore  34.55, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
GGAUGAAUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score     -10.96, deficit  5.25, CutoffScore  25.07, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
GAUAUAGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score     -11.07, deficit  5.77, CutoffScore  15.97, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUACCGAAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.65, deficit  5.83, CutoffScore  25.19, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GAAGAAUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.47, deficit  2.56, CutoffScore  18.23, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CCUACAAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -11.56, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  10.62, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCAAGAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -6.93, deficit  2.65, CutoffScore  85.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CGAGGUAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -17.53, deficit 12.91, CutoffScore   5.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCGUUUCAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.53, deficit  3.44, CutoffScore   6.28, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GGUGAAAACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score     -12.75, deficit  7.04, CutoffScore  13.15, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
CGUGGAAGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -12.95, deficit  6.48, CutoffScore  36.04, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
GCAAAAUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.52, deficit  5.71, CutoffScore   7.01, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CUGAUUGGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -11.24, deficit  5.05, CutoffScore  25.12, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
CAUGCUGUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.58, deficit  2.99, CutoffScore  36.63, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUGAUGAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.92, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  25.84, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCCGAACCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.67, deficit  2.58, CutoffScore  11.48, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GUGGAAAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score     -10.14, deficit  2.11, CutoffScore  25.49, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AAAGGACUAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -11.78, deficit  5.36, CutoffScore  11.42, ed  3, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GAGGUCUAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_04642.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -11.35, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  30.44, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGGAAUUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.17, deficit  4.83, CutoffScore  29.79, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUGACUCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.98, deficit  8.16, CutoffScore  14.20, ed  4, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGAAAUCGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -10.42, deficit  5.19, CutoffScore  29.06, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUAGUUAUUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score      -8.48, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  74.60, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F                         
AAUAUGCGACU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -15.55, deficit  8.81, CutoffScore   1.50, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUUCUGAAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -9.30, deficit  2.64, CutoffScore  48.76, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
AUAUAUGAUGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -16.75, deficit  7.70, CutoffScore  21.07, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAUGAAAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -12.27, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  25.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUGGGCCUCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -11.73, deficit  6.91, CutoffScore  20.43, ed  4, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUCCCGAAGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score     -12.18, deficit  5.67, CutoffScore  24.96, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
UUGCAAAGAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -12.70, deficit  3.36, CutoffScore   7.49, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAGACUAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -11.89, deficit  4.84, CutoffScore   2.65, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
CCGCGAAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -13.25, deficit  4.94, CutoffScore   6.81, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCUUGAAAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -12.27, deficit  4.01, CutoffScore  18.25, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAAAACAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.11, deficit  4.25, CutoffScore  37.30, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAAUAAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -9.87, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  45.34, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
UAAUUUUCCGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -13.18, deficit  6.06, CutoffScore   7.71, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCCGAUGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score     -13.23, deficit  6.71, CutoffScore   4.24, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
CUCGAUAGUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.57, deficit  5.80, CutoffScore   2.34, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GAAUGAAAUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -14.32, deficit  6.40, CutoffScore  12.25, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GGGGCGGUUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_23115.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -10.06, deficit  3.34, CutoffScore  50.92, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GACGCAAAGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score      -9.65, deficit  2.60, CutoffScore  32.97, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
GGGCCUGUACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93616.2,  8 NTs,           CAGCCCGGUAG,score     -13.53, deficit  7.65, CutoffScore  16.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F                         
CAAUCAGAAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.36, deficit  6.58, CutoffScore  37.08, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CGGAAAUUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -11.65, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  37.84, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUUCUCAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -12.88, deficit  5.06, CutoffScore   0.31, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GCAAAGAGAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -16.26, deficit  9.18, CutoffScore   7.40, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAUGAAAUUCA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -11.28, deficit  6.46, CutoffScore  31.08, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUUCAAAUUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -10.59, deficit -0.02, CutoffScore  43.69, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUGAAAAACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -19.40, deficit 11.32, CutoffScore  12.43, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGCCUGAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -11.80, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  48.62, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUUGAUGUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -10.05, deficit  5.24, CutoffScore  21.28, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGGUGGGGAUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.57, deficit  6.69, CutoffScore  25.40, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CUCUACAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -13.52, deficit  9.24, CutoffScore  14.99, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CUUCGUCAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.66, deficit  3.67, CutoffScore  46.30, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGCUGAGGAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -10.24, deficit  2.42, CutoffScore  33.26, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUGAUGUAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.33, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  23.51, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUCCAAUGAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.26, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore   8.73, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAUGGUUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -16.08, deficit  5.83, CutoffScore   9.41, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
AUGCAGAACUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -14.90, deficit  9.57, CutoffScore   5.74, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGCGACAUCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -15.30, deficit  7.92, CutoffScore   9.56, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAUGCAUCCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_15118.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -16.25, deficit  7.69, CutoffScore   0.35, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUUAAGAUCAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.97, deficit  3.36, CutoffScore   3.69, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CACAAAUCUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -14.72, deficit  3.98, CutoffScore  10.43, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GUAUUGAGAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12870.1, 12 NTs,         GUCCUUGGGAAAC,score     -13.64, deficit  6.17, CutoffScore  16.41, ed  3, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
GCGAGAUAAACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -13.53, deficit  4.09, CutoffScore  34.36, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
AGGAAAGAAUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.27, deficit  3.16, CutoffScore   9.28, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGGAUAGUAGCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -16.01, deficit  2.78, CutoffScore   1.31, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GUCUAAGGAUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.99, deficit  5.25, CutoffScore   3.31, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
AGAUUAAAAGAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -13.87, deficit  5.61, CutoffScore  45.92, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
AAUGCCAGAGUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -15.13, deficit  7.05, CutoffScore   3.66, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UAGGUGGUCGGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50851.1,  9 NTs,          GAGGCGGUUGGU,score     -12.05, deficit  7.50, CutoffScore  39.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F                   
GUCAAUUGUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04725.1,  8 NTs,          GUUACUUAGUUC,score      -9.96, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore   1.46, ed  5, 5 cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS                     
GGCAAAACACAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.95, deficit  3.84, CutoffScore   5.19, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGCGCAUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.61, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore  43.18, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAGAUAAUACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -17.09, deficit  4.94, CutoffScore   0.74, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAAGAGUAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -12.40, deficit  4.33, CutoffScore  46.71, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CGGAGUCCCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.15, deficit  5.49, CutoffScore   1.13, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAAAAAAAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.70, deficit  2.59, CutoffScore  30.63, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAUUUUUGUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_23509.1, 11 NTs,          GAAUUCAUUUUC,score     -15.93, deficit 10.47, CutoffScore   2.65, ed  5, 3 cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGUGGCAGACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31581.6, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -14.16, deficit  7.01, CutoffScore   4.96, ed  5, 4 cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F                 
UCCGCUGGCAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -15.76, deficit  6.99, CutoffScore  12.28, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
AAAAAUAAUUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.26, deficit  6.40, CutoffScore   5.82, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCAAACAUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -14.89, deficit  4.15, CutoffScore  26.29, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GAAAAAGAAGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.34, deficit  9.27, CutoffScore   5.80, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
UCAAAAAGACGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -12.12, deficit  2.71, CutoffScore   0.28, ed  5, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAAUUUUGACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -15.72, deficit  9.43, CutoffScore   0.70, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAAAAAAGUGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.34, deficit  7.27, CutoffScore   0.64, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
UGAUCAGUGAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.91, deficit  7.13, CutoffScore   4.35, ed  4, 4 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CUGUUAAAGUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.12, deficit  3.72, CutoffScore  18.63, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
GAGAGUGCCAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11542.1, 10 NTs,         CGAGCGGCCAAAG,score     -15.99, deficit  6.46, CutoffScore  13.92, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUACUUUGCUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04725.1,  8 NTs,          GUUACUUAGUUC,score     -16.25, deficit 11.22, CutoffScore   0.04, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS                     
GUCUAAGGUUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29958.1, 10 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -14.42, deficit  4.48, CutoffScore   2.01, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUGUUAUGUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -13.18, deficit  2.41, CutoffScore   8.97, ed  7, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAACGGAAGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -17.38, deficit  9.08, CutoffScore   4.26, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
GUUGCUAAAAAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.62, deficit  7.22, CutoffScore   0.52, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CAUGAUAAAAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.28, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  17.82, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CGGUAGUAAUCCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.69, deficit  7.29, CutoffScore   0.15, ed  5, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 86.0000	  4.0000	  2.0000
[11 11]	 80.0000	  4.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 50.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 18.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	  6.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 78.0000	 60.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 90.0000	 56.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 96.0000	 54.0000
[7 7]	 98.0000	 54.0000	 14.0000
[8 8]	100.0000	 28.0000	  8.0000
[9 9]	 92.0000	  4.0000	  0.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  20 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence  44 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence  57 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence  65 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 216 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 225 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 239 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 250 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 254 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 258 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 266 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 287 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 322 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 333 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 336 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 355 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 360 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 377 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 388 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 402 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 419 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 444 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 450 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 473 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 516 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 520 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 532 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 609 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 615 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 693 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 705 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 744 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 766 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 825 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 828 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 4.5604%
Number of models giving false positives is 232 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     1.07
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     1.97
