Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_9.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=GUCC FASTA(n).Sequence=GUCC
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:24:05
Evaluating how sequences fit models
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UCGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.17, deficit  2.39, CutoffScore  43.31, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.16, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  43.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUUA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.83, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  88.68, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.39, deficit  4.19, CutoffScore  55.92, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.20, deficit  4.00, CutoffScore  57.91, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.38, deficit  2.17, CutoffScore  45.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.20, deficit  4.00, CutoffScore  57.91, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.53, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.54, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.15, deficit  2.95, CutoffScore  68.94, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.16, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  43.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.54, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.84, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.89, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UAUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.78, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  60.36, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGCA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.98, deficit  0.97, CutoffScore  58.25, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.15, deficit  2.95, CutoffScore  68.94, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.29, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.46, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.77, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UACCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -9.01, deficit  2.88, CutoffScore  38.13, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GACGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGAAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.58, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGUC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  97.91, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGAUA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.37, deficit  0.16, CutoffScore  66.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.65, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.25, CutoffScore  86.81, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.19, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.32, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.41, deficit  0.48, CutoffScore  63.41, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.25, deficit  1.12, CutoffScore  25.04, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  34.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.44, deficit  0.91, CutoffScore  90.46, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.35, CutoffScore  64.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.35, CutoffScore  64.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUGCU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.67, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  84.58, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UUUGA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.67, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.38, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  87.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.60, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  85.36, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GACGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUCCA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.97, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  55.98, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.35, CutoffScore  64.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCUC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.12, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  55.92, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUGUC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  97.91, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAUUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -6.92, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore  69.35, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.60, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  53.78, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.62, deficit -0.06, CutoffScore  69.04, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGGUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.92, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  60.05, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.35, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUCC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.55, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  83.76, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCGUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.50, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  54.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  34.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.89, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UAUAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.27, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.85, CutoffScore  59.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CACAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.05, deficit  1.52, CutoffScore  84.04, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAUUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_29966.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -4.51, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.98, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCCGUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.74, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  66.93, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUUUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -5.58, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.41, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUACC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.88, CutoffScore  59.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUAAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.48, deficit  1.00, CutoffScore  57.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAAAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.12, deficit  2.02, CutoffScore  78.73, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAGGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -8.89, deficit  2.79, CutoffScore  39.02, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCCAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -8.50, deficit  6.11, CutoffScore  45.89, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
AUAAAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.39, deficit  0.29, CutoffScore  65.35, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGGGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -5.45, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  62.43, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
GGUUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.86, deficit  2.13, CutoffScore  78.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCGCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.17, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.78, ed  1, 1 cWW                                     
GAAGAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.83, deficit  0.23, CutoffScore  97.61, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCAUCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_62934.1,  6 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.68, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  34.27, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F                               
CCAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.66, deficit  3.90, CutoffScore  59.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAAUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAACUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_82710.2,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -7.08, deficit  2.74, CutoffScore  71.13, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAUUG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.45, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.12, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.83, deficit -0.31, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUAAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.49, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  81.96, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGGCCA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.39, deficit  0.29, CutoffScore  65.38, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.48, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.58, deficit  0.48, CutoffScore  63.37, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGUAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.66, deficit  0.60, CutoffScore  62.08, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUCGG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -1.94, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CAUGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.17, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  55.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGGACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  29.53, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCAUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.08, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGGAUU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -8.33, deficit  4.31, CutoffScore  54.59, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUGAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.16, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGGAUU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -8.33, deficit  4.31, CutoffScore  54.59, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.87, deficit  1.77, CutoffScore  81.36, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.20, deficit  1.31, CutoffScore  54.58, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
GAGGUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -7.74, deficit  2.86, CutoffScore  38.36, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
GGAUGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_52953.3,  6 NTs,                GGAAAC,score      -5.16, deficit  0.96, CutoffScore  58.36, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.38, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  35.33, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.83, deficit -0.31, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUCAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.34, CutoffScore  64.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.28, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  98.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGGUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.52, deficit -0.40, CutoffScore  41.04, ed  2, 2 cWW                                     
CGUCCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -4.38, deficit  0.65, CutoffScore  93.42, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCCGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -5.34, deficit  0.86, CutoffScore  59.34, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUUCG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.48, deficit  1.75, CutoffScore  82.37, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAGAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.20, deficit  1.31, CutoffScore  54.58, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
AGACUU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.09, deficit  0.96, CutoffScore  58.36, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAUGUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.42, deficit  0.49, CutoffScore  63.29, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUAGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.51, deficit  1.57, CutoffScore  83.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UUCAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -4.75, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  50.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AAUGUU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.85, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  58.77, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUCAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.34, CutoffScore  64.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.29, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  56.53, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCUUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67667.2,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.50, deficit  2.11, CutoffScore  52.24, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AAAGAAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.18, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  50.16, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
ACACAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.60, deficit  1.00, CutoffScore  63.80, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAGAUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -6.91, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  32.73, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUGAGUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -7.20, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  50.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUGGUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.20, deficit  0.96, CutoffScore  59.25, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UCAUUGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -7.03, deficit  0.54, CutoffScore  66.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAAGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.45, deficit  4.69, CutoffScore  51.08, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCCGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.07, deficit  1.40, CutoffScore  85.29, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGAGGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  64.63, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GACCGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.29, deficit  1.82, CutoffScore  49.23, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGGAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_82710.2,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -6.80, deficit  2.47, CutoffScore  42.41, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UCCAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.95, deficit  0.23, CutoffScore  34.45, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AAUGAAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.30, deficit  3.36, CutoffScore  33.03, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUGGGUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -11.49, deficit  5.04, CutoffScore  15.35, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGACAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.49, deficit  1.36, CutoffScore  54.11, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGUGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.61, deficit  3.97, CutoffScore  42.47, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
GCAUUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -7.95, deficit -0.13, CutoffScore  74.54, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUGCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.32, deficit  0.88, CutoffScore  27.61, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CACCAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.98, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  31.49, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGACGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -8.47, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  30.01, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAACUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.36, CutoffScore  61.96, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CACUCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.96, deficit  1.94, CutoffScore  54.64, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
UAGACCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -7.84, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  49.58, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAAAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.13, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.81, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCAAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.02, deficit  1.35, CutoffScore  54.19, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGUAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.20, deficit  0.95, CutoffScore  59.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  12.84, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGUUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -8.75, deficit  0.67, CutoffScore  40.87, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUAGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.40, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  50.17, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
GCUGAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.64, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  36.28, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.04, deficit -0.36, CutoffScore  40.62, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGAAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.11, deficit  0.67, CutoffScore  61.36, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCGAAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -8.40, deficit  2.80, CutoffScore  38.93, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAGCACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -6.91, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  32.73, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAAGAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.84, deficit  7.08, CutoffScore  26.22, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AAUAAAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.98, deficit  0.58, CutoffScore  62.31, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAUGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.61, deficit  0.94, CutoffScore  26.96, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSW-F                               
GAAUUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -10.49, deficit  4.56, CutoffScore  52.01, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAGCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -7.27, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  28.62, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUGCCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.12, deficit  0.89, CutoffScore  27.47, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUUCUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -7.16, deficit  0.67, CutoffScore  37.11, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CAACUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -6.00, deficit -0.06, CutoffScore  37.43, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGUAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -7.74, deficit  2.64, CutoffScore  44.02, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCAAAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.84, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  97.51, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAUUAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.97, deficit  0.41, CutoffScore  64.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
CUCCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -8.41, deficit  5.07, CutoffScore  39.08, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CAGCGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -5.74, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  66.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCUGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -8.09, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  28.28, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGAAAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_85993.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -6.53, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  66.25, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUGCCGAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -9.58, deficit  5.81, CutoffScore  26.39, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
ACAAAUGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -6.86, deficit  2.07, CutoffScore  57.62, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUAUCGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -10.60, deficit  4.18, CutoffScore  44.01, ed  1, 1 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GCGAGAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score      -9.64, deficit  2.13, CutoffScore  53.90, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUAAAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -8.66, deficit  2.41, CutoffScore  75.15, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCCGGGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score      -9.70, deficit  3.50, CutoffScore  40.62, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
GGGUUGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.58, deficit  0.85, CutoffScore  33.89, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAACCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.08, deficit  3.16, CutoffScore  27.05, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUAGGGGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score      -9.36, deficit  4.62, CutoffScore  25.48, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUACAUUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score     -11.64, deficit  5.51, CutoffScore  10.43, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUGUGCUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -8.69, deficit  3.35, CutoffScore  62.97, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
AUAAGACU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.70, deficit  2.79, CutoffScore  53.19, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCGGAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -8.10, deficit  0.63, CutoffScore  42.41, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGACAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -6.96, deficit  0.38, CutoffScore  64.40, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCGAAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -8.67, deficit  3.92, CutoffScore  44.74, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GGUGAAUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.19, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  66.47, ed  3, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
CUGAAUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.24, deficit  0.66, CutoffScore  61.46, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCUGGCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.08, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  33.89, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCAGCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score     -10.00, deficit  6.09, CutoffScore  27.63, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAGCUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -6.20, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore   3.66, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAUGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -9.07, deficit  6.34, CutoffScore  25.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAGAGUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -10.86, deficit  5.84, CutoffScore  32.48, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
CUAGCCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score     -10.04, deficit  5.30, CutoffScore  20.67, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUGAUUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.64, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  38.44, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGUCGCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -9.64, deficit  3.85, CutoffScore  36.02, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
UGAGUAAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.98, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  34.50, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
CCGAGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score      -9.70, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  53.27, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAGAAGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  37.54, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GGUAUUAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.28, deficit  2.64, CutoffScore  53.47, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
AUUUUUAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.09, deficit  0.26, CutoffScore  97.33, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCGUUAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -8.57, deficit  0.48, CutoffScore  69.12, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAGGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -8.11, deficit  5.38, CutoffScore  32.74, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGACUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.73, deficit  3.35, CutoffScore   1.61, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.88, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUGUCCGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -9.56, deficit  5.80, CutoffScore  26.47, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUAUGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -6.61, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  44.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAGAAUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -12.33, deficit  1.92, CutoffScore  48.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUAGAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -7.79, deficit  2.00, CutoffScore  53.28, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GGAUAACC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score     -11.31, deficit  9.55, CutoffScore   0.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUGGCGAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -9.56, deficit  5.80, CutoffScore  26.47, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGAAAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.36, deficit  1.97, CutoffScore  47.69, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGGAUCAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.37, deficit  0.35, CutoffScore  69.24, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CUCACCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -11.98, deficit  3.07, CutoffScore   6.51, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
AGGAUUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.59, deficit  3.40, CutoffScore  18.07, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUUUAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -8.29, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  33.55, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
CGCAAAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.74, deficit  2.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUAUGUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.94, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  20.78, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAAAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.80, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  49.56, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGGAAGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -11.48, deficit  6.31, CutoffScore  25.53, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UUACACGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -10.51, deficit  4.08, CutoffScore  44.76, ed  3, 1 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CUGCAUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -13.62, deficit  8.29, CutoffScore  12.23, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUAAGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -7.55, deficit  1.98, CutoffScore  62.96, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAGCUAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.97, deficit  4.24, CutoffScore  33.00, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAUUGAGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score     -11.72, deficit  4.25, CutoffScore  10.96, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGAAGAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.68, deficit  4.86, CutoffScore  50.29, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GCAGAGCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score     -11.49, deficit  6.05, CutoffScore   7.65, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CGUGAUGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_33983.1,  7 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -8.76, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  41.03, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UCAAGAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -12.03, deficit  5.53, CutoffScore   0.50, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUCGGUGGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -8.53, deficit  3.23, CutoffScore  48.30, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAUGAAGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -7.47, deficit  2.18, CutoffScore  41.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AUUAUGAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score     -10.65, deficit  4.45, CutoffScore  15.90, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
GAUCAAGGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score     -10.60, deficit  5.31, CutoffScore  19.29, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAACCAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.82, deficit  5.54, CutoffScore  12.52, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -7.70, deficit  1.26, CutoffScore  62.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUACAAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -11.05, deficit  4.63, CutoffScore  40.53, ed  3, 1 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CGUAGGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.17, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  20.25, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCGGUUUUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -10.22, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  29.99, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAUUAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.66, deficit  2.32, CutoffScore  30.87, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
CUAAAAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score     -11.34, deficit  4.90, CutoffScore  31.15, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AACGAACCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -10.93, deficit  6.30, CutoffScore   4.75, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CGGCUCUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score      -9.83, deficit  2.09, CutoffScore  47.04, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GACAGUAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -9.42, deficit  4.79, CutoffScore  32.85, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CUUCCUGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.70, deficit  5.32, CutoffScore  65.45, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGAUAAGCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.46, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  41.17, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGAGUGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -8.83, deficit  3.53, CutoffScore  46.63, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCUCAGCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -11.20, deficit  3.82, CutoffScore  16.73, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCUAAUGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -8.24, deficit  2.94, CutoffScore  49.93, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AGUUUUCAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.08, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  44.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUAAAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -16.20, deficit  6.85, CutoffScore   3.77, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUAAAAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -8.38, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  56.54, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AAUCAAAAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score      -8.82, deficit  3.25, CutoffScore  35.04, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAGUGCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score     -11.17, deficit  6.43, CutoffScore  12.76, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAUAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  43.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGGACUUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.20, deficit  4.38, CutoffScore  15.39, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CACCUAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.28, deficit  4.55, CutoffScore  11.32, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAACUCAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  43.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUGUUAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -10.86, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  38.43, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
GGCUAUGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -10.01, deficit  2.64, CutoffScore  43.90, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGGAAUUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -12.01, deficit  4.62, CutoffScore  51.37, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGGAAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score     -11.32, deficit  4.74, CutoffScore  18.49, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAGUUUUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -8.60, deficit  1.26, CutoffScore  55.65, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
UGGAAAAUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.63, deficit  5.06, CutoffScore  17.71, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGCAAGGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.28, deficit  3.90, CutoffScore  27.41, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAGUCCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -8.49, deficit  2.06, CutoffScore  60.53, ed  3, 1 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAUGACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  43.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAGCCCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -16.38, deficit  7.50, CutoffScore   8.34, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAUACUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -10.52, deficit  5.18, CutoffScore  17.30, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
GUAUGUCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -13.44, deficit  6.30, CutoffScore  21.43, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GUGGAUGGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -12.34, deficit  7.32, CutoffScore  24.04, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
CAUUCGGCGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_58224.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.99, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  29.71, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAAAAUGAGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score      -9.83, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  22.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGCAAACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score      -8.56, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  53.19, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUGAAAGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.21, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  41.28, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GAUCUCAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -13.70, deficit  5.63, CutoffScore  11.24, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGAGAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -8.80, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  39.46, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
GUAAAAAAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.95, deficit  6.67, CutoffScore  29.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GAAGAUUGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.63, deficit  3.04, CutoffScore  36.26, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCGAAGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -12.67, deficit  7.50, CutoffScore   0.21, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UCCGAAUGGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -16.80, deficit  8.03, CutoffScore  23.01, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGGAUGCGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -10.63, deficit  5.04, CutoffScore  25.74, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAGACACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -13.25, deficit  6.79, CutoffScore  20.17, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUUUAGAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.62, deficit  7.63, CutoffScore   7.66, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAAUAAAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.57, deficit  0.65, CutoffScore  52.92, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GGAAAAUAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score      -9.01, deficit -0.33, CutoffScore  57.54, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AAACUCAAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -13.87, deficit  6.82, CutoffScore   8.57, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
CGAACUCACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -12.49, deficit  5.98, CutoffScore  17.92, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAACGAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.98, CutoffScore  27.04, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUAAAAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -9.06, deficit  4.78, CutoffScore  56.62, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GCGAUAAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score     -12.15, deficit  4.64, CutoffScore   4.30, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUACACAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -11.50, deficit  2.58, CutoffScore  10.25, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
GAGAUACACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.84, deficit  5.10, CutoffScore  27.35, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAUGCAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.28, deficit  4.14, CutoffScore  52.57, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUCAAAACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.38, deficit  5.75, CutoffScore  26.01, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUGCAAGCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score      -8.56, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  53.19, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UCUACCGAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06059.6,  9 NTs,             CUUCCCAAG,score     -11.72, deficit  6.97, CutoffScore   2.54, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAUACCUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -14.97, deficit  9.63, CutoffScore   5.42, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAAGGUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.74, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  21.79, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AAUUAGUAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -10.58, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  44.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAUUUUCUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -13.18, deficit  3.18, CutoffScore  39.49, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUCUCGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.48, deficit  1.89, CutoffScore  44.37, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAGAACGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -14.62, deficit  9.55, CutoffScore  11.76, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUUGAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28252.8,  9 NTs,             GUUCAAGUC,score     -15.47, deficit 13.10, CutoffScore  14.70, ed  2, 0 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAAACAACUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score      -8.80, deficit  3.73, CutoffScore  44.78, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGUCCAACAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -11.90, deficit  3.83, CutoffScore  40.38, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUAAGGUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -14.50, deficit  5.91, CutoffScore  16.08, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAGAAAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.52, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  67.38, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
UUUCUCGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.51, deficit  4.37, CutoffScore  11.21, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAGUAAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.13, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  34.77, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GUCCACGAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.98, deficit  4.41, CutoffScore  41.62, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
AAAUCCCAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -13.49, deficit  7.90, CutoffScore  10.61, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAAAAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -12.34, deficit  8.06, CutoffScore  21.58, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GAUCCUUCUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.23, deficit  3.64, CutoffScore  32.06, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCUCGAGGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -12.33, deficit  4.26, CutoffScore  37.75, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCCGGAAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.81, deficit  2.72, CutoffScore  28.87, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GAGAAAUGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.04, deficit  4.22, CutoffScore  16.39, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GCAGUUAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -10.69, deficit  2.61, CutoffScore  23.70, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUCUCAAGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -11.16, deficit  4.51, CutoffScore  37.68, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
GAUUAGUAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -12.54, deficit  4.21, CutoffScore  42.71, ed  4, 2 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -8.82, deficit  2.17, CutoffScore  33.81, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CUCAGGAAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -13.35, deficit  3.35, CutoffScore  18.58, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUUAGGUGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -12.88, deficit  5.06, CutoffScore  17.83, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAUUGAAUUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.55, deficit  0.94, CutoffScore  37.69, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAAUGAAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.45, deficit  5.30, CutoffScore  24.90, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUCAAGCCCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -15.71, deficit  7.63, CutoffScore   0.75, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAGAUGUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07480.2,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -11.05, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  15.88, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
GGAAUAAAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -13.22, deficit  4.96, CutoffScore  31.14, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CAGGAAGAUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_23115.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -12.13, deficit  5.42, CutoffScore  24.23, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAAAUGCCUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -11.73, deficit  3.96, CutoffScore  28.62, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UUAGAUGCUAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -11.73, deficit  6.91, CutoffScore  20.43, ed  4, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUGGAAAACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -15.40, deficit  6.46, CutoffScore   3.76, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CCAAAAAUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.18, deficit  5.12, CutoffScore  11.74, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
UCGAAUAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.24, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  18.23, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAGUGAUAUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -13.30, deficit  4.99, CutoffScore   6.50, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAGCCGGAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -11.11, deficit  2.17, CutoffScore  30.45, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGUAUGCGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -13.00, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore   0.00, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUCUGAAGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.65, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  30.80, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUCCGGAACGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -15.60, deficit  7.52, CutoffScore   1.29, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGUGGAAAUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.21, deficit  2.60, CutoffScore   8.46, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUAGAAGCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score      -5.04, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  98.77, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGUGUUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.51, deficit  5.36, CutoffScore   4.58, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUUACGGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -12.16, deficit  3.28, CutoffScore  65.09, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UACUCAUGACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -12.38, deficit  4.56, CutoffScore   3.25, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UGACAAAAGGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.86, deficit  6.61, CutoffScore  20.79, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
AUCUGGCAACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.92, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  24.76, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCGCGAAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -13.97, deficit  5.09, CutoffScore   5.06, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUGCCAUUGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -10.93, deficit  5.70, CutoffScore  11.49, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGAUCUUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -15.70, deficit  6.40, CutoffScore   6.85, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
GAAUAUUGUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -10.12, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  31.57, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUGAGUGAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.54, deficit  3.56, CutoffScore  46.94, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAUUUUUCAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -12.95, deficit  5.13, CutoffScore  17.44, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUAAAAAGGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -10.43, deficit  5.20, CutoffScore  44.02, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCCCGAAGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.55, deficit  8.48, CutoffScore  25.31, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
AGUCAAAUCAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.45, deficit  2.83, CutoffScore  25.79, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AUAAGAAAACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.46, deficit  9.39, CutoffScore   5.17, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CUUUAAGCUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -12.54, deficit  4.73, CutoffScore   2.27, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UGUAAAUCGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -16.36, deficit  7.02, CutoffScore   2.52, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUGCUACAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -17.35, deficit  6.58, CutoffScore   2.86, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGCUAACUAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -16.19, deficit  9.54, CutoffScore   7.89, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CUAGUCGCAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -16.40, deficit  7.63, CutoffScore   8.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UUUUAAAAUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.68, deficit  3.07, CutoffScore  24.32, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCGAGGGUUUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29958.1, 10 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -14.53, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  19.15, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCUCGGGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_12870.1, 12 NTs,         GUCCUUGGGAAAC,score     -16.23, deficit  8.76, CutoffScore  18.67, ed  4, 2 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
CAAUUCCACAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.11, deficit  2.45, CutoffScore  35.29, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UGAAAAAAUAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.82, deficit  5.75, CutoffScore  23.94, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
ACUCGAAAGCGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -17.26, deficit  9.18, CutoffScore   8.08, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AGUUCGCAGUCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -18.88, deficit  8.27, CutoffScore  10.54, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUCUGAUUAUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -15.72, deficit  5.71, CutoffScore   2.98, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAAAAGAAGGCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.40, deficit  6.32, CutoffScore   7.39, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AACGUUUUGAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -11.64, deficit  2.87, CutoffScore  18.42, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGAGCCCAUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.48, deficit  2.37, CutoffScore  31.96, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GACCGUAAAUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -15.91, deficit  8.86, CutoffScore  14.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
UUUCGUAAAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -17.01, deficit 10.02, CutoffScore  11.05, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUGAAAUGGAUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.72, deficit  6.67, CutoffScore  27.02, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGAAAAGAGAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.18, deficit  7.11, CutoffScore  16.91, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CGACAAGAAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.51, deficit  5.44, CutoffScore  25.56, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GUCAAUACGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -14.59, deficit  1.36, CutoffScore  10.81, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GUAGGGGGAAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -15.74, deficit  6.97, CutoffScore  28.86, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UAAAAGAUUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.76, deficit  9.69, CutoffScore   3.59, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CAUUUUAAAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.30, deficit  2.69, CutoffScore   7.91, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGAACGUUUGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -15.95, deficit  5.70, CutoffScore  28.53, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
UAAUCAAGACUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -15.33, deficit  6.00, CutoffScore   5.63, ed  5, 4 cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F                 
GGAUGAAAUAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.86, deficit  5.46, CutoffScore   9.66, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CUAGAAUUCGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -17.75, deficit  5.60, CutoffScore  14.45, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAUCAAAAAUGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -16.97, deficit  8.89, CutoffScore   9.52, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAGGUGGAAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.2, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -13.74, deficit  5.11, CutoffScore  11.26, ed  4, 4 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
GAGGCAGGUUCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -20.04, deficit  9.80, CutoffScore   5.35, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAAUAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.77, deficit  6.91, CutoffScore   2.73, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AUUUGGAUGAAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -17.23, deficit  6.45, CutoffScore   3.51, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAUUUGUAUAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -15.28, deficit  8.99, CutoffScore   3.07, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UGUUCAAAAUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -18.44, deficit  8.04, CutoffScore  11.80, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CUGGUAAAUAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.07, deficit  4.67, CutoffScore  13.73, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
GAAUUUCAUUUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23509.1, 11 NTs,          GAAUUCAUUUUC,score     -11.34, deficit  5.89, CutoffScore  40.57, ed  2, 2 cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UGAAUUGGAAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -15.19, deficit  6.89, CutoffScore  31.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
CGAUGGAGAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.19, deficit  7.46, CutoffScore  17.68, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGAUAAUGAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -12.97, deficit  6.24, CutoffScore  23.78, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGAAUAGAAUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -13.52, deficit  3.12, CutoffScore  37.26, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
AGUAACAACGAACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -16.89, deficit  6.11, CutoffScore  20.96, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAAAAAAAAUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.81, deficit  9.74, CutoffScore   3.38, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GCCUAAAAUCUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_63355.1, 13 NTs,        GCUUAGAAGCAGCC,score     -15.26, deficit  7.48, CutoffScore   1.53, ed  5, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
GUUCGAACCUAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_84847.1, 14 NTs,        GUUCGCAACCAUCC,score     -14.80, deficit  6.66, CutoffScore  36.79, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F             
CUUCUGAAAGUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.36, deficit  5.96, CutoffScore   7.05, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CGUAAUUGGAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -18.78, deficit  5.55, CutoffScore   2.84, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GAAAUCGGCUGUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -16.99, deficit  2.87, CutoffScore  10.91, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCUUCUAAACUGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_63355.1, 13 NTs,        GCUUAGAAGCAGCC,score     -14.36, deficit  6.58, CutoffScore   5.47, ed  5, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
UGAUGAAACGACUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -16.48, deficit  4.33, CutoffScore   4.34, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGUCGGGAGAUAAAGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91641.1, 16 NTs,     AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU,score     -16.16, deficit  3.42, CutoffScore   9.79, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F         
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 96.0000	 16.0000	  2.0000
[11 11]	 78.0000	  4.0000	  2.0000
[12 12]	 48.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 34.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	 18.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 78.0000	 70.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 92.0000	 42.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 86.0000	 38.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 50.0000	 10.0000
[8 8]	 98.0000	 34.0000	  6.0000
[9 9]	100.0000	 16.0000	  4.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  29 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence  58 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence  84 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence  85 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 225 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 240 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 243 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 265 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 270 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 272 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 280 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 304 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 311 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 314 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 332 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 336 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 353 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 373 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 407 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 426 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 438 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 455 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 462 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 489 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 509 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 520 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 547 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 573 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 577 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 608 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 656 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 662 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 687 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 789 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 792 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 894 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 897 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 953 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 987 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 1055 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 1068 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 3.7350%
Number of models giving false positives is 232 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     0.74
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     1.61
