Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_16.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=GGAC FASTA(n).Sequence=GGAC
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:24:39
Evaluating how sequences fit models
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.60, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  57.10, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.50, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.76, deficit  5.56, CutoffScore  41.51, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.27, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  67.82, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.34, deficit  4.14, CutoffScore  56.46, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.60, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.19, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  79.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.30, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  88.40, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.89, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.50, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  75.74, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCCUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.32, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, CutoffScore  96.19, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  55.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.38, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  87.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.29, deficit -0.01, CutoffScore  68.56, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.12, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  91.90, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAGA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.76, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  55.59, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AACCU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.13, deficit  2.00, CutoffScore  47.40, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.25, deficit  2.05, CutoffScore  78.39, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.50, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  75.74, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGGUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.27, deficit  2.06, CutoffScore  46.76, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -7.13, deficit  2.14, CutoffScore  77.43, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  55.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUGCU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.67, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  84.58, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.67, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  68.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.19, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.32, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.89, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCCUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.20, deficit  4.00, CutoffScore  57.91, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.46, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.77, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.99, deficit -0.14, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GACUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76094.1,  5 NTs,                 CAAUG,score      -4.26, deficit  1.40, CutoffScore  53.64, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUCC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.55, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  83.76, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCUCC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.81, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  66.99, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUCGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.88, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.99, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.26, deficit  3.06, CutoffScore  67.78, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGUC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  97.91, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGUGC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.10, deficit  1.57, CutoffScore  51.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AAAGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.71, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.09, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.12, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUUA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.33, deficit  0.21, CutoffScore  66.24, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGCUC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.12, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  55.92, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.65, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GCCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -3.30, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.98, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.62, deficit -0.06, CutoffScore  69.04, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.26, deficit  3.06, CutoffScore  67.78, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAUA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.79, deficit  1.78, CutoffScore  81.31, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.38, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  87.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAUCG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.20, deficit  3.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAUUC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.03, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CACGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -8.89, deficit  2.79, CutoffScore  39.02, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUGAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.48, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.78, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUGUCG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -9.51, deficit  6.31, CutoffScore  33.55, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCACGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -8.55, deficit  6.61, CutoffScore  33.75, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUUUAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUAGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -5.97, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.13, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCUUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.12, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.31, ed  1, 1 cWW                                     
GGGGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.32, deficit -0.60, CutoffScore  43.15, ed  3, 2 cWW                                     
CUUGGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.72, deficit -0.51, CutoffScore  73.80, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.48, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAUUC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.03, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAGAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.92, deficit  2.16, CutoffScore  77.49, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUUAG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.09, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  62.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCGGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -7.17, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  44.35, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
AGCAAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.07, deficit  3.31, CutoffScore  65.51, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.77, deficit -0.15, CutoffScore  38.39, ed  4, 2 cWW                                     
GUGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -7.58, deficit  3.05, CutoffScore  67.93, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAUUG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.45, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.12, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.56, deficit  1.80, CutoffScore  81.22, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UACAAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.05, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  58.74, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.71, deficit  4.95, CutoffScore  48.43, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.28, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  98.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.84, deficit  6.08, CutoffScore  36.66, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AAAAUU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.13, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUGGC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.87, deficit -0.37, CutoffScore  72.29, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGACGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.71, deficit  6.95, CutoffScore  27.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.03, deficit  1.09, CutoffScore  88.51, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CCUCGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -7.26, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  85.12, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.47, deficit -0.45, CutoffScore  41.60, ed  2, 2 cWW                                     
UCCGAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -7.10, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  60.71, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUCUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.35, deficit  0.67, CutoffScore  61.36, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGAGAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.81, deficit  3.05, CutoffScore  68.24, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGCGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_99040.1,  6 NTs,                UUGCGG,score      -6.39, deficit  3.17, CutoffScore  45.73, ed  2, 1 F-F-F-F-F-F                             
GUCUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.38, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  35.33, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.66, deficit  3.90, CutoffScore  59.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.07, deficit  4.31, CutoffScore  55.09, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCCUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.59, CutoffScore  51.63, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -5.52, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUAGG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.64, deficit  4.88, CutoffScore  49.18, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.47, deficit  6.71, CutoffScore  30.06, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -7.45, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore  69.38, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.63, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  62.44, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAGCAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.15, deficit  0.05, CutoffScore  67.86, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -5.85, deficit  1.37, CutoffScore  53.97, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGGUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.52, deficit -0.40, CutoffScore  72.62, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
GCAUGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -7.20, deficit  1.45, CutoffScore  53.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUUUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -6.66, deficit  1.56, CutoffScore  84.48, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAUGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.90, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  53.01, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUCCUAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.40, deficit -0.38, CutoffScore  40.88, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.41, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  57.10, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCCGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.05, deficit  0.45, CutoffScore  63.66, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UAGCAUA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -5.74, deficit -0.31, CutoffScore  71.74, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAAAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.13, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.81, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -9.74, deficit  4.22, CutoffScore  55.58, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUUAGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -5.34, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  67.80, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUAACCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -7.88, deficit  1.44, CutoffScore  61.30, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGCGUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -11.08, deficit  4.63, CutoffScore  51.23, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGACCGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score     -10.35, deficit  6.44, CutoffScore   0.95, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGUAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.73, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.13, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
GUUUUAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.95, deficit  1.50, CutoffScore  84.22, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAGAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.77, deficit  1.32, CutoffScore  54.50, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCCAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -9.16, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  36.58, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUUGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -6.99, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  66.93, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAAGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.29, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  56.53, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCAGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -10.52, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  17.96, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCGGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -7.52, deficit  1.92, CutoffScore  48.23, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUACUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -8.47, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  56.16, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGAGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -7.11, deficit  2.47, CutoffScore  55.49, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCGACUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -12.44, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  15.42, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAGCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -6.17, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  63.99, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAUAACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.51, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  35.62, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UACUGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.26, deficit  1.80, CutoffScore  81.08, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCAAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -7.06, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  53.04, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCUUGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -8.86, deficit  3.76, CutoffScore  32.94, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGAUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -8.27, deficit  1.60, CutoffScore  51.59, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUUCUUU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.93, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  66.95, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUCUCCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.83, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  24.70, ed  3, 2 cWW-F                                   
CCCUGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.88, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  53.55, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCCAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -8.78, deficit  5.44, CutoffScore  36.29, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
GUCUCGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -10.28, deficit  2.05, CutoffScore  46.86, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAAAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_59735.5,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -5.67, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  64.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAGCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  64.63, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAUGCUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -6.06, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  46.38, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGCGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.48, deficit  3.14, CutoffScore  53.64, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
GAGAAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_82710.2,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.76, CutoffScore  49.90, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UCCCCUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.11, deficit  3.51, CutoffScore  13.99, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGCCCUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -9.55, deficit  5.07, CutoffScore  15.01, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAUUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -6.64, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAGGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score     -10.68, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  44.39, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  86.40, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGAGACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -8.20, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  46.51, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAACAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.13, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCGUUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -8.42, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  43.85, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUCAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.20, deficit -0.19, CutoffScore  38.88, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUUUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.06, deficit  1.42, CutoffScore  63.51, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
UUUUUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -10.78, deficit  4.85, CutoffScore  48.99, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UGUAAAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -8.16, deficit  2.37, CutoffScore  49.83, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CUGGAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -6.03, deficit  1.27, CutoffScore  89.84, ed  0, 0 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
ACAAUUUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.21, deficit  1.51, CutoffScore  40.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
UAGGUCAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.53, deficit  0.52, CutoffScore  67.74, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GUAAACAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.82, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.60, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAAUGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -13.20, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  20.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
CCAUAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -5.89, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  40.69, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCGAGAAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score      -9.71, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  53.24, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
ACGAAAAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score      -7.38, deficit -0.13, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCAGACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -10.54, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  32.83, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAGGCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score      -7.10, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  62.39, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGUACAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.17, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  34.41, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
UGGAAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.62, deficit  5.05, CutoffScore  17.78, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGACUCCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.50, deficit  0.49, CutoffScore  12.95, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
UAGCGGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -14.56, deficit  4.83, CutoffScore  36.24, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAAUAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -6.40, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  61.49, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUUCGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -10.27, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  52.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCUGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.96, deficit  1.52, CutoffScore  52.46, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAUAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -7.50, deficit  2.71, CutoffScore  27.24, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCAAGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -5.82, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  27.03, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAACGCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.28, deficit  2.89, CutoffScore   6.45, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAUUCGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score      -8.82, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  47.42, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CACAAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.55, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.15, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUGGGCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score      -6.00, deficit  1.26, CutoffScore  49.05, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.39, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.41, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUUCAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  57.11, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
CUUGAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -6.71, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  63.37, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
AGGUCUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.65, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  38.39, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAAUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -6.40, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  61.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCUGCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.86, deficit  3.95, CutoffScore  44.66, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUCCUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.56, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore   3.29, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CGCCUAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_85993.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.64, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  33.07, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUUCUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.30, deficit  2.86, CutoffScore  38.36, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGGGGCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score     -10.36, deficit  5.62, CutoffScore  39.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UCUUGCGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score      -9.27, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  43.54, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCUGUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.01, deficit  5.58, CutoffScore  26.74, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUUUAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.53, deficit  3.14, CutoffScore  35.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAUACGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.01, deficit  5.58, CutoffScore  26.74, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCUCAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  3.83, CutoffScore  38.27, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCUGGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score     -10.85, deficit  4.65, CutoffScore  52.15, ed  2, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
UUGGACAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score      -7.54, deficit  2.80, CutoffScore  17.17, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAGAGUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score     -11.59, deficit  6.30, CutoffScore  12.25, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCGGGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score     -11.95, deficit  5.75, CutoffScore  26.53, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
GGUUGGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -7.74, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  71.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AAAUACAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -8.93, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  29.21, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCGAGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -7.26, deficit  1.82, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CAAAAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -5.81, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  41.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCGAUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.04, deficit -0.36, CutoffScore  40.64, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGAACUGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -6.87, deficit  0.82, CutoffScore  28.23, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAACUAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score     -10.82, deficit  6.03, CutoffScore  24.56, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGGUCGUUA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -11.13, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  36.25, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAAGUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.50, CutoffScore  59.06, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUGAGAACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_28252.8,  9 NTs,             GUUCAAGUC,score     -11.97, deficit  9.61, CutoffScore  37.45, ed  2, 0 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F                       
UAGAAAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -14.88, deficit  6.97, CutoffScore  29.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
UUAAUAACA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -9.73, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  44.08, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
GAUAACUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.54, deficit  4.18, CutoffScore  32.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GAUCGGUCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -10.23, deficit  7.14, CutoffScore  30.41, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GUUCUUUAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -10.34, deficit  2.09, CutoffScore  33.26, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
GAGAAAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.85, deficit  3.93, CutoffScore  29.71, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CGAGUUCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -11.34, deficit  3.26, CutoffScore  17.94, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCUCCCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -10.19, deficit  1.28, CutoffScore  20.38, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
AGUGUAAAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -8.74, deficit  3.95, CutoffScore  52.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
CUUCGAGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -9.91, deficit  1.65, CutoffScore  36.85, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
GGGCCAAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93383.1,  9 NTs,             GCCCUAAGC,score      -7.28, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  28.55, ed  3, 3 cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAACUGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.21, deficit  3.84, CutoffScore  34.37, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUCGUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.05, deficit  0.30, CutoffScore  38.31, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCUUAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score     -11.66, deficit  6.87, CutoffScore  11.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
UGAGUCUCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.89, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  15.17, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUAUAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.69, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.28, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CGAGGGCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.44, deficit  2.70, CutoffScore  10.51, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAAGCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.36, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  35.30, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUGAUUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_33983.1,  7 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -8.84, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  40.50, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUGAUCUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score     -11.97, deficit  8.21, CutoffScore  30.14, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUGCUGUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -12.46, deficit  2.72, CutoffScore   4.49, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
ACACGCUAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_24792.1,  6 NTs,            GCCCGUUAUC,score     -12.07, deficit  5.65, CutoffScore  17.47, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F-F                           
GGUAAAUUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -6.53, deficit  0.96, CutoffScore  70.56, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGAAGUUGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score     -11.36, deficit  6.07, CutoffScore  13.88, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGAUCUGGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.22, deficit  2.86, CutoffScore  60.94, ed  2, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UUGUUUUUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.63, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  31.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAGUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.40, deficit  1.65, CutoffScore  25.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGUUUUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.13, deficit  0.94, CutoffScore  39.48, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUGUUUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -9.44, deficit  1.36, CutoffScore  34.76, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGACAGUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score     -10.74, deficit  3.27, CutoffScore  45.54, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUUUUUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -11.10, deficit  3.28, CutoffScore  36.46, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUCUCAAAA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  38.66, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GUUUAAGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_28252.8,  9 NTs,             GUUCAAGUC,score      -5.84, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  57.84, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUUAUAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -8.77, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  46.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CUGAUAGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.27, deficit  5.10, CutoffScore  32.89, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUCUGUCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -11.57, deficit  6.27, CutoffScore  14.52, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAAAGUUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.64, deficit  4.27, CutoffScore  11.47, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAGAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -10.31, deficit  5.68, CutoffScore  45.96, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CUGCAGAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -10.39, deficit  1.47, CutoffScore  42.13, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
UUGGUCCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score     -10.73, deficit  5.98, CutoffScore  15.88, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGCUUAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -8.09, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  56.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
GGAAUGAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -9.30, deficit  3.87, CutoffScore  24.43, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CGAUAACUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -11.08, deficit  3.70, CutoffScore  36.97, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UCUCAAAAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score      -6.63, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  71.56, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUAAAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -8.88, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  43.13, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CUAUUACUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.48, deficit  0.56, CutoffScore  49.14, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
GGGUAUUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.12, deficit  0.93, CutoffScore  65.74, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UAAAAAGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -11.85, deficit  5.40, CutoffScore  10.16, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAAAUCUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -11.24, deficit  6.96, CutoffScore  10.97, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CACCUAACCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -12.64, deficit  8.01, CutoffScore  29.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCAGAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -8.80, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  39.46, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
UGGCCAUUCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.16, deficit  3.42, CutoffScore  18.69, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUUGGUAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -7.88, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  54.25, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAAGUAAUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -11.49, deficit  6.42, CutoffScore  29.50, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGUUGAAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score     -11.18, deficit  3.44, CutoffScore  66.77, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGGCAAUGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -16.38, deficit  7.09, CutoffScore  20.83, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
ACAAUUGUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -13.07, deficit  3.07, CutoffScore  20.43, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUUAUUAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -13.17, deficit  3.16, CutoffScore  19.79, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGUUAGCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -13.66, deficit  3.91, CutoffScore  32.38, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAACGAGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  24.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUAAAAAGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -12.45, deficit  8.17, CutoffScore  20.98, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GUCUAAUCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -15.02, deficit  7.65, CutoffScore  11.36, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AAAUAGAAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score      -9.68, deficit  1.36, CutoffScore  30.73, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAGCGGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.37, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  25.00, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCUAGAUAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -10.06, deficit  4.45, CutoffScore  42.20, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
AGAUCGCCGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.40, deficit  6.11, CutoffScore   9.06, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUCGAAGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.49, deficit  5.88, CutoffScore  25.51, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAAAAAAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -11.14, deficit  6.87, CutoffScore  28.25, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
UGCGUGCAGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -13.97, deficit  5.88, CutoffScore   9.66, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GGUGCAAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score      -9.96, deficit  1.88, CutoffScore  33.98, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCAAAUCAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -12.49, deficit  5.98, CutoffScore  17.92, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAUUUGCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.54, deficit  5.16, CutoffScore  27.52, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAAUGAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.86, deficit  5.72, CutoffScore  22.17, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUGUUUCGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -14.47, deficit  8.28, CutoffScore  23.90, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
UUGGCCAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.75, deficit  3.87, CutoffScore  24.34, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GUUGCUCAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -8.91, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  31.99, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAAGAAAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -7.91, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GUAAAAUUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.25, deficit  0.50, CutoffScore  36.40, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAUAAUCGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -9.32, deficit  4.03, CutoffScore  28.45, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAGCGACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore  66.46, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAGGUUGUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score      -9.02, deficit  0.94, CutoffScore  45.05, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAAAUGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.49, deficit  4.20, CutoffScore  20.17, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
GGAACGUAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.38, deficit  5.24, CutoffScore  25.34, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUGCCUUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -14.26, deficit  6.19, CutoffScore  16.07, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAAUCAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.44, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  69.31, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUAGUUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.79, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  14.02, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUAAAGUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.41, deficit  5.59, CutoffScore  26.71, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CAAAGCUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -13.55, deficit  6.41, CutoffScore  20.72, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
UGUCCGGUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_58224.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -13.19, deficit  6.50, CutoffScore  11.42, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUCAUUUUUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -12.98, deficit  5.69, CutoffScore  29.08, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGUUCCGGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -11.66, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  13.72, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGAGAUCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.76, deficit  6.72, CutoffScore   9.49, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGAAGUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -14.03, deficit  5.96, CutoffScore   0.76, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGACAGAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -14.42, deficit  9.78, CutoffScore  20.41, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CAAGCCACAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score      -9.51, deficit  0.56, CutoffScore  59.14, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
AAAGUUUGCAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -11.40, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  47.46, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAAAGCUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -18.21, deficit 10.14, CutoffScore   1.29, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CUUGUUGAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.60, deficit  5.62, CutoffScore  18.84, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUGAAGUAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -14.59, deficit  5.65, CutoffScore   8.80, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUGACUCGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -14.37, deficit  8.80, CutoffScore   0.19, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
GAAUCCGGUAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_80411.1,  9 NTs,           CAGCCCGGUAG,score     -12.15, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  44.98, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F                       
GAAGUUUAUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -12.59, deficit  3.82, CutoffScore  29.64, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UAUUUUUGGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.22, deficit  4.48, CutoffScore   8.86, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CCAGGAAACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.25, deficit  6.60, CutoffScore   7.53, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
GGUAAAGAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -13.84, deficit  6.03, CutoffScore  12.19, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUGUGUUGAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.33, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  23.51, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCUCGUAUUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.32, deficit  1.70, CutoffScore  14.06, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGUGUCUGAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.86, deficit  4.72, CutoffScore  28.81, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GACGGAAAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.98, deficit  3.93, CutoffScore  25.25, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
GAAGCGUUCGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -10.30, deficit  3.18, CutoffScore  37.74, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAGUGAUGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -12.18, deficit  3.41, CutoffScore  31.92, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
AUCGAACGCAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -14.46, deficit  8.27, CutoffScore   7.97, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
GGGAGCAAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -14.97, deficit  5.97, CutoffScore   0.77, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUGUUUUCGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -15.45, deficit  6.71, CutoffScore   2.79, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCAGCAUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -18.34, deficit  7.60, CutoffScore   6.93, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UAAAAAGAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -13.26, deficit  5.40, CutoffScore  16.06, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAGUCGAUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -14.32, deficit  5.32, CutoffScore  37.48, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAACAAUCGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -11.39, deficit  6.16, CutoffScore   9.18, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAGAGCAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -15.41, deficit  5.86, CutoffScore   6.64, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGGAAAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score      -9.37, deficit  2.32, CutoffScore  17.24, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
ACACCUUUAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_24792.1,  6 NTs,            GCCCGUUAUC,score     -13.15, deficit  6.73, CutoffScore  11.39, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F-F                           
CGGGUUGGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -14.29, deficit  6.15, CutoffScore  19.30, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAGUUAGAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -11.44, deficit  3.63, CutoffScore  26.22, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CCAAGGCAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -16.43, deficit  9.35, CutoffScore   6.36, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAAAAAAGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -13.86, deficit  5.60, CutoffScore   8.26, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAAAGCAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -15.19, deficit  5.85, CutoffScore  11.28, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAAUGAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -15.85, deficit  6.51, CutoffScore   6.37, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGAUGACGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.56, deficit  5.51, CutoffScore  16.42, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUUAUUUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.22, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore   8.90, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUCAUCCAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -13.59, deficit  4.59, CutoffScore  24.97, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGUAACCUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -11.73, deficit  6.91, CutoffScore  20.44, ed  3, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUCUGCCAAUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.91, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  24.84, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUUAUUGAAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.37, deficit  3.71, CutoffScore  60.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
UGCUUCAAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.64, deficit  4.35, CutoffScore  19.27, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
GGAAACCAAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -13.26, deficit  4.26, CutoffScore  26.80, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGAUCAAUAUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -11.95, deficit  2.66, CutoffScore  47.64, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
CGUGAGUCUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -12.72, deficit  3.17, CutoffScore  23.54, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAGAAAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -13.24, deficit  4.98, CutoffScore  31.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CGGAAAGUUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.30, deficit  4.56, CutoffScore   7.14, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GCUUUGGCUACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -14.78, deficit  6.25, CutoffScore   7.41, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUGCUGGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -13.90, deficit  3.65, CutoffScore  22.72, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
GGUUUUGAAUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.65, deficit  6.03, CutoffScore  24.55, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGGCGACAGCGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -17.46, deficit  7.35, CutoffScore   2.14, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAUGCCCUCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_15118.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -11.93, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  37.40, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUAAGUGGAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -16.52, deficit  7.75, CutoffScore   8.09, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAACGCUCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.45, deficit  5.38, CutoffScore  10.39, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CGUAUAAAGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.61, deficit  6.35, CutoffScore   3.56, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GUGGCAACUGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41902.1, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.18, deficit  6.56, CutoffScore  22.22, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGUUUGUAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -15.17, deficit  5.62, CutoffScore  27.04, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCAAUUAUAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -11.12, deficit  4.83, CutoffScore  25.48, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGUUUUGAUAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -15.13, deficit  5.12, CutoffScore   6.86, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUAGCAAUCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_15118.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.03, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  16.66, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGUAAUUAGUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04725.1,  8 NTs,          GUUACUUAGUUC,score     -13.08, deficit  8.05, CutoffScore  30.52, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS                     
CGCAAAGAGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -16.07, deficit  5.33, CutoffScore   2.86, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UGAGAAUAUCUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -12.58, deficit  4.51, CutoffScore  14.86, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
AUUGAAAAACCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -13.34, deficit  5.26, CutoffScore  27.89, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGGUUUGAGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -19.60, deficit  9.20, CutoffScore   5.82, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CGUAAAUUAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -15.55, deficit  4.77, CutoffScore  12.30, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAUAGGUCAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -13.75, deficit  5.42, CutoffScore   2.28, ed  4, 4 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCCUUCGGCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -16.88, deficit 11.31, CutoffScore   2.97, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
GAGCAGCAAUGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -18.69, deficit 10.61, CutoffScore   0.86, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGGUUAAGUUCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.14, deficit  3.74, CutoffScore   2.99, ed  6, 5 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
GUCAAAAAUGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -19.56, deficit  8.82, CutoffScore   0.11, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UGUAACUGAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -14.86, deficit  4.85, CutoffScore   8.66, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAGCAAACAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -14.63, deficit  2.48, CutoffScore  15.18, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGGAAAUAACAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -14.36, deficit  7.50, CutoffScore  17.48, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGGGAAAAUGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -15.57, deficit  3.42, CutoffScore   9.67, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AAUGAAUGACAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -17.09, deficit  4.94, CutoffScore   0.74, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGUAUUAGUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -17.86, deficit  7.09, CutoffScore   0.19, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAUCAAAAGAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.85, deficit  6.59, CutoffScore   2.06, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GUCACCGGGUCGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -18.26, deficit  4.13, CutoffScore   3.31, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGCCGCAUGAAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -17.64, deficit  3.51, CutoffScore   7.04, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAAGAUAAAAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73183.1, 14 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -15.69, deficit  5.47, CutoffScore  10.21, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F           
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 94.0000	 10.0000	  4.0000
[11 11]	 88.0000	  4.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 44.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 18.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	  6.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 82.0000	 70.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 96.0000	 50.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 86.0000	 48.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 62.0000	 16.0000
[8 8]	100.0000	 34.0000	  6.0000
[9 9]	100.0000	 18.0000	  2.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  57 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence 102 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence 140 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence 145 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence 216 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence 224 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence 225 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence 227 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence 231 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence 233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence 237 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence 237 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence 239 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence 250 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence 254 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence 258 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence 259 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence 264 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence 283 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence 283 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence 283 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 287 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 310 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence 312 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence 317 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 333 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 361 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 372 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 373 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 377 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 385 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 398 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 413 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 421 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 458 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 471 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 472 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 481 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 492 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 552 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 566 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 568 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 587 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 611 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 631 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 668 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 702 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 750 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 768 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 794 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 818 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 837 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 936 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 937 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 975 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 986 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 1013 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 1109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 1156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 1179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 1207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 1399 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 1405 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 1585 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 1586 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 1713 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 1734 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 1873 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 1918 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 2.0481%
Number of models giving false positives is 238 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     0.47
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     0.94
