Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_6.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=UGGA FASTA(n).Sequence=UGGA
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:23:44
Evaluating how sequences fit models
UGGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.38, deficit  2.17, CutoffScore  45.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  57.10, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.28, deficit  2.08, CutoffScore  78.07, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.16, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  43.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  88.68, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.60, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  88.68, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -6.34, deficit  2.15, CutoffScore  77.36, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.50, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.54, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
ACGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.18, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  43.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.29, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  67.48, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.50, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore  63.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUCC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.55, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  83.76, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGUC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.65, deficit  1.76, CutoffScore  81.44, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-cSH                               
GGUGC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.10, deficit  1.57, CutoffScore  51.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCCGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  91.90, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.12, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUCGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.89, deficit  2.10, CutoffScore  77.89, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUGGA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.39, deficit  2.45, CutoffScore  74.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  60.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAAGA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.76, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  55.59, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGGUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.92, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  60.05, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUUAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -4.32, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
CUUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.65, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  60.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAGUA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_26631.1,  5 NTs,                 CAGUG,score      -2.69, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.67, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
ACGUU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.53, deficit  5.33, CutoffScore  43.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.60, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  85.36, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  48.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UCAAA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.31, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
ACGUU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.53, deficit  5.33, CutoffScore  43.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.30, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  75.13, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
AGUGU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -5.41, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  50.09, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.26, deficit  3.06, CutoffScore  67.78, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.92, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  60.05, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  48.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUCGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.89, deficit  2.10, CutoffScore  77.89, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGAGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  52.09, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.86, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.22, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAACU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.35, deficit  0.05, CutoffScore  67.94, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.25, deficit  2.13, CutoffScore  77.61, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGGAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.50, deficit  1.40, CutoffScore  53.64, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUCG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.33, deficit  1.32, CutoffScore  86.11, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUCG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.33, deficit  1.32, CutoffScore  86.11, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -10.47, deficit  4.53, CutoffScore  52.31, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UUCCA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.97, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  55.98, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.67, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  68.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -4.48, deficit  2.54, CutoffScore  74.52, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CAGUUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.58, deficit  0.65, CutoffScore  61.61, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.66, deficit  3.90, CutoffScore  59.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGCAAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.07, deficit  3.31, CutoffScore  65.51, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AAAAGU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.34, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGGAAU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.70, deficit  3.94, CutoffScore  58.91, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.69, deficit  3.93, CutoffScore  59.03, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGGAAA 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -8.04, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  69.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAUUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_29966.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -4.51, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.98, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
AAACCU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.04, deficit  1.91, CutoffScore  79.88, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAUUG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.45, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.12, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AAGUAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.34, deficit  0.28, CutoffScore  97.04, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUAGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -5.97, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.13, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCCAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -8.50, deficit  6.11, CutoffScore  45.89, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GUUCAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_71391.1,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -3.80, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGGUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.47, deficit -0.45, CutoffScore  73.18, ed  1, 1 cWW                                     
UAAGUA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.41, deficit -0.19, CutoffScore  70.44, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UCUAAA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.30, deficit  0.62, CutoffScore  61.87, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAAUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.83, deficit -0.31, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAACAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.03, deficit  2.09, CutoffScore  78.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAACA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score     -10.80, deficit  8.41, CutoffScore  25.51, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUUUGG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -4.95, deficit  3.01, CutoffScore  69.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GAACAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.36, deficit  2.43, CutoffScore  74.47, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.22, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  34.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAUCGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.77, deficit  0.83, CutoffScore  59.66, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAUUC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.03, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.94, deficit  3.18, CutoffScore  66.89, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUACG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.86, deficit  0.74, CutoffScore  60.60, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGUUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -5.52, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
AGUUGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.79, deficit -0.12, CutoffScore  69.73, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
GAAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.58, deficit  4.82, CutoffScore  49.71, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUAUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.03, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCGUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  2, 1 cWW                                     
AUUGUU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.77, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  61.64, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCAAUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.14, deficit  0.54, CutoffScore  94.26, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.83, deficit -0.31, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGUAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.66, deficit  0.60, CutoffScore  62.08, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.80, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  57.90, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCACGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.79, deficit  3.85, CutoffScore  61.45, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GAAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.58, deficit  4.82, CutoffScore  49.71, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAGCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.44, deficit  5.68, CutoffScore  40.76, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUUGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.67, deficit -0.25, CutoffScore  71.07, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
CCAAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.52, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  90.29, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUUUUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.23, deficit  4.03, CutoffScore  57.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.15, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  47.05, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUUGUU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.77, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  61.64, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.28, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  66.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAGCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -6.87, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  43.20, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAAUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -8.58, deficit  4.52, CutoffScore  52.43, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCGUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.70, deficit  3.77, CutoffScore  28.77, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCGUGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -8.12, deficit  1.63, CutoffScore  28.04, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAUUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -6.72, deficit  0.23, CutoffScore  41.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAGUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  64.63, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUAUAGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_59735.5,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.89, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  52.11, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCACGCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -8.34, deficit  3.25, CutoffScore  38.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGUUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.56, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.38, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
GCCUUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -9.13, deficit  4.69, CutoffScore  37.78, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CGAAGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.30, deficit  5.54, CutoffScore  42.27, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCAGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.91, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  35.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.08, deficit  6.32, CutoffScore  34.08, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGGUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -6.17, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  63.99, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.41, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  57.10, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAUUCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -4.82, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  88.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGCAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.47, CutoffScore  66.25, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CUUCUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.80, deficit  1.33, CutoffScore  54.42, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CACCUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.56, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  58.29, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GGCCAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.01, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  52.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUCCAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.46, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  49.63, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
UUAUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -8.83, deficit  3.36, CutoffScore  33.09, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.87, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  25.22, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCCAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.12, deficit -0.61, CutoffScore  43.24, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCUUUGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -7.02, deficit  0.53, CutoffScore  38.40, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGAACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.61, deficit  6.85, CutoffScore  28.55, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAGCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -7.52, deficit  1.07, CutoffScore  38.34, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGGCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score     -13.84, deficit  5.13, CutoffScore   4.11, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUUCGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -5.62, deficit  0.52, CutoffScore  35.34, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGAAUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -8.20, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  46.51, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGUUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.80, deficit  1.33, CutoffScore  54.42, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCUAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -7.74, deficit  2.64, CutoffScore  44.02, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UCAUACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_59735.5,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -7.54, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  13.71, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGGCUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -7.27, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  28.62, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAACUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -9.07, deficit  2.93, CutoffScore  37.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUACAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.64, deficit  0.41, CutoffScore  32.51, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.18, deficit  2.58, CutoffScore  22.39, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGAUGAA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.02, deficit  7.26, CutoffScore  24.35, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGACGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -8.00, deficit  2.56, CutoffScore  41.44, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGUCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -8.27, deficit  1.60, CutoffScore  51.59, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAUGUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.37, deficit  1.44, CutoffScore  53.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUGACC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.72, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  49.82, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.53, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.88, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUCUUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -10.04, deficit  1.98, CutoffScore  47.57, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUAAGUU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.83, deficit  1.35, CutoffScore  85.78, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUAGUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.83, deficit  0.23, CutoffScore  65.95, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGUUAAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -8.41, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  56.63, ed  2, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
GGCUGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.06, CutoffScore  46.73, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAUUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.28, deficit  3.34, CutoffScore  33.26, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUGGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.78, deficit  3.04, CutoffScore  30.88, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGCAGGAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.90, deficit  1.51, CutoffScore  52.48, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGUUUGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -7.74, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  71.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUCAUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.08, deficit  3.51, CutoffScore  29.24, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUCAACG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.53, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.59, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUAAUUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -6.45, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  97.93, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGGACGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -14.49, deficit  9.47, CutoffScore  11.82, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
GGGAUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.67, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore  17.34, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAGUGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score     -11.31, deficit  5.88, CutoffScore   9.02, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
UAAGGGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -14.44, deficit  9.42, CutoffScore  12.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
GAACAGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score     -10.34, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore  16.44, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
UUGUUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -11.60, deficit  3.52, CutoffScore  42.19, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUUAUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -7.74, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  42.07, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUCGCAUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -12.80, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  23.45, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
GGCCUCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.83, deficit -0.19, CutoffScore  74.19, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CAUGAUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.84, deficit  1.59, CutoffScore  52.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUAAAAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.82, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.60, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCCUUCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.86, deficit  3.47, CutoffScore  31.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCGUGUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score     -10.28, deficit  6.51, CutoffScore   3.34, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AAGAGUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score     -11.59, deficit  6.30, CutoffScore  12.19, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGAAUAUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -8.62, deficit  2.56, CutoffScore  41.42, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCUGUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.24, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  28.52, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUCGGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -12.01, deficit  3.76, CutoffScore  44.25, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CUCAAUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -11.37, deficit  8.27, CutoffScore  24.41, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAAUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.51, deficit  1.12, CutoffScore  56.66, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGACAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -7.53, deficit  4.80, CutoffScore  37.44, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUGUUUAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.08, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  67.10, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCGCGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.63, deficit  2.24, CutoffScore  13.27, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUGUAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -11.18, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  51.12, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CUUUCUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.70, deficit  1.97, CutoffScore  52.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUGGUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -9.31, deficit  3.53, CutoffScore  39.08, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CCUGACUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score      -9.67, deficit -0.74, CutoffScore  44.59, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAUUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.68, deficit  0.94, CutoffScore  32.97, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGGCCUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85993.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -8.93, deficit  3.58, CutoffScore  22.69, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAAGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.01, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  66.87, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUACUACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.76, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  12.75, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUUCUAAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -11.37, deficit  3.12, CutoffScore  49.52, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
GUACAAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -9.97, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  29.81, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
UUAUAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score     -10.19, deficit  4.76, CutoffScore  63.53, ed  2, 0 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CGACGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.08, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  33.89, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCCAAAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.83, deficit  1.44, CutoffScore  53.26, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUACAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -12.98, deficit  9.88, CutoffScore  15.89, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CGCAGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.17, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  81.81, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAUAACAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -6.58, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  64.61, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUCGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.68, deficit  0.94, CutoffScore  32.97, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAAAACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -8.93, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore  29.30, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUCAAUGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.63, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  55.39, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUUAACGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.56, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  24.54, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGCGGGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -16.82, deficit  7.09, CutoffScore  17.80, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUCAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -6.71, deficit  0.27, CutoffScore  65.60, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUUUGCCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score      -9.87, deficit  2.50, CutoffScore  25.32, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAAGGUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -8.62, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  63.96, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGGAAAUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.12, deficit  0.93, CutoffScore  39.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAGAAAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.89, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  39.06, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGCCAGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -12.62, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  24.40, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAUAUUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.07, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  67.32, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGAGAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -9.35, deficit  3.92, CutoffScore  46.99, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CCAAAAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -6.36, deficit  1.56, CutoffScore  47.79, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
GAGCAAGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -10.51, deficit  0.78, CutoffScore  44.78, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAAAACCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -7.95, deficit  1.50, CutoffScore  34.61, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCAUUAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.53, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  48.78, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
UGGGAUUUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -8.27, deficit  0.09, CutoffScore  99.24, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGUUAGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -11.41, deficit  5.23, CutoffScore  24.20, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
GGUAAGAGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.74, deficit  4.17, CutoffScore  68.94, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGCAACGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -8.61, deficit  3.32, CutoffScore  31.05, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUACCUUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score      -9.79, deficit  0.04, CutoffScore  40.87, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGCCCCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.34, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  50.25, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
GGGGAGGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score      -8.24, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  47.44, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
CGAAAGUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score      -9.46, deficit -0.28, CutoffScore  73.42, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UCGAAGGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -11.23, deficit  2.51, CutoffScore  42.05, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAUGCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.98, deficit  6.61, CutoffScore  15.87, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
AGAAGCGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -12.15, deficit  5.69, CutoffScore   8.30, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CACGAAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.00, CutoffScore  37.59, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAUAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  43.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUCAAAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_28252.8,  9 NTs,             GUUCAAGUC,score      -5.85, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore  77.31, ed  2, 0 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUCGCUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -12.22, deficit  6.92, CutoffScore  10.86, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAAAAUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score      -9.39, deficit -0.35, CutoffScore  44.73, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGUUUCAUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score      -9.85, deficit  2.47, CutoffScore  25.49, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGUAUUUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score     -11.41, deficit  6.12, CutoffScore  13.51, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGUUAAUAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32735.2,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -11.24, deficit  7.61, CutoffScore  37.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAUUGUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.80, deficit  2.05, CutoffScore  21.24, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCGACGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -13.35, deficit  6.90, CutoffScore   0.79, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UCUCAAAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_06059.6,  9 NTs,             CUUCCCAAG,score      -7.20, deficit  2.45, CutoffScore  59.06, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAUUUCUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.90, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  15.11, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAAGUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -7.82, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  60.92, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGGAGAACA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score     -11.96, deficit  5.38, CutoffScore  11.74, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AAAGUACAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -10.01, deficit  3.58, CutoffScore  25.26, ed  3, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
ACUCCGCAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score      -8.40, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  48.75, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CGUUUGUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -12.32, deficit  5.19, CutoffScore  28.55, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GGGUUGAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.62, deficit  1.89, CutoffScore  16.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCAAGUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score     -11.80, deficit  7.06, CutoffScore  29.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAGCUUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score      -9.61, deficit -0.13, CutoffScore  42.59, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAUUUAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.39, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  59.83, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
AUCGAAAUU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -6.00, deficit  1.37, CutoffScore  35.43, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
UAAAGGAAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -11.16, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  39.48, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUAAAGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -6.06, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  73.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGAAAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score      -9.83, deficit  0.09, CutoffScore  40.42, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAAAGGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.23, deficit  7.41, CutoffScore  15.20, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CGUUCAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32735.2,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -9.25, deficit  5.62, CutoffScore  31.21, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUGCAUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -7.83, deficit  2.66, CutoffScore  29.51, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GAAGGUGAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.02, deficit  1.44, CutoffScore  47.60, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUAUAAAGAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.92, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  43.35, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CAAGGACAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.73, deficit  2.64, CutoffScore  29.33, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
UGAAAAUGGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -15.51, deficit  6.21, CutoffScore   8.00, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
CGAUUGCACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.54, deficit  7.25, CutoffScore   2.22, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUUACAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -9.35, deficit  5.07, CutoffScore  38.23, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GUGGACUUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.17, deficit  4.44, CutoffScore  12.06, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUUAAAUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -11.62, deficit  7.34, CutoffScore  25.58, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
AAGAAAAUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.23, deficit  3.41, CutoffScore  40.51, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CUUUAGGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -12.64, deficit  2.90, CutoffScore  12.94, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGAACAGAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score      -9.09, deficit -0.25, CutoffScore  56.97, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAAGAAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.35, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  49.55, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUGCUGGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.63, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  50.34, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUCAAAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score      -9.80, deficit  1.48, CutoffScore  29.92, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAGGUUUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_04642.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -10.77, deficit  2.90, CutoffScore  16.93, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAAACUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -12.92, deficit  6.73, CutoffScore   0.20, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
GUCAAAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.75, deficit  6.10, CutoffScore  10.50, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
AUCUGAUUCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -15.44, deficit 10.63, CutoffScore   8.07, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUUAGAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -9.20, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  36.82, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
GACCAUUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24792.1,  6 NTs,            GCCCGUUAUC,score     -10.57, deficit  4.14, CutoffScore   9.07, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWS-F-F-F                           
GGGGAACGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41902.1, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.90, deficit  8.28, CutoffScore  13.62, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F                   
UAAAGCAUCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.96, deficit  1.21, CutoffScore  29.44, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UCAAAUUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -12.60, deficit  5.53, CutoffScore  11.38, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUGGAAGCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -16.20, deficit  9.72, CutoffScore   4.04, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
UUCUGGAGUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -11.94, deficit  7.31, CutoffScore  18.19, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGCAAAAAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -10.15, deficit  1.84, CutoffScore  27.54, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCGGGUUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -10.52, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore  23.08, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUGUUUUAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.02, deficit  4.97, CutoffScore  19.51, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAAAAUGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.95, deficit  4.14, CutoffScore  16.95, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GUUCGAUCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.30, deficit  6.21, CutoffScore  51.24, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GUUUUGUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.04, deficit  2.46, CutoffScore  19.26, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCGGGCGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.26, deficit  3.67, CutoffScore  10.71, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUAAAAACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -12.43, deficit  8.15, CutoffScore  21.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
UGUAGGAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.12, deficit  1.98, CutoffScore  27.05, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAGAAAGAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.16, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  41.64, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GGAAUGAUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -16.86, deficit  7.81, CutoffScore   3.16, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGUCCAGCCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.59, deficit  5.21, CutoffScore   7.69, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGGUACGAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score      -8.60, deficit  2.42, CutoffScore  39.19, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
GGAAAGAAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.13, deficit  7.32, CutoffScore  15.81, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CACUGAACAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score      -8.99, deficit  3.91, CutoffScore  60.76, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUCGACGAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -11.13, deficit  4.68, CutoffScore  14.64, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAUAAAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.57, deficit  0.65, CutoffScore  52.92, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GAUAUUUGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.89, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  13.29, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAAGAAAGCA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.65, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  66.49, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CUGAACUAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.84, deficit  6.02, CutoffScore   5.03, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GGGAGUGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -12.05, deficit  2.71, CutoffScore  34.81, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAGGGGCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -16.93, deficit  7.38, CutoffScore  15.94, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCGGGGUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.71, deficit  3.62, CutoffScore   5.20, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CGGGAAGUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -11.96, deficit  5.48, CutoffScore  10.41, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
UAAAAGAAAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.32, deficit  6.46, CutoffScore  23.82, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAUUUCAAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.00, deficit  6.35, CutoffScore   9.02, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CGGAAUAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -14.65, deficit  5.65, CutoffScore   2.57, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUGAAAAUAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -12.98, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  18.82, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAACCAAAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.24, deficit  4.57, CutoffScore  40.24, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUGCGAAUCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.20, deficit  7.38, CutoffScore   9.41, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUCUCUAACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score     -11.29, deficit  4.77, CutoffScore  44.88, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
GAUCCUAUUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -13.47, deficit  3.23, CutoffScore  26.72, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUCCCCACCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score     -11.57, deficit  5.05, CutoffScore  43.44, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
GUUUUCUAUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -9.35, deficit  2.70, CutoffScore  30.65, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CUCCAGUUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -15.45, deficit  7.12, CutoffScore  26.38, ed  2, 2 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAAGUGUCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.35, deficit  1.09, CutoffScore  19.99, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
GAGGCAGGCUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -11.06, deficit  2.12, CutoffScore  49.46, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUAGGAAUCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -11.69, deficit  6.87, CutoffScore  12.24, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGCGUUCUGUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -13.22, deficit  4.45, CutoffScore   9.73, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CAAACCGUUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_07480.2,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -14.24, deficit  7.00, CutoffScore  14.86, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CUUUUGAGGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -13.29, deficit  3.74, CutoffScore  19.96, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGCGGAAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.00, deficit  6.01, CutoffScore  16.64, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCGGAUACCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -15.50, deficit 10.16, CutoffScore   2.72, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCCGCUCGGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -14.36, deficit  6.27, CutoffScore   7.29, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CAAGAGUAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.04, deficit  5.27, CutoffScore   5.26, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGAGAAAUAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.51, deficit  5.44, CutoffScore  25.55, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GUUAAGUGAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.46, deficit  4.41, CutoffScore  22.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUGUGCGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.89, deficit  7.90, CutoffScore  22.82, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGUAAAAUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.70, deficit  6.62, CutoffScore   5.84, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UAAGAAAAAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -12.48, deficit  4.56, CutoffScore  25.26, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GGAUAUUGUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.22, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore   8.90, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UUACCGCAAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -13.62, deficit  6.50, CutoffScore   5.45, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAGAAAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -13.24, deficit  4.98, CutoffScore  31.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GUUGACGACAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -12.67, deficit  3.73, CutoffScore   2.09, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAUGGAAAUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.04, deficit  0.43, CutoffScore  22.08, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAGCAAGGCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -13.48, deficit  3.25, CutoffScore  26.63, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AAACCAAGUAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80411.1,  9 NTs,           CAGCCCGGUAG,score     -11.66, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  31.00, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F                       
CUCUUCAUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.57, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  12.51, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCAAUCCUCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -13.09, deficit  2.83, CutoffScore  27.69, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
GUUCCGUUGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -15.37, deficit 10.14, CutoffScore   4.32, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAUUCACUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_23509.1, 11 NTs,          GAAUUCAUUUUC,score     -12.15, deficit  6.70, CutoffScore  21.51, ed  3, 3 cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGCCACGACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80411.1,  9 NTs,           CAGCCCGGUAG,score     -11.86, deficit  3.59, CutoffScore  13.21, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F                       
GACUGUACAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -12.30, deficit  4.49, CutoffScore  21.22, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAAAUAGGAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -15.94, deficit  7.65, CutoffScore  11.84, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
CGAAUUUGUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -14.34, deficit  8.05, CutoffScore   8.13, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAAAAUACAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.83, deficit  6.97, CutoffScore  20.70, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAGGGUGCAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -12.35, deficit  4.58, CutoffScore  25.22, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAGUGAUACAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -11.24, deficit  4.95, CutoffScore  24.84, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAGCGUAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -15.16, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore  33.34, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CUGAAGUUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -13.42, deficit  3.98, CutoffScore   4.83, ed  7, 5 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
CUCAUCGAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -12.43, deficit  1.69, CutoffScore  40.05, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGUGCGAUCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.48, deficit  3.87, CutoffScore   0.48, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAAACACAUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.08, deficit  2.96, CutoffScore  28.41, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUAGAAACACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -15.20, deficit 10.39, CutoffScore   9.39, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUAAACGUUGUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.64, deficit  3.53, CutoffScore   7.07, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUGGUCGUAAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -16.86, deficit  8.10, CutoffScore   6.20, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GCUAAGAAACUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -10.28, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  58.55, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCAGAGAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -15.16, deficit  7.08, CutoffScore  18.68, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAACAUUCUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.57, deficit  2.46, CutoffScore  49.38, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUGGAUGAUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -16.55, deficit 10.08, CutoffScore   2.24, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
CGAACUAUAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -13.79, deficit  3.01, CutoffScore  37.19, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAAUAUGCGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -14.49, deficit  6.19, CutoffScore   3.67, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
CCGUUAAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.46, deficit  6.20, CutoffScore   4.47, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GUUGGUGAAGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -13.15, deficit  6.67, CutoffScore   4.31, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
GGAAAACUCACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.90, deficit  5.83, CutoffScore   8.04, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GGAGAGUAGAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -17.56, deficit  7.31, CutoffScore   0.36, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CUCGAAGAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -14.12, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  13.77, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GGGAUGAAACGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -14.09, deficit  4.68, CutoffScore   6.07, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCAUAAAAACACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_63355.1, 13 NTs,        GCUUAGAAGCAGCC,score     -18.29, deficit 10.50, CutoffScore   1.41, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
GGGAAUGGAUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29958.1, 10 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -14.42, deficit  4.48, CutoffScore   2.01, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCUGACAAACCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -16.05, deficit  7.97, CutoffScore  29.38, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUUUGAAAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -13.89, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore   4.32, ed  7, 5 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CUAAUGGAUCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -17.54, deficit  9.25, CutoffScore   3.37, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
AAAGGACGCAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11542.1, 10 NTs,         CGAGCGGCCAAAG,score     -14.17, deficit  4.64, CutoffScore   7.35, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UCGAACGGCAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -17.97, deficit  3.84, CutoffScore   5.07, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGGGCAAGAAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.2, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -15.49, deficit  6.86, CutoffScore   2.18, ed  6, 4 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
CGUUCGGUGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -18.05, deficit 11.06, CutoffScore   5.26, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUCAGGCUAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -17.54, deficit  3.41, CutoffScore   7.65, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AGGAUUGCUUACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -15.09, deficit  1.87, CutoffScore   7.42, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GAUGAAUAGAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -16.44, deficit  4.29, CutoffScore   4.56, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUGCAGUCUGAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -17.28, deficit  8.41, CutoffScore   3.31, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAAGCGCCUAAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_11542.1, 10 NTs,         CGAGCGGCCAAAG,score     -13.06, deficit  3.53, CutoffScore  30.25, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGUGGUGGUCUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29958.1, 10 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -17.01, deficit  7.07, CutoffScore   4.45, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGAAUCUCUCGGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -14.97, deficit  0.85, CutoffScore   5.04, ed  6, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AAGAGGCAUGAGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -15.68, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore   0.80, ed  7, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 96.0000	 12.0000	  0.0000
[11 11]	 80.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 50.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 28.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	  6.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 82.0000	 74.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	100.0000	 58.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 94.0000	 56.0000
[7 7]	 98.0000	 46.0000	 14.0000
[8 8]	100.0000	 36.0000	  8.0000
[9 9]	100.0000	 22.0000	  6.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  17 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence  38 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence  43 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence  56 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 227 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 256 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 268 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 283 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 293 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 302 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 311 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 329 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 337 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 341 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 359 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 377 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 389 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 403 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 442 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 443 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 454 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 526 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 527 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 595 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 608 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 639 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 657 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 698 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 710 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 5.5000%
Number of models giving false positives is 232 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     1.38
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     2.53
