Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_14.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=AGAU FASTA(n).Sequence=AGAU
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:24:29
Evaluating how sequences fit models
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.29, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUCA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.98, deficit  0.97, CutoffScore  89.83, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  88.68, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  88.68, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.30, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  88.40, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.39, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  87.51, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.24, deficit  1.04, CutoffScore  89.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -5.63, deficit -1.04, CutoffScore  47.79, ed  2, 2 cWW-F                                   
AAGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.52, deficit  3.32, CutoffScore  65.05, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -5.63, deficit -1.04, CutoffScore  47.79, ed  2, 2 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.24, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  78.57, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.22, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  68.24, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.20, deficit  4.00, CutoffScore  57.91, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.28, deficit  2.08, CutoffScore  78.07, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.28, deficit  2.08, CutoffScore  78.07, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.37, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  34.79, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCCGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUGGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.96, deficit  2.03, CutoffScore  78.67, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.80, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  76.17, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.42, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -7.13, deficit  2.14, CutoffScore  77.43, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUGAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.67, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.45, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.85, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.38, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  87.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUAAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.54, deficit  3.34, CutoffScore  64.84, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UACCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -9.01, deficit  2.88, CutoffScore  38.13, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGGCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.67, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  53.00, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUAAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.31, deficit  3.11, CutoffScore  67.27, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUUA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.33, deficit  0.21, CutoffScore  66.24, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  91.48, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.25, deficit  2.05, CutoffScore  78.39, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGCAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -5.63, deficit  2.45, CutoffScore  74.22, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUCAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.68, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  63.39, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.25, deficit  1.12, CutoffScore  25.04, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUAA 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -5.84, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.38, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  87.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.15, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  34.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
AUAUU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.12, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.86, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.22, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUGC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.10, deficit  1.57, CutoffScore  51.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AAAGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.71, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.09, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GACGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGUGA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -5.28, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  55.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.62, deficit -0.06, CutoffScore  69.04, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGUGC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.10, deficit  1.57, CutoffScore  51.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGUCA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.08, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AAAAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.13, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.53, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.32, deficit  1.38, CutoffScore  53.90, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.01, deficit  2.83, CutoffScore  38.60, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -4.44, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
CUCCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -4.95, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  95.61, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAAUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.28, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  98.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUACAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.94, deficit  1.81, CutoffScore  49.40, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -8.04, deficit  4.03, CutoffScore  57.61, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAUGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_86883.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.07, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.07, deficit  4.31, CutoffScore  55.09, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.16, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.05, deficit  5.29, CutoffScore  44.85, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.05, deficit  5.29, CutoffScore  44.85, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAGGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -6.22, deficit -1.30, CutoffScore  54.95, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-F                               
UUCUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -8.57, deficit  5.40, CutoffScore  43.20, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.82, deficit  1.88, CutoffScore  48.62, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAGUUC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -5.66, deficit  0.78, CutoffScore  60.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
GUGAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -5.37, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  75.19, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUAUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.11, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.22, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.16, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  92.74, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAUAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_52953.3,  6 NTs,                GGAAAC,score      -4.16, deficit -0.04, CutoffScore  68.86, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUGAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.48, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.78, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.80, deficit  1.67, CutoffScore  50.86, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAUCC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_62934.1,  6 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.55, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  67.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
GAGUAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -6.47, deficit  2.41, CutoffScore  74.65, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGCGUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_28791.1,  6 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.89, deficit  2.10, CutoffScore  77.89, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
ACGUUU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_65313.1,  5 NTs,                CCUUUG,score      -5.58, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  55.85, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.27, deficit  3.75, CutoffScore  63.99, ed  0, 0 cWW-cWS-F                               
GUCCUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -6.91, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCAAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.52, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  90.29, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGGAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.57, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  60.29, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.47, deficit  6.71, CutoffScore  30.06, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -6.07, deficit  0.32, CutoffScore  65.05, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAACCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  83.10, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUAUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.03, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AGUUUU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -5.59, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.12, CutoffScore  56.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGGGUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.52, deficit -0.40, CutoffScore  72.62, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
CCCUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -8.25, deficit  3.13, CutoffScore  35.45, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGGUUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -8.47, deficit  3.99, CutoffScore  57.95, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGGUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -8.91, deficit  3.79, CutoffScore  28.50, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGCAUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.79, deficit  5.03, CutoffScore  47.53, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.82, deficit  5.42, CutoffScore  51.99, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CAUUUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.85, deficit  1.97, CutoffScore  79.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-cSH                               
GGGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.35, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  52.10, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAGAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -8.65, deficit  1.13, CutoffScore  60.38, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWS-F                               
GUGUGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.86, deficit  1.38, CutoffScore  53.88, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.82, deficit  5.42, CutoffScore  51.99, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GGGACC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.46, deficit  2.34, CutoffScore  43.81, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAGAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.92, deficit  2.16, CutoffScore  77.49, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.20, deficit  3.00, CutoffScore  68.46, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAUGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.91, deficit  0.98, CutoffScore  58.15, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAUAUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.09, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  62.45, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_52953.3,  6 NTs,                GGAAAC,score      -5.11, deficit  0.91, CutoffScore  58.80, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUUACC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -7.64, deficit  3.92, CutoffScore  30.44, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGUAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -7.85, deficit  1.75, CutoffScore  49.97, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAGUUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.56, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
GUCUCGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -10.28, deficit  2.05, CutoffScore  46.86, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAACCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -7.96, deficit  1.52, CutoffScore  60.61, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AAAACCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_62934.1,  6 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.37, deficit  1.93, CutoffScore  48.09, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
CAGCGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -6.84, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  33.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUCUGA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.74, deficit  0.50, CutoffScore  63.13, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCGUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.89, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  25.28, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGAGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -7.93, deficit  3.46, CutoffScore  32.02, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAGGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -8.94, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  16.25, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  86.40, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGUGUGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.59, deficit  3.65, CutoffScore  30.00, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUGAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.46, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  32.97, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCCUGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.12, deficit  1.65, CutoffScore  19.48, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAGGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.06, deficit  0.66, CutoffScore  29.86, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAAUAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.21, deficit  0.65, CutoffScore  61.54, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
UAACGAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.65, deficit  2.52, CutoffScore  41.93, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGUUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67667.2,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -5.01, deficit  0.62, CutoffScore  66.15, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAUUAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -7.62, deficit  2.10, CutoffScore  46.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.04, deficit -0.36, CutoffScore  40.62, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUGUUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.80, deficit  1.33, CutoffScore  54.42, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGAACCA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -7.98, deficit  1.88, CutoffScore  48.64, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCCACCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -11.01, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  44.41, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUCAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.80, deficit  3.46, CutoffScore  73.90, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
AUCCGAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -8.18, deficit  2.51, CutoffScore  41.95, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
AGAUUUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.45, deficit  3.52, CutoffScore  62.96, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GCUUAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.44, deficit  0.85, CutoffScore  65.22, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUUCACU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.45, deficit  0.05, CutoffScore  67.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCGUCGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -9.06, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  64.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUUGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -6.99, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  66.93, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUGAGAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -8.09, deficit  3.62, CutoffScore  30.33, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUGGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -8.59, deficit  2.34, CutoffScore  44.99, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAAUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.98, deficit  4.22, CutoffScore  56.03, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCCCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -9.30, deficit  2.83, CutoffScore  38.63, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAGAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -7.85, deficit  2.10, CutoffScore  46.31, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUUUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -10.78, deficit  4.85, CutoffScore  48.99, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.80, deficit  1.33, CutoffScore  54.42, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUCCUUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.42, deficit -0.37, CutoffScore  40.75, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCUUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -7.19, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  29.27, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AAGAAUU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.57, deficit  0.01, CutoffScore  68.35, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
CAAAUGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.61, deficit  0.94, CutoffScore  26.96, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGAACGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.38, deficit  1.94, CutoffScore  47.96, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.08, deficit  6.32, CutoffScore  34.08, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.09, deficit  2.00, CutoffScore  47.40, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGAAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -6.84, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  33.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUAUAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.35, deficit  6.59, CutoffScore  31.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGAGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -7.85, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUUCAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -7.17, deficit  2.73, CutoffScore  53.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CAAUGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.22, deficit  0.66, CutoffScore  29.92, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F                               
CUAAAACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -8.93, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore  29.30, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAUCCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.60, deficit  1.87, CutoffScore  24.03, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUCCGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_00914.1,  6 NTs,              GGUCAAAC,score      -8.24, deficit  2.76, CutoffScore  21.81, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAGUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.90, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  35.15, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
UAGAAAAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.24, deficit  0.67, CutoffScore  61.41, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUGCUAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.92, deficit  2.42, CutoffScore  37.63, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CUUAAGUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -6.32, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.27, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAUAAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -6.45, deficit  1.66, CutoffScore  61.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCGGGGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score      -8.31, deficit -0.41, CutoffScore  51.82, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGGCAACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_85993.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -6.53, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  66.25, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UCAGAACA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -8.12, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  20.55, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAUGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -10.43, deficit  4.00, CutoffScore  21.99, ed  3, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GGUUUUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.25, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  37.14, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGCCGGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.03, deficit  1.65, CutoffScore  19.52, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAUCUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -7.95, deficit  5.21, CutoffScore  10.00, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGUCAUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -9.39, deficit  3.60, CutoffScore  38.37, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
AUCUUCCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.14, deficit  5.71, CutoffScore  25.93, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAACAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score     -10.88, deficit  4.75, CutoffScore  18.42, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUAAAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -8.66, deficit  2.41, CutoffScore  75.15, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCUCACGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -10.47, deficit  3.40, CutoffScore  33.36, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CACUGCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.01, deficit  5.58, CutoffScore  26.74, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCAUCCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -14.23, deficit  8.67, CutoffScore  17.78, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
UAGCAGGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -13.02, deficit  3.29, CutoffScore  24.33, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAUAAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score     -11.17, deficit  5.16, CutoffScore  34.47, ed  3, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
GGUUUCCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.25, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  37.14, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AUUGUUCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -9.49, deficit  3.44, CutoffScore  32.20, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCAGGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.12, deficit  1.42, CutoffScore  41.30, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
GGGUUAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.94, deficit  1.92, CutoffScore  27.32, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CUACGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score      -9.42, deficit  4.68, CutoffScore  25.04, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUACUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -12.17, deficit  4.78, CutoffScore  18.10, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCGAGUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score     -11.05, deficit  6.06, CutoffScore  21.86, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAUUGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.37, deficit  3.74, CutoffScore  44.41, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
AUAAAACU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -8.93, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  29.21, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCAAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.39, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGACGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score     -10.70, deficit  4.23, CutoffScore  23.85, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CACGUCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.17, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  71.07, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CAUUCAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score     -10.33, deficit  1.62, CutoffScore   8.51, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUACGAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.90, deficit  6.80, CutoffScore  32.18, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAAUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.94, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  52.08, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUAUUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.89, deficit  3.07, CutoffScore   8.31, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCAAAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.92, deficit  1.91, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AAAACAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -5.08, deficit  2.35, CutoffScore  81.16, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUGUUACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -10.51, deficit  2.43, CutoffScore  25.27, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUUUUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -5.35, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  69.40, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
AGACCAGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.06, deficit  0.60, CutoffScore  62.16, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAUGAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -6.98, deficit  4.25, CutoffScore  41.82, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCAAGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -8.79, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  20.12, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAAGGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.11, deficit  2.66, CutoffScore  40.37, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAGGUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -7.59, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  46.85, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAUGGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score     -10.29, deficit  2.55, CutoffScore  17.43, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAACUCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -10.98, deficit  4.48, CutoffScore  28.22, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAUAACGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -11.04, deficit  5.74, CutoffScore  34.25, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAAGAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -9.80, deficit  5.17, CutoffScore  30.46, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
GCAGGAUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.48, deficit  5.66, CutoffScore   7.28, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CGAAUCAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  43.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCUUAUAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_33983.1,  7 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -7.67, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  70.52, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCGAAGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score     -11.13, deficit  3.63, CutoffScore  40.42, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGUAAAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -8.50, deficit  2.93, CutoffScore  33.53, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AUUGUAAAU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -7.69, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  68.93, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
AAGAAUUAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.99, deficit  3.25, CutoffScore  19.80, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGGUGACAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.57, deficit  4.22, CutoffScore  19.25, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
CGAUGUCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.07, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  44.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUAAAUGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -8.51, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  34.20, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCAUUGGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.80, deficit  5.45, CutoffScore  30.05, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
UAUCAAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -11.68, deficit  1.28, CutoffScore  54.92, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCUGAUGGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_33983.1,  7 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -8.84, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  40.50, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAGGUUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score     -12.38, deficit  7.64, CutoffScore  25.33, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAGUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -12.15, deficit  6.85, CutoffScore  11.25, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCAAAAUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -9.51, deficit  4.72, CutoffScore  35.47, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUGCAUUAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.99, deficit  3.25, CutoffScore  19.80, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCCUCCACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -8.24, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  49.15, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAACGGCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -10.72, deficit  0.99, CutoffScore  43.06, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCCUGAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24792.1,  6 NTs,            GCCCGUUAUC,score     -13.02, deficit  6.60, CutoffScore  12.13, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F-F                           
CGUUAAGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -9.71, deficit  4.54, CutoffScore  18.10, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CACCAAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -9.53, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  29.02, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAAAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -11.98, deficit  3.06, CutoffScore   6.56, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
CUAACGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score      -9.77, deficit  5.03, CutoffScore  22.58, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAUCGUGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -10.12, deficit  2.78, CutoffScore  46.39, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
GGCCACUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.81, deficit  5.43, CutoffScore   6.27, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAUGCGAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06059.6,  9 NTs,             CUUCCCAAG,score     -10.09, deficit  5.34, CutoffScore  37.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGGCGAAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.09, deficit  4.80, CutoffScore  35.01, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAUUUGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.13, deficit  5.76, CutoffScore  21.57, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UCAAAGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.40, deficit  3.83, CutoffScore  26.82, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCACCAACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -10.36, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  12.84, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAGUCAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.90, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  15.11, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUUAUAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -12.03, deficit  5.53, CutoffScore   0.50, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGGCAGGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -13.55, deficit  8.53, CutoffScore  17.17, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
AUCUAUAUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -9.42, deficit  4.12, CutoffScore  26.54, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUAGGCUGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -10.36, deficit  5.02, CutoffScore  18.25, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
UCAAAAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -8.39, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore   4.57, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUUUCUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.23, deficit  4.86, CutoffScore  10.01, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAAACAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.61, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
AGAGAAUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.20, deficit  0.45, CutoffScore   7.52, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UAUUACAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06059.6,  9 NTs,             CUUCCCAAG,score     -10.66, deficit  5.91, CutoffScore  33.10, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAAGAGCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -12.09, deficit  7.08, CutoffScore  25.45, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
CGGAAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -13.43, deficit  4.09, CutoffScore  24.48, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGCCCGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -10.15, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  43.99, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
CGUUAAGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.25, deficit  2.89, CutoffScore  40.73, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUGAUGCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -12.69, deficit  2.94, CutoffScore  12.52, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUUUAACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.55, deficit  3.94, CutoffScore  18.86, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAAAAGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score      -9.01, deficit -0.33, CutoffScore  80.00, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAAAAAGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.80, deficit  1.89, CutoffScore  44.19, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GACUCCCAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.55, deficit  2.46, CutoffScore  12.20, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CUAAUUGGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -13.19, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  43.63, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWW                                 
CUGGUGAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score      -9.75, deficit  2.87, CutoffScore  47.84, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUUCGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.64, deficit  5.49, CutoffScore  23.65, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGCAAAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.64, deficit  1.89, CutoffScore  22.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGAAUCUAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -13.35, deficit  4.00, CutoffScore   2.64, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAACGAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score      -9.32, deficit -0.02, CutoffScore  55.26, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGAAGGAAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.37, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  49.42, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UCAGAGAUUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -10.05, deficit  1.98, CutoffScore  33.40, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAAUGAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.19, deficit  3.05, CutoffScore  39.88, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUGAGUUAGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.69, deficit  4.11, CutoffScore  28.78, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCAAGCGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -16.96, deficit  9.67, CutoffScore   5.72, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAUUUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.44, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  46.85, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAUCAAAUUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -11.53, deficit  7.25, CutoffScore  26.11, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CGAGAGCUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -14.44, deficit  6.36, CutoffScore   6.79, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGUUCAUCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.65, deficit  5.27, CutoffScore   7.28, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUCCAGCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score     -12.59, deficit  6.08, CutoffScore  22.86, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
GAAGAAGCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -10.36, deficit  5.34, CutoffScore  35.37, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
CACAGAAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.14, deficit  2.23, CutoffScore  41.77, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CAAAAAAUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.95, deficit  5.14, CutoffScore  29.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GUAAUGAUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.77, deficit  4.95, CutoffScore  49.71, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
AUUUUGAAUU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -12.82, deficit  3.27, CutoffScore  60.62, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGCAAAGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.69, deficit  4.40, CutoffScore  55.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAGGUUCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.96, deficit  4.82, CutoffScore  11.71, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GUCAGGGAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.63, deficit  3.04, CutoffScore  36.26, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAGAUCGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -12.22, deficit  5.77, CutoffScore   7.84, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCGAGAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -16.28, deficit  8.20, CutoffScore  13.03, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCAUAAUUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -12.86, deficit  2.46, CutoffScore  10.94, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGACACAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -11.27, deficit  5.93, CutoffScore   8.98, ed  4, 4 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAAAAAGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.92, deficit  2.00, CutoffScore  43.36, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GUAUCCCAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -11.40, deficit  2.49, CutoffScore  57.48, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW                                 
UUAUCGUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -14.07, deficit  5.82, CutoffScore  27.25, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CAAUGGUUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -9.22, deficit  2.09, CutoffScore  48.34, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CUUCAAAAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -8.98, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  31.57, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGACUUUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -13.71, deficit  5.64, CutoffScore   2.56, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCUUAAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -12.17, deficit  7.54, CutoffScore  17.04, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUUUUGAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -12.99, deficit  4.25, CutoffScore  21.59, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAUGUUUAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.06, deficit  1.91, CutoffScore  27.51, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUGGGAUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -8.91, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  48.58, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAGUGUGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -13.00, deficit  4.23, CutoffScore  43.89, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UUAUGUUCAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -14.11, deficit  6.98, CutoffScore  17.10, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
UUCAAUUGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -14.40, deficit  9.10, CutoffScore  15.45, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGUCUCUAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -12.04, deficit  6.46, CutoffScore  18.25, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUUUCGAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.12, deficit  2.50, CutoffScore  27.87, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGAAAAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.15, deficit  6.37, CutoffScore   8.15, ed  4, 4 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
GGCUAAUGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -12.74, deficit  3.40, CutoffScore  29.62, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAGUCGACAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -10.03, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  54.54, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GCAGACAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -11.57, deficit  2.63, CutoffScore   8.93, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAAAACUAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.14, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  39.07, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCGCUAUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -12.99, deficit  8.64, CutoffScore  26.78, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
GGAUAGCAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.23, deficit  5.61, CutoffScore   8.36, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGGUGGGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -12.50, deficit  5.62, CutoffScore  14.01, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
AGGUCGUGGAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04642.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -14.94, deficit  7.07, CutoffScore  10.42, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAGGAUGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -13.14, deficit  2.89, CutoffScore   9.03, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CAACUUAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -17.05, deficit  8.97, CutoffScore   9.13, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGCAGGGGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -13.84, deficit  4.29, CutoffScore  16.54, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUUCAGCAAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.59, deficit  6.51, CutoffScore  21.58, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAAUUAAAUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_23509.1, 11 NTs,          GAAUUCAUUUUC,score     -11.06, deficit  5.60, CutoffScore  12.01, ed  4, 4 cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUAUUCAGGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -14.36, deficit  5.48, CutoffScore  19.56, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCGAAAACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -15.48, deficit  7.40, CutoffScore  17.07, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGUUCGAUCUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.40, deficit  1.78, CutoffScore  51.19, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCAGGUGUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.39, deficit  7.40, CutoffScore   8.93, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGCUUCCCGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -13.71, deficit  4.84, CutoffScore   6.47, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AAUGCGCUGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_23115.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -10.66, deficit  3.95, CutoffScore  31.95, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCGUGUGUAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -12.74, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  18.63, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAUGGAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -13.03, deficit  4.77, CutoffScore  13.46, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
AGGUGAAACUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -15.91, deficit  7.60, CutoffScore  29.15, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCCUCCAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -12.27, deficit  4.46, CutoffScore   3.84, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
AUAGGGUGUUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -11.67, deficit  2.12, CutoffScore  30.14, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCGAUAGUACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -13.72, deficit  4.32, CutoffScore   8.14, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAGGGCCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -12.15, deficit  2.60, CutoffScore  45.98, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCCGAGAAGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -10.34, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  43.06, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUAUGGUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -13.00, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore   0.00, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGACUCAAUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -15.80, deficit  6.50, CutoffScore  24.38, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
GGAAAAUAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -11.14, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  41.67, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCAAUCUGUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -14.64, deficit  5.64, CutoffScore  19.15, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGCUUUAAGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -12.27, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  25.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGAUUUUUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -13.10, deficit  5.81, CutoffScore  10.15, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F                         
UAGAUUACGGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41902.1, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.31, deficit  6.69, CutoffScore   6.56, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUCGUCACGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -14.84, deficit 10.21, CutoffScore   3.66, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAACGGUUAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_07480.2,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score      -9.36, deficit  2.12, CutoffScore  72.76, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
GUUUUAAAUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -7.80, deficit  1.14, CutoffScore  57.66, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CUCGUAUGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.42, deficit  5.38, CutoffScore  17.18, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCAGAAGUAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_23010.1,  8 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -10.60, deficit  2.79, CutoffScore  30.47, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCCAACUUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -17.42, deficit  8.65, CutoffScore   3.15, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CCAAUAAAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -14.38, deficit  6.46, CutoffScore  11.80, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GCUAAACAAUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.59, deficit  4.48, CutoffScore   1.39, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAGAUUUGACUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -17.15, deficit  8.10, CutoffScore   1.50, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUCGCGCUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -15.80, deficit  7.27, CutoffScore   1.19, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUAUAACCGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.02, deficit  6.24, CutoffScore   8.78, ed  4, 4 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CCUCCAGAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -12.93, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  23.72, ed  3, 3 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAGGAGUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.86, deficit  6.79, CutoffScore   3.08, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GAAGGUGCAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -15.06, deficit  7.29, CutoffScore  10.31, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAUGUGGUCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -14.54, deficit  3.77, CutoffScore  17.56, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAACAGUGAGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.81, deficit  6.73, CutoffScore   5.27, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGUACCGCGUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -16.22, deficit  9.10, CutoffScore   7.54, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUUCCAAAGUGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -15.75, deficit  7.68, CutoffScore   0.51, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAUUGAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -12.73, deficit  6.44, CutoffScore   0.64, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGUAGCACGCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_15118.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.03, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  16.66, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGUACUUGAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -12.44, deficit  2.43, CutoffScore  24.64, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAAAUAACACUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23509.1, 11 NTs,          GAAUUCAUUUUC,score      -9.18, deficit  3.73, CutoffScore   6.37, ed  5, 5 cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UUACGCCAUUUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.92, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore   5.41, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGCGCGCCUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.22, deficit  3.11, CutoffScore   9.57, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAAUCUGUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.50, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore   7.90, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCUGAAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -14.63, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  10.91, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CUGAAUUCGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -15.68, deficit  2.46, CutoffScore   3.48, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GUUGGGAAGUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -15.19, deficit  4.41, CutoffScore  14.18, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UGAAUUGAUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.26, deficit  5.60, CutoffScore  34.46, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
AGGGCGUGUGAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_23115.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -16.54, deficit  9.82, CutoffScore   1.08, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAUAAAAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.42, deficit  6.34, CutoffScore   7.24, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAUGAAUUAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -12.65, deficit  4.32, CutoffScore   8.44, ed  4, 4 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCAUACAUGUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23509.1, 11 NTs,          GAAUUCAUUUUC,score     -14.47, deficit  9.02, CutoffScore   9.92, ed  3, 3 cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUUUCCAAACCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_15118.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.03, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  16.66, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UUUAUUCAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.78, deficit  8.13, CutoffScore  34.03, ed  2, 1 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
GGAAGUCAAGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -12.56, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore   8.54, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUAUCGAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -17.50, deficit 10.85, CutoffScore   0.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
GAGCCGUGAGACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -12.74, deficit  6.01, CutoffScore   9.94, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGAAGAAAUAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.67, deficit  6.60, CutoffScore   4.08, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CGUUGACAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -11.62, deficit  3.36, CutoffScore   3.51, ed  5, 4 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
AGGACCCCGAAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.99, deficit  7.21, CutoffScore  18.93, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
GGAAUCGAUCGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -12.31, deficit  4.02, CutoffScore  46.97, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
UUGAUAAGGAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.05, deficit  6.27, CutoffScore   8.64, ed  4, 4 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
GUUAAUGUCAUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -16.19, deficit  2.96, CutoffScore   0.13, ed  5, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CUAAACGUUAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.42, deficit  7.35, CutoffScore  31.18, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CUUGAAUAAGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -16.51, deficit  4.36, CutoffScore  21.70, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GACCAGGAAAUGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.44, deficit  4.70, CutoffScore   6.37, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
AGCAUAAAAGUCAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.36, deficit  4.96, CutoffScore  12.22, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CGUGGAAAGGGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98870.1, 11 NTs,     CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG,score     -17.16, deficit  7.86, CutoffScore  16.38, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F                   
ACAAGUCUCGCGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -15.51, deficit  1.38, CutoffScore  37.77, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CACGCGGAAUUGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.2, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -18.30, deficit  9.68, CutoffScore   3.16, ed  4, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
CGACAAGAGAAGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73183.1, 14 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -13.73, deficit  3.51, CutoffScore  20.28, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F           
GGUAGACAAUGUGGAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85461.1, 15 NTs,  GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC,score     -22.94, deficit  8.00, CutoffScore   8.01, ed  5, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F           
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 92.0000	 10.0000	  0.0000
[11 11]	 86.0000	  8.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 60.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 18.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	 10.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 90.0000	 86.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 90.0000	 42.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 90.0000	 50.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 40.0000	 14.0000
[8 8]	100.0000	 24.0000	  8.0000
[9 9]	 98.0000	  6.0000	  0.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  47 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence  88 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence 121 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence 123 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence 202 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence 227 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence 227 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 248 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence 249 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence 251 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence 254 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence 267 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 271 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence 272 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 293 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 315 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 322 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 327 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 329 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 343 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 352 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 370 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 372 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 395 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 412 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 413 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 425 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 434 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 482 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 496 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 501 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 505 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 535 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 553 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 589 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 612 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 641 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 667 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 697 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 715 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 741 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 813 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 815 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 849 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 869 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 882 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 969 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 1025 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 1026 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 1054 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 1217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 1231 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 1390 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 1394 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 1489 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 1523 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 1646 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 1668 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 2.3846%
Number of models giving false positives is 237 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     0.55
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     0.98
