Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_2.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=CUAG FASTA(n).Sequence=CUAG
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:23:27
Evaluating how sequences fit models
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.30, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  88.40, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.19, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  79.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUCA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.98, deficit  0.97, CutoffScore  89.83, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.54, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.19, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  79.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score     -10.13, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  37.67, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.38, deficit  2.17, CutoffScore  45.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AAUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.89, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  59.21, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.16, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  43.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -6.34, deficit  2.15, CutoffScore  77.36, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.44, deficit  5.24, CutoffScore  44.89, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.19, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  79.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.30, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  88.40, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.50, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.49, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  88.68, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.60, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.28, deficit  2.08, CutoffScore  78.07, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.24, deficit  1.04, CutoffScore  89.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.19, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.32, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UCUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -9.15, deficit  4.03, CutoffScore  57.63, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAUA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.79, deficit  1.78, CutoffScore  81.31, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -4.32, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
GUUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.81, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.51, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UGACA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  34.93, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.65, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.89, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.25, deficit  2.05, CutoffScore  78.39, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGCUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.85, CutoffScore  59.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -4.95, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  95.61, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.35, CutoffScore  64.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUCGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.88, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.99, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.50, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore  63.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CACGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGUUA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.33, deficit  0.21, CutoffScore  66.24, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UCCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -8.76, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  37.73, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -6.55, deficit  1.25, CutoffScore  23.73, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -3.30, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.98, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UACGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.98, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  34.74, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUAUA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.91, deficit -0.21, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.50, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  75.74, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.35, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.67, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  68.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.61, deficit  1.60, CutoffScore  83.19, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -4.32, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
GUGUC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  97.91, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.37, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  34.79, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAUAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.28, CutoffScore  97.06, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -6.19, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.29, deficit -0.01, CutoffScore  68.56, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUGGA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.39, deficit  2.45, CutoffScore  74.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.16, CutoffScore  66.68, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UCUAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.17, deficit  2.05, CutoffScore  78.42, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.89, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.35, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAUCC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.00, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore  60.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.35, CutoffScore  64.72, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, CutoffScore  70.35, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGCGAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -6.59, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.66, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUUAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.02, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  88.60, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGUCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.02, deficit  1.89, CutoffScore  48.48, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGACGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.49, deficit  7.73, CutoffScore  19.40, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.28, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  66.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUAAAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.39, deficit  0.29, CutoffScore  65.35, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAUGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.17, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  55.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAACC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score     -10.00, deficit  7.61, CutoffScore  32.61, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
AUCAAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.56, deficit  6.80, CutoffScore  29.15, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAUGUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.76, deficit  0.82, CutoffScore  59.75, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
ACGAAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -8.36, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.72, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.48, deficit  1.00, CutoffScore  57.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGGGUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.52, deficit -0.40, CutoffScore  72.62, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
CCAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.66, deficit  3.90, CutoffScore  59.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAGCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.77, deficit  1.67, CutoffScore  82.39, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.07, deficit  4.31, CutoffScore  55.09, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCACAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.24, deficit  0.56, CutoffScore  62.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUAAGU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.50, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  57.65, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCCGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -7.08, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  60.93, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAGUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.36, deficit -0.24, CutoffScore  70.98, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -5.37, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  75.19, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.82, deficit  5.42, CutoffScore  51.99, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
UUUUAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.11, deficit  0.63, CutoffScore  61.78, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUAGG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.64, deficit  4.88, CutoffScore  49.18, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAGCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -6.87, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  43.20, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGUCAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_56676.1,  6 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -5.21, deficit  0.74, CutoffScore  60.66, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_52953.3,  6 NTs,                GGAAAC,score      -5.78, deficit  1.57, CutoffScore  83.43, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUAAAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.30, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.21, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUGGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.72, deficit -0.51, CutoffScore  73.80, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUAAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -7.75, deficit  2.23, CutoffScore  44.99, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.47, deficit  6.71, CutoffScore  30.06, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAGCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -6.91, deficit  2.44, CutoffScore  42.78, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGGCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.73, deficit  2.63, CutoffScore  40.75, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAACAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.03, deficit  2.09, CutoffScore  78.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.48, deficit  1.00, CutoffScore  57.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.31, deficit  3.29, CutoffScore  33.76, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUAAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  0.09, CutoffScore  67.44, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUAUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.93, deficit  3.73, CutoffScore  60.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCAUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.87, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  62.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CACAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.63, deficit  0.50, CutoffScore  63.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.28, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  98.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAACC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score     -10.00, deficit  7.61, CutoffScore  32.61, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGAUGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_52953.3,  6 NTs,                GGAAAC,score      -5.11, deficit  0.91, CutoffScore  58.80, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
ACCGAGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -10.53, deficit  1.80, CutoffScore  17.87, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGUGUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -8.82, deficit  0.76, CutoffScore  60.43, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUUACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -7.26, deficit  3.54, CutoffScore  34.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCACAAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.71, deficit  1.12, CutoffScore  62.79, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.23, deficit  1.78, CutoffScore  49.67, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUUUUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.61, deficit  2.68, CutoffScore  71.81, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAAUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.68, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  52.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AAAACCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_62934.1,  6 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.37, deficit  1.93, CutoffScore  48.09, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
CUGGGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score     -11.29, deficit  6.53, CutoffScore  23.85, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CCAUGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -6.49, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  71.72, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCGACU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score     -10.56, deficit  2.16, CutoffScore  14.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAUGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.48, deficit  5.72, CutoffScore  40.39, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCUGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  36.84, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUUGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.21, deficit  1.57, CutoffScore  87.02, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
GGACACC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -12.75, deficit  6.82, CutoffScore  28.24, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCGUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -8.01, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  55.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AGUGCAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.47, deficit  1.07, CutoffScore  25.54, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AUAAGGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.59, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.29, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAGUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.86, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  37.64, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUGUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.20, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  76.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -7.20, deficit  0.95, CutoffScore  59.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUUAUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -8.78, deficit  2.53, CutoffScore  43.00, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUCCAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score     -10.63, deficit  4.17, CutoffScore  56.15, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUGAGUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -7.20, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  50.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGGACAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -8.08, deficit  1.98, CutoffScore  47.58, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCAACCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_62934.1,  6 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -9.50, deficit  4.06, CutoffScore  25.66, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
UGUUCUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -8.34, deficit  0.29, CutoffScore  65.40, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGCGAUA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.44, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  31.86, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CUCCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -8.41, deficit  5.07, CutoffScore  39.08, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
CACCCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.79, deficit  1.77, CutoffScore  28.69, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CGAGAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.16, deficit  6.40, CutoffScore  33.26, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAAGCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -5.81, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  66.06, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUCGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.91, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  67.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAUGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -8.00, deficit  2.56, CutoffScore  41.44, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UAGACCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -7.84, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  49.58, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAUUCCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.20, deficit  1.48, CutoffScore  85.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAGCAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.50, deficit  3.15, CutoffScore  30.88, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
GUACUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.91, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  35.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CAUUUUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -7.30, deficit -0.52, CutoffScore  74.91, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAUACG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_59735.5,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.77, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  53.38, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUGUGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.02, deficit -0.21, CutoffScore  39.10, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGGUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67667.2,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.96, deficit  2.56, CutoffScore  19.90, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAAACG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.64, deficit  0.63, CutoffScore  61.80, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUCGUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.89, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUCUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.51, deficit  2.87, CutoffScore  51.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
CGUUAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -8.32, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  57.40, ed  1, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
ACGCUAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -7.98, deficit  4.63, CutoffScore  42.34, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
GGGAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -9.22, deficit  3.47, CutoffScore  31.90, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCUGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -8.09, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  28.28, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAGCAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.98, deficit  4.58, CutoffScore  32.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
UGAGAUUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.21, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  32.79, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCGCCAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.73, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UCAAACAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -6.52, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  60.46, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GACGAGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -10.68, deficit  2.66, CutoffScore  48.08, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GGGAAAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.24, deficit  0.66, CutoffScore  61.44, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAUAAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score     -11.17, deficit  5.16, CutoffScore  34.47, ed  3, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
ACAAAAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -5.43, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  69.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCAAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score     -10.25, deficit  4.01, CutoffScore  27.84, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGACCAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.68, deficit  1.21, CutoffScore  87.23, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAUUCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -8.35, deficit  1.86, CutoffScore  25.87, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAACAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -6.29, deficit  3.55, CutoffScore  47.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAUGGGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score     -10.72, deficit  3.24, CutoffScore  45.76, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGGAUUUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -10.49, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  53.79, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGAAUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.82, deficit  1.25, CutoffScore  23.69, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAUGGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -14.55, deficit  7.21, CutoffScore  37.65, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
AAAAUUUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -6.52, deficit  0.47, CutoffScore  31.94, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGGUGAGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -13.17, deficit  4.43, CutoffScore  20.25, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCCUUUUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -11.20, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  28.44, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAACAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -4.37, deficit  0.45, CutoffScore  72.51, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAGGCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score     -11.26, deficit  6.51, CutoffScore  12.16, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGACAACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -9.60, deficit  3.14, CutoffScore  35.41, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGAUCUGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.49, deficit  2.85, CutoffScore  26.98, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
GUUUGAGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.53, deficit  3.14, CutoffScore  66.89, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAGGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -8.11, deficit  5.38, CutoffScore  32.74, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUGAGGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score     -11.96, deficit  3.56, CutoffScore  30.90, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
ACGUGUAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.56, deficit  0.74, CutoffScore  31.88, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGUUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -11.74, deficit  6.41, CutoffScore  27.67, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
GGCCGGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.77, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  43.34, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUGCGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.34, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  65.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -5.81, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  41.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAGAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -8.33, deficit  1.75, CutoffScore  18.39, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAUAAAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -6.34, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  71.08, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCAUCAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.18, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  49.60, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAGAUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.32, deficit  1.62, CutoffScore  39.73, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
GACAACGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.07, deficit  0.68, CutoffScore  29.71, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAUUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.43, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  53.39, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AAGAAAGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.99, deficit  2.55, CutoffScore  41.56, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGGGGCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.06, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  62.86, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
UGUAUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.94, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore   6.71, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAGGUACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.20, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  32.86, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAUGGAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -7.59, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  72.91, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GACAAGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.56, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.08, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUUCGACA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.04, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  61.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUGAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -6.24, deficit  0.45, CutoffScore  67.77, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGUAAUAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -8.81, deficit  2.57, CutoffScore  73.58, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGGUGUCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.20, deficit  1.47, CutoffScore  27.92, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAACUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -6.23, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  66.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGCGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -8.74, deficit  4.98, CutoffScore  12.91, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUUUCAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.68, deficit  1.86, CutoffScore  50.82, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAUUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.58, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  40.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAAAGUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.86, deficit  4.73, CutoffScore  31.46, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GAAACUCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.40, deficit  4.67, CutoffScore  10.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGAUAUGAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -6.85, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
ACGACGUCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -13.45, deficit  6.99, CutoffScore   0.19, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
ACUUAUGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -8.77, deficit  3.47, CutoffScore  63.79, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UCCAAAUGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93383.1,  9 NTs,             GCCCUAAGC,score     -14.37, deficit 10.90, CutoffScore   5.73, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UCAUCUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -14.31, deficit  4.58, CutoffScore  13.83, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUGGACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -8.68, deficit -0.06, CutoffScore  31.63, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGACGAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -9.43, deficit  4.68, CutoffScore  38.67, ed  2, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CGGUUGGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -9.64, deficit  2.51, CutoffScore  45.65, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
AGGGUUCAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.59, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  40.15, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UAAUGGCUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -9.64, deficit  2.50, CutoffScore  45.69, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CUCUAAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -16.11, deficit  8.82, CutoffScore  10.82, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCGGAAGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score      -7.66, deficit  2.64, CutoffScore  50.72, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
CUUUCUAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  46.54, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CGGAAUCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score      -9.55, deficit  2.17, CutoffScore  46.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGGUUGGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -9.88, deficit  2.74, CutoffScore  44.15, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CGGGAUUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.38, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  63.44, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUCUAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32735.2,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -14.06, deficit 10.43, CutoffScore   2.72, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGAUACAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.92, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  24.14, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
AUCAAAAUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -6.00, deficit  1.37, CutoffScore  35.43, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CAAGCUGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.82, deficit  5.45, CutoffScore  23.64, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUGGAAAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score      -9.52, deficit  1.50, CutoffScore  58.70, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCAAAUGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.96, deficit  5.14, CutoffScore  29.55, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GUGGAGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score      -9.15, deficit  4.14, CutoffScore  25.12, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
GAGACUAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.97, deficit  3.23, CutoffScore  19.94, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AAAAUAGGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.97, deficit  6.61, CutoffScore  15.94, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUUACAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -7.59, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  69.64, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CAAAGAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -9.77, deficit  4.86, CutoffScore  36.44, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGGAAGGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.82, deficit  2.07, CutoffScore  20.99, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCAUCGGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -13.83, deficit  6.44, CutoffScore   0.60, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GACAAACGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -8.46, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  30.16, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUGGGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.61, deficit  6.51, CutoffScore  33.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GAAUCCCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -11.34, deficit  1.60, CutoffScore  38.07, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAUGAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -10.21, deficit  2.86, CutoffScore  27.55, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
CAUAAAUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -11.59, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  55.94, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUUGAAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.52, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  48.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAUUGAAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_28252.8,  9 NTs,             GUUCAAGUC,score      -8.81, deficit  6.45, CutoffScore  18.99, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUUGUAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -8.87, deficit  0.62, CutoffScore  45.37, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CGGUUAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score      -9.41, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  49.95, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUGCCCACA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.95, deficit  4.38, CutoffScore  25.00, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
UGCAUCAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -14.99, deficit  6.90, CutoffScore   3.47, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GUUCGAACC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -4.70, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  75.59, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CGACGAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -16.57, deficit  7.28, CutoffScore   1.56, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
CUGGUUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -9.14, deficit  1.06, CutoffScore  10.83, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGGGUGGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score      -8.24, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  47.44, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
GAAGAUUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.45, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  39.43, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGCAAAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.60, deficit  0.85, CutoffScore  32.97, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGUACCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score      -7.86, deficit  0.48, CutoffScore  57.88, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGGAUAUAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -13.37, deficit  8.01, CutoffScore  26.59, ed  2, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUUAGAUGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -10.30, deficit  5.49, CutoffScore  36.48, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAGCAGUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -11.26, deficit  6.63, CutoffScore   6.56, ed  4, 4 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCAAAUAGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  24.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCAAUCGCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -11.34, deficit  5.76, CutoffScore   6.10, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUUGAAGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_28252.8,  9 NTs,             GUUCAAGUC,score     -18.88, deficit 16.52, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUGUCAUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -10.08, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  25.50, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAAAGAUAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.43, deficit  1.09, CutoffScore  24.48, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUAAACUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.46, deficit  7.12, CutoffScore  33.38, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAUGAAGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -11.12, deficit  4.67, CutoffScore  14.69, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGCUGAACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -11.39, deficit  3.07, CutoffScore  39.35, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAGUUGAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.93, deficit  4.79, CutoffScore  31.07, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CGGAAUCCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -14.11, deficit  8.52, CutoffScore   7.33, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAUUUCGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -11.79, deficit  5.60, CutoffScore  22.20, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
GCGGAGCUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -12.05, deficit  3.98, CutoffScore  21.25, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAAUGCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -13.03, deficit  4.50, CutoffScore  18.03, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGUUAACCAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -10.58, deficit  4.99, CutoffScore  26.02, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGCAAGAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.54, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore  30.97, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGGCACAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score      -9.88, deficit  1.80, CutoffScore  52.65, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUUGAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28252.8,  9 NTs,             GUUCAAGUC,score     -15.47, deficit 13.10, CutoffScore  14.70, ed  2, 0 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUAUGCCAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -12.82, deficit  4.29, CutoffScore  37.54, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAUAGUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.07, deficit  1.32, CutoffScore  28.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUGACGGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_58224.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.09, deficit  5.40, CutoffScore  17.70, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAAUAGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.34, deficit  4.96, CutoffScore   9.31, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUAAAAAAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.40, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  24.73, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGCGUAUCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -13.19, deficit  5.81, CutoffScore   3.80, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAAGAGUAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.27, deficit  5.50, CutoffScore  20.43, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGGGGUUGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.59, deficit  4.01, CutoffScore   8.34, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCGUUCCGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -12.15, deficit  5.96, CutoffScore  20.28, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
CAGAACCAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.03, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  19.52, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUCCCCUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score     -15.60, deficit  9.08, CutoffScore  22.83, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
UGGUAGGCGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -13.62, deficit  3.87, CutoffScore  32.74, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUUAUAAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.18, deficit  6.53, CutoffScore  25.71, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
UGGGGGAGCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -10.44, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  49.26, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCUUUGUGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -13.63, deficit  5.56, CutoffScore  11.68, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCGUGUUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -12.86, deficit  6.68, CutoffScore   0.48, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
GUAUCAUAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -11.97, deficit  7.63, CutoffScore  31.85, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
GACGAGCGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.39, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore   9.75, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UCACAAUCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -14.80, deficit  9.46, CutoffScore   6.25, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUAAACUUUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -11.49, deficit  7.21, CutoffScore   9.61, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GUUGAAUGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  54.66, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAAAAUUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.55, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  33.37, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCAAUCAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.67, deficit  2.59, CutoffScore  29.67, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CUUCAAAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.12, deficit  4.83, CutoffScore  16.75, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCAAAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.81, deficit  6.53, CutoffScore  30.11, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GAAGUAGUAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -13.14, deficit  4.37, CutoffScore  26.64, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GUAAGAUGAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.56, deficit  5.51, CutoffScore  16.42, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAGUAAGAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.98, deficit  3.94, CutoffScore   7.90, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
CGCCGAAUACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.87, deficit  5.26, CutoffScore  10.60, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUCGGUUAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -16.49, deficit  7.05, CutoffScore   4.46, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
CUAGCGUCAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -10.89, deficit  2.12, CutoffScore  38.99, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GUGAAAAGGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score      -9.32, deficit  4.09, CutoffScore  49.56, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGCCGGUCGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -16.53, deficit  8.46, CutoffScore   3.54, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAGGAAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.84, deficit  6.59, CutoffScore   2.07, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CGUCGCUAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score     -12.90, deficit  6.38, CutoffScore  21.29, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
AAAAGCGAGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -16.44, deficit  9.36, CutoffScore   6.31, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCGUGGCGCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -11.00, deficit  4.12, CutoffScore   5.22, ed  4, 4 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GGAUCUAAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -11.30, deficit  3.04, CutoffScore  24.32, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GUUCGUGCGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.30, deficit  4.32, CutoffScore  26.05, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AGUCAGACCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -12.57, deficit  4.49, CutoffScore  16.60, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGGACGUCGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -14.14, deficit  7.02, CutoffScore  18.12, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAGUCUACCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -12.55, deficit  3.61, CutoffScore  21.52, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAGUAAAUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -12.66, deficit  4.40, CutoffScore  15.83, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
UAUAGUGGUUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -14.55, deficit  6.73, CutoffScore  25.62, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGGUUCGUUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.36, deficit  2.74, CutoffScore   7.55, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCAAAAAUCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.70, deficit  5.63, CutoffScore   9.07, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CGAGCCUUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -12.26, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore  15.03, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CCAAAAAGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.16, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore   9.44, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCGGGACAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -14.49, deficit  6.41, CutoffScore   6.48, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
AGUGAUAUGAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.84, deficit  3.54, CutoffScore  24.14, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
CUGCUUUAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.23, deficit  3.18, CutoffScore  29.83, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CACUCAUCACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score     -10.17, deficit  3.65, CutoffScore  19.89, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
GGUGCAACAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -14.56, deficit  9.48, CutoffScore  12.13, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAUUUUUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -12.48, deficit  5.18, CutoffScore  13.93, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F                         
CCUUCAAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -8.18, deficit  1.53, CutoffScore  37.60, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CGUUCUAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.26, deficit  3.65, CutoffScore  20.67, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUCCUCAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score      -9.32, deficit  2.80, CutoffScore  54.96, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
GCACGGCGUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -13.08, deficit  5.96, CutoffScore  23.55, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCCGAUCACUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -14.36, deficit  6.28, CutoffScore   7.28, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CUUUAAAAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -7.51, deficit  0.86, CutoffScore  41.54, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
AUUAUCCAUGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.76, deficit  7.94, CutoffScore  30.31, ed  4, 2 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAGAAAAUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.35, deficit  4.62, CutoffScore  10.87, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUUGUGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.66, deficit  3.67, CutoffScore  46.30, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGAAAACAGUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.99, deficit  6.73, CutoffScore   1.16, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CGUAGAGGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -12.25, deficit  5.78, CutoffScore  24.25, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
GGAAAGCAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -14.63, deficit  5.63, CutoffScore  19.24, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAUUCGUUGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -15.17, deficit  6.88, CutoffScore   0.04, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
UAGGGUUAAAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -16.73, deficit  7.29, CutoffScore   3.26, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
CCAAAUGUCCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.87, deficit  6.80, CutoffScore   3.04, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GUGAAUGAACCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -12.48, deficit  3.07, CutoffScore  15.13, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUUAAAGAACCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -11.88, deficit  2.48, CutoffScore  18.50, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAACAGGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.52, deficit  6.74, CutoffScore   6.30, ed  5, 4 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CCAACGUGUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -12.39, deficit  2.95, CutoffScore  25.02, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
CCGAAUGAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -16.92, deficit 10.18, CutoffScore   4.08, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGGCCAUAGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -15.22, deficit  5.10, CutoffScore  15.59, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAUCUAUGCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -11.12, deficit  4.83, CutoffScore  25.48, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUCAAACCUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -14.64, deficit  3.90, CutoffScore  10.88, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GGUGGUGCAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -13.19, deficit  6.71, CutoffScore  19.47, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
CAAAGCUCUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -13.99, deficit  3.73, CutoffScore  22.19, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
GGAGUUCCUUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore   6.92, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGUUUGAUUAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.19, deficit  1.58, CutoffScore  33.65, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAGCGAAGGGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -13.16, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  28.59, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCACAAUAUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.31, deficit  6.24, CutoffScore   5.94, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
AACCCGAAAAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -13.79, deficit  6.74, CutoffScore  26.38, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
AAAAGGGAUUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.51, deficit  4.77, CutoffScore   6.00, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CUCGCGCCGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.42, deficit  4.31, CutoffScore   2.38, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAAAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score      -9.49, deficit  2.63, CutoffScore  28.88, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGUUGCGAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -20.38, deficit  9.98, CutoffScore   1.76, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
GAUUGACUCUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_15118.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -15.23, deficit  6.67, CutoffScore  20.72, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAAGUAUUGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.40, deficit  5.63, CutoffScore  19.75, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CCGGAAGAACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -11.81, deficit  2.41, CutoffScore  18.89, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCUAGCUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -15.95, deficit  7.61, CutoffScore   6.78, ed  3, 3 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAUCAAUCAUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -15.97, deficit  6.64, CutoffScore   2.28, ed  6, 4 cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F                 
CUUGCAACUAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_84847.1, 14 NTs,        GUUCGCAACCAUCC,score     -18.47, deficit 10.33, CutoffScore   3.47, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F             
AAAGAUGACUCCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -13.45, deficit  1.30, CutoffScore  22.08, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCCAAGGGAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12870.1, 12 NTs,         GUCCUUGGGAAAC,score     -12.96, deficit  5.49, CutoffScore   3.62, ed  4, 4 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
GGAUGCGGAAGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -14.13, deficit  5.84, CutoffScore   5.56, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
AGAAAAAUCAAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -13.49, deficit  1.34, CutoffScore   4.25, ed  6, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAGACCGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11542.1, 10 NTs,         CGAGCGGCCAAAG,score     -13.34, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  11.99, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUUAGAAGAUGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -20.18, deficit  9.44, CutoffScore  13.46, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UGAGCGUUUUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -15.24, deficit  4.98, CutoffScore  32.89, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CAACUGUCUCUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -17.23, deficit  7.90, CutoffScore  11.39, ed  3, 3 cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGAUAUGGGAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -14.83, deficit  6.54, CutoffScore  33.62, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
CGCGGGGCGUUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.2, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -16.98, deficit  8.36, CutoffScore  10.00, ed  5, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
UUCAAAGAAUUGCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -14.10, deficit  3.36, CutoffScore  13.89, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGGUAGUGAAUGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -15.77, deficit  9.04, CutoffScore   9.80, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
GGAUUGUUUGGUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88364.2, 15 NTs,      UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA,score     -14.80, deficit  4.53, CutoffScore   1.46, ed  6, 5 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F           
AGAUUUUGUAAAUUUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99324.1, 17 NTs,     CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG,score     -20.99, deficit  8.13, CutoffScore   7.48, ed  7, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F       
UGACCUUAACAAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_00317.1, 19 NTs,  UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA,score     -24.34, deficit  9.19, CutoffScore   3.25, ed  6, 5 cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F   
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 90.0000	  8.0000	  4.0000
[11 11]	 82.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 52.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 22.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	  6.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 90.0000	 78.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 88.0000	 52.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 86.0000	 46.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 50.0000	 16.0000
[8 8]	 98.0000	 38.0000	  8.0000
[9 9]	100.0000	 18.0000	  2.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence   5 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence  13 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence  16 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence  20 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 230 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 231 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Overall false positive rate is 16.4615%
Number of models giving false positives is 226 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     3.96
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     7.31
