Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_14.mat
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.05, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.05, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UCAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.91, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -8.25, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.52, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGCAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAUAA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.46, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.04, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -7.10, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.90, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CAUAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.22, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UUAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.38, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GCAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -8.40, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
AGGGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUACA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.92, deficit  1.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAAA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.95, deficit  0.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.97, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -7.35, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
AUUCUU 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -10.29, deficit  7.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGUUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.72, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
UCAGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -7.54, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUAUCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.51, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
UUCUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -7.72, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.13, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
UGAUAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.17, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UAAGAA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.15, deficit  0.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.96, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUACG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.39, deficit  0.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CCGGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -6.72, deficit -0.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.29, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGUGAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.48, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GGAUAC 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UGAGAA 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.15, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_29487.1,  6 NTs,                CUGAUG,score      -2.34, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s35-s55                       
UUCCUA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -5.04, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GUGUUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.72, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GUAUCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.51, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCGUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.09, deficit -0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UGGGAG 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.47, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGGAG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.59, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.40, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUGUCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.73, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.08, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUGUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -5.62, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUCUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -9.74, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGGCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAGAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGGGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.29, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUCGUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.09, deficit -0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GCAAAC 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.45, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAUUAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -3.95, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.07, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
CUCUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.92, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UUUACA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.19, deficit  0.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUUCCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_46463.1,  4 NTs,                UUUCGA,score      -5.15, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AACAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -8.22, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCGGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.69, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CGUGAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.48, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CUCCCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.00, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUAUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -3.41, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.24, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUUAUG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.45, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUGGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUCCCA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.12, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
ACGAAAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -8.91, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CGAAGGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score     -10.11, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GCCUGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.37, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
AUGAGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.77, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGAAAGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GGGUAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -5.10, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GGGAGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.56, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAGAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.67, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GACGACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -7.73, deficit  4.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
UUAAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UGAGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -7.92, deficit  2.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGGUUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -10.43, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
AAACAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.17, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAUACAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.67, deficit  0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
AGAUUAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.83, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
AGGUUGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -5.23, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
UGACGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.51, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UCGAUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -9.81, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
UGAAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.01, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GGUCGAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.00, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CAUACAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.67, deficit  0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
UAUUUGA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_33612.1,  6 NTs,               CUUUUGG,score      -6.72, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55                 
GAAGUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.79, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
GGACUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.81, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
GGACAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -8.39, deficit  2.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GUCAUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -7.01, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UAAAACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -8.41, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGGAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGUCUGA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.85, deficit  1.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CGCUAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.90, deficit  1.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAGCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.96, deficit  0.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CUAUGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.98, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GUGUACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.77, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
CGAAGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.44, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UGCGGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score     -10.28, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
AGUUGAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.59, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GGAUAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.33, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UAAGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.27, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGUUCAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -8.28, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GAAGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.78, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
UAGGCAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -8.90, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUAAGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CUUUACG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CAACUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GAAGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.78, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CUGAAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.17, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UAUUAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -8.20, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CGAGAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.29, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GAAAUAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -5.96, deficit  0.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
GUUAAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.10, deficit  1.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GAAUUGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -6.89, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
UGAAGAAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.57, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.17, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGCUAUGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.00, deficit  1.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUGGGACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.74, deficit  2.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUAGAUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.98, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GUUCACUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score     -10.49, deficit  5.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GUGUCGCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -9.48, deficit  5.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CGCAAGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.59, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCUUGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -9.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
GUCUACCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.14, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGCGAUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.00, deficit  1.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAAGAGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.47, deficit  1.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGAACGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
AGGUUAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
AGGAUGAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.60, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CUUCCUCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.25, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CUAACAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.48, deficit  3.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGAACUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -10.04, deficit  6.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UGGUUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -11.48, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GGAUUAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
UGGGAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.93, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CUCAGGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.65, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUAUGGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.01, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UGAACGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.18, deficit  1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAACGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -5.27, deficit  2.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GAAAAGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.19, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGCACAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -5.55, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CCAAGGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -8.11, deficit  0.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGGAUAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.02, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CACUCACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -10.00, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
UACUUUGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -8.57, deficit  4.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUUCAACG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -5.05, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CGAAAGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.88, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGUGUUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.62, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CAUUGUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -7.83, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCUUUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.79, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GUAGAGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -4.03, deficit  0.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.81, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CCAUGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.39, deficit  3.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAACAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -6.08, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
UGGUGAAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -11.19, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CUAAAAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -8.52, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
AGCUUCGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.84, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CCAAGAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -8.99, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCCUCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -10.91, deficit  5.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CGUUGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.16, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
CGAAUUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -7.61, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CUCUUAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -9.16, deficit  2.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CUCCGGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -12.22, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CGAGCAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -7.18, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
UAAAGGCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.90, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GGUCACAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -10.12, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
UAAUCGGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score      -9.42, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CGGGACGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -7.81, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAACAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -9.59, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GUCUUUGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.46, deficit  6.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGUUCUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -10.13, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
GGCAAUUGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.14, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CCAGAUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -11.81, deficit  5.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
CAACUAUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -12.80, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
GGUUAAGGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.16, deficit  2.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
UUGAAGCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.40, deficit  7.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAAUGUAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.64, deficit  3.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CAGGAUAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.59, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CUCAAGCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.35, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGACUGCAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -12.95, deficit  4.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GCCGAGAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -10.31, deficit  5.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GAUGGCUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -10.52, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GGGAUUCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -12.74, deficit  7.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCUACGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score      -9.89, deficit  4.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
UACGCUGGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -10.39, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.59, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GAUUUGGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -9.15, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GACGAAUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.14, deficit  2.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GGAUCCCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -11.24, deficit  7.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUGUGUAUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.17, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CGGAGAGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.89, deficit  3.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GCGGCUGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.52, deficit  3.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAGCAGAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -10.47, deficit  3.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
UGUAACCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -15.41, deficit  8.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUCAAUUC 1  Matches 11; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -3.59, deficit  0.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CAGGCCCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -13.26, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
AACGUUCCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -12.99, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUGGAGAUU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -9.13, deficit  3.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
UGGACGUGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.31, deficit  7.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUCCGAGUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.15, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGAUUGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.80, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UGAGAUCAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.25, deficit  4.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGGCGACAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -13.88, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCUCAAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score     -10.97, deficit  6.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GUCACGAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -9.31, deficit  3.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CGCGCAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.81, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GGGUGGCAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -10.74, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
UCUCCAUUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -10.58, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
GUAGCCAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAAAGAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.32, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GUGUGCUCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -7.07, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
CAAACUUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.87, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
AUUAAGCCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.32, deficit  1.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAUUGAUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -10.79, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
UUCGUUGAUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score     -11.56, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CGGUUUGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.94, deficit  6.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAAACAGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -14.46, deficit  9.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CUUAGCGUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -11.54, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUUUUGCGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -12.59, deficit  3.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GUCCGUUGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score      -9.85, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
GUACUCUCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -11.06, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
UUGAGAAUUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score     -13.28, deficit  6.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GACAGUCUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.15, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GUCUGUAGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.55, deficit  5.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGAUCUGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -14.00, deficit  7.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCACAUGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -12.21, deficit  8.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
UGAACUUGAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -15.38, deficit 10.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
UGAGAGUGAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -11.94, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CGAGACAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.39, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GCAAAGUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.94, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGCAUGCUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.80, deficit  5.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAAACGAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.25, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUAGACACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -15.03, deficit  7.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGGGACGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score      -9.76, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.10, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGACUAUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.27, deficit  5.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGGAAAAGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -14.30, deficit  6.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GACAAAAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.65, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GGAAAAACAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -10.05, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAGACGUGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -12.73, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GGUUUGUCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -15.14, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
AUCGCUAUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -8.32, deficit  3.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
CUCCCUCGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -10.27, deficit  2.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGUAAGAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -11.63, deficit  5.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUGACGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.07, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
UUGGCUCACA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -10.09, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAAUGAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.83, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUUUCAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.43, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUAGGGAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -8.76, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UAAAAAGAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.25, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CGGAUGAUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -10.04, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGAGAAGAAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.54, deficit  3.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CCUUUCCCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.10, deficit  4.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGCGUAAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.66, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
AUGAGUGCUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -13.73, deficit  9.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGACGUCUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.87, deficit  9.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAAAAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.19, deficit  0.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CGAAAACUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CGAAAACAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -13.05, deficit  7.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGAUAUGAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.72, deficit  6.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUAUGAGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -9.98, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
CGACGGAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -10.51, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
AUCUCUAGACU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -13.58, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
AGCACGAUCAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -14.65, deficit  6.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.44, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUUAGUUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.58, deficit  3.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.79, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AUUCAUGCUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.91, deficit  5.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UCAGAACGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.00, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.55, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UUGUUAAAUUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -10.81, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.62, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
AAAGAUCUAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -10.65, deficit  3.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
CGGUGAGACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -15.44, deficit 10.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
GUAGAUCCUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score      -9.43, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGUCGUUUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -11.23, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
AACGUUAGUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -14.35, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.74, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CUAAAGGAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.37, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CAAGGCUGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -13.87, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
GUGUAUAUGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.76, deficit  6.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
UCAUCGGCGAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.12, deficit  4.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCUUCGUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.52, deficit  4.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.83, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UACUUUGAAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score      -9.21, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGACCUUCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.97, deficit  7.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAACCGAAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -15.91, deficit  8.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
UGGAACUAAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -12.43, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.52, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCCUGGUUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -13.40, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
CGCGAGACGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -12.89, deficit  5.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GUUAAUCUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.70, deficit  7.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGAAUAGAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.02, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CGGCCGAGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -11.74, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
CGUAACAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.92, deficit  7.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CUACUAUUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.17, deficit  5.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.16, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGAAUGCAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -14.04, deficit  6.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGACUCGCUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -14.72, deficit  7.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
GUAUUGCCUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.90, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
CGAUUGUUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -12.04, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GAACAAUGACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.14, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GGUGAUGCAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.35, deficit  5.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAGCCUCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score      -9.76, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.13, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
AGGGGGAAGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -12.90, deficit  7.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUCGAGCCCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.55, deficit  7.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.18, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUGUGAAAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.79, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCGCGACGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -11.79, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
AUCCUUUGAUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.02, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GUGGAAAUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.02, deficit  6.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGAAUACUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -14.33, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.85, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
UGGCCUCUUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_10751.2,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -12.74, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33                   
UAGGGAUAUAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -12.85, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
UUCGUCCACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score      -8.33, deficit  0.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.03, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAAUCCGUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -12.37, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGGUAAUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -13.94, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.17, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CUAUGUGAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -15.10, deficit  5.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUCCUUUGUGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -14.08, deficit  5.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
UGUUGGUCCUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -12.52, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.00, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
GGCCGUUGAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -18.03, deficit  9.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GAUGGGAGUAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20714.1, 11 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -14.19, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUAAGAAGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.79, deficit  6.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAAAGAUGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.10, deficit  8.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGAAUUAGCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -12.03, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CGACCUUGCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -16.13, deficit  7.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.81, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
ACAAAACGUAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.67, deficit  7.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUCGUUAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -13.50, deficit  4.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CAGAUAAAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -15.17, deficit  7.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGGUGACUAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -15.22, deficit  7.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CACUAAUCCUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.69, deficit  6.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.67, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
GUUUAGAAACCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.31, deficit  8.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
GGAGACAGAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.45, deficit  7.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.22, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GCUAUGAGUCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -12.33, deficit  3.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
UGACGACUAAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -11.30, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UACCGUGUUGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -13.65, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CUGUACGAUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.68, deficit  6.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
UUUUAACAAGUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -13.60, deficit  5.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
AGGAUUCAUUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.56, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAGAGGUAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -15.42, deficit  8.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CAAAAUGACCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -15.52, deficit  8.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CAUGUGUGUACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.79, deficit  5.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUAGUGAAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -13.94, deficit  7.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CGCUUGAGAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -15.74, deficit  7.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.98, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CGAAUGCGCAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -12.66, deficit  4.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
UUUUAGAAAAACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -13.32, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
CAAAGUCUGAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -13.21, deficit  4.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.50, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
AGAAUCCCUGUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -17.94, deficit  8.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
GCGGGAAAGAACCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.1, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -16.85, deficit  9.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55
UAAGGAAAUAAUAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -15.80, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.33, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
GUAAAAAUCUAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.75, deficit  8.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUCCAGGGAUAGUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -17.01, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.91, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
AGUUGUUCAGGAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98870.1, 12 NTs,     CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG,score     -18.89, deficit 10.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35
GUAUGGCGGGGCAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12773.1, 13 NTs,       GUAUUGCAGUACCUC,score     -14.66, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.35, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 86.5714	 79.7143	4
5	100.0000	 88.7143	 50.2857	23
6	100.0000	 87.4286	 51.2857	60
7	 99.5714	 53.8571	 15.7143	51
8	 99.5714	 28.2857	  4.5714	46
9	 98.4286	 17.2857	  1.7143	68
10	 95.2857	  6.7143	  0.1429	41
11	 83.0000	  3.4286	  0.0000	42
12	 43.2857	  0.4286	  0.0000	23
13	 18.0000	  0.5714	  0.0000	12
14	  5.7143	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.1429	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.5714	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.7143	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.5714	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.1429	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  70 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 107 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 114 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 240 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 244 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 248 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 253 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 254 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 255 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 258 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 288 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 288 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 292 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 294 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 307 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 311 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 324 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 331 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 335 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 341 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 354 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 354 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 362 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 365 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 376 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 398 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 404 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 409 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 420 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 439 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 451 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 478 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 478 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 480 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 484 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 491 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 495 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 504 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 505 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 527 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 548 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 549 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 562 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 611 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 632 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 651 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 697 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 721 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 727 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 742 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 747 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 750 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 761 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 772 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 774 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 775 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 1037 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 1039 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1406 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.2917%
Number of models giving false positives is 302 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.48
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.55
