Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_16.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:24:47
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.4263 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.4101 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.7185 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.6499 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.6242 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5885 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   5.1295 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.9313 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.1818 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.8164 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.6323 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.4994 minutes

ans =

    12

UGUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
ACCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
AAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.10, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -8.00, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.51, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.31, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UACA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.98, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.21, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.36, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.13, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
ACCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -8.00, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.31, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUAAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.30, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
AGACU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.16, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UCCGA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.74, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_24625.1,  5 NTs,                 CAGUG,score      -2.68, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.84, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
AUAUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.73, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -8.25, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.52, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
UGCGA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.82, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.61, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.40, deficit  0.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UCGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -11.15, deficit  8.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
GUUGC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.82, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
UUCCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -6.81, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
CUGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGCCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -6.91, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
GGUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.51, deficit -0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AGACU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.16, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GAUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56387.1,  5 NTs,                 AUUUU,score      -6.25, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55                 
UCUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.93, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.09, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
AGUUU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.61, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.27, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CGGUGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.13, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UUGGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.83, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
UGAAAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.26, deficit  2.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGAGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUAAUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.58, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGCUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.13, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CGGCUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -6.36, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CGCUCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -6.53, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UGUGAA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.65, deficit  0.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GGCUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GAGAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -8.17, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUUGGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
CAGGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AUGUAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.55, deficit  0.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
AUGUAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.55, deficit  0.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
ACCAGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.28, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUUUUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.02, deficit -0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUCUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -9.74, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAUCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -6.73, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CACCAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -5.23, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.04, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UUGACA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.59, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAGGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -7.13, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
UUUAAA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.44, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GUCCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.11, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGAUG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -3.94, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
CCGUUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.16, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
UUGAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_29487.1,  6 NTs,                CUGAUG,score      -4.56, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s35-s55                       
GGCAAC 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.18, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.70, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.95, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUCAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.26, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCAGC 1  Matches 22; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.03, deficit  5.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.28, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AUUUAU 1  Matches 34; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -6.90, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUCAAC 1  Matches 19; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.68, deficit  5.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.24, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUCCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.13, deficit  3.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.57, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CUAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.27, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
UGUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.11, deficit  1.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GCUGCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -8.57, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
GGGUAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.46, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
GUAAUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.58, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GGAUAC 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CAAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.41, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUUGAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.85, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CGAAUG 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.56, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGGGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.55, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAUCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -7.49, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UGCAAA 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.06, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.69, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UUUAAA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.44, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GUUGAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.62, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CGACUAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.74, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
CGAAGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.44, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAGAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.29, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GCGGUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -10.55, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GUUCGCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -4.67, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.95, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CCAGCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.92, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGGGGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -7.94, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GAUUCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -8.20, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGAUCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.69, deficit  4.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUGGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -8.22, deficit  3.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GUCGGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -7.32, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUUGAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -6.79, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CGAAAUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -8.96, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GGUAAAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.11, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGCUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.16, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AUAAAAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.53, deficit  3.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GUUAUGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_33612.1,  6 NTs,               CUUUUGG,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55                 
AAGGACU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -7.85, deficit  4.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
AUGUAGU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.22, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CUAAAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.54, deficit  1.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GUGAUAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.19, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
GUCAAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.40, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.26, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAGCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.41, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
AUUAACU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.16, deficit  2.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GUAAGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
GAAACUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.08, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
UGAAAGA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.34, deficit  0.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UAUGGGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.40, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
AGGAAUU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.01, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGGGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.15, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUCAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -7.56, deficit  4.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.01, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGACGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.28, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
AGUUAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.37, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
CGAAUUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  0.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
UCAAGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.62, deficit  2.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCGCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -7.86, deficit  3.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
AGCUAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.17, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UAAAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.88, deficit  1.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CAAUUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
AAAACAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.51, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.92, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GGAAUCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_40469.1,  4 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.18, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CAUACAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.67, deficit  0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
UGAUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -6.85, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGGUUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.15, deficit  1.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GGCUGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.37, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
GCAAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.47, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUGAACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.24, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GAGAAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.67, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUUGCGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.81, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
GACUAUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.94, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CACGUUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.47, deficit  0.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GGCCAUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -8.85, deficit  4.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CUCAGAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score     -11.07, deficit  6.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGGCGUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_56387.1,  5 NTs,                 AUUUU,score      -9.86, deficit  4.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55                 
CUAAGGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.92, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CCGUUAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.05, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CGAAUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.78, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUCCGCUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.14, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
UUGUCGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score     -11.71, deficit  7.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CAGAAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score     -10.23, deficit  2.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
CUAACGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.16, deficit  3.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUGAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.54, deficit  0.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGACAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
GUACGGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.96, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCUGAUUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score     -10.51, deficit  5.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CAAUGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -6.96, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GGAUUCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.09, deficit  0.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CUGUCUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -4.93, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
GAGAGAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.11, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CUUCACAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.18, deficit  2.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGGUGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -13.67, deficit  5.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CUGUGGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.19, deficit  1.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAGAAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUCAUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -6.22, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AAGAGGAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -12.34, deficit  5.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GUGAGGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.30, deficit  1.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUCGUAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -12.41, deficit  5.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
AGGAUCGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.30, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGUUAACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -6.07, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
GAGUGAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -9.54, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CUAUCCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -7.96, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGUCGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -7.27, deficit  0.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGGUUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -10.02, deficit  2.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CUUAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.08, deficit  1.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUAAAUUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -8.27, deficit  4.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCAGCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.15, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CGCGAUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -8.47, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
UGAAACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.73, deficit  1.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGACAGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.51, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUAGCCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -12.08, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AAAACAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -4.79, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.02, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
CUUUCAGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -7.27, deficit  0.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AGAUUCGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -12.45, deficit  7.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AUUCGGGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.44, deficit  1.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.57, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGCCGGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.55, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AACAUAUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -8.77, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GCGUACUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.98, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGCCAGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.26, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGCCGCCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -12.96, deficit  5.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGGUUGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.02, deficit  3.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCUCGAUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.48, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CCGGAAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -10.93, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
AGGCGAGGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -17.03, deficit 11.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUAUGCGAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.85, deficit  4.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUUCUUAGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.41, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCAAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -9.89, deficit  4.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CUGAAGGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -10.52, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GUCUGAACC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score     -10.08, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GAAAGGUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.01, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GCGUCUUAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score      -9.32, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
UAAGACAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.34, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCGGAACAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -8.27, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CGCUUUGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score     -12.56, deficit  6.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUAAUAGUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.68, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CUUUCCGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAUUGACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.28, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
UUGCUAACA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -7.93, deficit  1.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CAAAGAGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -12.99, deficit  7.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CGAGUGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.90, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAAAAUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.70, deficit  8.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUUACCCCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.85, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGGGUCAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -12.24, deficit  4.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
GGCAGCAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CUAUCAGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -10.55, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GGGAAAGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -9.57, deficit  3.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
UUCUUUUCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.54, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GGAGUAACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -8.94, deficit  3.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CUUGACAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -7.58, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCACGCGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -10.22, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GUUAUUGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score     -10.62, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUAAGAGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.04, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CUUCGUCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.52, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CAUAGUUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -11.46, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUGUUCGAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.44, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
GCGACAAAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -8.64, deficit  2.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GGUGUUUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -10.38, deficit  6.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
GAAAAAGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.53, deficit  3.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GGCGUCAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.85, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
ACUUGUGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score     -10.81, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGACUACUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.94, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUUGGUCAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -7.94, deficit  1.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GGGCAAAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.25, deficit  2.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UAAAAGAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -9.38, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCAAAAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -7.78, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CGGAAUUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -10.23, deficit  2.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAGAGAAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -6.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GCUGAUGUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -11.80, deficit  5.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
CGGGAUUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -8.28, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAACAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.89, deficit  7.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CCUAAGCAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -13.11, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CGGUUCGCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -10.76, deficit  4.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAUGUUCAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.73, deficit  6.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AGGCGACACU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -10.68, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
CUUUAGAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -11.38, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GACAAAGAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.64, deficit  6.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GUUGGCAGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -12.43, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CUAGCAGGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -12.64, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAAGAAGAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -12.45, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CUGAAAUCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.30, deficit  5.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GAACGCGAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.74, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CGAAACUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -9.61, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CCGGACUGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score      -9.94, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGGCGCCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -14.77, deficit  8.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAGAAUCGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.74, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GGAAAGGAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -8.15, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUUGAGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -9.98, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
CUGUUAAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -12.17, deficit  8.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CUCAAAACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -10.08, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CUAGAGGGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score      -9.39, deficit  0.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GCCUAAUGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.32, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAUCUCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.52, deficit  5.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.72, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAAAAACCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.55, deficit  5.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGUGAUUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -13.20, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUGAACAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score     -12.30, deficit  4.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
UUGUUCGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score     -11.95, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
UUUUUCUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -10.69, deficit  4.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
UGAAAGUCUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.33, deficit  6.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGUGUAAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -12.66, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CCAAAGGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.65, deficit  5.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUAAAAAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.18, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
UUGACUCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.11, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.95, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GUAUUUAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -12.47, deficit  6.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
AUGUAGAAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.66, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGAAUGACA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.58, deficit  8.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GUUCUCAGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.49, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAUGUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -11.39, deficit  5.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUUCAUCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.22, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGAAUAAAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score      -9.96, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAGCUUCGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -10.94, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-F                               
GUUCGAACAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -11.90, deficit  7.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUUGGAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -11.64, deficit  5.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUAAGCAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.30, deficit  7.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGAUUUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -13.79, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.14, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
UAAGCUCAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.15, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUCCAUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.95, deficit  7.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CGAACCGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -10.47, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGAGAUCAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.77, deficit  7.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.05, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAAAUAAUGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.00, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.55, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GGAUCCAUGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -14.21, deficit  6.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
AAAAUGUAAUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.09, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GGAUUCGGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -12.83, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
CGCCGGGAAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -12.65, deficit  6.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GGUCAAAGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.69, deficit  1.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAAUCCCUCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -21.99, deficit 12.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
GUAAACAUCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -11.96, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GUAAUUGUAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -10.84, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
GACUUCUGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.40, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CAAUGUUAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.73, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GACAGAGUUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -15.92, deficit  8.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CGUAAACAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.31, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCUAAUCCUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.68, deficit  8.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAACGAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -17.26, deficit  9.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCACUAUGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -10.37, deficit  5.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
UAAACUCUCUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.37, deficit  8.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GAAUUAAAACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -14.23, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
CAAAGAACAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -11.99, deficit  6.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
AACCUAGAAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -11.56, deficit  4.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGAAGACAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.50, deficit  5.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.36, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGUUGGUAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -15.87, deficit  6.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGCGAAAAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -10.80, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.80, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CCAGACAACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -15.01, deficit  8.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CCUUUGAGUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.04, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AUGGGUUGAUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.02, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CCAGCUGGUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -12.92, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
CGGUGAACGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.36, deficit  4.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAAUAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -13.36, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAUUAUUGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -10.04, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
CGUAACUGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.35, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.40, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CUUUUUCUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.15, deficit  5.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UGACAAAAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -11.90, deficit  6.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
ACAAGUAAGAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -15.73, deficit  9.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CGAAAAGAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.74, deficit  6.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAGAUCAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.65, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
GUGAAACAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -14.47, deficit  6.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.34, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGUUUAAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.54, deficit  6.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GCAAAGAGAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.85, deficit 10.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUUCGGCAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.58, deficit  5.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.58, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGAAGAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -16.95, deficit 10.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
GUAAUGCAGCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.32, deficit  6.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GGAAUGGAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.20, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAUGGAUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -15.35, deficit  5.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CAUGCUAGGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -10.68, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.07, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CUGAACAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.54, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CGGGGAAAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.24, deficit  5.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.74, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUCGGAUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -17.09, deficit  9.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
AAAUUUGUGCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -11.95, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
GUAAAUAACUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.27, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
ACGAAGAACAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.83, deficit  4.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
UGGAUCGAAUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.98, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUAAAAAUUAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.34, deficit  6.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGGAAGAUGUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -13.12, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.88, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUAAAAGGAAUAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.96, deficit 10.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCCUGAAAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.37, deficit  8.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
GUUAUUAAAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.86, deficit  8.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GGGAUAUGAAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.09, deficit  5.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.00, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUUUCUGAGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.69, deficit  7.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.28, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CCAAAGAGUAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.73, deficit  9.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGCAAAUAUGAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.81, deficit  6.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.92, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGAAUUAUUUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42211.1, 13 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -16.77, deficit  6.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35     
CGGAAUGGGGAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42211.1, 13 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -16.77, deficit  6.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35     
CGUAACAGAUGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -15.51, deficit  5.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
AGGCUUUGAACCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -20.30, deficit  9.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUCCAAGACGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -15.63, deficit  5.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.78, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GUGUUGCGAAGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -14.72, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.40, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
AGGAGCAGCUGGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -13.91, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
GUUCGCGCAACUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_56677.4, 13 NTs,       CUGAACGCAUCUAAG,score     -13.81, deficit  7.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.61, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35
GGGCGGGAGAAAAAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30585.1, 16 NTs,     AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU,score     -17.35, deficit  4.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.45, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 81.2500	 69.5000	4
5	100.0000	 90.6250	 47.2500	23
6	100.0000	 86.1250	 45.1250	60
7	 99.8750	 50.3750	 13.6250	51
8	 99.3750	 26.7500	  3.7500	46
9	 99.2500	 19.6250	  1.8750	68
10	 94.8750	  8.6250	  0.2500	41
11	 83.3750	  4.0000	  0.0000	42
12	 44.6250	  0.7500	  0.0000	23
13	 17.7500	  0.2500	  0.0000	12
14	  7.2500	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.3750	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.6250	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.3750	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.1250	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  63 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 155 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 157 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 202 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 214 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 216 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 224 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 231 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 234 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 238 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 244 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 246 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 246 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 251 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 251 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 253 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 260 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 261 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 261 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 268 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 277 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 279 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 280 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 281 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 286 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 292 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 298 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 300 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 313 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 336 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 350 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 354 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 354 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 356 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 357 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 357 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 358 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 358 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 360 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 384 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 389 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 416 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 442 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 448 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 466 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 480 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 493 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 493 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 493 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 497 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 502 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 509 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 512 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 522 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 561 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 563 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 577 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 584 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 596 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 619 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 694 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 694 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 715 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 751 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 758 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 823 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 850 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 867 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 884 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 896 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 928 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 966 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 1001 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 1008 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 1125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 1196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1314 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1506 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.4531%
Number of models giving false positives is 301 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.56
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.35
