Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_15.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:23:13
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.4230 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.4069 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.7223 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.6628 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.6410 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.6103 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   5.2926 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   3.0055 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.2416 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.8757 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.7102 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.5621 minutes

ans =

    12

CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UCUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.88, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.05, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.05, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.36, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.20, deficit  3.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -7.22, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.77, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.87, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UGUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.36, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
ACUUU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56387.1,  5 NTs,                 AUUUU,score      -6.12, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55                 
ACAGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GUUAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.30, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGGUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GGUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.51, deficit -0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
AAACU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.06, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UAUAA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.46, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.04, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
AAAAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.96, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAAAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.96, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUGC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.82, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
AACUU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.34, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
CUGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
AAACU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.06, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UAAUA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.58, deficit  1.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.84, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.40, deficit  0.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.84, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
GGUGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -7.47, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UACUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -6.81, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
AGACU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.16, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.30, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.48, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.40, deficit  0.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CCAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGGUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.87, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAAA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.95, deficit  0.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.99, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.09, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UCGAA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -5.15, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
GUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AAAUAU 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.54, deficit  0.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CACAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.55, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGUAUC 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CGAAUG 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.56, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GAUCUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -5.20, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CUGGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.86, deficit  1.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
UUUUCA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGUGGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.55, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAUAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UAAGUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
CGAGUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -6.14, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUAGGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -7.13, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
GAAGCC 1  Matches 18; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.41, deficit  5.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.39, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUACC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.29, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUAAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -3.80, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
CGUGUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.13, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
UUCCGA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.27, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CUCUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.20, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUCUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -5.27, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.28, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CUGCUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.72, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GGAUGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.50, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UGUUCA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGACGG 1  Matches 18; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.32, deficit  6.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.96, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUACAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.62, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAUGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.03, deficit -0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGCCCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -5.34, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
AGUAUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.29, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
ACAGAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.46, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGACAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.47, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.70, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.95, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GAAAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.04, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGGAC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.41, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGCUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.13, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CUACCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.80, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CUGUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -3.06, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GUCCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UAAGCG 1  Matches 11; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.46, deficit  6.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UUUUAA 1  Matches 34; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -5.23, deficit  1.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
GAAGCC 1  Matches 18; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.41, deficit  5.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.39, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.41, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUACCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.91, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GGAUAC 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UCUGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.03, deficit  0.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
AUCUUGU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_33612.1,  6 NTs,               CUUUUGG,score      -6.77, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55                 
GUGGGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.92, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGUGUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -7.36, deficit  3.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
UUAAUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.19, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CCGGUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -8.81, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CGAUUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.74, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
GGAAACC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.90, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UCUGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.23, deficit  5.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GUGGUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -7.28, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35                                 
GUUCUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -5.61, deficit  1.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GUCCUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -7.54, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GGCGACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.36, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GUCAAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.40, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CAGCGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.13, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGAGCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.36, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CGUUAUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GUAAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.50, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
CGUUUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -5.83, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGUGCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -8.02, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGGUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -7.20, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35                                 
AGUGAAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.31, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
UGAGGAA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.85, deficit  0.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AAUUUGU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_33612.1,  6 NTs,               CUUUUGG,score      -6.73, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55                 
AGGGAGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -9.44, deficit  3.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGACCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.03, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGCGACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.36, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
AUACGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -7.11, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGAGUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.36, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GGAAAGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GUACGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -7.03, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
UGGACCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.75, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
CCACAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.23, deficit  4.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAUCGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -7.27, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CUAAUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.26, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GUGUGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -8.22, deficit  3.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GAAAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -3.99, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
CUGGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.85, deficit  1.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUCCUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -7.54, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UGACAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_77081.1,  5 NTs,               UGAAAAG,score      -5.91, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35             
GGUGAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.55, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UUCAUAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.91, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
GUUUGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -7.12, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GAAAUUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCCGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.59, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AGAAAUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -5.83, deficit  1.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CUCUUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.26, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GGCUUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.97, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
GGCCAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAAAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -5.16, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CCCGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -10.43, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CGUUAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -6.07, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
CCGGCCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.46, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGACAGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.51, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAAACCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -7.34, deficit  4.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
UUCGAAUA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -9.47, deficit  4.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CAACUGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.73, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGGAGAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.50, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUAAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -6.89, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.12, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
CAAGGAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -9.62, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
GUUGCUAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.74, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
CUAGCACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score     -11.37, deficit  4.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GGAUAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -9.60, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
AUCAGAGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.84, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
UUUCCUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -9.62, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
GUUCAGUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -6.67, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.82, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CUCGAGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.81, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
AGUCACAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -5.57, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GACCAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -10.90, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GCGAAAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -6.58, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
UUAAUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score     -11.60, deficit  7.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GAUCAAGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -9.11, deficit  3.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUGAGGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.15, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CAUAACAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -6.65, deficit  0.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAAUUUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -6.89, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CUGAGAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.44, deficit  2.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CCGUACAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -7.61, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CUCUAAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.71, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CUGUAGUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -9.42, deficit  5.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GUUUGACC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.22, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CUCGAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -9.30, deficit  4.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UAAUUCCA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -9.75, deficit  3.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GCAAGAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -8.72, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CGGGUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.88, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAUCAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -4.00, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GGUUGUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.23, deficit  1.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
UGCAGCAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -6.66, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUCUAGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.71, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
CGUAAUGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -4.61, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.12, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUUAGUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -9.44, deficit  5.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUACGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
UUUUGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.75, deficit  4.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AGCCAGAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.74, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUGGUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -7.34, deficit  1.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAUUGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -7.32, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GCUCUCGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score     -10.37, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UCCUCCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.03, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CUUGCAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -12.08, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AAAGACCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.82, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GUCUUGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -11.24, deficit  6.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GGAGUCGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.87, deficit  4.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUAGUUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -11.26, deficit  4.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAACUGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.96, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GUUAAAGUC 1  Matches 15; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -5.23, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CGCGAACAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -10.96, deficit  2.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGAUCCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.33, deficit  3.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
UGGCAUUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score      -9.01, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.55, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
UGUAAAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.64, deficit  1.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCCCCAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -10.36, deficit  4.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GAACGCCUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -10.19, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
UGUUUGCGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.99, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAUGCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.72, deficit  6.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUAGACUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -10.93, deficit  5.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAGAAUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.12, deficit  0.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUCAAAUG 1  Matches 22; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -6.18, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GAGAGACUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -12.47, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
CACGUGCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.38, deficit  1.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CAUAACAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -8.73, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGUCGUGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -11.87, deficit  5.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
GGUUUUGCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -9.28, deficit  3.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAAAGUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.67, deficit  2.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCGACUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.97, deficit  5.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUGGAUGAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -7.32, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGUUCUUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score     -10.05, deficit  5.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CAAGAAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.41, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CUUCCUAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score      -8.94, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
UCCGUGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.00, deficit  3.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUUGAGUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -11.88, deficit  5.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAGGAUGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -12.13, deficit  6.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CAAGGGACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -8.65, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
AAAGAACGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -7.47, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUCAUUGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -11.11, deficit  4.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCUGAAAAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score      -4.75, deficit  0.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCGUAACCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -9.44, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
UUGCGGUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.39, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
AGACAUGAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -8.11, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUGAAAGAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.67, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
UAGAAAAAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.35, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
AGGAUCAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -10.27, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
AGAUUGAUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -8.94, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
GGAGACCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -7.89, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGCAGGACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -9.85, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAUUAAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -10.10, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
CGGUAUUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -10.23, deficit  2.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAAGGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -10.80, deficit  3.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GUAUCAGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -9.80, deficit  5.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UUCGCACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score      -9.29, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGACAAACG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.35, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAGAAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.41, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GAAACAAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -11.10, deficit  6.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GUCGUUCUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.50, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CUUAUUCUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.71, deficit  9.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGAAAUGAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.29, deficit  4.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CAAGGUUUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -15.01, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
CGGUUCGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.16, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.08, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAGUUAGUAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -10.93, deficit  3.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
GCUGAAGAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -11.17, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUGAUCAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -13.46, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUUUAGUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.45, deficit  6.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.54, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
GGAGGCAGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -11.54, deficit  5.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
GGGAAAGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -8.47, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGAAUAAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.07, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGACAUAGUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.59, deficit  6.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAGAACUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.57, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GAGAGCAGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.15, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
AUUUUGAAUU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -10.75, deficit  3.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
CUCUUUUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.51, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.51, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGACAAAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.02, deficit  2.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
UUAAUUGAGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.58, deficit  8.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CAAAUGAUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -13.06, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
AUAAAAUUAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.89, deficit  7.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
AUUUUGGGUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -12.16, deficit  4.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
UACUUAAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -11.59, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
GAUGACAGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -10.28, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CCGGAAGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -9.99, deficit  4.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CUAAAGGUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.70, deficit  8.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CACGCGUAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -13.98, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
CGAACCGGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.07, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.79, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUCGAAACAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.54, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
CGCCUUUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.84, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAGGACGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -14.73, deficit  9.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
ACUGAACGAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.47, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CGAUAAAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.53, deficit  5.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUAUUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.07, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGAGAUGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.17, deficit  3.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UGAAUCAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.82, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUUUUAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -11.05, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
CCAACGUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GGGCUGGACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
UGGGAACACA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.41, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUUAUCCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.41, deficit  7.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGGUUGUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -10.89, deficit  4.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
GUGCAUGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.43, deficit  6.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUUCCACUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.73, deficit  6.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CGAGUCGUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.83, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CUCUCCCGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.46, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.08, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCUCUAAAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -10.77, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUUCAUAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.31, deficit  5.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GGGAGGAAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -12.16, deficit  6.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
UGAGUCAGCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -11.33, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCGUCAACAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -10.45, deficit  2.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAAAAAAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -17.60, deficit 10.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUUAAAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.83, deficit  5.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CAAGGUAUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -11.96, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CGUUUUGGAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.45, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUUUAAAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.46, deficit  3.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CUAGUAUCCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -12.98, deficit  7.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
CGUUCGGAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.61, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGAACCGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.46, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGCUGAUUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.47, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
UGGCUCCAAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.54, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGCGAUUGAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.24, deficit  5.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAUAGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.84, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUUUAAAUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score      -9.07, deficit  1.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGACCAACUAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -11.27, deficit  3.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
AGAGAUUAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -14.56, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.88, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUUCAUUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.25, deficit  4.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GUAUACUCGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -12.08, deficit  6.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
AUAAGUGAAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.01, deficit  3.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
ACUGGGAGUUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -15.20, deficit  9.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUUCUCGAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.22, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
GUCAUUCAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -15.28, deficit  8.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GGAAGUGGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.42, deficit  4.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAUCAAGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -17.91, deficit 10.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGCGUUAGUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.44, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGUGUUUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -10.66, deficit  1.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
UGAAAUAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -12.22, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.60, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAAUUUUAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -12.35, deficit  6.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
CGAAGAAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.53, deficit  5.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCGUGUGCAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.98, deficit  6.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAGUCGUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.78, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUAGUGUGAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -10.47, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CAUCACAUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -17.28, deficit 10.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
UGUACGAGACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.97, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGGACUAGGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -11.82, deficit  5.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.63, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
ACUAACUAAGAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -16.47, deficit 11.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GGAAGACCAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.61, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGAAAUAGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.50, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UAUUACAAACCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35978.6, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -11.93, deficit  8.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GUCCCUUCCGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -12.98, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CCCAUUGAUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -13.34, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.72, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
GGUCACCAAUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -13.66, deficit  6.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
CCGUAAGAGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -14.15, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.81, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
UGCCCUUCCCUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -16.10, deficit  7.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.95, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
UAAGAUAUUAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.79, deficit  3.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GGUCCGCAAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -10.19, deficit  3.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.19, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
UAGAGACCUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -16.52, deficit  8.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CUGAUAAGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -16.06, deficit  9.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CGAAAAAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.93, deficit  6.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.84, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGGCGGUGUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -16.36, deficit  6.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CGAGAGACGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89082.1, 11 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -11.41, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35   
UUUCGAGAAUCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -16.48, deficit  9.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
UCGCGAAUAUCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -11.04, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.60, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGAUGUAGGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.26, deficit  6.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.15, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GGAGGUGCUAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -16.62, deficit  7.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
CGUAAGUUCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.60, deficit  5.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CUCAACAAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -17.62, deficit 10.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CUAAAGAAGCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.66, deficit 10.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAGGGAGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.87, deficit  8.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
GGGGAAGCGACUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -13.86, deficit  2.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.02, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAACGGAUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -14.52, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CAAUAGAGAAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -12.18, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGCGAUGAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score      -9.71, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
AACAAGAUCAUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58446.1, 12 NTs,        GACCUAGAUCACCC,score     -15.85, deficit  7.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.11, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35 
GACGUAAAGGUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -13.07, deficit  2.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.71, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAAAAAAUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.89, deficit  8.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAAGAUGGUAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -15.96, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.27, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
GGUGAAGACUGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -16.09, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.35, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
GUUAAUUGGUAAAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58539.1, 15 NTs,      UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG,score     -16.47, deficit  6.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAACUUAGGAUUUUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_82866.1, 17 NTs,     CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG,score     -20.14, deficit  9.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35
4	100.0000	 81.2000	 69.2000	4
5	100.0000	 90.6667	 47.6000	23
6	100.0000	 86.6667	 45.7333	60
7	 99.8667	 50.2667	 13.6000	51
8	 99.3333	 26.9333	  3.7333	46
9	 99.2000	 19.7333	  1.8667	68
10	 94.8000	  9.0667	  0.2667	41
11	 83.7333	  4.2667	  0.0000	42
12	 45.8667	  0.8000	  0.0000	23
13	 17.6000	  0.2667	  0.0000	12
14	  6.8000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.4667	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.5333	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.4000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.1333	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  61 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 145 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 147 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 202 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 230 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 231 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 236 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 237 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 238 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 244 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 247 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 252 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 256 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 258 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 263 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 265 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 271 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 277 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 278 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 279 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 295 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 315 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 324 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 328 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 333 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 334 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 335 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 336 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 336 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 337 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 338 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 360 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 366 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 387 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 411 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 418 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 437 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 454 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 461 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 463 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 463 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 469 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 470 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 479 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 481 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 483 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 526 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 528 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 541 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 544 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 551 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 578 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 648 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 649 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 664 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 696 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 701 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 770 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 796 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 813 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 828 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 833 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 869 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 907 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 938 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 946 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 1057 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 1127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1419 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.4889%
Number of models giving false positives is 301 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.58
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.41
