Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_10.mat
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.10, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UCUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.94, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UACA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.98, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
ACUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UCAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -7.35, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUCCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -6.81, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUCCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
AUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.10, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UGCGA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.82, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.61, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -7.22, deficit  3.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAUCC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.45, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
GUACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -10.26, deficit  7.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GCUAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.22, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F-s35                             
AUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.10, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CCUUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.38, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
UAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.84, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGGGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UCUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.03, deficit  2.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GUCCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
GUACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.94, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGUCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.94, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.83, deficit  0.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUGUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -5.55, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F                             
GGAUGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CGUAGG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAAGG 1  Matches 22; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.48, deficit  4.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AUGCCU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.57, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCCGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -5.62, deficit -1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
UAUUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -6.49, deficit  2.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-F                             
GCUGAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.03, deficit  0.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
AAAUGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_52240.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -5.51, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGUGGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGUAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.45, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
CGCCAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -6.55, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.54, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CUGUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -3.06, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GAAAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.04, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGUAAG 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.69, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUGUCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.73, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.08, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUCUC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.80, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GUAGCC 1  Matches 16; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.99, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGCAAC 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.18, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUCGCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.08, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GGCAAC 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.18, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UAAUCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -9.18, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CCCAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.84, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGAGAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -7.23, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UAACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
UUAUUA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -5.42, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.81, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CGCAAG 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -3.36, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGUAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.45, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
GUAAUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.58, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CUAUCG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUGAUU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_29487.1,  6 NTs,                CUGAUG,score      -2.56, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s35-s55                       
GUGUUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.72, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
UACCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -8.47, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -5.40, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.04, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
UGAGAA 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.15, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAACAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -3.46, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
CGACGG 1  Matches 18; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.32, deficit  6.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.96, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAAUGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_52240.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -5.61, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGGCAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_57204.1,  5 NTs,                UGGAAA,score      -5.59, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
CAGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.07, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGCAAC 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.18, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGUAAC 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.90, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.16, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGAAC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score     -10.00, deficit  6.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAACAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.89, deficit  0.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAAACAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.50, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GCCGUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.30, deficit -0.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CUCAAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.76, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUCAGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.70, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GAGAAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.67, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGAUAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.97, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
GAAAAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.50, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GAAAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -3.99, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GGUGAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GCUUGUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score     -12.39, deficit 10.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
UAAAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.88, deficit  1.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GCUUUCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.18, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CUGACCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -7.54, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
UGCAGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score     -10.28, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGUAGAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.15, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGUUGGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.33, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CUUGUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.26, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CUCAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.64, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
AUGGAUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.65, deficit  4.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AUGAGCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.35, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
AUACGCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.41, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
UCGGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -12.57, deficit  6.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CCCUAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -6.99, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAAGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CGGAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.30, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUUAAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.10, deficit  1.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CCUCUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -6.48, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CCGUUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.66, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
AGUCAAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.48, deficit  3.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUUGCCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.08, deficit  1.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GGAGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.51, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UGUUGAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.75, deficit  3.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
CGAUCAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.83, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUCUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.26, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CUCGUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.12, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GGACUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.58, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UAAGACA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.91, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GCAGUAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -10.55, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GCGGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -9.10, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAUUCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -7.88, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUGUUUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.77, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
CGAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CCAAUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -5.88, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
UAAAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.88, deficit  1.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GCGACAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -8.88, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
ACUCUUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.40, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUGAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.16, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGAGGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.77, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAGAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.67, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CACUGGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.71, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGACUGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.22, deficit  2.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUAGAUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -10.44, deficit  4.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GGAGUGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.94, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GGGCUGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.63, deficit  2.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CACUAAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -9.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CUAAGACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.69, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CGGAGUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.83, deficit  4.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGUUCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.70, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUAUGCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.23, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGCGGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -8.00, deficit  4.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAACGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -7.34, deficit  4.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
CGUCAAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -10.91, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
CUGUAAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.40, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUUGUUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.91, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGACCGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -7.14, deficit  0.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAGGAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score     -10.18, deficit  5.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GAUUGAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -7.50, deficit  1.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGAAAAGA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.01, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CAGUUUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -10.76, deficit  3.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CCGCAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.39, deficit  2.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCGCCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.56, deficit  1.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUCUGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -16.12, deficit  9.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
CGGGUUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -7.59, deficit  1.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUGCAAUU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -6.45, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
AUUGAUUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -5.78, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
AUAGCUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -9.08, deficit  5.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CGCGUCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.62, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GUAAAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.33, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GACAAAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -7.15, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
CGACGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.89, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAGAUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.81, deficit  1.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CUAGAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GGGUAAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -9.09, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
UUAUAAUA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.08, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CGUUAGGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -7.05, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CGGUUAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -8.05, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GAAAUCCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -12.18, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GAGCUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -11.05, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UGUUUUAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -4.63, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
AAGUACCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score     -10.66, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CGUUGGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -11.13, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUCAAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.15, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
UCAAGUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -8.23, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AAAUUACU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -6.97, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CGUCCCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -9.15, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAACACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.08, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CUAAGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score     -10.09, deficit  5.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
UGUCUUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.85, deficit  4.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
AUGUCUUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -4.94, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAUGUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -12.10, deficit  6.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CGUGAAAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -8.61, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CAGGAAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.26, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
AUCAAAUCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -13.34, deficit  7.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GGAAGACGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -9.28, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAUUCAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GAUAUUCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.99, deficit  5.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CGCAAAAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.48, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGAGUCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.16, deficit  3.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUCUAAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -5.86, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
CGAGGAGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -12.04, deficit  4.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AAUCGAUGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -11.14, deficit  5.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GGCAAAGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
GAACAAUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.74, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGCCCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -10.70, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAGUUGGCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score      -7.62, deficit  0.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
GGACGAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.35, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUAAAAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -7.32, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GGUGUCAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCCUCAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -11.27, deficit  4.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AACAACUAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.01, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUCUAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -7.87, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GUUCACUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -8.75, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CCAUCGAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -9.54, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGGUCCGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -12.28, deficit  6.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
UUCUCCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.39, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GUUUAAGCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -12.34, deficit  3.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CAUGUGAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.81, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CUGCAUUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.34, deficit  7.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
UGAAUCUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -18.73, deficit 10.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGCCGAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -10.13, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
AGGUCGAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.48, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UAGCAAAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
GCUGAAGAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -7.11, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAUCGAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -10.40, deficit  4.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
AAAACAAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.32, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCCUUGAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score     -10.22, deficit  3.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
UUUGUAACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -9.91, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
CUCCGAUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -9.88, deficit  5.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
AGAUCCCAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -8.93, deficit  5.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGAGUGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -12.38, deficit  7.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGAGCGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.83, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CGGGGCCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -10.73, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GUGCACUCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -14.79, deficit 10.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
GUAUCUACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.53, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GUGAAUAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -7.07, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GGUGAUGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -8.05, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUAGAUGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -10.60, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAUGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.92, deficit  2.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UACGCUUUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -18.53, deficit 10.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CUCGCAGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -12.74, deficit  8.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CCUAUUAGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score     -11.90, deficit  6.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GACCUCUGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -12.03, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
GUCUUGGUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -11.93, deficit  6.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CUGAGGAUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.14, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UGCAAACGAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -11.06, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUGAACGCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -11.03, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
CGAGAAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.80, deficit  1.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
UAACUAGUCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -10.87, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
CUUGGAACUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -8.88, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
CCAUCGGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.73, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
CUAAGGUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -13.68, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.27, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
GCGUAAGUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -13.83, deficit  7.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGAAACUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score      -7.13, deficit  2.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
AGACAAUGGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -15.12, deficit  7.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GUGGACGGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -11.47, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUCUAUAUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -7.88, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CUCAUAUGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.10, deficit  6.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UGCGAGAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.32, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
UCGCAUCUUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.65, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GAAGAAGUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.94, deficit  3.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CGAAAUAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.37, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGAACACAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.57, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUCCGAAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.21, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
AUUCAUGAUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -13.61, deficit  5.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUCCAAUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.64, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GGUAAAUGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -9.47, deficit  1.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CGACAGAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -14.56, deficit  9.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGGUAAGUGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -8.93, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGUCCUUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.19, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAUUCUUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -11.89, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
GGGAAGCUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.15, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUGUUCUUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.64, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GGUAGUUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -9.59, deficit  1.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CUGGCAUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.67, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CGGAAAAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.90, deficit  6.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CUGACAAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -11.66, deficit  7.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CUCUGAACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -9.52, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUGAAUAUUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -6.93, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
CUGAACUAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.57, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CAGCGUGACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -10.66, deficit  3.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
CCUCAAACUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.58, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCUAAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.23, deficit  6.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
GUUUUUGCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.14, deficit  7.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGUCGAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score     -10.75, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
CAUAAAGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.27, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CUAACAUGUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.89, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CAAAAGAACCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -15.21, deficit  6.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.89, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CUAAACCCUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.65, deficit  5.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.75, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAAAAUUAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.15, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CGAUUUAUAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -15.26, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
AAAUCUAUUAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.61, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCUGAAGUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -14.52, deficit 10.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCGACCCGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -11.77, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.22, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CACAAACAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score      -9.37, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.97, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCCAAGAGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -13.35, deficit  7.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CUAGAUCGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.65, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
GAAUAUGGUAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -10.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GCGAGGGUUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -11.82, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GAAUAGCGCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -10.63, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
GGUUAGAAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score      -8.56, deficit  0.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAAUGUACGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
GGAAGCAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -13.00, deficit  7.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GUGAAUGAGUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -14.22, deficit  7.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GCAUGUGAUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.46, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
UAAGAACGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -12.16, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CAUUUUAAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -9.22, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CCCAAAAUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -12.26, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CAGAUGUCCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -11.76, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
UGGGCCCACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -15.13, deficit  7.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
UUCGGACCGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -15.33, deficit  7.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.14, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GAAGAAGAGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -13.80, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GGAGAAAUGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.26, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GUUUUUAUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.00, deficit  3.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.68, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UGGUCGAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.03, deficit  6.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
AGAUCGACCAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.48, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CCUUGAACGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.55, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.17, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UAACGCCGAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -13.34, deficit  6.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
GUAGGCAUAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.90, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GUAAACAUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score      -9.74, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.15, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CUGAAAGUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.33, deficit  5.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUGUUGCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -13.09, deficit  2.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.74, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
GAAUUUCUCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
GCCACGUCGUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -16.45, deficit  9.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGGGGAACGCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score      -9.76, deficit  1.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUCCCUCCGACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -16.91, deficit  9.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CUUCCGCCUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.03, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GGCAACGAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.61, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.33, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUUGCGUUUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -12.08, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.34, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
UGAAUAAAAAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -15.03, deficit  7.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAAACAUAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.26, deficit  2.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAUGAAACACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.30, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.79, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
CUCCGCAAGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -17.98, deficit 10.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CAGGGGAGUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -16.28, deficit  6.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GUUAAAGAUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -12.92, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
UGAAUCUUGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.60, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCAUCGCUAGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -15.47, deficit  6.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.24, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
GAGGAGAAUAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.71, deficit  4.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUGUACAACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.06, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.16, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGAAGAUAGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.75, deficit  6.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CUACCGUGCGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.87, deficit  5.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
UGAAGAAGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -12.61, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.47, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GCUUGAAAGGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -15.04, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGUCGGGAGAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.52, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUCACGAAACUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -13.07, deficit  5.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.67, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
GGACUAAAGCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.14, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGUUCGAAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.51, deficit  6.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CAAGGUGGUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -14.77, deficit  4.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
CUGCGUCUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94032.1, 10 NTs,          UAGUCUCUUUCG,score     -17.30, deficit  7.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUAAUUUAUAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -16.95, deficit  9.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
CUUCCAGAUACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.25, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.40, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAACGAUCAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -15.92, deficit  7.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.07, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GGGCUAGAUCAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.07, deficit  6.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAGUUAAUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.75, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.80, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAGCACUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -15.83, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.76, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
GGAUAAGGGUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68863.1, 11 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -13.85, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.08, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F   
CAGGAAUUCGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89082.1, 11 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -12.63, deficit  7.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35   
UAACAGAUGAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58446.1, 12 NTs,        GACCUAGAUCACCC,score     -15.70, deficit  7.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.85, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35 
GAACAAGUAACCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.63, deficit  6.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCACAUGAAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -16.32, deficit  7.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CUCAGAACGAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -14.77, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.24, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
GAAGGCCGAAUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -13.47, deficit -0.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.87, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
GGCAAAGCACCUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_56677.4, 13 NTs,       CUGAACGCAUCUAAG,score     -14.01, deficit  7.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35
GUUAAUUAGGAGUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58539.1, 15 NTs,      UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG,score     -17.56, deficit  7.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.71, ed 99, 5 cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 86.2000	 78.2000	4
5	100.0000	 88.0000	 49.4000	23
6	100.0000	 87.4000	 51.0000	60
7	 99.4000	 53.8000	 16.2000	51
8	 99.4000	 27.6000	  3.8000	46
9	 98.2000	 18.0000	  1.4000	68
10	 95.2000	  7.4000	  0.0000	41
11	 82.0000	  3.4000	  0.0000	42
12	 43.4000	  0.4000	  0.0000	23
13	 17.6000	  0.6000	  0.0000	12
14	  6.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.2000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.8000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  54 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  71 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  82 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 214 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 243 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 247 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 255 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 256 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 265 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 272 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 277 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 282 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 282 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 295 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 308 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 316 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 324 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 328 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 333 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 342 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 352 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 353 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 353 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 355 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 367 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 375 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 388 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 389 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 438 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 447 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 449 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 494 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 507 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 507 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 524 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 534 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 539 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 541 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 546 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 550 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 551 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 730 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 737 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 817 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1002 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.2167%
Number of models giving false positives is 298 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.33
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.53
