Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_8.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:12:43
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.3762 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.3552 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.6534 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.5930 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.5680 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5360 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   4.7017 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.6867 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.0069 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.6630 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.4993 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.3748 minutes

ans =

    12

AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.32, deficit  0.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.31, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.62, deficit  0.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.87, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.33, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UUGGA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.79, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AGAUU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.30, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
AUGUU 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.57, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
AACUU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.34, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
UUGGA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.79, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56387.1,  5 NTs,                 AUUUU,score      -6.25, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55                 
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.40, deficit  0.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.40, deficit  0.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGCCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.30, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UCUCA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CACCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.99, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -6.38, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.40, deficit  0.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CCGUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -8.75, deficit  5.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.90, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGACA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.16, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
AUGAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
CUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.84, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.12, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -2.79, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
AUUAU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.09, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.09, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
AUUUAU 1  Matches 34; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -6.90, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GUGUAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.49, deficit  0.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
GGGCGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.69, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.44, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CUUUUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -3.94, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AUCUAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.34, deficit  0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CCCAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.84, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUCUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.92, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GUAAGC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.29, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CCUUCG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAGCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -6.14, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUUCUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -9.74, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCAUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -5.02, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UAGCGA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.40, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
GGACAC 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.29, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.96, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AGCACU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -6.13, deficit  1.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAUGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GGCGAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.31, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
AAGCGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.33, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.27, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CCAAAG 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.62, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGUAAC 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.90, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GGCUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UAAACA 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.01, deficit  5.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUUAAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.46, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUCUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CUUUUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -3.94, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUAACU 1  Matches 22; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.44, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUAG 1  Matches 37; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -4.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CUAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -5.40, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.04, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GGAUUC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.03, deficit  0.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGUGUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.13, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GUGAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -5.50, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
AGAGAU 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.15, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.16, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAUGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GUUACC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.29, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGUCGG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.88, deficit -0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GAGAUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.11, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
GGAUAC 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAGUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -6.14, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGUAAG 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.69, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCAAC 1  Matches 19; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.68, deficit  5.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUUUGC 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.24, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.45, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CGGAUG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -3.94, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
CACAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.55, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UCUUGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -7.29, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUGUCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score     -11.79, deficit  8.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CGCGUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.41, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CGAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UUCAUAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.91, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CUCUGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.67, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
UCUAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.82, deficit  3.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCUAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.05, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUGUUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.69, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
AAAUAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.19, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
GUGUAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.91, deficit  1.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAAUUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  0.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
CAAGGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -7.78, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CACAUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.84, deficit  3.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CGAAAGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CCGACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score     -11.77, deficit  5.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCGCGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.06, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
UAAUAUA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.21, deficit  1.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CUGGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.85, deficit  1.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AUGAAGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.73, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
AUGACUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.28, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UGAAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.01, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
UAUAAAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -6.70, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGAGUAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.72, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CAUUUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGGAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGUCUUU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -5.93, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGAAUAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.56, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CAGUUGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.06, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GCCUUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.40, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GUGUCGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -9.88, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
GAGAGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -18.09, deficit 12.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GUGAGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.81, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGAAUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UACACAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.92, deficit  2.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
AAAUUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -5.86, deficit  0.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUCCUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -7.54, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UGAAUGA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_40469.1,  4 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.19, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GAUGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -6.69, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUAAGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
GAGAACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.68, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
CAGCAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.27, deficit  3.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GCCGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.30, deficit -0.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CACCACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.67, deficit  1.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCGGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -7.18, deficit  3.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CUCCAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.59, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUCUGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.83, deficit  1.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CUUCAGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -7.29, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GUCAGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.62, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CUCAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.84, deficit  0.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GAAAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -3.99, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
CAAGCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -12.66, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CGCGAUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.78, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UAAGAGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.64, deficit  2.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUCUUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -7.93, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
AGAAAGGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.14, deficit  0.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCUGUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.23, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
UCGGGAUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.10, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CAAGUAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -8.06, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CGCGGCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.71, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GUCAAAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -6.98, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
UAAAAAGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.44, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAGCACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.22, deficit  2.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAUUUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.82, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GAGCUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -11.05, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CGUAAUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -6.22, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CCAUUGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.15, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
UGAAAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGUGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.29, deficit  3.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUGAUUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.57, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CGGUAAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CAGAGCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -12.34, deficit  7.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAGAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.66, deficit  6.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CAUCCGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.06, deficit  4.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUGAACGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -8.88, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
GAGAUUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score     -10.66, deficit  4.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GAAAUAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -6.89, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CUCCCGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -10.46, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CCCAACUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -11.57, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CGAAACUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -6.61, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUAAUCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.62, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAUCCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -10.98, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAGAGACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.01, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
GGAGACCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -9.91, deficit  6.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CCUUCAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -6.50, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UCGUUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -11.91, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUAGUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -10.96, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GCGUAAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -9.54, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
UGUUAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.07, deficit  2.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
GAGAUUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -9.47, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUAAUUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.22, deficit  3.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GUUCAUAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.98, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUGAUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -5.77, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CAGGGUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -7.96, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CUAGCGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.39, deficit  3.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUAGUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.06, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GACUCGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.86, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CCCAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -11.06, deficit  3.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GUUUCGUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.25, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
UCAUUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score     -11.40, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
UGGCCCCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -12.20, deficit  4.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUAAAAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.72, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
GGAAAAACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.88, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GAACAGCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -12.60, deficit  3.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GUGAAAGGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -6.46, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CUUUCCGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUUGUUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.60, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
GAGGGAUAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -10.03, deficit  2.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
UGCACCCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -13.81, deficit  6.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAAUUUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.30, deficit  3.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CAGCCGCCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score      -8.96, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GUUCGCGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.85, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUUCACCUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -6.09, deficit  0.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
CUUUAAUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.52, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GCACUUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -14.04, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CGCAUAUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -13.09, deficit  9.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUAUUCAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -10.53, deficit  6.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
GGAGCGGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGUGUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -7.93, deficit  1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCCAAAAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -6.28, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GUGUCUGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -9.74, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CUAGCCCCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.78, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUUAGAUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -7.80, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CGUUGGAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.05, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UCAAAUUCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -11.81, deficit  6.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUAGACGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -8.78, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGAAACAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.91, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUCUUUUUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.71, deficit  6.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UCUUCUAGA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score      -8.23, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
GAGAGAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -7.78, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GGACUAGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -13.18, deficit  7.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
UACUGAUGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -12.77, deficit  5.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
AUAUUUUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -9.15, deficit  3.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.92, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UAAAAGAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -9.38, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGCAAGACU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -9.87, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
AUGGUUGGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.51, deficit  3.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGGUGCGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -10.30, deficit  4.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
AAUUGUUAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score      -9.74, deficit  1.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CGGUACCUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.90, deficit  5.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGCGGAAAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -9.93, deficit  4.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CGAAGCACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
AUUGGUGAU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score      -9.90, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAUCGGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.78, deficit  5.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CUUGGUUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -7.89, deficit  1.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GUUUUUCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -7.95, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
GAGACAAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.50, deficit  6.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UCUAUCUCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.27, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GUUUCUUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.87, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
UUUCACCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score     -11.70, deficit  7.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGGAUUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.55, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGACCACUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -17.72, deficit 10.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUGGUAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.68, deficit  7.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GUCAAAAUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -6.78, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CGAGAAAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -9.83, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAAACAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -10.04, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGACCGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.49, deficit  5.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUCAAGGCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -10.16, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GAGGACUAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.64, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GCCAAUUUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.41, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GUCGCGUGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.38, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGAAGCCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -13.02, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
ACCCCCGGCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -11.04, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGCUUCCUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.39, deficit  5.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UAAGUUUAUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.22, deficit  5.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUUCAACCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.30, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGAGGCCAGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.32, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.86, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGGAAAACAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score      -8.95, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUAACCUAUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -12.82, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GUUGAAAGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -10.04, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GAGAAUUGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.69, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CUCGGGAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -9.98, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
CGGGGUUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -14.22, deficit  4.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CUCUCAUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.36, deficit  1.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAUGAAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.82, deficit  3.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUCCGUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.83, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCAAAGUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.34, deficit  7.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUCGAAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.30, deficit  7.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CACGAAAAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.87, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CAAUAAGUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.54, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.61, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUAGGCGUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -12.97, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
GUGAAAUUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -8.40, deficit  2.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
AUUCUUUCCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -13.32, deficit  5.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAAAGCUCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -13.24, deficit  6.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GGAUCGGAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -13.13, deficit  6.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
UGUUAAGUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -15.29, deficit  7.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUCUAAACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score      -8.20, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
UUGAUUUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -10.91, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CAUCAACGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.74, deficit  0.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GUAAAAAUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -7.45, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UUGGUCAAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.77, deficit  3.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
AGUCUUGAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.00, deficit  7.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGUCGGCCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.04, deficit  7.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CACAAUACUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.72, deficit  3.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAUUAUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score      -9.18, deficit  2.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGGAGUGCUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -12.33, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.28, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GGGAAUCCAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -16.81, deficit  9.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UCUAUCACUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.26, deficit  6.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
AGUCAAAAGAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score      -8.63, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
ACACCUAGGCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.56, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.95, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAACUGCAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -15.96, deficit  9.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAGAGAAGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.89, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CUGCAUUAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.99, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GCGGUAACAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -14.34, deficit  6.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CGGAUAACUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -14.56, deficit  7.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
GGUUUCAGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.76, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGUUGACGGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.74, deficit  4.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUCGAUGAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.10, deficit  7.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CCCGAAACCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.32, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
ACAGAAAAACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.72, deficit  8.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CGAGAUACUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.35, deficit  2.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAGUGUGUCAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score      -9.74, deficit -0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
GUAAAAAGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.14, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GGGAUCGUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.43, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUUUCCUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.53, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGAAGUUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -16.12, deficit  8.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGUUGAAGUUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.45, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGGAAGUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -10.89, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCACUGAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.60, deficit  5.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GCAUUGAAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -11.79, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CGACUAUUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.21, deficit  6.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGACUUUUCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.56, deficit  8.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGGGAAUUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.05, deficit  3.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.35, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGAGACAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.48, deficit  3.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
GAUUGAAGGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.07, deficit  2.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGUAAUGGAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.48, deficit  4.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCAGCUUUGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score      -9.96, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
UGCUUGGAACA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.50, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
UUGAAUUGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -10.81, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GAACAUGAAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.59, deficit  5.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUUGGAUAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -10.80, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
CUUUUGAUAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score      -9.82, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
AGAAGGUCGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.84, deficit  8.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCGGCAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -10.50, deficit  4.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CGUGUGAGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.13, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UUUCACGAUAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.52, deficit  4.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
UACAGGAAAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score      -7.68, deficit  0.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUCGCUUCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.89, deficit  5.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UGAUCACGAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score      -8.88, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAACGCAGUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.66, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAAAACAUAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.01, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAAAAAACAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score      -7.88, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GAUACCGAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -17.54, deficit 11.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UGAAAGGAAGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.56, deficit  7.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.64, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCGGUUUAGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.05, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
UUUAUGAUGCGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -13.21, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
UGAAUAGGUAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -16.66, deficit  8.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
UUAGGAUAUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -17.20, deficit  9.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCACUGUUCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -13.38, deficit  4.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.80, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GAAAAGAACUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.24, deficit  6.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CGAAUUUAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.05, deficit  3.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAUCGACUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -16.24, deficit  6.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
CGGCUAAAACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -18.91, deficit  7.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCAGCUUUGUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.05, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GGUAACUGAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -15.32, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.07, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CCUGAACCAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.11, deficit  7.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.50, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
GUGAAAGAGACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.61, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GUCAAAAUGAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -14.93, deficit  7.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CUCACGAAUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.17, deficit  5.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.69, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CAUUCGAAGACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.12, deficit  5.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.86, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUCCUCUUCUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -16.06, deficit  6.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.55, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
UGAAAAUUUAAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.57, deficit  6.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAGGGAAGGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -17.84, deficit  9.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GACUCGGACAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -15.92, deficit  7.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.07, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CCUUUGAUUGAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38011.1, 13 NTs,        GCUUAGAAGCAGCC,score     -13.87, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.83, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCGAAUUCAUCUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_56677.4, 13 NTs,       CUGAACGCAUCUAAG,score     -14.43, deficit  8.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35
CGGCAUCGGCUGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -18.89, deficit  8.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
GAGAAUUUGAAUACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42211.1, 13 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -13.67, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35     
CUCGAAAGAUAAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30585.1, 16 NTs,     AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU,score     -19.76, deficit  7.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 83.2500	 70.0000	4
5	100.0000	 91.2500	 48.0000	23
6	100.0000	 86.7500	 50.0000	60
7	 99.7500	 49.5000	 15.7500	51
8	 99.0000	 29.0000	  4.2500	46
9	 99.0000	 18.7500	  1.7500	68
10	 94.2500	  9.7500	  0.2500	41
11	 85.7500	  3.7500	  0.0000	42
12	 44.2500	  0.7500	  0.0000	23
13	 16.2500	  0.2500	  0.0000	12
14	  6.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.5000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.7500	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.7500	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.5000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.2500	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  32 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  71 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  72 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 234 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 234 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 237 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 238 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 248 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 248 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 251 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 258 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 259 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 260 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 276 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 278 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 283 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 292 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 298 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 301 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 308 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 347 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 348 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 364 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 386 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 389 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 418 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 432 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 439 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 440 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 456 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 463 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 484 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 497 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 505 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 561 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 600 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 661 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 755 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.3750%
Number of models giving false positives is 298 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.92
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.54
