Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_4.mat
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.05, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.05, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -8.00, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.21, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUCA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.94, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -6.91, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UCAAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -5.15, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CAGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.91, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -4.11, deficit  0.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
AAUCU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.57, deficit  1.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAUAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.35, deficit  0.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UUGCA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.89, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
UUUUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -2.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GAUCC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.45, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGGAU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.36, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GUCCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
CAUCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.32, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAAA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.95, deficit  0.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUCUA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.91, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GCGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UCAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -6.79, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
UUCUA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.91, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UUCCA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.79, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.84, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
UGGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -6.51, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GCUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAUAA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.46, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.04, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUCUA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.91, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGCGGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.69, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CGGGAG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.59, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUAGUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.29, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCUUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.77, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.93, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GCAACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -8.35, deficit  2.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGAGAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CCUAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -6.00, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
AAAACU 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.85, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.17, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGACAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.47, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGAAAA 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.18, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GAACCC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -8.39, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.12, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
CUGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGAAAU 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UGAAAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.26, deficit  2.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UCCCAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.25, deficit  0.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GCCACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.36, deficit  1.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.11, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UGCCAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -9.78, deficit  7.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUUCUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -9.74, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUGAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CUUACG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.39, deficit  0.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUUAUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.52, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -5.40, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.04, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GAGGCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.07, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AAGUCU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.10, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUACCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.91, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUUAUG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.45, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -6.72, deficit -0.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGCCAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -6.55, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.54, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
GGGAAC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score     -10.00, deficit  6.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUCAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.59, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAAGAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.08, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UUAUCA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.59, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGCGAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.31, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GGUAAC 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.90, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAACG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.30, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAAAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.04, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
AGAAAU 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUCGUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.45, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGGUGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.13, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GAACAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -3.34, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
AUCUUU 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.93, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UGAGGA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -6.42, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
GCCAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.89, deficit  0.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UUCGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -7.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CGACGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.46, deficit  0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAACAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UAUCUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -7.21, deficit  3.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CAAAGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.29, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CGAAGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.44, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GAAAGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.08, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GUAUGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -7.03, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GCGCGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -4.97, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GCUGGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score     -10.61, deficit  5.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAGGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score     -10.32, deficit  5.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GAGCCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -7.67, deficit  4.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CCGAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.29, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
UAGAGGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score     -10.03, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CAACCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.50, deficit  1.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
UGAAUGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_40469.1,  4 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -8.20, deficit  3.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GGUCAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.78, deficit  2.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GUCGUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -8.63, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CUUAGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
GUGUUUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.77, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
GUUUUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -5.16, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
GGUUUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -5.10, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GUGGGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -9.42, deficit  4.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGAUUGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.20, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CGCUCAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -9.47, deficit  6.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGCUCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.74, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UGCGUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.72, deficit  4.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
GGGAUGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -9.43, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGAAUAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.42, deficit  0.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.08, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUAUUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -5.91, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAAAGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.29, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
UUAAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAAGGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score     -10.32, deficit  5.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGACAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.20, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUCGUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.12, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GGUCCGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -9.91, deficit  7.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGUAAAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.11, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
AGACAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -8.41, deficit  2.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CUAACUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -4.65, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCCCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -9.20, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGAAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.17, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GUUCGUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -5.77, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
AAUUUGU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_33612.1,  6 NTs,               CUUUUGG,score      -6.73, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55                 
CGUCGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.89, deficit  4.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGACUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.32, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUUUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -4.65, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GGGUGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.56, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGCAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UGUAAGA 1  Matches 21; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.34, deficit  7.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.39, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGUGAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.86, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GGAAACAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UAAAAAGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.44, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAUUAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -6.89, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
UGACCUGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -7.32, deficit  0.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAGGACAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.66, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CUUGAUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -5.77, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
UGUCAGAA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.92, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
UAAAACAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.88, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GAAAAUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -8.41, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CGACCAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.95, deficit  2.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAGCCGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -8.87, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUGCGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -9.37, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGUUUAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.62, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CGAAUUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.48, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUUGAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -9.00, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
UGUCCAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score     -11.02, deficit  4.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUGUUGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.99, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CGAGUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.91, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GCUAAUUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -8.75, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
AUUUUUUU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -8.21, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CGUGCGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -9.46, deficit  3.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUUUUACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.15, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GAAGCGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.86, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CAUGAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -8.17, deficit  3.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
CGGCUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.57, deficit  2.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CUCAUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -12.20, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
UUCAACCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.35, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
AGAACAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -4.79, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.02, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GUGAAACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.74, deficit  2.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CAGGGAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -13.20, deficit  5.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
CUCGUCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score     -11.96, deficit  8.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CAGCAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -8.87, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAUAUGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.98, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
UUCGUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -12.67, deficit  6.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
CGCAACGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.90, deficit  0.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAAAGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.66, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAUUGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GAAAGCGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.79, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGUCGAGA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -9.01, deficit  4.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGGAGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.69, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGGAUCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.84, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GUCAAGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.21, deficit  2.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
AGGAAAGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -4.93, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.11, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CCGGCACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.46, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCUGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.36, deficit  3.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUAGACG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.25, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
AAUCGUAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -13.43, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GGACUAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score     -10.19, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCGAGACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.40, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
UGUGGCGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -8.54, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GGAUAGCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.11, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UACGACACA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score     -12.59, deficit  8.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGACAAGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.98, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGAUCACAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -10.75, deficit  7.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUCGAAGUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.68, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GGCCGAAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.34, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAGAAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score     -12.64, deficit  5.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
UAAGAAGAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -6.46, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGCGGAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -11.16, deficit  3.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
AACAAUUAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.85, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCCUUACG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.29, deficit  3.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CUAAAUCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.37, deficit  1.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGGAGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -9.21, deficit  3.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GUUAUUUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score     -11.09, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGUGUCUAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -9.74, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
GGAACGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUGAGUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.40, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CUUCAUUCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.52, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
UAAAAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -10.47, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUAUUAGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -8.85, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UCAGACAAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -9.16, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GAGUUACAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.08, deficit  1.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CUAAAGAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.70, deficit  8.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGUUUUGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.25, deficit  2.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GUUUGAAUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -5.79, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GUCAGGUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.15, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAAAGCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.28, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AAAAAAAAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -7.23, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUCGUGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -10.26, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
UGGAAAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -11.81, deficit  5.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
GAUAACAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -8.53, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AUGGGCACU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.87, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CACCUUCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -13.16, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUCCGGAUU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.84, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCGAAUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.06, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAGGAGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CUGUUACUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -11.50, deficit  4.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
CGGCGAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.17, deficit  0.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.49, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGAUCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.23, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCACCGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -8.85, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CAAAUGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GCACUGAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score      -9.46, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUCUUGACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score     -10.15, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
UGUGAUUAA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -11.06, deficit  2.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CGCGGAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -9.92, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UGGCUUAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -11.58, deficit  4.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
UUAGGGGUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -11.64, deficit  6.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CUAAUCGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CUAAAGACUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -10.08, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GUAAUUAGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -13.36, deficit  7.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CUUAUGCAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -11.89, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
GGGGGAGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -6.97, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUAUGUCUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -13.10, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
CGUCGUAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.06, deficit  7.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGGUCUAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -11.56, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GUAUGUGAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -10.56, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
GUUAAGGUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.28, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GUGGAGUUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -10.18, deficit  1.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GGUACAGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.93, deficit  2.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCCCACGGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -12.13, deficit  8.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
UCAAUAGGUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -11.06, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.41, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUCAUGAUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -8.39, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GUGAUAACCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.15, deficit  6.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
AGCGGUUCAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -12.58, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GCCGUAUGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -11.04, deficit  7.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CGAUCAGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -17.86, deficit 10.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAGUCUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CAGGCGAUAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.94, deficit  0.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CCAGUUAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -10.18, deficit  6.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
CCUUUUCUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -12.72, deficit  6.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
CAAAAAGACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.12, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
ACGGUCUGAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -12.88, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GUAAUCGAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -11.03, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
GGAUGUGGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.64, deficit  3.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGUGAAUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -9.43, deficit  1.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAACCGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.66, deficit  8.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGGCUUGUAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -12.82, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
CUUGGACUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.61, deficit  6.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
AUAGUGUUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -11.37, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
UUGUUUUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.32, deficit  5.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGUAAUAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -11.83, deficit  3.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CAGGCUGGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score      -9.76, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-F                               
CUCGAAAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -10.20, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
UGAGUUUGGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.43, deficit  6.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CACAACAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.59, deficit  5.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
UGGAAGUUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.42, deficit  6.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUCAGCGUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -10.18, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CGAAGCGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -10.47, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAGGAAGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -8.88, deficit  2.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AGCGAUGAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.53, deficit  3.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUAAGGACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CUACAAUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -11.82, deficit  7.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
GCUGACGGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score      -7.66, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCGAGGAAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.99, deficit  4.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CACCGAUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -12.25, deficit  6.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GUAUCCUUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.74, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GGUAAGAAGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -14.67, deficit  8.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAAAAGGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.06, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GUUGUAAAUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -11.77, deficit  5.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.31, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CAUUCGAAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -11.51, deficit  5.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GAAAACUUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GGACCGAAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -11.39, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CGAUAAAGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.58, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGAUUGGUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -10.80, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
UUAGGUUGAUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score      -8.95, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
AUGACUAAGCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -14.78, deficit 10.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
GGUAGAGAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.49, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GCUCCAAGUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.30, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAUUGAAAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.10, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGCGGGGAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.64, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
UGACCGAUAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score      -9.17, deficit  1.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GUUCGAAAGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.69, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GUAGAUCCUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score      -9.43, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUGAAAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -10.29, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGCGAUCGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -13.45, deficit  3.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
GUUAAGCUACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -10.80, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.74, ed 99, 4 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GGAUCUAUCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -11.38, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
UGCGACAAAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.52, deficit  3.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.35, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAGAUCUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.89, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GUUGGGUAGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.97, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGAAGAUUCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.78, deficit  5.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAGAACGUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.19, deficit  7.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.96, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
ACGGCUUCCCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -12.88, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.07, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
UUUUCUGCAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.06, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGACUAGACAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -12.82, deficit  7.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.85, ed 99, 4 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
CUGAACAGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.89, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
AAAAUGAAGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -12.06, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GGAAGUGCGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -14.26, deficit  7.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUGUCAAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -10.69, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
CACAUGAUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -12.73, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.44, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CUUACUGUACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -15.98, deficit 10.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAUAGAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -11.97, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
UCAUGAGAAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.00, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.13, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCAAAAUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -10.32, deficit  4.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
AGUCUUCAGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -16.76, deficit  6.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGAGUUCGAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.74, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
CUCUCUGAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.21, deficit  7.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGGACUGGUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -10.73, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
GAUACAGACCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.86, deficit  5.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.52, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GUUUUAGACCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -14.63, deficit  6.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.91, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CAAAGAGAUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.68, deficit  8.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGAUUCUGUAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.56, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUAGUGAACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -10.71, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
GAGGGAGAUUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.24, deficit  3.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.31, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAUGCUGAGAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -12.87, deficit  4.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.12, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CGCCCUACGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -16.67, deficit  9.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GUGUCACGUAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -12.00, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CGUUGAGAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.84, deficit  6.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.28, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUGAGAGAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -13.02, deficit  6.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CGCGAGUGAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -16.95, deficit  8.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
AAUUCAAAACGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -14.89, deficit  7.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAACUCUGCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -11.23, deficit  2.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGGGACAGAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.82, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.69, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGGAAGAGUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.09, deficit  6.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGCUAGUUAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.61, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
AGAGAUGCCCAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -19.91, deficit 12.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
GAAAUCCUAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.97, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUCAUUAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -15.35, deficit  8.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GUAAUCGAUGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -15.88, deficit 10.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
UAGGGAACCUCGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20714.1, 11 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -14.28, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.16, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGGGGAUGAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.1, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -13.67, deficit  6.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55
GAAAAGCGGUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -12.97, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.89, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
CGCAAAGAUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -12.44, deficit  5.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGACUACGAAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.50, deficit  7.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CGGACGUGGCAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -13.80, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.71, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
AGAAAGAGAAUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.82, deficit  8.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUGUUGCAGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.28, deficit  6.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.83, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUCACCAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -13.77, deficit  5.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
UUUUCAGAAGAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -12.40, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
CGGAAUUGACGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42211.1, 13 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -17.28, deficit  7.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.98, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35     
UGUCAAAGGUUGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -18.86, deficit  7.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.80, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
CGAGGAAUGAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -15.03, deficit  0.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.86, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
CGGACCAACACGCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_52657.1, 15 NTs,     CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG,score     -18.58, deficit  6.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.32, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGUUGGCCACAGAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98870.1, 12 NTs,     CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG,score     -19.28, deficit 11.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35
UGAAAUAAUGGGAAGAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90257.1, 15 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -18.39, deficit  6.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.26, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 86.0000	 78.0000	4
5	100.0000	 87.0000	 53.5000	23
6	100.0000	 87.5000	 54.0000	60
7	 99.0000	 56.0000	 13.5000	51
8	 98.5000	 30.5000	  4.0000	46
9	100.0000	 16.0000	  1.0000	68
10	 94.5000	  7.0000	  0.0000	41
11	 84.5000	  4.0000	  0.0000	42
12	 47.5000	  1.0000	  0.0000	23
13	 19.0000	  0.5000	  0.0000	12
14	  6.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  3.5000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.5000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  21 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  33 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  35 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 216 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 294 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 303 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 325 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 409 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.5833%
Number of models giving false positives is 293 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.50
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.65
