Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_12.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:18:48
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.3746 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.3641 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.6609 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.5954 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.5787 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5498 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   4.7985 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.7553 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.0699 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.7175 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.5584 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.4413 minutes

ans =

    12

UGUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
AUGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.36, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.71, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.87, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.20, deficit  3.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.90, deficit  3.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.20, deficit  1.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.38, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAAA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.95, deficit  0.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AGUGU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUGAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.89, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.30, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GCAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UGCUA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -5.07, deficit  0.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GACGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.74, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.73, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGUA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.00, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.78, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUUGC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.82, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.06, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.12, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CGUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.99, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
ACGAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
AUAUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UUAAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.30, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UCGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -11.15, deficit  8.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.87, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
ACUAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.28, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CAGUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_24625.1,  5 NTs,                 CAGUG,score      -2.57, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.73, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAAAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.96, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGACU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.16, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGCUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.94, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GAGUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_24625.1,  5 NTs,                 CAGUG,score      -2.68, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -2.84, deficit  0.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UUAUA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.82, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUCAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -2.79, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
AAGUU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_24625.1,  5 NTs,                 CAGUG,score      -2.71, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GAAGAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.72, deficit  0.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAUGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GCAGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.55, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAGCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -6.14, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GAAGCC 1  Matches 18; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.41, deficit  5.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.39, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCCGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.13, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CGUAUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAAUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.47, deficit  0.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CAUGCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F                             
GACUGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -6.71, deficit  1.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGCCUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -5.27, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUAUGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -6.50, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
UGACAG 1  Matches 20; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.35, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.01, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGUUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.16, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGAAUG 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.56, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGACG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.04, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAUCAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -2.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
GCGUUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -6.97, deficit  1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GGAGCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -6.14, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UAGACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -9.31, deficit  4.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CCCUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.32, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -7.49, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
UGAUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -8.50, deficit  4.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.55, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UUUGCA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.34, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CCAAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.49, deficit  0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
UUUCUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -12.13, deficit  9.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUACCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.91, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GGCACC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -5.98, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAGUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -6.14, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGAGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UGUCCA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -5.73, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUCUAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.32, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.28, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CGGGAG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.59, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGAGAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -7.23, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGAAGU 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.15, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUCUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -7.14, deficit  3.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GGGCGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.69, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.44, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
GAUGGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -5.24, deficit  0.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
GGUUUC 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CCCCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.12, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUACGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -6.81, deficit  4.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
CUAGGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -7.13, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
ACGUUU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -6.93, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GGAGAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UUGUGA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.59, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGGAUA 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.02, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAUUCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GAAUAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.17, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CUAAUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.26, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAGUUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.50, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUAGGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.11, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
UGCCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -8.81, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -7.06, deficit  3.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GAAAGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
UGAAAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -8.50, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.68, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GGCUUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.97, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CCUAAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.36, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGGCACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -9.17, deficit  5.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
UACAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -8.41, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CCGUCGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.15, deficit  1.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GAAGAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.53, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CCACAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -11.85, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAACUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUAGUCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CAGAGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -9.87, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUCUAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
UGAUAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.11, deficit  2.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGCUAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.20, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
UUUUAGA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.71, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CUUCGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -5.83, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GAAAUUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGUGAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.28, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -7.64, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CGCGAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -9.22, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
UAAUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -7.17, deficit  1.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGGGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.06, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
UUGGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.14, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUCGACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.16, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
UUAGCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.56, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CUAAGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.64, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGAUGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.97, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UUACUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -8.86, deficit  4.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
GGAGGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -8.92, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UCUAUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.42, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GCAAUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -5.96, deficit  0.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
AGCUCGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.80, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CGGAAUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.73, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AUGAGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.77, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGUAAUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score     -10.38, deficit  5.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AAGGCUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.81, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CGUACAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.24, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCUUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.15, deficit  2.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -6.23, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CAAACUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.26, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUCAUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -5.93, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
GGCUCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.64, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CUGAAUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -7.66, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CAUGAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -8.17, deficit  3.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
CGAACUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.47, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAAUGAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -8.06, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CUGGAGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.69, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UGAAUGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.34, deficit  2.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGCAUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.25, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CAAAUUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.22, deficit  3.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CCAAAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -9.65, deficit  4.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CUUUUUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -8.11, deficit  3.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CACAAUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.59, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
AGCAGAUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.19, deficit  3.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUCUCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.03, deficit  0.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UAUUGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -9.54, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AUUUGAGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.45, deficit  2.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AGCUUCAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.61, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CUUCUAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score     -10.01, deficit  3.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GUCCGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -11.90, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
CUUGGGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.43, deficit  2.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUAGGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.13, deficit  1.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGAGUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -8.29, deficit  4.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUUCCGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.99, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GAAGAAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -10.05, deficit  4.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GGAACUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score     -10.21, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CAAGAUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.80, deficit  1.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CGAAUUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.48, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUCAAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.31, deficit  3.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GGGGAAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.63, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
GCGAUGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.10, deficit  3.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAAUUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score     -10.66, deficit  4.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGAAAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.17, deficit  0.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAGAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -9.57, deficit  6.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UCUCGGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.36, deficit  3.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUAAACG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.15, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GCUUCUGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -8.25, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUUUUAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.95, deficit  3.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUAGCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -7.88, deficit  2.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGACAAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.64, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CUCAUUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -9.39, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
UGAUUUGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.00, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
UGAAGCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -15.76, deficit  9.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAUUGUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -8.59, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CGAGGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -8.99, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCAUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -12.52, deficit  4.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CCUGAUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.15, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CUUUUGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.10, deficit  2.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GCUGGAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -9.00, deficit  2.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
AGCCCAAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -11.08, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUCUGACU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.14, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
AUGAAUAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -7.76, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
GAAAAAGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -7.09, deficit  1.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GGCAAGUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.62, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAAACGAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -9.59, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
AUGGCAGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -9.25, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
GCAAAUACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -9.87, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
UGUAGGGUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score      -9.89, deficit  3.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AGUGAGAGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -8.74, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CGCUGUGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -13.28, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-F                               
AGGAUAAGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.98, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CGAGAACAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.23, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGGCUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.57, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
AUAGGCGAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -8.45, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCUUGGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -6.94, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUCUCAAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -6.55, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CCCUAAGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.82, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGUACUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -10.12, deficit  4.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
CAAAUUGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.21, deficit  3.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GAAAUAGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -10.20, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CUCUGAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -8.87, deficit  1.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
GGUGAAAGC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GGUGUAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score      -8.72, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUUUGUGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score     -10.69, deficit  5.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUGAAAAC 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.50, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.33, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
AGAUUGAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.82, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGAAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -12.87, deficit  6.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CGUGAGAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.71, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CAGUAGUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score      -8.91, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
CUGAUGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -11.69, deficit  5.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGAGCUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -7.61, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
GGACUGCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -10.38, deficit  3.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CGAUAAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.17, deficit  2.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GGCUAAAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -9.77, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CUGUUGUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -7.15, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
UGGGAUUAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.37, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUCUUAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.40, deficit  1.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUCACCGGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.67, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCCACUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score     -11.45, deficit  8.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGUGAAUAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.57, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GCUCGUCCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.44, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CGGAAAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.97, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GGUCCUGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -11.21, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
CGGUCACAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -7.34, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGCGAAAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -9.84, deficit  4.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CUCAAAAGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -6.99, deficit  1.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CGGCGGAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -8.65, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CUUCUUAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.30, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAAGGAGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GGUUUCCCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -10.39, deficit  6.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
CGAAGCGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score     -10.87, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUUAUCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -9.04, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
GAACGAACUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.45, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.89, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAGGCAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -14.69, deficit  8.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CAUUUUAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -12.57, deficit  6.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
GAGGGCGGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score      -7.64, deficit -1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
CGUCAAGCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.43, deficit  4.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAAUCGGCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.73, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
UUGAAAAUGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -7.10, deficit  1.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGAAAGAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -8.47, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GCUGAAAAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score     -12.31, deficit  7.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -10.47, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAUUGCAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -15.33, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GUGACAGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.72, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUCCCAAUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score      -7.69, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CUAGCGAUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -9.44, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
CAGAAACCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -11.56, deficit  3.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CAUGCGAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.68, deficit  7.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGUUUGAGUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -15.61, deficit  9.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAAAGUCGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -12.48, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.46, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
UGAUAACGCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.22, deficit  6.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAAAACUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.94, deficit  6.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUUUUUCGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score      -7.28, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
CGUGAGAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.11, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GAUUGUAUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -13.38, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GGGGAGGUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -11.30, deficit  6.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
AUACGAGGAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.00, deficit  7.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGGCUAGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.20, deficit  6.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGUCUGAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.33, deficit  5.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CAAGGUGACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -10.52, deficit  4.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
GACAAGUUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -10.31, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
AGUUAAAGAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -9.53, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GAAUGGCAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.15, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCGAUUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.09, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.60, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUUAUGAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score      -9.33, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
CUUUCUAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -7.30, deficit  2.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
UUGAGACGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.38, deficit  5.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GGGGAGGAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -8.15, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUUCUCUGAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.55, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGUGAAAGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -9.29, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GGAUUACGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.35, deficit  4.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAGAGGAAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.37, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GUUCUCCCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -16.57, deficit  8.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGGGAAAGGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -11.58, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CUGUAUUCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.19, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UCGGGAUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -14.17, deficit  6.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
UGCGGAAUAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -10.33, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CGUUUAAAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -10.29, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAUCGCUGUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.91, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
CAAAUGAUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -11.23, deficit  0.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GGACUCGUAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.40, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUAUAAUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score      -9.20, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAGAUUACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -15.85, deficit  7.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUAUGGGAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -12.59, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGGAUACAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -10.81, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UCUUGGGGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.02, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AUGGAAGAAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.13, deficit  7.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGCCGAUCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -12.35, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
UGAAAUGGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.55, deficit  4.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUUUCAUGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -12.87, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
GGGGGAAUAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.07, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.21, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUUUUAACUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score      -9.60, deficit  1.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
UGACCGAAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -13.71, deficit  8.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CGUCUGAUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.10, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGAAUCUCGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -17.36, deficit  9.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGCUUUUUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -11.75, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.96, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CGCCCAAAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -10.69, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CUGAAUGUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.09, deficit  7.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UUUGCCAAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -11.47, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGUAACAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -15.97, deficit  8.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGCAAUGAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -13.36, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAAAGAACUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -13.08, deficit  8.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUGAGCGUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.08, deficit  6.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUAGAAACUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.07, deficit  7.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUUGAAAUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.43, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGGAAACAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.78, deficit  5.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -8.84, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CUAAACGAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.62, deficit  6.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.36, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAUCAAUCGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.74, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.86, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGGCAUGGGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -11.10, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
CUGGGGAGCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -15.56, deficit  7.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCUUAAAUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.89, deficit  4.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.23, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAGUAACUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.30, deficit  4.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.72, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGACCCCAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -15.74, deficit  8.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.01, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCAAGCUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -12.91, deficit  7.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
AGAUCAGUUAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -11.27, deficit  3.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GGAGUUAAUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -11.44, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUCAAAUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.64, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
AGGACGUCUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.63, deficit  9.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAAUCGAUAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.23, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
CGAGUAGGAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -12.35, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.76, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGAUAGGACGGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.54, deficit  7.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.75, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAUAUAUUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -15.81, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAAAGAUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.68, deficit  6.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GAAAAUUCGGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.27, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CUGACAGCGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -17.79, deficit 10.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGAUUCAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -15.81, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAAAUGCAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -15.58, deficit 10.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
GCAGAGAAGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -17.03, deficit 10.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.90, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CGUUGUGAAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.88, deficit  8.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CAAUUGUUCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -13.22, deficit  3.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.17, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
GCGAAGUUGUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.27, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GCCUGCUACCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31581.4,  8 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.97, deficit  8.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.32, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCUACUGCAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -15.34, deficit  6.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.01, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GUGUCGAUGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -14.20, deficit  6.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.31, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CGAUCCAUUACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.38, deficit  8.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUCAAGACUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.62, deficit  6.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAUUCUGUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -12.95, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
CGUGACGAUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -15.57, deficit  8.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GGGUGUGAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.82, deficit  8.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CGAAAUUAGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.67, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
UUUUCGGAAGAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -13.50, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.32, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
CAAGAAGAGACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.00, deficit  4.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.10, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGAGGCGGAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -11.39, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CGAAUUAUUCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -13.50, deficit  5.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.81, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
GGCAGGUUGAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -15.73, deficit  6.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.05, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GAAUUCGCUUGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -17.61, deficit  8.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
CAAAAAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.04, deficit  5.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GGAGCGAGGAGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -17.90, deficit  6.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.58, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
UAAGGAGCUCUUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -13.78, deficit  4.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.29, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
CGAAAAGUCAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.52, deficit  7.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.33, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUUCCAGAGUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -17.89, deficit  7.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 81.5000	 68.6667	4
5	100.0000	 91.3333	 49.0000	23
6	100.0000	 85.8333	 47.3333	60
7	 99.8333	 50.3333	 14.3333	51
8	 99.1667	 26.6667	  3.5000	46
9	 99.3333	 19.3333	  1.8333	68
10	 94.5000	  8.8333	  0.3333	41
11	 85.1667	  4.1667	  0.0000	42
12	 45.6667	  0.6667	  0.0000	23
13	 17.3333	  0.1667	  0.0000	12
14	  6.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.8333	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.5000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.3333	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.1667	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  44 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 111 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 113 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 251 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 258 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 266 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 267 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 268 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 269 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 269 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 271 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 272 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 272 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 284 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 294 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 302 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 333 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 339 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 358 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 361 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 367 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 367 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 368 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 370 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 377 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 377 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 381 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 395 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 419 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 423 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 436 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 442 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 444 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 461 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 519 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 524 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 532 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 560 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 566 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 627 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 630 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 646 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 659 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 684 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 696 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 715 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 749 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 755 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 837 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 900 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 977 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.5069%
Number of models giving false positives is 299 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.71
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.37
