Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_5.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:08:12
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.4408 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.3875 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.6598 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.5921 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.5687 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5516 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   4.9099 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.8183 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.1506 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.8071 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.6921 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.5726 minutes

ans =

    12

CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.87, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.33, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -8.00, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.61, deficit  0.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.32, deficit  0.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
GUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AAGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.06, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
AUGAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CUCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCUAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.22, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.28, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
AGGAU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.36, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
GUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GACGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.74, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
UUGAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.89, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGCA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -6.15, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CAGUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_24625.1,  5 NTs,                 CAGUG,score      -2.57, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACCUU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -5.25, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.11, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
AGCCU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90197.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35                             
AUCUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.90, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.99, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUUAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
UAACA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCCAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -4.16, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
CCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
ACAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GAGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.27, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GGACGC 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.14, deficit  7.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAAUCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.14, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.40, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGAUGU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGCUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -6.30, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
AAAGUU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.45, deficit  0.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
AUCCGU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.19, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
UGGUUA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.07, deficit  1.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UUCAAG 1  Matches 11; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.74, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GCCUAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.38, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGUUGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.88, deficit -0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GAACUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -4.39, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-s35                               
GGGACC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.11, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
CUGGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -6.23, deficit  0.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UUCAAA 1  Matches 20; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.56, deficit  6.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.43, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UAAUGA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_52240.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -5.60, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGUGAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.48, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
AUGAAU 1  Matches 25; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.35, deficit  7.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAAUGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_52240.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -5.61, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUCAAG 1  Matches 20; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.86, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.11, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGCAAG 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -3.36, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCUUAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -7.10, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CUUUUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -3.94, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAUAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
UAAUCA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.36, deficit  0.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUUAC 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CUUUUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -3.94, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUCAC 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -3.80, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
CUCCUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.00, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUAAGC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.29, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
AGGUUU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.07, deficit  1.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GUGCUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.59, deficit  0.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
CGCUUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -4.81, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.07, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AGUAAU 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
AUUCGU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -3.92, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
GCAAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score     -10.51, deficit  8.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.33, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CAUCUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -5.27, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GUGGCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUAUG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.45, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.41, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGAUC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
GGUAGC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAUG 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.56, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAACG 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.02, deficit  5.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.38, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAUUAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -3.95, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.07, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
CUACAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.51, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUGAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.85, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CGGAAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.36, deficit  2.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GGUCAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.08, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAAGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -9.12, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
UGAAUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.34, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CAACUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGUCAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.08, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGCCAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.67, deficit  0.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GAAAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -3.99, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
CUGAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.73, deficit  2.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AGGGGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -7.46, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGAAGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -8.74, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
CUCUGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -7.18, deficit  3.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GAGACGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.93, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
AGAUGUU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.96, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CAAAUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.26, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CACGCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score     -11.30, deficit  6.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CGCAGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score     -10.11, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGUACGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.08, deficit  1.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CUAAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.70, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GUACGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UUGAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.92, deficit  4.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CCCAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -9.35, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
GGGAAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.05, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GUUCUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -4.65, deficit -0.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUACAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -6.79, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CUGGGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.73, deficit  2.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUAAUUC 1  Matches 13; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -12.60, deficit 10.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAAACUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.26, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGGACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.68, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
UUACUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -7.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UUAUAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.71, deficit  2.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAAACCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.87, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAUAUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.19, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
UGUGGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.42, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CUGAUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -6.93, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGCAACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -5.80, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -9.17, deficit  5.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GCCUGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.79, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGAGUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.71, deficit  2.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
AGACAUU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.42, deficit  2.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCUAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.37, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AUCAGGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.74, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CUAAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.70, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GUGUGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -7.69, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUACUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -8.63, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GCCCAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.86, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAGUUGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.06, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UAGAUUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.72, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CUUCUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.26, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GCUUCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -5.97, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UAAAAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -10.58, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGGUUUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.62, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
AAGAGACU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CGGCAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -8.94, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
AAUUUGAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CUCAAAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -11.69, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
AUUGACAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.96, deficit  4.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUAGCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.16, deficit  3.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AAAAAGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.26, deficit  2.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAGUGUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -11.28, deficit  3.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CUUUUAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -8.99, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CACAAAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.86, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAGGUUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.20, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGAAAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
UUUAGUCA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -9.46, deficit  5.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUCGUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.84, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
CGCGGAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.73, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
UGUCCUAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.83, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CCAGGUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -5.93, deficit  0.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GGAAAAUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CGCAAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.96, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUAACGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.56, deficit  0.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUCAAGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score     -10.20, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CUUUUCGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_33612.1,  6 NTs,               CUUUUGG,score      -9.06, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55                 
GAUUAGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CACAAGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -9.06, deficit  1.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUAAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -6.89, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.12, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
GUCUUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -9.80, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
UUUUUCUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score     -10.44, deficit  3.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
GAGAAAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -7.12, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
AAGAAGAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -9.11, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAGGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.66, deficit  4.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UCGCAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score      -8.82, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
GUGCUAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -8.76, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUUCAAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -8.64, deficit  3.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CUGAUCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -7.71, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUUCCCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.64, deficit  3.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
CGACAUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.37, deficit  4.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GCGGGCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -7.22, deficit  0.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGUCAAAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -10.20, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
GUCUCAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.20, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
AUUCACGU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.44, deficit  1.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGAAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -6.53, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CGUGGGUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score     -10.04, deficit  4.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUUUUAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.17, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCCGAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -8.00, deficit  4.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAUCUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score     -11.37, deficit  6.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CGUGCAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -8.51, deficit  2.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGUUAGAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
GGGAGAGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GCAAAUCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -7.26, deficit  1.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GGGUUUCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.54, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGUAAGUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -6.20, deficit  0.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGAUGAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -11.53, deficit  5.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAUAUAGUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -8.37, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GGAAUUCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.88, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GAAAUCUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -7.69, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CAUUAUUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.88, deficit  4.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUUCAACGA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score     -11.11, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CCAAGAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.90, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
ACGUAGGAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score      -7.85, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GGCGGCUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -12.49, deficit  4.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
CGAAUUGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.30, deficit  7.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAGACUUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.77, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CUUUUUCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -8.04, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.36, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAUAACAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score      -9.87, deficit  2.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGUCAGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -9.44, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
UUGAUGAUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -7.84, deficit  1.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CUGCCGUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -7.15, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GGUUCUAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -8.28, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
GCCGGGGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GUAAAGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -12.12, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUUCAGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.46, deficit  3.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
CUAAAGAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.70, deficit  8.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUGGGCAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGACGAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.18, deficit  7.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GAUCAAAAC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.96, deficit  0.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
GACUCUUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.84, deficit  3.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CAAGGAACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -10.26, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
UGCGAACAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -11.03, deficit  2.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAAGAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.82, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAGCUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -7.62, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
AUAGCCGGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.87, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUAUCUUUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.24, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
ACAUUUUCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.38, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
UAGUGAACA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.35, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CUUGAAAAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.52, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.23, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
CUCAUCAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.13, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCGCGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -8.85, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
UUUUAGCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score      -9.97, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CAAGGUACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.41, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CUUCGAUCG 1  Matches  9; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -8.29, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.96, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GUGACAUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -9.27, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CGCAUGGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAACACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.43, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGACUUACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.30, deficit  5.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
ACUGAGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -7.01, deficit  1.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GUUCUUAAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.18, deficit  6.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GUAAAACUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.84, deficit  5.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UUAAGGGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.91, deficit  2.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCUGACCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.53, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
UAAAGAAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -11.51, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CGAAAGAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GGGAAAUUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.74, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CGUUUGAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.36, deficit  3.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCCGGCUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -16.08, deficit  8.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
AUACGCGAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.90, deficit  5.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUAUGCGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -12.37, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGGAUAAUUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.74, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUAAGAUAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.72, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AGAGAUCAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.53, deficit  3.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGCAAAUAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.68, deficit  2.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGAGCCUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -11.05, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GCAUCAUGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -14.99, deficit  7.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GAAAAAAUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.57, deficit  0.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CGGAAGAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.94, deficit  8.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
AGGUGGCACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -9.68, deficit  2.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAGGCAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.20, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUUUAAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.43, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.12, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUAAUAUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -7.63, deficit  3.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GAUAAAAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.71, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CUGAAGCGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -10.20, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
UGCAUGUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.31, deficit  3.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUCGAAAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.17, deficit  5.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GUUGAACCUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.44, deficit  7.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAGGGGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.87, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUGUCAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.15, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
GCGUGUAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -11.37, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
AGGAAAAACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.06, deficit  4.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUGUGAAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.15, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GACUAUUAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -12.16, deficit  8.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
GUUAAAGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -8.62, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AUCAGAGGAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -13.46, deficit  9.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAAAUGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.89, deficit  6.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUCUUUACAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.46, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
CGUCGAUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -9.51, deficit  1.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CUUUGUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.96, deficit  5.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGAACGAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.03, deficit  4.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UCCAGCGUCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -11.30, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GUUAGAUUCC 1  Matches  4; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -8.25, deficit  5.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CUUUGCUGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.85, deficit  0.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCUAAAGAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -8.72, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUAAGCGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -10.18, deficit  1.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
AUUACCUCAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.50, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.68, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGAUUCGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.12, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAGGGAGCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.52, deficit  7.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CCUGAAAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -11.79, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.00, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CGGCAAAUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.48, deficit  2.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.68, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUUGAGAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.61, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCAAAACUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -14.10, deficit  6.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCAGCUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -11.30, deficit  6.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.08, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAGUGAAUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -11.32, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CAAAAUAUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -10.36, deficit  0.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.75, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCGAAAAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.40, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
AGAGAAUGUAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.26, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
UAUUCUUGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94032.1, 10 NTs,          UAGUCUCUUUCG,score     -15.03, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUCAAAAUUGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.95, deficit  6.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CCAAUCUUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.02, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUUGAAGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -15.42, deficit  6.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAACCGACCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -10.29, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGCGUUGCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.36, deficit  6.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.86, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUGAACGUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -17.04, deficit  9.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CAGAUGCCAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -15.02, deficit  7.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CGAAAAUCGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.16, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GAAAAAUAUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CUAAUCCGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -11.52, deficit  4.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.61, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
UUCAUCCGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -10.81, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
AUAAUGUCGCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.06, deficit  5.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.75, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGGUUAUGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.89, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UCUUCCGGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.41, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCAAGUUAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.59, deficit  5.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUACCGAAGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -10.69, deficit  5.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GUACCACCAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -12.81, deficit  5.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GUCGCUUUGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -12.20, deficit  6.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
UCUAGUAAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -16.24, deficit  9.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
ACUGUCGUAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -16.12, deficit  6.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUACUGAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -11.88, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
AGUUAAUGUCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -14.02, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCAAAAUCUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CGUUAUUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.54, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UGAAGCAAAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -13.18, deficit  7.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GGAGAGGACCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -16.19, deficit  9.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGAGAAAAAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -11.19, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GAUCGAAAUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.48, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CACUGAACUGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -11.57, deficit  4.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
GUUUUGCAAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -12.83, deficit  5.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
CUUUGAACUGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -11.57, deficit  4.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
UUCCUAAAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -15.54, deficit  8.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CGACAAUGUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.56, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCUGCAACUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.81, deficit  6.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
CUCCGUUAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -15.62, deficit  6.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CAGGAGAUUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -16.45, deficit  8.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAACUGAAAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -14.93, deficit  6.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CAAACCUCGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -14.33, deficit  7.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
GAACGUCAUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.36, deficit  3.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.91, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCUUGGUUCAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -15.80, deficit  6.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGUAUUUGAGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -14.22, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.41, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CCUUCAGUCUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -16.45, deficit  7.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.58, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
AAUUGCUUGUAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.49, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
AUUGCUUUCGCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -13.70, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.96, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CGACAUGAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.46, deficit  9.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAAGUUGCCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -15.54, deficit  7.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.74, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CGGAGGUGGCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -13.86, deficit  7.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CGAUGGAUAGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.84, deficit  5.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.64, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
UAAUCUCUAUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94032.1, 10 NTs,          UAGUCUCUUUCG,score     -16.51, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCCAGUUGAGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.64, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GUAACGGAUAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.28, deficit  7.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUUAAAAGACUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.32, deficit  3.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.63, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUGAAAAGAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.95, deficit  3.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.38, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAAAUGAAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.00, deficit  8.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUCAACGGGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -14.06, deficit  7.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.83, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
GGACAAAGAAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.62, deficit  7.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCACACUGGAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -12.31, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.14, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CGUGAGAAAUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.58, deficit  8.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
UUGCAUUGUAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42211.1, 13 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -16.97, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.49, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35     
CUAAACCAGUACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -15.85, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.86, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
GGAGACAGAUAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -15.76, deficit  1.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.57, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
UGAACGACAGAGAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98870.1, 12 NTs,     CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG,score     -15.08, deficit  7.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.24, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35
GACCUGUUUCUAUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07579.1, 14 NTs,      UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA,score     -18.28, deficit  9.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.37, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGAAUUGAGACCUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58539.1, 15 NTs,      UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG,score     -16.47, deficit  6.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGACUGGAGUUUAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_82866.1, 17 NTs,     CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG,score     -20.30, deficit  9.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.15, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35
4	100.0000	 82.8000	 69.2000	4
5	100.0000	 89.6000	 48.8000	23
6	100.0000	 87.2000	 48.0000	60
7	 99.6000	 46.8000	 12.4000	51
8	 98.8000	 28.4000	  4.4000	46
9	 98.8000	 16.4000	  2.0000	68
10	 96.0000	  9.6000	  0.0000	41
11	 86.4000	  4.0000	  0.0000	42
12	 43.2000	  0.0000	  0.0000	23
13	 17.6000	  0.4000	  0.0000	12
14	  8.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.2000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.8000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.8000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.4000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  17 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  41 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  42 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 243 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 264 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 266 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 271 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 274 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 278 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 288 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 290 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 310 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 315 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 341 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 369 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 412 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 467 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.5667%
Number of models giving false positives is 294 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.70
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.22
