Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_8.mat
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -6.04, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.62, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUGCA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.89, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACGAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UUCCA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.79, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.90, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GUCCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UAAAA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.95, deficit  0.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.84, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GCGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
AAAGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.07, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
ACGAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -6.25, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AACCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -5.06, deficit  0.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCGUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -8.75, deficit  5.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -8.20, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.91, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
CACAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CAGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.91, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGACGC 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.14, deficit  7.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGUAAG 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.69, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAACAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -3.46, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
CGCAGG 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.21, deficit  4.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGCGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.69, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.44, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CCCCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.15, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.09, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
GAGCAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -5.10, deficit  1.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
UGUGAA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.65, deficit  0.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CAAUAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.38, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGCUAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -8.88, deficit  7.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
UGAGGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
UUUGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.78, deficit  3.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GUCUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAUAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUAGUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.29, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CAAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.41, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UUUUUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.02, deficit -0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCGGAA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -6.74, deficit -0.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GCCAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.89, deficit  0.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CCAACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -8.27, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AGGAAU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.96, deficit  6.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGUGGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUUCG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUCUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
AAGUGU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -6.72, deficit  1.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUCUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.92, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UUAUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -7.72, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGCUAC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -9.94, deficit  8.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
GUUCUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -10.28, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUACCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.91, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
UGAAAA 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.18, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGUUGC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.78, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CUUUCG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.95, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AAAAAU 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.96, deficit  5.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.01, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGGUGA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.26, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UCAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.50, deficit  5.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.40, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AUUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.03, deficit -0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.77, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GUAUCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.51, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUAGUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.23, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GUGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAGUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.23, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGUCAC 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -3.80, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
CCUUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.77, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.93, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GAGACC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.07, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UCAUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.94, deficit  2.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGUUGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.88, deficit -0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
AUAAGCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CCAACAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.91, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UUCGAUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -6.81, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
UAGAAAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.84, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CAUGCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUGUCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.69, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
GGCCAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.52, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GAUCCGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -8.20, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GAUUCAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -8.20, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUCACCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -5.93, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CAGAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.67, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UGCCUAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -4.88, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CGAAGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.44, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
AGAAAAU 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -5.93, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
UGAUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -6.85, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUAAUUC 1  Matches 13; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -12.60, deficit 10.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCGCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -4.73, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
UGCGUGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.70, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CGUGGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.11, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
GAAAAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.50, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
CGAACGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -8.01, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UCAUUCA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.88, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGAAGGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score     -10.32, deficit  5.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAUCAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.60, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAUUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.74, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
AGUGUAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GAAAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -3.99, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GGACAAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.47, deficit  0.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGUAAGG 1  Matches 19; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.63, deficit  5.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.07, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGCUGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -8.13, deficit  0.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CUAUCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.26, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UGCUUGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.34, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GUAUCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GAUGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -6.69, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGAAUAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.36, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAUAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.33, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGUCAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -7.27, deficit  4.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AUAAUCU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -4.90, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.30, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
UGAAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.01, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CGAAGGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score     -10.11, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
ACAUGAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -5.99, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAGUAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.51, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UACAGAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.99, deficit  1.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUCUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.33, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CAAGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UUGGAUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.51, deficit  3.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AGAUGGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.96, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUAGACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -6.17, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
AGCACAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.86, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CUAAACG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CUUCUGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -16.12, deficit  9.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
GGUGGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.38, deficit  2.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
AAAGUGGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -13.18, deficit  7.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GGCCGGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.55, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UAAAUUGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.16, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGGCAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.40, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUCGGGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.25, deficit  3.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAGAACCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -9.81, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CUUUUUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -8.11, deficit  3.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CUGAAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.46, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AUGGAUCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.47, deficit  3.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUAAAACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -7.13, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
AAGGUGAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -10.01, deficit  2.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CAUUUUGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -9.01, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GCAAAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -7.15, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
UGAAUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.04, deficit  1.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUGGGUUU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.26, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUAACAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.48, deficit  3.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCAUUGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -7.44, deficit  1.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GUAAGACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.62, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CGGUAUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.71, deficit  5.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CUAUAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.06, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.43, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
AGCCAAAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.54, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CUUAUUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -8.99, deficit  4.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
AUUUUCCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.57, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
CUAAUUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.22, deficit  3.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CUUCCGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.73, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUGACGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -6.63, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UAUGGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -11.40, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
AUAAAAUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -8.53, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GGAGUGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.94, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CCCACAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -9.96, deficit  2.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CUAUCUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.97, deficit  4.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CUCUGCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.91, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGCCUGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.57, deficit  2.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GUUAACUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -6.83, deficit  2.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GAAUUUGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GUUGGUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.54, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GGUAGUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -7.54, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAUGUAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -9.31, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AAAGAUGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.70, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CUGCAAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -6.54, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
AUUGAUUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -5.78, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CGUGAAGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.63, deficit  4.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GGCACAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -5.27, deficit  2.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
CGCUCUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.79, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GGAGCGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -9.20, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCACUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -8.28, deficit  4.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
GUAUCGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -7.29, deficit  0.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAGAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.66, deficit  6.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UGUGUAAAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -6.68, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GUUUAAAUC 1  Matches 20; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -5.80, deficit  2.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CGCGGCGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -13.95, deficit  6.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
AAAGUUUAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score      -9.54, deficit  0.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GUAAACUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -8.91, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
AGAUUGGAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score     -10.07, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUGAAUGUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -9.61, deficit  5.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGAAAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.92, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCCAUUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.87, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CGGUUAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -7.87, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GUCAAGCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.35, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGCAAAAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.81, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
CUUCUGUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.52, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GUGGUUCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score      -9.81, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAGGGGAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score      -9.38, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
GGGAAAAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -8.37, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
UGCCAGUAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.22, deficit  1.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUUGCGAUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.77, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
ACCGAAAAU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -6.41, deficit  0.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GUGUUGAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -6.84, deficit  0.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
GAAGGGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.56, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GUACGAAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -8.71, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GACCGAACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.50, deficit  6.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GUGAAUACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.16, deficit  0.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGAAAUCC 1  Matches 10; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -8.40, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CUUUAGACG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -12.35, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GGGUUGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -9.62, deficit  3.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
GGAAUUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.06, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
GAGAAGUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -11.13, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
CGGAAAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.97, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CCAAAACAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -7.78, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CACCCCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -12.70, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAAGUUUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.88, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAAGAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.89, deficit  3.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
AAGGAUAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -8.86, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUAAAUUUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.86, deficit  6.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
CUGUAAAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -7.17, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
GGAUCGCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -11.24, deficit  7.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UACGAUAAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -9.56, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GUCCAGACC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -8.24, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
AUGUCACUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.16, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GUGAGUCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -12.13, deficit  7.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUACUAGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -8.40, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
GGUUUGAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -9.67, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
CCCGUUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score      -9.90, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.23, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUUUUUACA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.34, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
CGGUUGGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -9.27, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
CUCGGUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -8.72, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUCAAACUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.41, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CGUGAAGGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -9.36, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
AUGAAAUACU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -16.39, deficit  8.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGAACAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -8.63, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGACAGAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -14.56, deficit  9.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
AGAAAAGGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.84, deficit  4.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
AGUAGUAGAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.11, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUUCUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.42, deficit  4.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAGAAAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.52, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CUAGAAACUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.37, deficit  3.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CAUACGUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -12.45, deficit  6.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAGAAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score     -13.29, deficit  6.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CGAAAAUAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -10.47, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGAAGUUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GUAGCACGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -12.56, deficit  7.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GUGAAAUACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -16.39, deficit  8.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUCGUGUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -13.08, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CGAAAAGUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -12.49, deficit  6.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGGGACAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -13.48, deficit  5.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCGGAGAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -8.88, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
UUCUUGAAUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -11.86, deficit  4.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
GGGCUCAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -12.67, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
UUUGUGUCUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -10.00, deficit  5.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
GUCGAGUUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -10.18, deficit  1.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GUCUAUUGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -11.79, deficit  7.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CGUCACAUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.62, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGUGAAAGAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -9.37, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GGUUAAGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.55, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GGUAUCAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score     -13.16, deficit  8.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CUCAAAGUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -9.73, deficit  4.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
AUGCAGGUUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.66, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CCGUGUUGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -12.22, deficit  8.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
GGAAUGGGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.88, deficit  5.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGCUUGUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.21, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CGCACCAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.97, deficit  1.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGCACCGGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score     -10.24, deficit  3.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCCGGGGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -12.18, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
CUUUCGAGUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score     -11.84, deficit  7.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
CGGUCUUUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.13, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CUCGUAAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -9.98, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
GGGAAGAGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.28, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGGGAAUUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -8.20, deficit  2.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.37, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUAUCAAGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score      -9.64, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CAAAAAUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.31, deficit  0.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GGAAUAAAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -13.12, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCAUGGUGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.27, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
AUCCGCAUCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -8.87, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
AGAUAACAAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -16.34, deficit  8.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUAGCCUAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.10, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GACGCCGGCGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -15.19, deficit  6.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
GAAUUGUGCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -11.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
UUGCUGAUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -17.19, deficit  7.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
GUAAAGUGAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score      -9.84, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.91, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GUAAGACACCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -16.83, deficit  8.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
GUAAGAAAGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -11.06, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.54, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GUUGGCUCAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -13.00, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
UCAAUGGCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -14.21, deficit  6.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUUGACGUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.02, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CCAAAUGACAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.67, deficit  7.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UUAAAUAUGUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score      -8.86, deficit  3.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CGAUAUAACAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score      -9.90, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUGCAUCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -12.98, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.54, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
GUAUUUGCGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.61, deficit  6.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CUUGCCAUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.07, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.86, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UGACUAAAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score      -8.95, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CGAGUACAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -14.16, deficit  6.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGGAAAUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.38, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGUAGAAGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -14.15, deficit  6.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCAUCAUCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -13.56, deficit  5.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CACAGAAGGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -10.63, deficit  6.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAUUGAAUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.11, deficit  4.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GACACCAAGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -14.71, deficit 10.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CGUGUGAAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.56, deficit  4.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCCGACCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.56, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGGAAACAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -14.32, deficit  6.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.08, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUCCUAAGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -12.75, deficit  8.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
GGAUUACGUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -16.55, deficit 10.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGGGAAAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score      -9.37, deficit  1.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.20, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGAAGAAUGAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.26, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GUACCAAAUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.57, deficit  8.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CGAAAAAAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -10.82, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAGACUUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -12.20, deficit  4.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.89, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
GGAGAUACGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -12.28, deficit  6.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
UGGUUAGGUGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.63, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGCCCAAGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -10.90, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GGUCUCUGCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.44, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUUAUUAACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.49, deficit  3.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GAAAAAUAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score      -9.04, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GCUGAAGAGUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.27, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CUUUGUGAAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.75, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAAUCCUGUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -16.64, deficit  7.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
CUAGAAGAUAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.54, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CGCAAACAGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.05, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CUAAACAAUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -18.15, deficit 10.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGGGAAAAGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.16, deficit  4.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.44, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAAGAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -19.01, deficit 11.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCUUGACUACCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -12.32, deficit  3.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CAAUGCAGGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.18, deficit  5.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
GUGAGGAAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.61, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
AAUGGGAAGAGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.86, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUAAAACAUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.27, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUCAUUUAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -14.36, deficit  7.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
CGAAAUCAGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.05, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
UGAAUAAUGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -12.92, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.89, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAUCUUGCAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -12.60, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.16, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
AAAGAAACAAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.78, deficit  5.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.91, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAUUUUCUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -12.95, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
GGCCCAGGCUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -18.62, deficit 11.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAACACAAAUGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -14.59, deficit  7.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.20, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
AGAAAGGGAACGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.51, deficit  7.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CAAAUUGUUCGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -12.60, deficit  4.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
CCUAAAAAACGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.78, deficit  8.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
GUAACGAUCAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.71, deficit  9.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCCAGGAGGCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -17.26, deficit  6.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.76, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
CGAAAAUGAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.33, deficit  7.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGAAAGAAAGUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -16.59, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
AGCACGUUCAAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -17.33, deficit  8.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GAUAUAAGGUAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -15.96, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.27, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
CUCUUGAGUACUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12773.1, 13 NTs,       GUAUUGCAGUACCUC,score     -13.75, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35
AGACCAGUGACACCAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_52657.1, 15 NTs,     CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG,score     -23.98, deficit 12.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.73, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 87.0000	 80.0000	4
5	100.0000	 88.5000	 49.5000	23
6	100.0000	 86.5000	 49.2500	60
7	 99.5000	 53.7500	 16.0000	51
8	 99.2500	 27.7500	  3.5000	46
9	 98.5000	 18.2500	  1.5000	68
10	 95.7500	  7.7500	  0.0000	41
11	 82.7500	  3.7500	  0.0000	42
12	 42.5000	  0.5000	  0.0000	23
13	 18.0000	  0.7500	  0.0000	12
14	  5.2500	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.2500	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.7500	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  41 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  59 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  70 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 240 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 245 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 261 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 263 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 264 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 272 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 273 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 274 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 279 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 282 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 292 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 306 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 307 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 308 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 343 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 347 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 357 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 396 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 413 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 414 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 417 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 421 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 423 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 424 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 430 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 430 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 447 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 583 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 596 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 655 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 796 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.2292%
Number of models giving false positives is 296 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.32
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.60
