Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_1.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:02:03
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.4844 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.4004 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.6512 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.5817 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.5574 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5342 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   5.0827 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.9878 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.2400 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.8652 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.6847 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.5414 minutes

ans =

    12

ACCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.87, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.61, deficit  0.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AACU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.36, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.52, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AGGAU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.36, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GUGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.78, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUCAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -2.79, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.40, deficit  0.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UAUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -6.51, deficit  2.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GUAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.09, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
AGGCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.16, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CCGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAGA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.80, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UGUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.21, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.13, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AUGAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUGAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAUCC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.45, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.84, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -2.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AUCAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -3.00, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.85, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.13, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UGUAA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.37, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
UGGAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score     -11.92, deficit  8.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUCG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.95, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AGAAAU 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUGUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -3.06, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGUGGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UACUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -8.56, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CCACCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.82, deficit  0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
AUAGCU 1  Matches 13; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.72, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAUG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -3.94, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
GUUUGC 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.24, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.45, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
GUUAAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -3.80, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
CGAUGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAAAA 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.18, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUAAC 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.90, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUGUAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.49, deficit  0.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
CAGAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.70, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGCAGG 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.21, deficit  4.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUCAUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -5.02, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CUCCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -4.07, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.02, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
AGUUAU 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.46, deficit  0.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CAACCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -8.38, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GCGAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.09, deficit  2.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
CAAGAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.08, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUAUAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.51, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GCUUGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -5.69, deficit  0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.81, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UAUUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.27, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CUGAAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.81, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.26, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAUGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -4.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
UGCUCA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -6.44, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CAGAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.70, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUAGGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -7.13, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
UAAAAA 1  Matches 33; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.12, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.38, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UCGGAA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -6.74, deficit -0.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
AGAGGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.40, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGCGUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -7.41, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGCGAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.31, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CCGUAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.51, deficit  0.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
UGAACG 1  Matches 20; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.90, deficit  7.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GCAUUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.36, deficit -0.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGGGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.62, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.22, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
GAUGGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -5.24, deficit  0.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CUCUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -7.14, deficit  3.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CUAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.27, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
UGCGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.72, deficit  1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.69, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CGGAUG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -3.94, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
GGAGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGUGCCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -4.55, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UGUCGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score     -11.06, deficit  6.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGAAUUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  0.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
GGUUUUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -5.91, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
AUGAGGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.73, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CGAGUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score     -10.17, deficit  5.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UGGAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.79, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGGCGAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUCAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.64, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CCCUUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.06, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGAACAA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.24, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GAUUCAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -8.20, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUGGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.85, deficit  1.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.46, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CCACCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.90, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCGUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.41, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
GUGCGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.28, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GAAUGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
AUCAUAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.92, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CGACAUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.42, deficit  2.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.46, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
AGAGGCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.48, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GUAGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.11, deficit  1.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GGUUUUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -5.91, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAUUUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -5.75, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
UGUAGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.86, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CUCACCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -5.93, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAUGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_40469.1,  4 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.06, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GUUUUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -5.16, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
GUAAUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -5.09, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
UUACACA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.35, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GUAACUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -4.57, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CGGUUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -10.43, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CAACAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.89, deficit  0.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUGGUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
GUGAGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.70, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CAAUUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -5.86, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUCUACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.16, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGGUAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUCCAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.59, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGGAAUA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.85, deficit  1.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AUCGUUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -8.72, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAACGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -8.01, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CGCCGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.67, deficit  0.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AUGUGUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -7.70, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UAGAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_77081.1,  5 NTs,               UGAAAAG,score      -5.98, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35             
UAAAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.88, deficit  1.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CGAAGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.44, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGCAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.36, deficit  2.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CAUAAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score     -10.57, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
AGUGAAAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -7.35, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUAACAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -6.00, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
UUAAAAUA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -8.54, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CAAGGGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.95, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GUAAAGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.52, deficit  2.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UGCUCCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.03, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CUCUUGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score     -10.98, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
CUGUGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.29, deficit  3.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGUCUCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.98, deficit  0.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CGCCCCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.85, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GGGGACAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.72, deficit  0.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GUCAACGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -8.81, deficit  1.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
GACAAAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -7.15, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
AGACUGAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.23, deficit  2.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UACUCGGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.98, deficit  3.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUUGUGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.20, deficit  1.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CGCUUGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score     -10.77, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GAGUGAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.35, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCGUUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.52, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UUUGUUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.10, deficit  5.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUUACAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -7.10, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
GGGUGCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -8.84, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGGCUUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.42, deficit  4.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUAAUCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.45, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUUUAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -6.76, deficit  1.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCUUGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score     -11.05, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
GUAUGUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.55, deficit  4.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGAAACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CUUAAUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -7.78, deficit  0.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCGGAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.71, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGUGAAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -7.02, deficit  1.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGUUCUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -4.59, deficit  0.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CCGCUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.22, deficit  3.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GAUGUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.03, deficit  0.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GGAAACUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -9.01, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUCGCGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -12.21, deficit  7.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
AUGCUAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -9.01, deficit  2.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GUGGAAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -4.76, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.40, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CAUAUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -7.83, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AAUGAAUU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -8.61, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CGAAAUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.38, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAAGAUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.85, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UCAGGUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.69, deficit  4.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CGUCUUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.30, deficit  2.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
UGAAAAGA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.01, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GGUUAUAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.23, deficit  1.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
ACAGCAGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.40, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGCGGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
GUGACAGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -8.27, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GGAAAAAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -9.44, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CUGGACUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.75, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAAUGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -10.88, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGACGCUUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.29, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CUGUUCGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -8.85, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
ACAGCCAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.77, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GACCUCUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.34, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CUUGGCUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUAAGAAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -9.93, deficit  4.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GUCCCGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score      -9.60, deficit  3.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
CAGACAGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -11.01, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
AUUAAGACU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.82, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAUUCACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GUUCUUUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -8.88, deficit  2.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
CCGCCGAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.21, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAAAACAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -7.46, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUACCACUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -11.41, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
GCUGCAAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.44, deficit  4.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUACUCAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.14, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CUCAUAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -14.79, deficit  9.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
CGAGAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAAGUGUCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -7.35, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
UUAGACGCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -8.80, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAAUGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.62, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUAUGCACA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -10.39, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CAGGCGUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score      -9.42, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
GGACUCAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.52, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUUAAGGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -10.00, deficit  4.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CAAUUAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -10.56, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
CGGCCUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.77, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CUAUCCUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.25, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GUCGUUGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -9.58, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUAAAGACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.35, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUAGCAAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -7.69, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GGAGGAACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -14.31, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAAUAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -6.79, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAGCUGGUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score      -8.40, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GUCGUACAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.94, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
CAUCUAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score      -9.37, deficit  3.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAACGUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -7.74, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGCCAGGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -16.12, deficit  9.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGACGAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.16, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CUCCAGAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.84, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGUUCGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -9.49, deficit  4.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CUUACCUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.78, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAGAAAUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -9.36, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CCCGACAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.78, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CCACUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -13.97, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
UCAGCACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -13.55, deficit  7.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUGUUGCAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -14.83, deficit  7.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAGGGGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
AAUGACGCCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -15.50, deficit 11.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCUUUACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -10.06, deficit  3.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAACAUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.31, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGUUUUAGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.66, deficit  7.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGGGAAGGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -8.93, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
ACAAACAACU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.00, deficit  5.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUGAAAAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.02, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GAAGAAACUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.88, deficit  1.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CGUGAAGCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.47, deficit  2.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GAUGCGGAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -12.57, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGCAGAUCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.58, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGAAACACUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -10.88, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUAAAAAAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.22, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GAGAUCCCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -13.38, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CUUUCCAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.95, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGGAAAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.11, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCUGACUUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -10.96, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUUCCUGUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -10.95, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
UUUAAUUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.55, deficit  7.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAUUAUGUUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.37, deficit  5.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GGUGUGCAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -8.15, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGUCGUGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -12.02, deficit  6.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
CUUACCGUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.77, deficit  8.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCCAGUGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -14.71, deficit 10.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCAACCCAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -11.05, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CAAAAAACUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.04, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
UAUAGAACAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -13.51, deficit  9.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGUUUCCCUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score      -8.52, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGGAUGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.66, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUGAUCAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.60, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CAUUUGGCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -12.78, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
UAGAGUGUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -16.17, deficit  8.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
GGCGAGCAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -8.15, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.50, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGUGAAGGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -11.52, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GCGGCCGAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.55, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CAUUAGAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -10.29, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUGUUAGCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -12.44, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GUACUUCGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -11.47, deficit  6.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.52, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CAAAAGAGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.22, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGGAACAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -11.56, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUAAAAGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.64, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CGAAAUAACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -12.49, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUAAAAAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.47, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GUUAGUGUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -13.73, deficit  9.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCUAUUACUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.20, deficit  6.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUUGACGGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -12.15, deficit  6.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCUAAAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score      -9.38, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
GAGGGUGCAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -10.79, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
GGUUUUGAAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.90, deficit  2.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUCAAGAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.21, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGAAGAAGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.09, deficit  5.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GAACUCAUUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.03, deficit  5.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.08, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GUUUGGUAAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score      -9.59, deficit  3.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUGAUAUCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.22, deficit  7.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.81, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGGAUGAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -13.33, deficit  8.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
CAAAGGUUAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -11.19, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.71, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CCUCCUUUUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -11.82, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.64, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
CGCACAUAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -10.28, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CAGAAGUUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -11.70, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.69, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GAUGAGUUAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -14.46, deficit  5.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
CGGGACAUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.49, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAACCCUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -15.57, deficit  7.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.83, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUACUUAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.55, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.17, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AGCAAGAUCUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -17.90, deficit  8.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGGUUAAAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -16.04, deficit  8.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCAAACAAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -11.40, deficit  4.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
AUUGAGAAGAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.40, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAUUGUUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.86, deficit  5.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUCAUCCUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -11.30, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.17, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCAUCGAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.02, deficit  6.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CUCCGGACAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score      -9.54, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GGAUCUAAACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.78, deficit  3.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UUAAUUAGACA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.44, deficit  6.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CUUAUCGGGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.90, deficit  6.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GGCGAAUCGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -15.96, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAGUGUGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -12.67, deficit  5.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.29, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CGAAAAGAGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.93, deficit  6.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUUUGGACGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.32, deficit  3.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUCGUGAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score      -9.22, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GGUUUAAUAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.59, deficit  4.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAGUUAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.58, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUUGUUUUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.54, deficit  5.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.24, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGGAAUUAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -17.08, deficit 10.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UAGCUGUCGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -13.99, deficit  3.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
CGUUAAAUGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.76, deficit  5.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUACAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.25, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAGCAAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -12.17, deficit  5.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.91, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUUCUUUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.72, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.23, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UGACGUGGCAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.33, deficit  3.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CCGUACCAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.34, deficit  5.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.62, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGCGUUGAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.03, deficit  3.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGGGGAAUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.48, deficit  2.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAGAUAGAAGUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.78, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.23, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGACAUGAAUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.20, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAAAAGAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -18.87, deficit 11.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCGAUGUUUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -12.75, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CGUUCUCAAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.50, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGUCGAAAAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -13.62, deficit  7.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CGAGCAGAUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.75, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAUAUCUUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -11.86, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
CUAGGAACGCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.34, deficit  6.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.93, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGUCAGAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -14.03, deficit  6.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.20, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GGUUAUAAUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.96, deficit  8.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUGAGAUUGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -15.53, deficit  8.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CAGUUAUCGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.70, deficit  6.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.68, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUGCUUCGUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.51, deficit  9.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCAUUGAAAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -12.95, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
UCCCCCGAUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -12.07, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GGAACGCUAAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.12, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAUAGAUGCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -11.93, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
GUAUCUGGAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.39, deficit  6.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUCUACUACGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -10.77, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.00, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GGAAAUUAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.27, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GACCAUAACUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93221.1, 13 NTs,        GACCUAGAUCACCC,score     -16.13, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.43, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35 
AGCUAUGAAACAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -16.92, deficit  8.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CAAGAAAUCGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89082.1, 11 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -12.49, deficit  7.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35   
CGGUCAGUGGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -17.65, deficit 10.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
GGAGGAGGAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -16.65, deficit  9.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CUAAUAAGGGAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.95, deficit 10.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUAAGACACUAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -14.90, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.49, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CUAUCCAAAGAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -14.90, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.52, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CUCAAAAAGUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -14.35, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.34, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
UGAAAAAGUUCUAGUAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90257.1, 15 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -17.14, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 90.0000	 74.0000	4
5	100.0000	 92.0000	 54.0000	23
6	100.0000	 80.0000	 50.0000	60
7	 98.0000	 52.0000	 14.0000	51
8	 98.0000	 26.0000	  2.0000	46
9	100.0000	 22.0000	  0.0000	68
10	100.0000	  4.0000	  0.0000	41
11	 88.0000	  8.0000	  0.0000	42
12	 42.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	23
13	 10.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	12
14	  8.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence   0 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence   7 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  15 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.2500%
Number of models giving false positives is 265 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.08
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.58
