Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_3.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:05:17
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.4263 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.3883 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.6722 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.6115 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.5906 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5603 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   4.8938 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.7876 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.0747 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.7199 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.5494 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.4254 minutes

ans =

    12

GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -7.22, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.77, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.05, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.36, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.36, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.52, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.05, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.87, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.33, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGGUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.87, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.65, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AGAGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
CUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_24625.1,  5 NTs,                 CAGUG,score      -2.57, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -7.87, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.73, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.51, deficit -0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
UCUGA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.22, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UGGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -6.51, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
AUUCU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.26, deficit  1.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAGUU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_24625.1,  5 NTs,                 CAGUG,score      -2.71, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GCUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUCAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -2.79, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UUGAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.89, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UCCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -5.69, deficit  2.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
CUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.84, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.10, deficit  0.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.21, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
UGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.40, deficit  0.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CACGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.62, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CGCUAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -8.88, deficit  7.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
UUGAAA 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.51, deficit  7.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.57, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.24, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUCUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.92, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GCGGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -6.60, deficit -0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
UGACGA 1  Matches 19; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -10.02, deficit  8.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.28, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGUCCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -7.75, deficit  5.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CCACUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35                               
GAACAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -3.34, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUAGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -7.26, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
GACCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -5.19, deficit  1.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.92, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GGCUUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -4.87, deficit -0.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGCUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score     -12.11, deficit 10.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
GAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.24, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AUUUGU 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.30, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.84, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CCGAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.46, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.54, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GGUUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.70, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUGGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
GUUGGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
CAGCUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35                               
UUUUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -9.05, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GUGUGC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGCCG 1  Matches 12; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -11.57, deficit  9.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UAGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.83, deficit  0.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGCUAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -8.88, deficit  7.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CGUGCG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.57, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CUUCUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -9.74, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUCAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.59, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
AUCAAU 1  Matches 18; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.40, deficit  6.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGGAC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.41, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAUC 1  Matches 38; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.66, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCAUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.81, deficit  2.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.92, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUCAC 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -3.80, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
CUGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAGAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.08, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CCAAAG 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.62, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AGGAGU 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.71, deficit  6.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.93, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGUGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_90197.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAGG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35                             
AGUUGU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.95, deficit -0.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.05, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UUCGUA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.51, deficit  0.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UGCGUA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -7.62, deficit  3.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.04, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGCGAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.44, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
UUGUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -7.09, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACGUUU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -6.93, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GCCGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -5.51, deficit -1.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
AUUGUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -5.64, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAACUUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUCAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.84, deficit  0.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UAAAGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -7.72, deficit  2.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CUCGAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -9.41, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAGAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.67, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUCGAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -9.41, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAAGCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -9.25, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35                               
GUCAGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.24, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGCCAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCAUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -5.93, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
UGAAGGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score     -10.20, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
AUUAUUU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -5.93, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUUUCUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GUUAUCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -4.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
AAAACCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.94, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
UAAGUAA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -7.80, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CCGGCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.92, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
AGGCUGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -9.22, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
ACACAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -11.85, deficit  5.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UAAGAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -8.20, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CCAUCUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.29, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
CUGCUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -5.76, deficit  0.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAGGUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.70, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
UGAUGUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.12, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UGUUCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -7.67, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUAAGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.70, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGAAUCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_40469.1,  4 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.18, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGAUAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.05, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.09, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGUUGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -6.19, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
CGGAGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.32, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUCUCUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score     -10.60, deficit  6.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
UAAUUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.27, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UAGAACA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.89, deficit  1.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAGAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.29, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CAGAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.67, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUUCCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -5.29, deficit -0.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GAACCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.03, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UCUUUGA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.44, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.73, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CUAGGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.98, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GUUUGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -7.12, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GAUAAUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GAAAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -3.99, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
CUGUGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -7.58, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -6.23, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
AGGGUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.84, deficit  1.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GGACUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.58, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUGCAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.71, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCGAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -9.41, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGCAUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -9.26, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.85, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUAGAAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.47, deficit  3.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
CCUUUGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -7.05, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CAGAAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score     -10.23, deficit  2.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
CGUUAUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.71, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CUCUGAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -7.61, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GUGAGAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.63, deficit  3.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GCAGUCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -7.33, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GUUAAGUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
AGGAAGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.02, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GUCAAUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.52, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CAGAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.18, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
GUAAAACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -7.13, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
GCCUAAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CUGUGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.29, deficit  3.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GCCCAGCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score     -10.88, deficit  4.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUUAAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -6.14, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
GAGUGGUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -11.58, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GAUCCAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -8.76, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAAUGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.78, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAAUAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.02, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGAAGGCA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -12.31, deficit  7.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
UGAACAAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -4.80, deficit  2.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
AAAGCGUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_23481.4,  7 NTs,              GAAACAUC,score      -7.91, deficit  5.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35               
GGAUGGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -8.12, deficit  5.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
CAAGAACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.57, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GGUUCAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -8.25, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCAAUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.52, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUAUCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score     -10.70, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGGCUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -4.86, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
GCCACGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.65, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
CGAAGAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.10, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CCGGAUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -8.70, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CGGAUGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.68, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UAAGCUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.86, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CGUCGCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -8.99, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
GAAUCCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -7.80, deficit  1.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGAUGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -9.79, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.38, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GUAUUUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.17, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
AGCAUCGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.49, deficit  0.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGCAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.80, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
AUCCGCAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.14, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CAAAAGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.39, deficit  1.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGGACUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.68, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAGAAAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -9.54, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
GCAAAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -7.15, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
GGCAAUUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.31, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAGCACUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -10.70, deficit  5.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GGCAAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.17, deficit  1.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUCUAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -9.42, deficit  5.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CUCUAUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -9.39, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CUAGGCCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -10.37, deficit  5.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
CUCAAAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.73, deficit  0.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
UAAGAAAGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -7.24, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUGCUUAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -10.62, deficit  3.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GGUGGGAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GUGCUGGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -10.73, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
GGUGAUCGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score      -9.80, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAAAGGGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.44, deficit  1.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CGAAAAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUUUUCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.87, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
CUAUUUAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -11.73, deficit  5.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
CGUAACUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -6.00, deficit  0.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGUUUAUUA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAGCUAAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.14, deficit  1.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CUGAAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.11, deficit  6.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CAAAGGAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -8.65, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
UGUUUUGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.67, deficit  7.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGCCUAGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -10.96, deficit  4.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CGCUGGAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -13.05, deficit  6.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
AGAGGUCAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -12.17, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CUGUGCUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -5.48, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.11, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
AUUCAAAGU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.15, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGUGUAGUA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -9.63, deficit  3.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUUCAGGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.94, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGCAAUAAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.90, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UCCCCGGAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.76, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CUAUUAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -10.12, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
CGACAUUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.82, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGCCACUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.85, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
UAAUUGGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score      -8.62, deficit -0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
UCGUGUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -14.01, deficit  6.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GUGGGAAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.77, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GGGAAGACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -9.94, deficit  4.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.20, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
UGAAAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.92, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUAGCUUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -7.96, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
UAUAGUAUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -9.19, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGAAUGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -11.59, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUUGGGUCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CCUAUCCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.18, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GUGCAGCGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -11.38, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUGAAAGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score     -10.57, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
AUUUAUACU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.92, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCUCGACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -11.74, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
GGUUAUAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -5.92, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CGCAAAGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.59, deficit  8.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUUGAUCAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -7.85, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GACUAAUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -12.76, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
UUAUUUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.56, deficit  8.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGGAUAAAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -7.79, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CAUGAGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -11.86, deficit  6.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
AUAAAAAAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.22, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GGCGUGAGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.96, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.49, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUGCAUGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.46, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GUUUCUUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.57, deficit  5.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
AUCCAGAAUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -8.48, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
UGCUAACGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.04, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUCAGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -13.55, deficit  6.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAACGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -7.63, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GCGCGAAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.98, deficit  4.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGAUGAAUAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -8.62, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CGGUUGAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.00, deficit  3.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGACAUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.51, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
UAAUUAAGCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.52, deficit  3.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
ACUCAAGUCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -13.27, deficit  8.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CUUUGAAAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -7.27, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
UUUUAAGUGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -16.67, deficit 10.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAGGAACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -9.84, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGAAGGGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -7.97, deficit  2.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CAUGUAGGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -12.79, deficit  3.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CAUCGCAUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -16.08, deficit  8.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCAGAAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -9.02, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
AAAAAAAAAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.61, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GCUGCACGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.98, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUAUUUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.85, deficit  8.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UCUAAGAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.81, deficit  8.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCAGUGGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.29, deficit  3.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUUGGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.34, deficit  3.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUUCGGAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -19.08, deficit 11.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UUCAAUGGUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -15.94, deficit  8.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CCGGAGUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -14.58, deficit  6.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
AUACGAGAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.39, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUGCGAAGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.17, deficit  4.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUCAGAUUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.83, deficit  6.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GGUUGAAGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -9.72, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CAAGGAACAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.76, deficit  1.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GGAAACUCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -10.96, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AUGUAAACGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.53, deficit  6.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CUGAUAGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -10.58, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
AGCCCUGAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.80, deficit  4.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGUGUGAAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.22, deficit  1.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAGUAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CAACGAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.04, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CGGCGAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.77, deficit  3.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGAGCCAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score      -9.93, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GUAUGGAUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.06, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UCAGAGCUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score      -9.93, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GGAUCCUAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.22, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
GGAAGAGCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -13.05, deficit  8.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAGAUGCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.06, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CUAGGACUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score      -9.66, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.70, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCAAGAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.29, deficit  7.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.84, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUACCAACAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -11.71, deficit  4.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CAAUGCAACUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.69, deficit  6.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
CUGUUAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.86, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CCAAACAACUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.80, deficit  6.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.84, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CUUUCUGCUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.78, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUGGACACAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -10.54, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
GGAGUGUGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.44, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUGAUCAUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -10.31, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGGAAUGGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.95, deficit  6.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
UAAUAUCAAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score      -7.93, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
GGACAAGAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.73, deficit  6.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGGUAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -13.16, deficit  7.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GUUUGUGUGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.90, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAGUUGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -13.04, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CUGAGUGAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.27, deficit  5.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUAUCGUUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.13, deficit  2.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
CGUGAAAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.31, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUCCUCAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.88, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUAAAAGGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.35, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.40, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CCAAGGAGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -13.13, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CGUUUAAAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score      -9.74, deficit  4.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
AUUGCGAAAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score      -8.82, deficit  3.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGGGAUUUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -12.26, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.75, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GUCCAAUCGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -16.45, deficit  9.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CGAAUCUGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.77, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUAUGAACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -14.62, deficit  6.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
UUAGUUUUCGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -13.19, deficit  5.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.46, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CUUUCAAAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.02, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CCGAUAGUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.80, deficit  6.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
UUAUGUUAGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.85, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGCUAGAAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score      -9.41, deficit  1.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCACUAAUGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -11.44, deficit  6.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GAGUUAUGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.02, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
AGUUUUUGCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -16.95, deficit 10.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUAAGGAGCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -13.41, deficit  9.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUCAAAAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.47, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
GGAGGGACACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -11.70, deficit  6.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GAAAAGUUGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score      -9.38, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.96, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
UGUUUGAAGGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.76, deficit  5.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CCGAAUGUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -14.26, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GCACGUCUAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.56, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GAUGGAAUGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.68, deficit  5.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGGAAUCUAAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.00, deficit  5.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.79, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAGAUGCGUCAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -15.87, deficit  5.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
CAGAAGGCGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.40, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.64, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUUUAAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.36, deficit  7.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GGAUCAAUCGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -14.85, deficit  7.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CUUAAUGAAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.05, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GGAUUAAAAUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.67, deficit  6.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUGGGCUAUAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -13.81, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.20, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
GGAAAGAAGUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.10, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUAAUCUGUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -11.95, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
UUUGUAAAACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -18.64, deficit  7.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUUGUUCCUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.87, deficit  9.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUUAGAAAAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.91, deficit  6.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CGUUGAGAUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.14, deficit  3.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUCGAAAAUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -16.69, deficit  9.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CAAAAAGAUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.28, deficit  9.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUGAAAGGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.30, deficit  6.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.17, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCCAUGAUCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -15.32, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.07, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CUUUCAACCUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.48, deficit  8.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAUUAAAGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -15.86, deficit  6.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGACAUUAAAGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -16.32, deficit  7.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.11, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CUUGAAGAUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -20.61, deficit 10.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CGGAAAAAAACUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -13.83, deficit  2.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.16, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAGGCAUCUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.38, deficit  7.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCAUGUGAUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -16.24, deficit  7.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.49, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GUAUUAUGGAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -13.92, deficit  7.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.09, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CGCUCCUGAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -13.80, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.71, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
AAGAAGGCUUAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -15.93, deficit  5.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.23, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
GUUUCUAGUGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -17.31, deficit  7.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GAAAAAAAAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.16, deficit  5.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
AGAACAGUUAAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.09, deficit  7.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GACUCUGCACCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -14.47, deficit  5.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.75, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
CGAUCCGUUCUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -10.72, deficit  1.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
UAGAAUCGGAGGCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42211.1, 13 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -16.68, deficit  6.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.95, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35     
AUUCACAAUCGAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -15.90, deficit  5.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CGAUGGUGACUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -16.69, deficit  9.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CAAAGGGGAAUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -15.71, deficit  1.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.60, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
CGCAGCAAGAAUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -18.02, deficit  7.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.97, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
GGAACUUGGUAACUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58539.1, 15 NTs,      UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG,score     -18.79, deficit  9.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.83, ed 99, 5 cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 86.0000	 71.3333	4
5	100.0000	 87.3333	 50.0000	23
6	100.0000	 90.0000	 54.0000	60
7	 99.3333	 48.0000	 14.6667	51
8	 98.6667	 29.3333	  4.0000	46
9	100.0000	 18.0000	  2.0000	68
10	 98.0000	 11.3333	  0.0000	41
11	 89.3333	  6.6667	  0.0000	42
12	 42.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	23
13	 17.3333	  0.0000	  0.0000	12
14	  8.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.3333	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  0.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  10 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  24 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  28 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 245 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 281 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.7500%
Number of models giving false positives is 288 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.17
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.69
