Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_7.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:11:15
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.3972 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.3665 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.6598 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.6010 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.5764 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5490 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   4.9003 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.7868 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.0780 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.7429 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.5797 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.4488 minutes

ans =

    12

UGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.71, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.62, deficit  0.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.36, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.71, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.51, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.94, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.20, deficit  1.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.87, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.33, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.22, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GCUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.22, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.73, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAUAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.35, deficit  0.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.37, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UUAGA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CGGUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.87, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGUGU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CCAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGCUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.99, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.48, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
CUGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.30, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UUGUA 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.57, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UGCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.65, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGCUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.94, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CCCAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -4.16, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.99, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGGA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.89, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
GGCUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.94, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.09, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
ACAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.73, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.78, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.09, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.30, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.48, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UUGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAAGCG 1  Matches 18; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.58, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.93, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGGUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -9.19, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUACAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.62, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAGUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -6.14, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUAACC 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.71, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAACC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.85, deficit  6.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
ACUUGU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -5.70, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.74, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UAAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -3.95, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35                             
GGCCUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -5.20, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CAACUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -4.47, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-s35                               
AGAAUU 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.56, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AUAAGU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.36, deficit  0.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGGCGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.62, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.22, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
GUCCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUCAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.15, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GCUUGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -5.69, deficit  0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.81, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGGUAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.46, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
CAAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.41, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AUUGAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.13, deficit  0.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UUCUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -6.08, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUGAAC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.63, deficit  6.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUAAGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.23, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
AGUGUU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.23, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.41, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CGUGGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGUCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -3.64, deficit -0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -6.14, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AUUGUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -5.64, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUGUCU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.94, deficit  1.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGCUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.59, deficit  0.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
CACGUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.28, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.24, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AAUAUU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.89, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
UGAAAA 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.18, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AUCCGU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.19, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
UUCCGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -7.30, deficit  5.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
GGAACC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.85, deficit  6.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGAGAA 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.15, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUCAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -5.81, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
CUUGUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -5.55, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUGUUA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.73, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGCCGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -5.97, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
ACUACU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.39, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UAGGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -8.31, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UUAGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -7.44, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
ACACAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -6.45, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
CUGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUACCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CGGAACG 1  Matches 15; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.81, deficit  7.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAUCCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -3.62, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.23, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGUCGAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -4.69, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CCUGCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -6.99, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
ACUUCGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.53, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CGGCUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -8.89, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGGAGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGAAAGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CGAACAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GCAUCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -7.06, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.30, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CCAUCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -6.99, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GAAUCAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.45, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAGAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GUUGCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.08, deficit  1.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
UUUCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -8.67, deficit  5.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.04, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UGUCAGA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.90, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
AAAAAGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.19, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
GCAGAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -8.27, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCUAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.20, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
UUUGUGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_33612.1,  6 NTs,               CUUUUGG,score      -5.46, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55                 
CGGGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.06, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
UUCGGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -9.35, deficit  5.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GUUGAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -6.72, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CGGAGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.32, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGACGAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.73, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAAUUGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUGUGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -7.69, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGAAACG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUAUCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUCAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -7.56, deficit  4.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.01, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGGUGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.56, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UAAGAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -7.32, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
AGAAAAU 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -5.93, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
AGUAUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -4.83, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.09, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGCUGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -8.01, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CUCCAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.69, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCCCGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.20, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.16, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GCGACAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -8.88, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
GGUGAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CGGCGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -3.22, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUAUGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.20, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAAUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -8.96, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GUCGACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.24, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CUAGUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -10.43, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CUUGAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
UCUAGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score     -10.41, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
GUUGGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -8.22, deficit  3.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
AUUCAAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -7.89, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGGCCUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -8.94, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
AGAGUAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.75, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CAAAACUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -9.95, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CCCUUCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.71, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GUGCGACC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.32, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GAAAAACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.01, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
UUUGGAAA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.59, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGAAAUGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.97, deficit  0.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUAGACAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.32, deficit  2.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUUGAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -8.99, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
GGCUUUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.99, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CGAAAACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.03, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CGAUAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -9.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CCGAGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.82, deficit  4.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGUAAUUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -6.22, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGCAAGUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.00, deficit  1.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUUACAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.81, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
UAAUUUAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -6.98, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CGAGUACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -8.95, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GAGUGGUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -11.58, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CUUUGUCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.42, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
CUUGCCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -12.08, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUGCUUGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.43, deficit  3.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUGUAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -7.66, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUGGUUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -6.49, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.77, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGAACGAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -7.36, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GCUAAGCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -8.06, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CACGGUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -6.86, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GGCCUCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.68, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CGCUGUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -8.47, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GGGUAAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -9.09, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GGAGUACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -8.89, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GCCAGACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -10.03, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CUCGAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -9.30, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUUUCCAA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.82, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
GGAUACGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.95, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UGGAAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -12.01, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAAACUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -8.64, deficit  5.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GGAUCCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.75, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAGAGGCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -12.11, deficit  6.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.88, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGAAUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -7.66, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
UAGCUUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -10.52, deficit  3.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CAAAAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.98, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCGAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.45, deficit  1.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAGAAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -10.80, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GUUAGAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -8.05, deficit  2.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUAAAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -8.97, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
GGAGGAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CAGGUUCAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score      -8.71, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CGUAGAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -7.93, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GAUCCAGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.38, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
GAAUAAGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -7.54, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAGUUAAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.34, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CGGGGUAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -12.06, deficit  4.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
GGUCCGCUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -9.55, deficit  6.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUAAAAAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.63, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
UGCUCUCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -9.34, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.72, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
GAAACACAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -10.98, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
UCCAAAAAA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -6.60, deficit  0.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CGAUCGGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -10.26, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CAACCGGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score      -9.62, deficit  0.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
UAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -9.38, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCAAAGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.78, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
GUAAAAGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -10.84, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAUCCAAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -10.11, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
GUCUAACAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -8.85, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
ACUUGGACU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.28, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
CGGCCUAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -10.04, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
UUCACGAAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.76, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
UAAAUCUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -10.93, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
UUUACAGUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.44, deficit  5.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GGGUGAUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.37, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGCUAAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.03, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GUUAAUACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.81, deficit  0.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGAAUUACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -10.93, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GGGGGAAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -10.77, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAUCGACGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -10.58, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GGGUGAUAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -11.73, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
UCUUGAUAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -10.73, deficit  4.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GUCAAGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -9.82, deficit  4.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GUCAUCGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -8.97, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
UGAAAACUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.09, deficit  6.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUCAUACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score      -9.29, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGAGCUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -6.01, deficit  0.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
GGCAAAGUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -7.09, deficit  1.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GUUAAGUCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -10.72, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAAAAGUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.42, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UAGAGGUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -10.54, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
UUGACAAAA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GGAGCAAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -10.68, deficit  4.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
GGGGAAGUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -7.52, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CUAUGCAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -7.49, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
AGAGAAACU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -12.98, deficit  6.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CUCGUGAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.78, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUCAUCGCA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -7.37, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CAAGAAGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -8.99, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUCGGUAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -13.59, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
UCGUGACUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score      -9.39, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAUUCAGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.92, deficit  5.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGGACAGCUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -16.08, deficit  9.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCCGAUUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.60, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CGUCUUAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -12.96, deficit  6.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GGAAAAUAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.05, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUAAGCGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -8.62, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UAGCUGACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -12.68, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
GUAAUUAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.33, deficit  7.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GCUGAUGAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -10.87, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
CUUUGGAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.08, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCGUCAAUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.53, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
CAGAAACUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score      -9.48, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
UUAUUCUGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -11.88, deficit  6.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GGUGAGAUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -14.73, deficit  5.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CAAUACUUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.57, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GUAGGAAAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.12, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAUUAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.16, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUCAAAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.71, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CGGUAGUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -11.04, deficit  6.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
GCUAAUUUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -17.73, deficit  9.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
UGAGUUAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -10.97, deficit  4.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAUCAUCUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.67, deficit  6.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUCCCCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.95, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUCGCGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -15.94, deficit 10.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUGGUGCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -11.54, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGUUCAAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -10.48, deficit  4.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
GGGAAUUUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.69, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CUUACUGAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -11.01, deficit  6.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GUUAGCACAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score      -9.97, deficit  5.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAUUAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -17.66, deficit  9.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GUUAAUACUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -7.63, deficit  3.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GGUCUAAUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.30, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGAUCAGCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -15.97, deficit  9.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUCUACGAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -10.95, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
CGUAAAAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.64, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GGAAAUGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -6.28, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UCAGGAUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -11.03, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.28, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GAAUUUGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -12.18, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GAUAGAUGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -12.16, deficit  7.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAUCGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.55, deficit  7.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UCAUCUAAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -12.38, deficit  6.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
ACUCAUCGAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -14.09, deficit  8.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
GUCAUGAAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -8.39, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CUUCGAAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -9.41, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
GGUACAAAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.22, deficit  7.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UGCGGAGAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -14.63, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
GUUCGAGACAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.54, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
AGGUCGAACUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.73, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UGGUCUGCGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -15.96, deficit  6.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGAGUCGCAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -10.29, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
GUGUUCGUGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.64, deficit  5.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.54, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CUUGAUUCAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.04, deficit  8.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUCUCUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.01, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UCAGAGAAGAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -15.42, deficit  7.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
UGAAAAAAACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -14.89, deficit  7.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCUUUUUCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.94, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGUGGAACCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score      -9.95, deficit  5.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAGCCGUUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.53, deficit  8.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCUGAGACCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.23, deficit  8.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CGAGGUCCCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -12.98, deficit  7.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
UUUCGAGUGUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.43, deficit  5.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUAAAUUCGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -11.99, deficit  6.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.89, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
UAAUUAUUUCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score      -9.81, deficit -0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CUUUUGGAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -12.96, deficit  7.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAACAAGGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -12.16, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
UUUUAGUGAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -11.37, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGUCGCAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.06, deficit  6.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CACUUGUUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -10.85, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.46, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
GGUUCUAAAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.30, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CGCUGGGAACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.47, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
GGAGAGACUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -13.70, deficit  6.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CGGCAACAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.88, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.32, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAACCAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -13.37, deficit  5.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCAGGAUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -12.20, deficit  6.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CGAUCGGAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.18, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAAGCAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -14.31, deficit  7.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUAGGAGACAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -13.70, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
GGUAUUCAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.20, deficit  6.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.69, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GUAAUCUUAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.97, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUAGAGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.93, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAAGUAUAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.32, deficit  1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAAGGAUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -11.97, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CUAAGUUAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -11.38, deficit  4.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
CGUUAUUGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.20, deficit  3.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.98, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUCUAAACGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -16.45, deficit  9.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GGUGUCAAUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.30, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUUGUGAGGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -12.45, deficit  6.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUGAAGGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.22, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.12, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUUUGUGGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -15.44, deficit  8.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GUAACUGAAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.24, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.30, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GGUAAUUUUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.27, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GCAAGUUUGGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.27, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GAUGGUAGCAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -10.67, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.14, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CUAAAACACAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.08, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CGGACGUAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -16.04, deficit  7.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
UUUUAAUUUUUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -13.27, deficit  5.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
GGAUCCUGAGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.44, deficit  5.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.32, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UCUGAGGUAAUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -16.55, deficit  7.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UAAAAGGACCAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.40, deficit  5.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CUGGAGGGUAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.54, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
UAAAACUACCAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.79, deficit  3.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GGAGUCCAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.10, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAACCCACGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -15.57, deficit 10.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CGAAGCAGAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.68, deficit  5.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.57, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAUUUGAUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -14.61, deficit  4.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GUUUCUUCAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -13.26, deficit  5.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
CCAGUUAAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -12.95, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
AUGACAUUCUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.66, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUAUAGCCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.24, deficit  9.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGUCAAAUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94032.1, 10 NTs,          UAGUCUCUUUCG,score     -14.81, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GACUGUAAGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -15.18, deficit  8.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUGAGAGAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -10.71, deficit  4.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CCUAAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.42, deficit  5.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CGUCUUUUUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.60, deficit  5.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CGUAGCUUUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.60, deficit  5.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
GGGAGUGAUUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68863.1, 11 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -13.85, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.08, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F   
AAGGGGUGUUCAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68863.1, 11 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -13.77, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.59, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F   
CGCGCUAAAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -13.23, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.54, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GGGAGCGUGUAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -15.91, deficit  5.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
CUUAUGAUUUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -16.22, deficit  7.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
GUUUUGAAGAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -12.70, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.40, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GGGAUGGGAUGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -12.79, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
CUAAAAAGUAACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.85, deficit  8.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 82.0000	 69.1429	4
5	100.0000	 90.5714	 48.2857	23
6	100.0000	 87.4286	 50.8571	60
7	 99.7143	 48.8571	 16.0000	51
8	 98.8571	 29.4286	  4.5714	46
9	 98.8571	 18.8571	  2.0000	68
10	 95.1429	 10.0000	  0.2857	41
11	 85.7143	  3.4286	  0.0000	42
12	 44.5714	  0.2857	  0.0000	23
13	 17.1429	  0.2857	  0.0000	12
14	  6.5714	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  0.8571	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.7143	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.8571	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.5714	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.2857	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  28 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  59 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  61 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 202 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 214 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 230 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 240 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 242 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 243 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 255 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 255 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 262 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 268 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 305 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 308 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 312 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 330 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 336 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 365 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 374 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 382 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 385 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 394 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 402 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 414 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 436 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 436 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 491 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 517 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 572 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 649 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.4524%
Number of models giving false positives is 295 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.96
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.46
