Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_13.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:20:15
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.4085 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.3730 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.6684 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.5970 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.5777 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5530 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   4.9503 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.8287 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.1183 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.7688 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.5971 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.4679 minutes

ans =

    12

CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UACA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.98, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UGCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.62, deficit  0.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.71, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.32, deficit  0.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -8.00, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.33, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCGC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.13, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UGCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -9.84, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.37, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.84, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AAUUU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_56387.1,  5 NTs,                 AUUUU,score      -6.12, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55                 
GUAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUCCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -6.81, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UUCAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -3.00, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.99, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUCAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -2.84, deficit  0.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UUGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -5.81, deficit  2.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90197.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35                             
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUCAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -2.79, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGACA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.16, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.94, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.99, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -7.87, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.84, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
AUCGU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.15, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCGC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.13, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UACAA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GAGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
ACUAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.28, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GCGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
AUUCU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.26, deficit  1.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GGUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.10, deficit  0.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UACAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -6.79, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUCAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -2.84, deficit  0.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CCGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -8.25, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.52, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
AUAGU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.90, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CAAAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -6.93, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGAGUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -6.14, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUUUUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -3.94, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.11, deficit  0.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GGGGAC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.41, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAGUAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUGCCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGCUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.72, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GGCAAC 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.18, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AGCAAU 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.91, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AUGGCU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.57, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUGGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.73, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GAAUCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.14, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAAGU 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.15, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAUCC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -6.69, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.69, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UGUCGA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.95, deficit -0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CAAUUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_52240.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -4.51, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
AUCUAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.34, deficit  0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUGUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GAAUGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_52240.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -5.60, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGUGAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.48, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
AACAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -8.22, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.77, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.93, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
UGACCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -7.21, deficit  3.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.24, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UCGAAA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.19, deficit  2.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CCAAAG 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.62, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUCCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.11, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUUCCA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_46463.1,  4 NTs,                UUUCGA,score      -5.06, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AAUAAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -7.52, deficit  0.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CACUCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F                             
CUCAUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -5.02, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GGUGAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GUUCUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -10.28, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGGUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -3.87, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.64, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSH                             
AAUGAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -5.26, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
GGACAC 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.29, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.96, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAGUC 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -6.14, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AUAUGU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -6.51, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GUUGAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.11, deficit  0.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GUAGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.29, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUCAAG 1  Matches 20; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.86, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.11, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UCGCUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.72, deficit  0.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.59, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
GGAUAC 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUCACG 1  Matches  9; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.49, deficit  4.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.36, deficit  2.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GUUGAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.62, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CAACGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.14, deficit  1.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGACAUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.42, deficit  2.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGGUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -11.46, deficit  3.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GUGAAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.92, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGAAGUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.81, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CCUGAGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -9.35, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
AGAAGAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.72, deficit  1.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.40, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGGGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -7.38, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUCCUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.18, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CUGUGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.69, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
AAGACUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.81, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CGAGCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.51, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
AUUCGCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -4.80, deficit  0.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CUUGUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.26, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GUCUUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.24, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGGUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -7.20, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35                                 
CGUGCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.96, deficit  0.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GGAAUCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_40469.1,  4 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.18, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GGUGAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.55, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
AUUUCCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -8.07, deficit  5.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AUCUCCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -7.89, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35                                 
AUAACAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.05, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -6.23, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CCUCAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.16, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCUCUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score     -10.60, deficit  6.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CCAUAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.29, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
CUAAAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.26, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCCCGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.20, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.16, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUCCAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -8.73, deficit  2.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UAGUAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -8.20, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
AUCAAUU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.77, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UAAGCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -9.46, deficit  6.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGUGAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UAAAUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.42, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.05, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUAUGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -7.03, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GUGAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.07, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CCAACAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.91, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GAACAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.17, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
UGUGCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.27, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GAGAAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.58, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CGGUUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.15, deficit  1.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UGAGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.71, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.96, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
AGUAGAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.31, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
AAGGAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -7.29, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
GGAUGUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.97, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUGGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.85, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GUGCUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.53, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GACAAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.93, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
CUUUUCGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_33612.1,  6 NTs,               CUUUUGG,score      -9.06, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55                 
CUAAUAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -11.14, deficit  7.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GUCUACAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.14, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGAACAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -6.08, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
CUUGUUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -9.72, deficit  5.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
AGCCAGAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.74, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUGAGGCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.82, deficit  2.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUAAUGAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -11.35, deficit  6.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CACCGUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -13.29, deficit  4.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
ACAAGACU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.70, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CGUGGAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.63, deficit  4.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GACUAUAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.55, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
AAAAAGGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.65, deficit  1.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUAGAGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.17, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UACAUCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -7.73, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
AGCGAAGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.73, deficit  2.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUAACACU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -11.08, deficit  4.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GUCCAUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -12.13, deficit  5.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGGCAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.64, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CCACGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.34, deficit  4.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCAACGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -8.88, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CAUGGGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.80, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGUGUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.64, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CUAACCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score     -10.41, deficit  6.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CCACAUAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -6.29, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GCAAUUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -7.73, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CAAAUAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -8.06, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GAACUUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -14.15, deficit  6.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GGACCUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.04, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
AUUAAAUU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -5.33, deficit  1.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
AUCGGAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score     -10.49, deficit  5.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGGGAAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.63, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
AAAACUAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -7.35, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GUAGAUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.94, deficit  3.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUCAUCUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -9.06, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUGCGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.27, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGAGAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.34, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GAAAAGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.19, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGACUUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -7.73, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
UGCAAAAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.54, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AGUUAAAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -6.16, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
AGUCUCCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.83, deficit  0.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CAUGCGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -13.11, deficit  7.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGCACAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.12, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UACCUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.74, deficit  4.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUACACUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.16, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GUAAAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.33, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CUGGACCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score     -10.45, deficit  5.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UUUAGGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.48, deficit  2.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAAAGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.68, deficit  1.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AGAGGUAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.91, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AUUGAAGAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -8.52, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
CAAAGAGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -12.99, deficit  7.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
AUGACUUAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score     -10.92, deficit  7.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
UAAAAGCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -13.30, deficit  4.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GGAUCGUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.28, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CGGAGUUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -8.28, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CAACAGUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -12.20, deficit  3.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GGAGAUUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.20, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
AUCCUCAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -7.67, deficit  2.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
GGAUGAGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.78, deficit  5.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GUUAUGAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.81, deficit  0.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAGUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -8.75, deficit  3.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAAAGUAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
AGAUUGAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.48, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGAGGACUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.37, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
UGUGUUGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -12.58, deficit  8.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
AGGAAAAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.98, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CAAGAGAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.74, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGGACGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.40, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GUCGGUGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.78, deficit  6.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGGACAUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -9.45, deficit  6.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -9.91, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
UUAUAACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -13.66, deficit  8.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAUGCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.82, deficit  6.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGGAAGUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -9.13, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GACUGCGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CUAAAGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.35, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUUUCCAGA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.76, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAAAGAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -10.99, deficit  4.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGCGAUCGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.40, deficit  3.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CGUGAAAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -8.61, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
UAUCAGUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -12.56, deficit  7.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGAAAACUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.37, deficit  6.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAUUAGCGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.87, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUCCUCAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.68, deficit  4.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
GUCCUGGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -10.73, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
GUGUCUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -7.14, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GUGCGUUCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.87, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GGCUCACAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -7.57, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CACAAAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -6.96, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GUCCAUCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.89, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAUAGAAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -6.61, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUGCGAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.66, deficit  0.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUUUGAGCU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.53, deficit  3.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GUCACGUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.97, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CUCGUUUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -11.26, deficit  4.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUAACGGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAGUAGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -12.42, deficit  7.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CUCUAAGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -8.69, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGACUAGGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -13.02, deficit  7.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
AAAUUUCAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.62, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.68, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CUUGAAGGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -10.49, deficit  1.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GAUUCAGAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.18, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUGAUGAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -7.76, deficit  1.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GCAGUAUAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.66, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CGAGGGUUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -12.99, deficit  5.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CAGUAAAGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.82, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
AGGAGGGCUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -17.26, deficit  9.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GCUGGAUCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -11.06, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
GUGAAUAUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -7.85, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGGAUUAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.11, deficit  5.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUCUGCUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -11.84, deficit  6.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GAUUGGCCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -13.37, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.08, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
AGUGAGAUGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -13.53, deficit  7.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
AUAAAAUCCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.34, deficit  7.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
GGAAAACGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.04, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGCUUUUCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGGGGUAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.38, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CUUGGCAUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -11.30, deficit  5.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CGUGCGCCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.52, deficit  8.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCAAGUCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.03, deficit  4.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCGCCAGGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -11.41, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
CCGGAUUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.70, deficit  3.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.22, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
AGGUGUCGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -10.96, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-F                               
GUUAUACGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -12.57, deficit  8.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GUGCUUCCCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -10.28, deficit  2.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUGACAAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score     -12.46, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
UGUUUGAAUA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -12.84, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
GAUCGAAAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -9.60, deficit  3.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CGUUGGAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -8.11, deficit  1.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CAGGAAGACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -12.17, deficit  6.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GGCUCACGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.81, deficit  1.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.55, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGAAGAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -10.08, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GGAUAACGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.18, deficit  5.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
UGAUAAUGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.91, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
AGAAACGAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.38, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGCAAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -11.14, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGUAUCUCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.93, deficit  2.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.72, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGUGCUAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -9.85, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
GUGUAAAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -9.97, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUAGGCUGGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -12.82, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
UGUCGAUAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -14.31, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
GGCAAAAUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.41, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
UGUUAGGGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -9.62, deficit  1.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GGCGAAAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.98, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GCAUUAUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -16.63, deficit  7.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
UUUUCAAUUGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.04, deficit  7.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UGCGAAUUAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -11.40, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.01, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CUGCAGAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -16.05, deficit  8.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCUGCGGUGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -11.35, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.18, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
CGGUGGGAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -13.16, deficit  7.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GUUUCCGGGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.17, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGCUGGACAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -14.19, deficit  4.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
GUAUAAGAUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -14.92, deficit  9.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
AUAACUUGUUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -12.20, deficit  4.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
CGAAGGUGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -12.45, deficit  6.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GGAUCGCCUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.40, deficit  6.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGUAUUUCCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.94, deficit  7.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGUUGGGAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -12.87, deficit  7.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCUUUUUGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -13.29, deficit  7.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GUUAUCUCAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -10.72, deficit  3.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
CGGGCUGUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -12.26, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CGAACUCAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.51, deficit  7.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.36, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GACGUGAAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -14.66, deficit  7.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUAGAUUUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -10.56, deficit  6.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUCAAAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score      -9.31, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGUGGUUCAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score      -9.64, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
CUGCUAAUACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -17.08, deficit  9.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGACGUAGCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.93, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUACCUCGGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -10.72, deficit  4.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
CGAGGGGAGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.62, deficit  7.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CAAACAUGGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.06, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GGCCUUUAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -12.57, deficit  5.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
AGAAAAACUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.93, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGUUUCGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -10.12, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
CAGAAUUCCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -15.96, deficit  8.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
UGUUGAAGAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -10.85, deficit  6.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUCGUUCGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.91, deficit  6.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUCGUUCAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.76, deficit  4.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GGGAAUCUUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -17.24, deficit  9.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.14, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CAACAAGUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -13.30, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
CCCACAAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.59, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CCUAAAGUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -16.45, deficit  7.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
AUCGAAAGGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -12.87, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
AGUCGGAGAGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -13.63, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
GAGACACCACAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -11.89, deficit  3.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAUCACAAUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.48, deficit  3.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -14.45, deficit  6.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUAAUGUCGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -14.22, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.41, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
AGAAACAAAAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.05, deficit  3.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAUCGAUUUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94032.1, 10 NTs,          UAGUCUCUUUCG,score     -13.84, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAAAUCGAUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -17.23, deficit  9.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUGCGGCUGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.78, deficit  5.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAACGCAUACAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -11.53, deficit  2.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUGAAAACCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -11.77, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.09, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
GUUGGAGAAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -16.71, deficit 10.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GACUCCGCUGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -18.81, deficit  9.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
CGAAAAACGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.69, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
UAGAUUAUAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -13.96, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
CUGUAAGUUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -13.81, deficit  7.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GGACGCGUAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.29, deficit  4.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.74, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGACUAAAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -10.90, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GUUUUUAGAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.54, deficit  8.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
AAAGUGAAGAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -15.59, deficit 10.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
CUUAGCAAGCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score      -9.52, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUGUCAAACUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -11.81, deficit  5.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.89, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CUCGGGAUAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -16.12, deficit  8.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCAACUCAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.08, deficit  5.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.37, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGAGCAACGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -15.08, deficit  7.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGAAUUGUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.05, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CGAAUCGGAUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -16.08, deficit  6.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.46, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
UUAAAGGAUGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.59, deficit  8.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCACUAAAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -14.83, deficit  6.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
AGUAGUAAUAGCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -18.00, deficit  7.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.12, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGAGCAAGAGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -18.21, deficit  7.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.01, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
AAACAUUGCAACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.63, deficit  6.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.78, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCGAGAGAUGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -20.67, deficit 10.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GGAAAAAUCUACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.49, deficit  9.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCGAUGGAUCAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -13.71, deficit  3.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.43, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
UUUAGCAGAGUGUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -17.79, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.14, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
GUCCUAGGGGAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12870.1, 13 NTs,         GUCCUUGGGAAAC,score     -18.60, deficit 11.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35
CGGAGUCAGAAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -17.70, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
GAGAAUGACAAGUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -18.62, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 81.6923	 69.3846	4
5	100.0000	 90.7692	 48.0000	23
6	100.0000	 86.3077	 47.2308	60
7	 99.8462	 49.6923	 14.1538	51
8	 99.2308	 26.7692	  3.3846	46
9	 99.3846	 19.0769	  1.6923	68
10	 94.4615	  8.9231	  0.3077	41
11	 84.6154	  4.1538	  0.0000	42
12	 46.1538	  0.7692	  0.0000	23
13	 17.2308	  0.1538	  0.0000	12
14	  6.6154	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.5385	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.4615	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.3077	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.1538	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  51 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 119 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 121 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 225 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 227 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 231 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 237 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 239 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 253 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 275 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 277 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 283 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 288 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 289 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 289 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 291 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 291 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 297 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 300 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 310 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 316 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 335 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 360 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 361 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 379 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 389 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 395 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 398 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 399 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 401 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 410 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 415 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 417 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 422 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 459 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 460 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 469 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 474 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 485 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 496 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 563 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 569 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 580 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 602 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 608 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 674 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 689 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 706 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 719 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 730 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 753 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 775 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 810 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 813 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 913 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 977 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1058 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1224 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.5000%
Number of models giving false positives is 299 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.67
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.35
