Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_2.mat
UACA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.98, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.05, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.21, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.94, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.21, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -8.00, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
UUCUA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.91, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GCGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCCUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -5.05, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UGUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -6.51, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
UGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UGGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -6.51, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AAGCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -6.16, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UUUUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -2.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
AGCAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UGGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -6.51, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GACGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.74, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CAGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GCGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -8.33, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.74, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
AUUCU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.26, deficit  1.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GCCCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UAAAA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.95, deficit  0.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAGAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUGCUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.72, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GUACUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.51, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CGACAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.47, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGAGC 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.98, deficit  6.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.43, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGCCA 1  Matches 12; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -13.28, deficit 11.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAGGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -7.13, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUUCUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -9.74, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCCUAA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.39, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGGGAG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.59, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUAUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -3.41, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GUCCUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -4.95, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CUGAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_29487.1,  6 NTs,                CUGAUG,score      -2.34, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s35-s55                       
CAUUGG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -4.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
UAAACA 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.01, deficit  5.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAGCAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -5.10, deficit  1.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
CCAAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.49, deficit  0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GGAUGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
AGAGGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.40, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UUUGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.78, deficit  3.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CUCACG 1  Matches  9; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.49, deficit  4.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGAAC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score     -10.00, deficit  6.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUAUCG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCGUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.45, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGUCAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.59, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CUGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGCGGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.72, deficit -0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.79, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CUCGUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.45, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GAGGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UUUUUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -6.04, deficit  1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGCGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.69, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.44, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
UUAUUA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -5.42, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.81, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GUAGUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.29, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.16, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAUGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUGCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.47, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GUCUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GUCACC 1  Matches 11; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.32, deficit  5.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GCUCCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -7.90, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GGGAGC 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.98, deficit  6.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.43, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAGAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUUGCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.47, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CGCAAG 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -3.36, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAUCAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -2.72, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
CAACAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CGGAUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.90, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CACCUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -11.74, deficit  4.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -6.23, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GGUAUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -6.42, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGCGAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -9.11, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CAAUCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CUGAGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.64, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
UAACCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.68, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
UACCACA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.68, deficit  1.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGCUGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -8.13, deficit  0.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
UUGAAUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.24, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UUCGACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score     -10.34, deficit  6.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CGAAGGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score     -10.11, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCACUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UGAGGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -6.85, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGUCGAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.00, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GAAGAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.17, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CUUCCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -5.29, deficit -0.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
UAAAUGA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -7.97, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GCACAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.67, deficit  0.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
ACUUCAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -5.99, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CUACUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -8.71, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GUGCACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.57, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUAUUUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.33, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GUACCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUGAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
AGCUAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.17, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUGCUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.53, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAUUUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGUUCAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -8.28, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
CUCUACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.16, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CUAAUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -4.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CGAAGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.44, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UGGAAAA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.17, deficit  1.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UUGGAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -9.64, deficit  5.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGUCAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.15, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUCGACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.16, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
AAGGGGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -6.96, deficit  1.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGAUGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -5.75, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUGAUCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -5.93, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CGGGUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -11.46, deficit  3.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CGGAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.30, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGCUGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -5.75, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CAACGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -7.19, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
UGCUAAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.02, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AAAUAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.19, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CUGGACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -8.17, deficit  4.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CGCUUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.90, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CUUGAGCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.10, deficit  3.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGCUAUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.55, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CAAGCCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.67, deficit  4.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGAAAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCUGGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.84, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GUGAUUCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.72, deficit  4.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UAAGAAGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score     -12.47, deficit  6.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUGGCGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -11.65, deficit  5.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
CUGCAUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.56, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GGUCGUGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -7.71, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCAGGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.78, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAAAGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.86, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCGGGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -14.37, deficit  7.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CGAGGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -8.99, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CACUCCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.60, deficit  1.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CUGAUACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score     -11.63, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGUCUAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -11.31, deficit  4.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
GCUCGAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
ACCUCGAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -8.82, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UCGAGAAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -7.69, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
GUUCGACC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.22, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGUUUGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
GAAUUUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -9.85, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGCGGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -8.45, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUAAAGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.62, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUCGUUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.69, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CGUCACAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGGAGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.50, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UAACCGCA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.42, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCAAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.31, deficit  3.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
UUGCAGCA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.33, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
UACCGGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -13.03, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GUUGGUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.54, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GCGUCAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -6.64, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GCAAAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.91, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CUAAUGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score     -10.60, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CUUAUGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.20, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GAGAAGGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.73, deficit  3.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGGUGAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -8.05, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CGAAUGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.19, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAAGAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.53, deficit  6.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UCGAUGCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.29, deficit  3.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAGUCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.94, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UGAAAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAGUAGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.15, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CGGAAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -5.93, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GGAUCUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.82, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GUGCGACC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.32, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
UGACCGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.42, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAUCCAAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -9.85, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCUUAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -7.95, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
ACGUAGGAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score      -7.85, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GGAAUACAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -12.07, deficit  4.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAAGGGAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.44, deficit  1.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CGGUUGUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -8.56, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
GAAGGAACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -10.38, deficit  3.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GAAACCUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.88, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CUGAAUCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -13.44, deficit  8.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CGGAUGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -11.43, deficit  3.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUCACACUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -8.87, deficit  5.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GUCAAAAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.64, deficit  1.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GAAAGGGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.56, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GGGUGACAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -13.59, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGACUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -13.02, deficit  5.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAACGGACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -7.67, deficit  0.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
AGGCCGCGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.66, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUCUCGAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -7.97, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
AUCUAGAUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -7.96, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
GGUGAAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.69, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
UUCGAAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score     -11.88, deficit  4.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
AACCCUAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score      -8.52, deficit  1.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
GCUCAAACC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -8.24, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GUGAUCGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.44, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GGAAUCGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.88, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
UUUUUGCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score     -11.42, deficit  4.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CAAGAAACG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.32, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAAGAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.18, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GAGGACAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.60, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCGUCGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -12.89, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GGAAUUUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.30, deficit  3.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GUGAUACCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.70, deficit  2.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CGGCGCAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -10.27, deficit  1.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAAAGGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -12.82, deficit  7.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GUCGUCUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.44, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GUUUCGUCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.87, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
AAGCCCAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -11.43, deficit  4.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
CGGAAACAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -10.75, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
GGAAAACGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.19, deficit  2.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CACUGUUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score      -8.45, deficit  1.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GAAAAGUAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.22, deficit  3.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAGCAUAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -10.12, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
GUAGCAAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score     -10.84, deficit  3.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GCUUUACAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -7.85, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUUUCCGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -8.29, deficit  1.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
CUUUCCGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.36, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GUCCAUGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.46, deficit  6.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCGAGAGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -7.44, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CUUGUUUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -10.44, deficit  6.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
CGUUUAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -6.75, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GUGUAUGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -17.52, deficit 10.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CUCGAAAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -9.98, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
UGAAAAAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -15.86, deficit  8.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
ACUCGAAUCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.52, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGCAAGGUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -9.89, deficit  4.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GUCAUGAAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -8.39, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CCCUUCAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score     -13.75, deficit  8.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CGAAUGUGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.80, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGCACCCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -11.05, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
GGAAAAGCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.86, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUUUCGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.46, deficit  4.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGCACGCCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.64, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GUAAUUCCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -10.98, deficit  4.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CACCAAUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.61, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GUUUAGCCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.28, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CGUUGGGUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -12.12, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
GUGGGACAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -8.81, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
AUGCACACUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.66, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CUCUCUUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -13.39, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
GCGUCGAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.67, deficit  3.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CGCAUGCAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.19, deficit  2.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAAGUGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.37, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GAAAUGAGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.27, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GGAAGAGCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.82, deficit  4.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CUAAAGGUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.34, deficit  5.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CAGAGAACAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.53, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
UACCCAAUGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.55, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
AGCGGCUCAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -15.67, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
GACACGAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.43, deficit  6.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CAACACAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.76, deficit  1.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CGAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -10.47, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUGGAAAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -12.00, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CUUUAAUACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.74, deficit  4.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGGCUAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.17, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUCCUUCUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -11.89, deficit  4.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
UUUUCACGUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.87, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.14, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGCCCAGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.12, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGCAUCAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -10.04, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAGACUACAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.53, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
CGUAUACCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -10.04, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUGUGGAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.88, deficit  6.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CAUACAAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -13.73, deficit  8.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAAAAAACGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -9.98, deficit  3.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGUUGCUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.20, deficit  0.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUGAAGAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -12.59, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GGAAAGGAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -8.15, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGUGAAAAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score     -11.51, deficit  4.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
CUAUUGUGAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -10.48, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
CGUCGUCGCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.76, deficit  4.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUUCGUUCUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.15, deficit  5.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UACGAAGUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -13.81, deficit  5.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
AUUCGAAAGCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.81, deficit  5.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CGGAACCGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.37, deficit  3.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAACAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -14.23, deficit  6.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUUUGUGGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -10.91, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
AAAGCUCGGAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -10.74, deficit  4.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
CUAGUCUGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score      -8.94, deficit  1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
GGUCGUCACGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.17, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.40, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUAAACCUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -15.94, deficit  8.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUCAUCGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -10.55, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
CUUCAGUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.15, deficit  5.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGGUCGCGUAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.39, deficit  7.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
CUGCCAAGGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -14.26, deficit 10.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
UUCAAGAUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.38, deficit  5.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
UGAACAAGGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -10.05, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CCAUUUAGGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.14, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
CUAGACUAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.46, deficit  5.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
UUGCAUUUCUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -14.34, deficit  7.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
UGAGAGUUAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.34, deficit  2.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
GUAGGUAAGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.63, deficit  6.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
UUAUUAUUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.91, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.73, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GUCAAAGAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.40, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CGGAUAUAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -11.78, deficit  4.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CUGCUCCUCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -13.46, deficit  6.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
GGUGCGUUGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -10.92, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.78, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
GUGAAUGAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.22, deficit  7.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CAAUAGAAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -10.33, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGAUUAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.77, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.92, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGCCUAGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -11.90, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
GAGAAUCAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -14.10, deficit  6.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCCCGUGCCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.93, deficit  4.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GCACUUAAAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -11.52, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GUAGGUGAGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.53, deficit  5.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CUGAGGCGAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -10.73, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GGAAGGAACAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -12.82, deficit  7.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
GGCUCGCGAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.44, deficit  6.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGUACACCCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_31581.4,  8 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.46, deficit  7.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAACUCUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -12.55, deficit  4.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAAAGACAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.83, deficit  6.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GGAAAUGUAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -14.26, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
GGAACAGCUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -15.31, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAUCGAGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -15.04, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGUUAAAUUGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -14.30, deficit  6.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAAACGCAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.78, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
UAACCUGCUGCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_10751.2,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -13.84, deficit  7.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.68, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33                   
UGCUGUUUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -12.52, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.00, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
AAACACUACCAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -19.93, deficit 11.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CAUCCUUUCCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -16.44, deficit  7.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.63, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
AGAUUGACAAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.19, deficit  7.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAUUUGAUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -12.95, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
CCGAUGGGACUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -12.32, deficit  3.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.10, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CUGUACUGUGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -14.98, deficit  7.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGACCGGAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -15.34, deficit  8.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGGUUCGUUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -19.85, deficit  8.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAUUACGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.25, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.96, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CCGAUCCUUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.32, deficit  4.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUAUCUUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94032.1, 10 NTs,          UAGUCUCUUUCG,score     -12.98, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.15, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AGAAUUAAAAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.15, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUAAUUCAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.05, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CGAAAUCGAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -12.32, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.92, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUAAUCACCUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.69, deficit  6.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
CUUUUUAAAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.18, deficit  7.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CGGAAAGAACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.77, deficit  6.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.31, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUCAAAAUGGUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -15.12, deficit  8.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
ACUUGUUGAGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -13.48, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.00, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CUGAAACUAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -14.64, deficit  7.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CUUGAUUUAGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -14.38, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
UGAAGGUGAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -12.52, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.19, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
UACGCAUUAGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -14.93, deficit  6.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CGUAUAACUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -13.75, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.57, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUGAAAAAACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.76, deficit  6.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.32, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCUAAUUAACUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.64, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CAUGGCAUUUCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20714.1, 11 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -14.04, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAGUACACGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89082.1, 11 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -12.29, deficit  7.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35   
GGAUGGGCAGAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -14.20, deficit  5.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
GGUACGUGUCGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -12.78, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
UGCCUUUGUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12870.1, 13 NTs,         GUCCUUGGGAAAC,score     -16.05, deficit  9.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35
CUAAGAAAGAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.20, deficit  9.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAUCUGUAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -18.04, deficit  9.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
UCGUUUAUCCAGCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38011.1, 13 NTs,        GCUUAGAAGCAGCC,score     -13.38, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.42, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UAUCCGAUUUGAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93650.1, 15 NTs,       CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG,score     -15.45, deficit  8.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
GGGAAAUUGAUAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42211.1, 13 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -17.47, deficit  7.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.00, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35     
CCUAAUUGAGGUAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58539.1, 15 NTs,      UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG,score     -18.42, deficit  8.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.30, ed 99, 5 cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAGGCUUGGUCUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12571.1, 13 NTs,       CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG,score     -17.64, deficit  9.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35
GUAAAUGGACGAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58539.1, 15 NTs,      UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG,score     -18.66, deficit  8.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.32, ed 99, 5 cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 82.0000	 69.0000	4
5	100.0000	 89.0000	 59.0000	23
6	100.0000	 86.0000	 52.0000	60
7	 98.0000	 59.0000	  9.0000	51
8	 99.0000	 26.0000	  3.0000	46
9	100.0000	 15.0000	  0.0000	68
10	 94.0000	  7.0000	  0.0000	41
11	 83.0000	  1.0000	  0.0000	42
12	 53.0000	  1.0000	  0.0000	23
13	 19.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	12
14	  7.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  5.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence   7 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  12 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  16 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.7917%
Number of models giving false positives is 285 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.00
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.25
