Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_15.mat
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -8.00, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.06, deficit  1.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -8.00, deficit  4.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.06, deficit  1.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GACGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.74, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.32, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UAACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -7.10, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UACAA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGCAA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.60, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.57, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
ACUAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.28, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F-s35                             
AAAGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.07, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUGUU 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.57, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
UUUUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUGUU 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.57, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UGUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -6.51, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GAGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -6.04, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AGGAU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.36, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GAUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.91, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UUCUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.00, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -7.87, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.22, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
UGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90197.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35                             
GGCUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GUGGUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -3.74, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSH                             
CGUAGG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGUCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.94, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGUAAU 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CCUUCG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUCCUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.00, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUGUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -5.55, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGGAC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.41, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUCUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.92, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CAAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.41, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAUAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUCAUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -4.95, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UAAUCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -9.18, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CACUAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.42, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGGGAG 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.47, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGCCGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.09, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCAUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -5.02, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CAUUAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -4.07, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.85, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
GUCGUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.09, deficit -0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GAAAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.04, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AGAAGU 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.15, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UUGCUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.70, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
CUGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CACUCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F                             
UAGUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -8.31, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.24, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAACC 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.71, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GCUGAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.03, deficit  0.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UUUCUA 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -10.14, deficit  7.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUUGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.88, deficit -0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UUAACA 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.59, deficit  4.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.84, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUACC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.29, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUUGCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.47, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CGGGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.29, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.41, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGGUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -3.74, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSH                             
UACCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -8.47, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUAGUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.29, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
UUAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.64, deficit  2.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGCCAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -6.55, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.54, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CGAUAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UAGAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.76, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCCUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -4.95, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
AAAUUAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAAAGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.29, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CGCUAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.90, deficit  1.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CCAUAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGGCAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -4.69, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CAUUGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -8.29, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UUCAGUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.77, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GAAAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -3.99, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GAGAUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.20, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GGGUGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.56, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUUUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -4.65, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GGUAAGC 1  Matches 19; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.46, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AGAAAAU 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -5.93, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CGGGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.06, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CUGAAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.17, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GGCUUGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.20, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
UUGAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -8.82, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CCUUUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.30, deficit  3.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
UCUAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.82, deficit  3.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
UGCUUAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.98, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
GAGUAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.80, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CUUCUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.26, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CGAUAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.05, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.09, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAACAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCGAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -8.21, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
AGAAGAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.72, deficit  1.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.40, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UGAUCGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -7.28, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CAAGGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -7.78, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CGACAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.20, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGGUAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -5.22, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GCGAGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.37, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
GUUACCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CGUCAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.15, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUGAACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.24, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGGUGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.26, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GGUCCAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -7.43, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
UAAAUAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -5.97, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
GGCAGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -8.01, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GUUUUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -5.16, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
UGCAAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_77081.1,  5 NTs,               UGAAAAG,score      -5.91, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35             
CUAAUUG 1  Matches 13; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -11.77, deficit 10.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGAUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -6.93, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGCCGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.77, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GAUUAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -9.19, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CUUUCUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -5.75, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GGAUAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.33, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGGGCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -12.97, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CUGAUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -5.93, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CGUACAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.24, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CAGUAUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score     -11.30, deficit  6.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GACUCCCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.92, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GUAGCUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.00, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAUAGACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.01, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
GUACUCUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.57, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
ACGAUCCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.25, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGUAGAGA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.10, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CCCAUGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.81, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
GAAGAGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -10.05, deficit  4.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CAAAAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.42, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUACGAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -5.90, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
UAAGUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -14.58, deficit  6.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
CGGCGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -12.06, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCUCAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.72, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAAAUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -9.50, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
GUGAGCCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -7.68, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGAUUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.67, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAUGAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -8.99, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CCUUGCAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -9.35, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAAGAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.10, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAUCAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.13, deficit  0.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CCCUUGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -9.58, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAGAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.73, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GGAAAGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.66, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAAGUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.89, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AAGAUUGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -9.60, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAGGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
UGCUACGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -6.63, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CUCAAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.31, deficit  3.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CGCGGUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.26, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GGCGGAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.86, deficit  5.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CUGAUUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.43, deficit  3.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGGUAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.62, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CGACCCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUCAAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.15, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GUAGGCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.19, deficit  1.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUACGACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAGGAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.18, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
UGUCAAAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -10.20, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
UGACAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.27, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AAAAUGCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -8.49, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CUUCAAUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score     -10.46, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GGUUAAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -6.14, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
GCGAAGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.52, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
GGACUCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.95, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AGGCGAGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.54, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
GGGCAAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -6.53, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
GUUUUUUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -8.19, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CUCGUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -12.21, deficit  7.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGGUUUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.62, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CGUGGACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score     -10.75, deficit  6.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGUCUGAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.91, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUGACGCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.39, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CGUCAUUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score      -8.89, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
CACCUACAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.07, deficit  1.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GUUUAAUCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.87, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
ACGAAAUUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -10.67, deficit  4.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CGGGAAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.97, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
UACUUUUAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score      -9.59, deficit  1.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
UGAGCUAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.92, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AUCUCGCUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -11.15, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
CGCUUCUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score     -11.33, deficit  6.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GGCAGGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -9.85, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CAACUAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -13.52, deficit  8.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GUGGGCUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -5.80, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
GGGCGCAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -10.26, deficit  1.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGUGAAAGC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GCAUACACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.26, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GGCGAAGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -13.08, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUAUGUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -11.99, deficit  7.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGCGCACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -9.34, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.72, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
UCUUGCAUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.31, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
CAUCAGGAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -11.22, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
UUUAGUGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -5.53, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAACAAAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AAAUUCACU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -7.60, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CAACUUCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.90, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GUCUAGUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.24, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GUACCUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.87, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CGAUGAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -11.03, deficit  4.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
GAGGAAACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.34, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
AAGAGAGGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -7.84, deficit  2.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CGAAAAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGGAGUGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -11.89, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
UUGUUAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -9.23, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
UUUGUGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -10.90, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGAAAAUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -7.07, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CUGCGAUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -7.29, deficit  0.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GACGGUGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score      -9.71, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GGUUGAAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -8.28, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
GUCCUUUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.42, deficit  3.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGCACAAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -12.49, deficit  4.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUGCCCUCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.24, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGUGUAUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.17, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
ACCUAGUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -15.95, deficit  9.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCUCUGGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score     -10.41, deficit  4.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGACCACAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -7.74, deficit  4.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAAGCUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.32, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
AAAAGAGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -6.90, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GGUCAACAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.03, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGAAAAAAGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -12.12, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCCGAUGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -11.05, deficit  5.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
UGACUGCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.86, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGAAAGAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -8.47, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGUACCUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.83, deficit  0.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGUCUAAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -10.35, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
GAGGAUAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.96, deficit  2.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CGGAGGAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UUCAUCUAUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.38, deficit  5.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UAAGAGGUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -15.74, deficit 10.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GCAGUGUCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -15.09, deficit  7.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CAAAAAGGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.23, deficit  0.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GUGAGAUACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -17.51, deficit  9.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGCCAGGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.27, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAUUCUGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.98, deficit  5.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUCUCGAAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score     -10.67, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GGAGAGAAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -7.64, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGGCUAAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -10.48, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
AGAGAAGGAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.47, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
UGCCAAGUGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.55, deficit  6.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUGUGAACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -12.43, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GGAAAGAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -8.47, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAAAUCAUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -13.67, deficit  7.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
AUGUUACUUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score      -9.58, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
CACAAAAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -10.91, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCUAGUUCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -14.17, deficit 10.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
AUGGCUUGCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -10.10, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.98, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAUUGAGGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.81, deficit  1.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUUUAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -11.50, deficit  5.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
AAAAGAUGGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.68, deficit  8.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UGGGAGAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -16.04, deficit  8.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCAACCCACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GUAUUAAACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.15, deficit  6.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CGAUAAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -10.41, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAUAAAGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.56, deficit  6.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGCAAAACGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -10.04, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGUGAGAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.64, deficit  3.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCGAACACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -11.82, deficit  7.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
AACCGUUUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.76, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GUAACGUAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.44, deficit  6.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
UUCCCCAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -11.87, deficit  8.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
UUCGACUCUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -12.16, deficit  4.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
CGAUCGUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -13.18, deficit  4.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
GGUCUUCCAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -11.40, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.17, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
GUCGAGAAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.86, deficit  6.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GAGCAACAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.79, deficit  3.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.80, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score      -9.35, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.05, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGAAAGGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.16, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
AGCCCUGAAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.72, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.31, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GGACGCGAGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.46, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGAGAUAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.79, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UGAGGUAAAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -11.75, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGUUGAUAAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.57, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGACCAAAUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.65, deficit  7.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAACUGAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -13.75, deficit  8.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GUUGAGGAAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.11, deficit  4.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGACUUACGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -10.05, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.18, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
UCAAGAAGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.91, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.73, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GUAAAUACUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -10.96, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GUAAGGAGUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -11.87, deficit  4.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.67, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
GUCACCAUUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.35, deficit  5.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CUAAGACGAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -10.73, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
UCCAAAUCUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -13.40, deficit  6.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
UUUUUUGCAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -13.22, deficit  7.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
CUCAUCCAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -14.65, deficit  6.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCUGUCGCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -13.54, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
GUGGAGAAAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.53, deficit  6.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCUAAGGACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -14.33, deficit  6.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.15, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CUGUGCAGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -13.62, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGUAAACAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.46, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUCGGGAGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.15, deficit  5.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGAACCAUAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.25, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAACCGGAGCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -10.32, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GGAAAUUAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -13.36, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GCUCUUUAACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.25, deficit  5.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UAGAAGAGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.27, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.60, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGAUUGGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -10.81, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
AUCUAGAAUUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.94, deficit  6.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CGAUGAAAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -10.41, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUCGGAAAUU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score      -7.29, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GGCUGAGAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.40, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CUGCCUUGUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -10.73, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
GGCUGGCGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -14.74, deficit  8.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGUCAAAGAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.85, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUCGAUCGAUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.76, deficit  8.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUAAGAAUCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -12.92, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CGAAUUCAAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -16.04, deficit  8.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUCACCUUUAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -10.92, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CGAUAAACAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -15.01, deficit  7.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGCAUCAUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.61, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUACUAGCAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -13.08, deficit  4.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.06, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
UGAAAAACUAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.81, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CAUCAACCCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -13.81, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.12, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
CGUCGAUGAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.16, deficit  5.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGAAAUUAAAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.79, deficit  3.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GGGGGGUGGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -12.09, deficit  5.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CACUGUUAGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -14.15, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.81, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CUUACACAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -15.63, deficit  9.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UGUAAGGGGUGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.22, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
AUUGGAGUAGCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.96, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGCAUUAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -13.80, deficit  6.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGUUUUAUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.43, deficit  8.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUGUCCCCUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.17, deficit  5.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.69, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GGGAAACAGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.27, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CGUCUAAGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.93, deficit  6.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.44, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UACAGUAAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -15.70, deficit  8.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGAUGCAGAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.08, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.69, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCAGAAGAGAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -11.66, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAAUCAAGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -13.21, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
GUUUGAAAAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score      -9.94, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
CUCACAUGAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -16.45, deficit  7.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
UGUGUAAAAACAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -12.04, deficit  1.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGCUCAAUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.62, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.05, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUGUGUGAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -15.74, deficit  7.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.98, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CGCACAAGAAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -14.84, deficit  6.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.50, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
AUAAGAAGUACUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.12, deficit  6.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.34, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUUGGCGAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -12.93, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
AUAAGAAUGCGUCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89082.1, 11 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -16.21, deficit 11.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35   
CAUGAGGAUCUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20714.1, 11 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -15.59, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUUUGGAGAAUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_03603.1, 15 NTs,       AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU,score     -15.06, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.54, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 85.6000	 78.6667	4
5	100.0000	 88.8000	 50.4000	23
6	100.0000	 87.3333	 50.9333	60
7	 99.6000	 54.2667	 15.7333	51
8	 99.6000	 28.1333	  4.5333	46
9	 98.4000	 17.7333	  1.6000	68
10	 94.8000	  6.5333	  0.1333	41
11	 83.0667	  3.4667	  0.0000	42
12	 43.2000	  0.4000	  0.0000	23
13	 18.2667	  0.5333	  0.0000	12
14	  5.6000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.2000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.4667	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.5333	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.1333	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  78 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 116 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 122 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 224 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 250 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 255 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 260 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 267 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 270 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 273 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 273 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 277 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 305 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 310 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 314 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 317 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 329 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 333 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 350 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 355 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 360 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 366 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 379 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 382 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 385 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 392 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 404 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 423 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 431 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 435 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 455 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 472 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 476 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 509 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 509 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 514 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 518 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 520 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 530 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 538 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 538 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 558 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 587 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 594 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 612 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 650 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 680 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 700 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 743 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 771 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 772 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 795 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 807 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 810 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 819 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 826 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 827 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 839 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 1109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 1117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1224 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1509 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.2722%
Number of models giving false positives is 303 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.42
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.53
