Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_6.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:09:50
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.5118 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.4359 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.7029 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.6273 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.5977 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5619 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   4.8486 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.7666 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.0575 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.7131 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.5400 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.4111 minutes

ans =

    12

GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.71, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.33, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UGUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.71, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UCCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.51, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.33, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUCUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.90, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UAUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -6.01, deficit  3.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGGUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.87, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -8.63, deficit  3.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.30, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UAAAA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.95, deficit  0.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.09, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GUCAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -2.79, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UAGAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AAAAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.96, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCAGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.73, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAAA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.95, deficit  0.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCUAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.28, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.30, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -7.87, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
AUAGU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.90, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.10, deficit  0.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.48, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -2.84, deficit  0.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UGGUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -6.97, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.09, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CGACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.30, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGCUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -6.30, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CGAUGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUGAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.85, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GGUUUC 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GUUAGC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -4.91, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGACAU 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.02, deficit  5.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.45, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUCCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCUUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -4.87, deficit -0.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUUGGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
GUUAUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.52, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.43, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CUGGUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -3.87, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.64, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSH                             
CGCAAG 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -3.36, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGAAC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score     -10.00, deficit  6.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUGG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -4.19, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
GGGGAC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.41, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.88, deficit -0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GACGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.55, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GCCACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.36, deficit  1.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CACCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -6.69, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UAAAAA 1  Matches 33; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.12, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.38, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.86, deficit  1.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GGGAUC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
GUAUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -3.41, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUGUCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.94, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCCUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.32, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CCUGUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.40, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
UGUCCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -7.75, deficit  5.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGAUAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGACGC 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.14, deficit  7.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAAAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.32, deficit -0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CUCAAG 1  Matches 20; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.86, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.11, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUAG 1  Matches 37; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -4.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CAUGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -4.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CAACAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -3.46, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
CCUCAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -7.17, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UGAUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -8.50, deficit  4.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.55, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UGACAG 1  Matches 20; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.35, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.01, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAGAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.70, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAUCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -6.73, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UGAGGA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -6.42, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
GGCGAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.31, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CCUUCG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGGCGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.62, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.22, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
AUGCAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score     -10.85, deficit  5.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UUCUCA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.59, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGUCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.94, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGCCGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.11, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUUAAGA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -9.14, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
AGCAAGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.92, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GCAAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.83, deficit  0.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUAAUUG 1  Matches 13; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -11.77, deficit 10.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAACGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -8.01, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CAGGCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -8.81, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUGGUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
CUACCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.26, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUGGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.85, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GGGUCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -7.54, deficit  1.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UAGCUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -8.48, deficit  5.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUUAUCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -4.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
ACGAGGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -9.36, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CGAGAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.29, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
AACGAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -11.37, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GGACAAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.47, deficit  0.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAAAUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GAAACCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.08, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
AGAAAGU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.46, deficit  0.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UGAAAAA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -6.06, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
AGAGGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -6.15, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UUUCUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -8.36, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CCUUUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.30, deficit  3.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GCAUGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -5.97, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GUUCCGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -7.27, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GCGAAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.40, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UUCGAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -7.18, deficit  3.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CGCCUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.90, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
GUGGCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -9.30, deficit  4.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAAGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.44, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGACAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -8.12, deficit  2.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
AGUAUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -4.83, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.09, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UAAGCGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.78, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UAACUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -9.37, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUCGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -7.11, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GGCCGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AUCUGGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.74, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
UUCUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -7.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAGAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.29, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCAUGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.97, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
GCGCUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.91, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAGGUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -6.07, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUGUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.26, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GAAUUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -5.87, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.11, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGGCCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score     -10.00, deficit  6.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUAAUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.26, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUGAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.73, deficit  2.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUAGCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -8.17, deficit  4.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CGCGAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score     -10.60, deficit  3.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
AGCGCAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -9.23, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
AAGGGGCU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -10.58, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GCCAUGAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.74, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
CAAGGUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.40, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GUUUGAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.99, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
ACCUCAUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.40, deficit  3.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUGGGAAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.63, deficit  1.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.92, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUUCGACC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.22, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGUAGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.73, deficit  1.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAUAAUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -6.22, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGUGUUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.30, deficit  2.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CAAAAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.42, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUCGGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.98, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAGACGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -9.91, deficit  6.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GUUAAUAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -6.00, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
CUGUUCGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -7.60, deficit  1.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCCCGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score     -10.98, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CAACGUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -12.71, deficit  3.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CUAUUCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score     -11.22, deficit  8.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGUACAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.64, deficit  5.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAUUGAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -7.70, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AUUGGUCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -8.10, deficit  1.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
AGAAACUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -6.87, deficit  3.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUGUAAGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -7.15, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGAAAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -4.90, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GUUCUAUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -11.19, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAAGGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.33, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAUCAACC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score     -10.20, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CUGCGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -12.16, deficit  4.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CGGCUGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -8.94, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
GGAAGGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CGCUAUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -9.52, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGUUCGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score     -12.49, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGAACUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -10.04, deficit  6.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
AGAUCCGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -7.97, deficit  1.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -11.51, deficit  5.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CGAAUUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.09, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGUCAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score      -8.82, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
AAAGUUAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -7.35, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CGGUGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -13.67, deficit  5.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CGAACGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.62, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCGAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -13.26, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAACGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -13.90, deficit  8.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCAGUCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.94, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GGCUGGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -9.96, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CUAAAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -8.88, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CACCGCUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.68, deficit  4.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAGAAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.18, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CUUGAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.54, deficit  0.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UUUUCUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.86, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
CUGGGCAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.78, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCUAACUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -15.45, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUUGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -8.36, deficit  1.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GACAUUUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -12.16, deficit  6.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CUUUGAUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
AGUCUGAAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.82, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAGUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -11.09, deficit  6.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUAUUGUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -10.33, deficit  4.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
CUCGUACCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score      -8.19, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUCCUGCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score      -9.81, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAGCGACCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -10.47, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
AGAAAAAUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -9.46, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CAGCAUGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score      -8.62, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GAAAGGAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGUUAUCUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.20, deficit  4.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAGGCCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -13.07, deficit  5.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
AGGUGAGCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -12.15, deficit  5.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGAAGCAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.89, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GGCUGGGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -13.36, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-F                               
CACCGAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score     -11.66, deficit  6.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
UUAACAGAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -11.30, deficit  5.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUGACAACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.32, deficit  3.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GUGAGGAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.17, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CAAGGUGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score      -8.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CUUCGUAUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -10.13, deficit  3.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
CGUAAGUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.82, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUCCAUACC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.83, deficit  0.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCAUUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.59, deficit  3.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAAUUUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.80, deficit  2.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CUCACGUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.25, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
CGCUGUGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -9.70, deficit  5.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGGACGAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -9.59, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGAAAGAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.67, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CCGUAACGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.82, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUGGAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -9.86, deficit  3.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
AUGGGUCGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -6.82, deficit  0.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAUUUAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGCAAAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.53, deficit  2.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUCCAGCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GUUGUCUCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.43, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
UUAUUUUGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -9.16, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.85, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCGCAGCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.44, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CACCGAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -9.26, deficit  4.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GGGACAGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -10.92, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GGGUCCGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -12.35, deficit  6.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GGAAUCUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.88, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CAGAAAAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -7.17, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
UGGCAAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.79, deficit  6.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUUGGAAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -7.59, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GUAAACGAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.28, deficit  7.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UGAUUGGAGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -8.16, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.50, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGUCCAAGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.33, deficit  0.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAUUAAGAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -13.08, deficit  5.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUAAUAGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -9.59, deficit  1.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CGUCAAUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -8.41, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CUACGGAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.35, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CGUUAAGUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -13.71, deficit  6.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUUAUGGGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.99, deficit  1.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.47, deficit  0.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GGAGAACGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.82, deficit  5.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UGGAAAUUGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.85, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UGCGAAGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score      -9.35, deficit  2.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUAAGCUAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.15, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GUCCUAAGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score      -6.25, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CCUUGAAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.16, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUUGGCCGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -14.99, deficit  9.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUCUGAGGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.90, deficit  5.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGGACUAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -11.56, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GAGCAAAAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -9.91, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAGAUACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -18.84, deficit 10.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUGCCCGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -10.86, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.18, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-F                               
CCGUGUGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.38, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
UGUGGAUGUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.48, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GCGAAAUUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.51, deficit  4.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GCGAGGAGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -10.38, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGGGGUCAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.38, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CGCGGGAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.85, deficit  2.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAACGCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.20, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
UCUUAAAUUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.72, deficit  6.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GCGGCCGUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -10.96, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCUGUGAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -8.76, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGAAAUAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.57, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUGCAAAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.20, deficit  7.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CGGUUCCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -10.00, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAAAUUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.60, deficit  3.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUGCGCAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -13.00, deficit  7.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GCCGUUUGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.60, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.80, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CGAAUGAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CAGAUUGUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -9.73, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
UAGAAUCGAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -11.89, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
AGGGGAACAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.86, deficit  5.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUUCCAAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.81, deficit  1.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGCGAACUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.35, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
UUUGAGUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -11.64, deficit  5.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCAAAGAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.34, deficit  5.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GUCAUGAGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.15, deficit  6.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
GAGCUUGGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -10.94, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-F                               
CGGUUCGUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.47, deficit  5.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CGGUGAAUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.91, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCACUAGUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -11.30, deficit  5.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.37, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CGCGGGAAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score      -8.55, deficit  2.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GGUUCGCUCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.02, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAAAAAAACGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.80, deficit  4.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.79, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCUCGCGUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.50, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAGAACUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.60, deficit  5.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
UGUUCUAAAUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score      -9.76, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
AGAAGAAAGAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.44, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCUCAGUUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -14.62, deficit  6.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.98, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
GCUGAAUGUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.50, deficit  4.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AGGGAAAAGUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.23, deficit  5.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.81, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAACAAUCGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -15.36, deficit  7.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CACAAUUCAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.00, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GUGCCUUUGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -12.54, deficit  7.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.14, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CGCUGUUGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.42, deficit  4.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.96, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUUGAAGCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score      -6.84, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUUGAAAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score      -9.74, deficit  4.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CAGAGAUCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -15.27, deficit  7.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.70, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
GGUUGGAGACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.57, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GUAAGACAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -10.80, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GUAUUGAGAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.34, deficit  6.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.90, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CCUAUGAGCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -14.62, deficit  6.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CUGCAACGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -15.90, deficit  8.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAGUGGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.27, deficit  5.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GGCAACUAUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -14.82, deficit  7.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
ACACAACAGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.18, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAACUAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.47, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.00, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
AUUCGGUCAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.97, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUUUUGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.60, deficit  5.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUUGAACGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.50, deficit  8.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAACUUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -16.19, deficit  9.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UUUUAUCUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.03, deficit  8.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGCUUGCUUCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.60, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GUGCGAAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.00, deficit  6.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.81, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
UUCAAUCGGAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -14.23, deficit  6.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.67, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CUCGUCUGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -11.87, deficit  4.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.68, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
GGUACAAAACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.84, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GAUUCCCCGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.78, deficit  4.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAGAUUAGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -14.26, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CGAUAAUUGUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.93, deficit  5.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.17, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAAAAGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -17.03, deficit  9.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGCUGACGCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -16.31, deficit  7.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CACUGUGAUGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.69, deficit  5.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGCCAAUUGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.32, deficit  6.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GGGAGGACAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -10.22, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.87, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAUGAAAACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -11.86, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
CUUUGAGAGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.65, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGCGCAUGAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -16.03, deficit  7.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.54, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CAAAUGAGAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -16.13, deficit  5.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CGAUCUCGAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -10.96, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCAAAUCGGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.05, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GGUAGGGCUUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.34, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GCAUAUCGAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -15.00, deficit  8.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
GAAUGGAAGGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.85, deficit  5.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCCUAGAAUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.44, deficit  6.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUUCAAGAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -16.16, deficit  8.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCAAAAUAAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.05, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CUGGGUGGGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -16.36, deficit  9.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CGCUCGCAUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -17.27, deficit  9.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGCAAAGAUGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.86, deficit  7.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAAAAAGUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.38, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.30, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGACGAGAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -16.44, deficit  7.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.51, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CGAAUGCGAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.71, deficit  6.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.62, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGCCAUAGACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.22, deficit  3.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.17, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAAAUAAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -14.36, deficit  7.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GUCAUGGGACAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12870.1, 13 NTs,         GUCCUUGGGAAAC,score     -12.60, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35
GUCCUAGAGCAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12870.1, 13 NTs,         GUCCUUGGGAAAC,score     -11.87, deficit  4.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.15, ed 99, 4 cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35
CAAAAAAUAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.63, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CAUGAAAUGGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.06, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAGACGACAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.98, deficit  7.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.05, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUAAUCGAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -12.93, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
CGAAGGUAGAUAGGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12710.1, 15 NTs,      GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC,score     -18.87, deficit  7.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.40, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAGAUUAGAACUUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_82866.1, 17 NTs,     CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG,score     -17.68, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.63, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35
4	100.0000	 81.6667	 70.0000	4
5	100.0000	 89.6667	 49.3333	23
6	100.0000	 87.6667	 50.3333	60
7	 99.6667	 47.6667	 14.0000	51
8	 99.0000	 28.3333	  5.0000	46
9	 98.6667	 18.3333	  2.0000	68
10	 96.0000	 10.0000	  0.0000	41
11	 85.6667	  4.0000	  0.0000	42
12	 43.0000	  0.3333	  0.0000	23
13	 18.3333	  0.3333	  0.0000	12
14	  6.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  1.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.3333	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  26 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  49 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  50 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 224 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 227 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 262 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 267 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 268 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 280 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 290 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 322 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 323 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 324 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 334 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 335 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 336 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 356 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 371 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 380 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 418 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 445 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 494 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 564 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.5000%
Number of models giving false positives is 295 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.94
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.33
