Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_18.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:27:45
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.4214 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.3770 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.6744 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.6067 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.5825 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5546 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   4.8567 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.7795 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.0769 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.7312 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.5674 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.4338 minutes

ans =

    12

UCAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUCA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.51, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.94, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.36, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
AUGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.36, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.31, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.33, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
ACGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.88, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.10, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GGCUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.94, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -6.25, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
GAUCC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.45, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -8.63, deficit  3.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GUAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.94, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.73, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.21, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GCAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
AUAAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.30, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.17, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CACUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
CCGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
AAUCU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.57, deficit  1.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AUAAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.30, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.17, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -6.25, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
UUGAA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.89, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.22, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.45, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
AUUCU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.26, deficit  1.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.22, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UCAGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GACAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
ACGCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -8.35, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.51, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
AAGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.06, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUGUUU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.74, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.34, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GGCAUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -8.02, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUCGG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.88, deficit -0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CUGAGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -5.29, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.92, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CUCUCG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUUAG 1  Matches 37; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -4.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
AAAUGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_52240.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -5.51, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGCGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.62, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GUAGCC 1  Matches 16; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.99, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUGGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
GAAUAC 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.38, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AUGAAU 1  Matches 25; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.35, deficit  7.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAAGAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.72, deficit  0.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CCACUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35                               
GCAAAC 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.45, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUCUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.20, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AGCAUU 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -8.09, deficit  2.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUAGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -7.26, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
CAUCAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -2.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GCCCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -7.31, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CAGAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.70, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGUGGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCAACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -8.35, deficit  2.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AGUUGU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.95, deficit -0.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.05, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UUUGAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.01, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CAUUGG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -4.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CGAGCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -6.14, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGCGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.62, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CUCACG 1  Matches  9; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.49, deficit  4.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGCUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -6.30, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UUUCCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46463.1,  4 NTs,                UUUCGA,score      -6.45, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUACAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.62, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.16, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAAAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.32, deficit -0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GGUUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.70, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGCAUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.81, deficit  2.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.92, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GCGGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -6.60, deficit -0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGAUUG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.93, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UUUAGA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -4.42, deficit  1.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.02, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CGAGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGUAAC 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.90, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_29487.1,  6 NTs,                CUGAUG,score      -2.34, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s35-s55                       
GAUUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -4.46, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-F                             
CGCGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.43, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
AGUAGU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGCAUU 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -8.09, deficit  2.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GCUUCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.70, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAUCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -6.73, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
AGUGCGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.97, deficit  0.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
UGUCGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.80, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUAAUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UCACGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.21, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGAGACC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -3.41, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GGCACCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score     -10.47, deficit  4.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UCAUAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.80, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAAGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
ACUAGAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -5.99, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGUGGUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.28, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GAGGUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.58, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GUAAAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAGGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -6.07, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUCCGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -4.73, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GUCGGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -6.96, deficit  1.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GAAUUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -5.87, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.11, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUCUUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.33, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
UUGAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score     -10.84, deficit  4.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CGAAUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CAACGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.11, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GCAGUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -10.55, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CUGUCGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -9.81, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
CCCAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.66, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GAUGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -6.69, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUCCAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.52, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGCCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -9.39, deficit  4.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGAUGGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.12, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CCAAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.56, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGCGAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score     -10.60, deficit  3.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGUCGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -8.04, deficit  5.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGCUCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -9.93, deficit  7.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUGUAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.91, deficit  1.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUCAAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.49, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUGUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUUUAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
UAGAAAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.84, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UUAUCAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.19, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGAAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.92, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGGAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGAGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.51, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUGUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -7.36, deficit  3.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
UGCCUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.90, deficit  2.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CAAACUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.26, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUGUGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -8.22, deficit  3.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GAGGUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.79, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CUACGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.34, deficit  2.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.46, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GUCGAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -9.52, deficit  3.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUGACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.26, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CCAGUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.82, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GAGAAAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -7.12, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
GAGUCACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.99, deficit  3.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUGAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.54, deficit  0.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUGUAUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.64, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CUACAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.73, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGGCUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -4.86, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
AGAGCAGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.81, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCAGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.36, deficit  3.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGUCGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -8.36, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGGAAAAA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.01, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
UGAGUCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.95, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GGUUCAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.82, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GGAGAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.66, deficit  6.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CGUAAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAUUUAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -6.89, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
UGCCAAAA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.63, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
UAAGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -13.67, deficit  8.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CUGGAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.67, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UCGAAAGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -11.10, deficit  4.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
UUCCGUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.03, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CCAUACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -9.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
UUUGCCAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -12.16, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUCAUAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -12.34, deficit  5.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
GUGGGCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -6.12, deficit -0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGCGUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -10.05, deficit  2.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CCGAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.46, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGGAAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -8.03, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CUGAUUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -7.71, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGUGUCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.97, deficit  0.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CUAAAGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.81, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
CAUAAUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -6.22, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAAGAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.10, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAACCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23481.4,  7 NTs,              GAAACAUC,score      -6.44, deficit  4.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35               
CCAUUAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -6.96, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
UUAAUGUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -10.16, deficit  6.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CCUUGUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score     -11.08, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
GUCUUUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -9.81, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
GCAUCUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -7.29, deficit  0.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAUGUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.21, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAAAUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -9.59, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCAUGGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -11.88, deficit  5.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
UUAUGUGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.30, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GAUGCCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.69, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GCAUAACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -9.17, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
UGGCAGGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -8.93, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CUUCAGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.85, deficit  1.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAAAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.08, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
GACGAAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -10.99, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UGGCAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.58, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.01, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
UAGGAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -9.14, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGAAAGGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -9.91, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GGAGUAAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score     -10.54, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CUGGGUCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -7.33, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUACAAAUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -9.89, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GUGUGAAGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.61, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAUUACCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.90, deficit  7.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AGUUUCAAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -8.29, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
CAUUGUCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -10.66, deficit  2.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CAGCAACUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -10.40, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
CGCCCGAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -9.78, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CAUCCGAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -11.01, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUGGCUGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.85, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GACGAUUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.06, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAGAGUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.36, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CGUCAACAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -11.72, deficit  8.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGGCAGUAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.38, deficit  1.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUAAAAAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.94, deficit  4.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CUUCGACAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.87, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
CCCACUGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.32, deficit  3.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUGAGUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -6.50, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUAAAAUGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.26, deficit  4.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GAUUAGCGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.87, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAAUGCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -12.40, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
CGGGCGGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
UAAAUUGAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.89, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CUGCAGAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.18, deficit  1.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GUCAGAUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -12.75, deficit  7.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GUUCAGGUC 1  Matches 10; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -7.92, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CUGACCUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.25, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
CUCCGAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.84, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGCGAAAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -9.92, deficit  4.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CUAUGUUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -9.25, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
GGAUUCAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.10, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GUCAAUUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -11.62, deficit  4.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
AGGUGAGGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -12.09, deficit  4.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AACUUUUAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score      -9.60, deficit  1.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GGAUUUCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.69, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAAGGCCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -10.06, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
ACGAAAAAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -7.52, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CGACAUACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score     -10.25, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGACACUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.00, deficit  5.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CGGCAAUGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.00, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAGGAGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -9.27, deficit  4.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GAUGAGGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -7.61, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUGACCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -10.99, deficit  4.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCACUGGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -8.36, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAGCGGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
AGAGUUGAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -11.16, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGACUUAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -6.72, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUAAGUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -10.78, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCAUCUGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.70, deficit  3.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.23, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CUGUGGUUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -12.20, deficit  4.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CCAUGACUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UUCGUGCAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.83, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGAAGGUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.35, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
AGCAGCAGUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.99, deficit  1.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.18, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUAAGUCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -14.33, deficit  8.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCCAAGUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.83, deficit  6.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUCGAUGUGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.79, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.64, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GGAUCUGUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.45, deficit  6.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.54, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
UGAAAAUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -12.80, deficit  4.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CAUCAUUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score      -9.47, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CGUGUUGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.23, deficit  5.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUGAGGGUAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.87, deficit  4.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
AACUGAGUCU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -15.64, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
GGCAAAGUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.14, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CAAAAACGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.87, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GGAAAAAAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -12.03, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGCAAUGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.01, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CAUGACGCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -11.54, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUCGCACCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.46, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
CUGCUUCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -11.96, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
GUUUAAGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -13.08, deficit  5.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAUACUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -13.84, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GGUUGCUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.40, deficit  5.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CGCGGAACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.19, deficit  2.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUCAGCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.92, deficit  4.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCAGCAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score     -12.38, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GGUAGAUGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.57, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GGGGAAAUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -9.73, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGGGACCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.35, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CGAAUUUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.21, deficit  4.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCCUGGUCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.71, deficit  3.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GGCCGCUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.90, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCGGUGGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score      -9.76, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.36, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-F                               
GAAUCCAGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.46, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
CUUACGUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score      -9.26, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAUAACAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.45, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGAAAAAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score     -10.93, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CCCAGAUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GGGUUAGUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -11.78, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCGAUCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.60, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GGAUAAUCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.32, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUACGUGGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.11, deficit  5.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
UAUCCAAACA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.19, deficit  3.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUCGUAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.09, deficit  7.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUUCCAGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.58, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUGGUGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score      -9.31, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGAAAGGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.02, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GGAAGGAAGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -13.00, deficit  7.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GCGUGUCCCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -17.73, deficit  9.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CGUGUGCUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.66, deficit  5.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUACCCUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -17.05, deficit 10.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GUGUGGGACUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.30, deficit  6.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GAUAAGAAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.21, deficit  5.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUGACUUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -14.10, deficit  8.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GCUCGGAGGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.35, deficit  7.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUGGUUGCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.94, deficit  8.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGACUUGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -12.54, deficit  7.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.17, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
AGGAUCAGUAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.77, deficit  2.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.92, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGAACACAGAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -15.89, deficit  8.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUGACGAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -16.86, deficit  9.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAUACAAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -9.89, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GUUGGGGUGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.59, deficit  4.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUUAGGUGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.22, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUACUCAUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.23, deficit  5.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CAAAGUAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -11.35, deficit  5.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
UGUAGCAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -11.05, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GUCUUUGGUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -15.57, deficit  6.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUCAAUAAAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -8.74, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GACCAGUCACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.58, deficit  7.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAACCGGCUUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -14.33, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
GAAAGAGACAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -12.82, deficit  7.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
UGCUGGAAGUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score      -9.42, deficit  3.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CGAGUCGUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -13.36, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.13, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
UGAUACAGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.27, deficit  6.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.12, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUGUAUCAAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.22, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
GUAUGCUUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -13.00, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
UUAACGAGAUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.72, deficit  6.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
AGAGGAAUACU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.80, deficit  4.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGAGAAAGCAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.21, deficit  7.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGAUGCCUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -13.97, deficit  6.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
GUCAAUUAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.72, deficit  6.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CAACAAAGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.46, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGCAAGUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.47, deficit  7.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.55, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCUCAGCCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.47, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.00, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
GACCUGAAGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -13.05, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GGUAGAUCAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.20, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.90, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGACUACAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -13.57, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
GGAAGUCAUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -15.74, deficit  8.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCGACUGGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -14.59, deficit  8.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
UGCUCUUAACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -16.41, deficit  7.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
GGAAGAGCUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -15.42, deficit 10.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
GCCGAGAUACGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -11.60, deficit  5.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CUAUAGCUCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -15.13, deficit  5.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.33, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
CAACUAGUUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -16.89, deficit  6.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
AGAAAACUAUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -15.07, deficit  6.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGGUCGUUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.61, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CUUUUGAUAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -12.95, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
CAUCUCAAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.97, deficit  8.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CAUACGAAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -15.46, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.29, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
GGAAGUUAGUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.27, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CAUGAGAAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -10.87, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
GUCCAAAAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -17.76, deficit 10.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GUCAAAAUCAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.20, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.99, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CAACCCCUACAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -10.51, deficit  1.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUCUAAAGAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.82, deficit  8.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UCUCGCUCAAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -13.74, deficit  4.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.60, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
UGGAUCGUGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.59, deficit  8.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CUAAAUGCUAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -13.60, deficit  5.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GGCGGGGUUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68863.1, 11 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -13.96, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F   
CAGGCCGUACUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -12.87, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.11, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
GUGGUACACAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -15.94, deficit 10.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
CGCGGAUCGGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.06, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.41, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAUUCGCAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -10.78, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.35, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
UUGGAACAGAGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98870.1, 12 NTs,     CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG,score     -19.53, deficit 11.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35
UGAACCGUGGAUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -14.37, deficit  5.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GGGAAAUGAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -15.73, deficit  6.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.05, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
AGAAAAUGAUACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.22, deficit  8.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAAAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.04, deficit  5.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
UGUCUCAAAACCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -13.84, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.70, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUGUCCAAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98870.1, 12 NTs,     CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG,score     -16.21, deficit  8.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.80, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35
UGGAGGUGUAGAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -13.90, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
GGUACCAGAAAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -15.17, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.03, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
CGUGAUAAAGAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98870.1, 12 NTs,     CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG,score     -15.95, deficit  8.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.05, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35
CGUUGUCCAGAUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98870.1, 12 NTs,     CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG,score     -15.29, deficit  7.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.24, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35
GGGAUUUGUUGGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42211.1, 13 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -16.37, deficit  6.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.50, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35     
AAAAAUAGGGACUUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58539.1, 15 NTs,      UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG,score     -17.64, deficit  7.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGAUCACCAAAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_52657.1, 15 NTs,     CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG,score     -21.59, deficit  9.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.28, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 81.3333	 69.3333	4
5	100.0000	 90.4444	 46.3333	23
6	100.0000	 86.5556	 45.7778	60
7	 99.8889	 50.8889	 13.4444	51
8	 99.3333	 27.1111	  3.8889	46
9	 99.3333	 19.0000	  1.6667	68
10	 95.2222	  8.8889	  0.2222	41
11	 83.2222	  4.1111	  0.0000	42
12	 45.3333	  0.6667	  0.0000	23
13	 17.3333	  0.2222	  0.0000	12
14	  7.1111	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  2.2222	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.4444	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.5556	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.3333	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.1111	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  73 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 175 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 181 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 202 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 231 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 236 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 237 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 242 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 242 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 244 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 244 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 246 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 246 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 246 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 247 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 250 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 252 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 252 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 253 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 258 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 264 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 267 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 268 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 270 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 270 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 270 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 273 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 277 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 282 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 283 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 286 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 288 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 292 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 295 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 296 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 310 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 312 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 314 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 315 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 322 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 332 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 340 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 344 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 353 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 378 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 390 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 393 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 395 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 396 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 396 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 401 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 404 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 405 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 407 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 429 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 436 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 458 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 492 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 498 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 516 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 540 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 551 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 554 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 555 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 555 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 557 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 570 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 574 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 585 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 627 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 633 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 645 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 650 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 677 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 692 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 781 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 782 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 806 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 845 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 853 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 924 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 968 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 980 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 989 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 1008 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 1047 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 1079 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 1125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 1128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 1280 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 1343 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1465 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1696 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.4769%
Number of models giving false positives is 301 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.53
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.38
