Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_16.mat
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.94, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UCCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
UGUGA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.10, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UGUGA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
AGCGU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.84, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.47, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUCUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.90, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCCAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -4.16, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
UCUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.93, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.04, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -6.51, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUCCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CCUUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.38, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GACAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGGGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
UUCUA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.91, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UUACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -6.88, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUGA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
AAAGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.07, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
UCCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -5.69, deficit  2.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
AACAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.06, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
GAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGUGAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.48, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GGCCAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -7.60, deficit  5.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.09, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
AUUAUU 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAAAA 1  Matches 33; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.12, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.38, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCGAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.46, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.54, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CUUUCG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.95, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUAUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -3.41, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CACAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -8.12, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAACG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.30, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGCCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGAAGU 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.15, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAUUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -4.39, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-F                             
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACCGAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -5.63, deficit -1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUACCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.91, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
AUUGCU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.47, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CUUCUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -9.74, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUCGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.78, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GGUGGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUUAC 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CACGAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.92, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UUUGCA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.34, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CGCGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.43, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GCAUUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.36, deficit -0.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCAAG 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -3.36, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUAAUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.47, deficit  0.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
UGACGG 1  Matches  9; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -10.20, deficit  8.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCAUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.77, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
UAUCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -5.10, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.85, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
CUGUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -3.06, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GUGUUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.72, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CCACAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -6.30, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
AGAUAU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.21, deficit  0.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGCAGG 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.21, deficit  4.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGAAGG 1  Matches 22; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.48, deficit  4.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGCGAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.31, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCGUU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.45, deficit  0.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAUAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGUUAG 1  Matches 37; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -4.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CAAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.41, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGCGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -9.59, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.04, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.16, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAUAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGAGC 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.98, deficit  6.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.43, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGCGAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.31, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
UGACGAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.58, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.08, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUGGAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.53, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGAACAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAAGGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score     -10.11, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCGUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -8.71, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GUGUACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.77, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
CUACUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -8.71, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UUCCUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -9.44, deficit  5.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GUCGACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.24, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CGGAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.05, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GAAUAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.17, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CUAGGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.98, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CCAAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.62, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GGACGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.72, deficit  0.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GAGGGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.46, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CGUUUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.93, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GACGCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -7.43, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UAACGAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.27, deficit  1.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGACAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -8.39, deficit  2.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CAAGGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -7.78, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GGAUAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.33, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CACCCCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -8.22, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UUCGGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -9.35, deficit  5.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
UAGAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -9.91, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GAAGCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.45, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
UUUUAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -8.06, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.28, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.26, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CGUAAAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.19, deficit  1.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGCGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.32, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CAAAGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.19, deficit  1.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GUAAGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
AGGCAGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.50, deficit  1.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GCAACAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.08, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GCAAGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.20, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGGAUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -9.17, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGACGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.51, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGUGUGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.39, deficit  1.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CUCAAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.76, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UCGAAAA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -8.89, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CGACUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.32, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAGGCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -8.81, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGGCCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -8.89, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUGUUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -5.67, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UUGAACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score     -10.26, deficit  5.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
UUGGUCA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
GUUAACC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.14, deficit  2.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CGAAAGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UACCAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.31, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAGAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.29, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGACAGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.37, deficit  4.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAAUGCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.14, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
UGUAUAAA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.10, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUUUUGUA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_33612.1,  6 NTs,               CUUUUGG,score      -9.14, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55                 
GGAUGGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -8.12, deficit  5.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
UGUAGGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.73, deficit  1.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGCUCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.68, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UUUGACCA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.33, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GUUGGCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.18, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CUUCAAUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score     -10.46, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
AAUGAAGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -9.24, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUAUGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.55, deficit  4.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUUACGCA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score     -11.20, deficit  7.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGAAGAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.10, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGAUUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.69, deficit  1.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GUAACAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.32, deficit  2.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAGUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.89, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGAGUGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.95, deficit  5.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CUUUAGCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.15, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CGUGAGAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.30, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CACCAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.95, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUAAAUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -9.50, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
GGUGCAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -8.41, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUCAAUC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score     -10.39, deficit  5.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
CUCUUUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -9.72, deficit  5.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
UCAGAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.89, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CGUUGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.16, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
CUAACUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score     -10.60, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CUUUGUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.46, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
AUUGAUUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -5.78, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GAACGGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -12.32, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CUUUAAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score     -11.13, deficit  7.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAGUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -8.74, deficit  5.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAGCGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.28, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUCAAGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.35, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGUCUUAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.82, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GGAGAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.66, deficit  6.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CGAAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUAAUUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.22, deficit  3.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
CCGCGGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.39, deficit  4.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCUUGCAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -9.35, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGAAGAAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.57, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.17, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGAAUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -8.27, deficit  4.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GUGAAUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -8.17, deficit  3.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.91, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GCAAGGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -11.65, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAGAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.55, deficit  1.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.28, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAGCAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -5.10, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
CGCUUAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -8.06, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GUGCUAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.63, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CGCGGCUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -12.67, deficit  5.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
UAUGUCAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.83, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
UCGAUCGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -10.23, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CACUGGAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -10.82, deficit  3.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
CCAUCGGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -8.44, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CCAUCGUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -10.75, deficit  4.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
CAAGGCUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score      -9.80, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GGAAUGUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -12.41, deficit  6.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
AGUCCAGGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.76, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUGGUCCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.06, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.59, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GGAUUCAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.10, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GUUUAGGUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score      -9.97, deficit  4.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GGGAGGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.68, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AAGACAAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.57, deficit  6.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CGUGGAUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -12.76, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CUAACUAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -8.49, deficit  4.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
CGACAUAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -5.62, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UACUUCACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -10.93, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAAGAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
AAUUUGAAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -8.29, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GGGUUUUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score     -11.53, deficit  7.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CUGUUAUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.25, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
UGACAAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -8.82, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GCCAUCGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.36, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAAAGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.26, deficit  2.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUCAGUUCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -11.02, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUCAGGUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.97, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GAAUGACGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.48, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAGAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.89, deficit  3.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GUGACCGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -11.23, deficit  7.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
AAACAGAAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -8.97, deficit  3.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGAUACUAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -10.84, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAUUUCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.49, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CGUCCCGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.10, deficit  4.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCCGGACUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score      -8.29, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUUGGGGCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -13.70, deficit  4.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GUUCUGAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.30, deficit -0.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAGGGCCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.50, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGCAAUCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.14, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AGUUUCGAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score     -10.07, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGGAUUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.13, deficit  0.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCGAUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -10.62, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CAAGAAAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -7.22, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUAAAGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -9.81, deficit  5.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UUAUAAUUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -9.45, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CUCGGAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.91, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
AUCAUCUUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -9.12, deficit  3.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCACAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -9.56, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUAUUGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -5.89, deficit  0.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GGAUAGGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
AAAAAAAUCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.20, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GGCUGAAAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -6.38, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
GGAAGAGAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.82, deficit  4.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CUUGAAAUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -7.17, deficit  2.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
AUGAUCGAUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.22, deficit  6.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UGUAUGAAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -8.85, deficit  1.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCAUCGAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.35, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
AAAAGUUGAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CGGAAAGGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.69, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CACCCGUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.09, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.60, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CGGAUGGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.60, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAGAUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.60, deficit  6.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUGCUUCAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.62, deficit  6.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGUCAACGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.53, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CGGAUAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score      -8.94, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUCCAAGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score      -9.71, deficit  5.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CUUUUGGAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score     -10.37, deficit  3.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
GUCACUCUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -13.50, deficit  5.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUUUCAAUCA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.68, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GCAAAAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -12.93, deficit  6.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUACCCCGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -15.86, deficit  8.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
UGGUUUGAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.77, deficit  6.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAGCUCUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -18.49, deficit 11.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAAAAACCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -13.31, deficit  7.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGAUUGGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -12.03, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
GAGCGACCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score      -9.56, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
CGGAAAGGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.69, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUUCAUCACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.43, deficit  7.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CCCGGACGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.73, deficit  2.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GAUGAUUACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -9.57, deficit  4.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.85, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
AUGAAGAACU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.66, deficit  6.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGAUCACGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.33, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
UUUUCCAGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.05, deficit  2.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAACAUCUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.74, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
UGGGAAGAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -10.64, deficit  4.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AGAUCCGGGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.97, deficit  2.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUAAUUGUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -13.71, deficit  6.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CUACGAAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.17, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGACAUUAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score     -12.68, deficit  7.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGGACAAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score     -11.58, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CCCCCAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.53, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
CUCAAAGAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.34, deficit  5.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
AGCUCAAAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -11.56, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUAGUAAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score     -14.15, deficit  8.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CGCAUCAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -10.04, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUCAUCAGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -15.59, deficit  9.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAUGUUUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -12.98, deficit  5.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CUCUGACUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -14.13, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
CAAGUAAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.41, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GUGCACGAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -16.10, deficit  8.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGGAUAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -10.98, deficit  3.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.70, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAGAAUAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.94, deficit  4.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
ACCUAGUACUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.34, deficit  7.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GGCCAGCAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.40, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CUUCUUAGUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -10.69, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
GCAAAAGAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -15.25, deficit  8.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CACAGAAAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -14.14, deficit  6.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAGAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.92, deficit  4.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUCGAUAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.22, deficit  5.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GAUCUUCAUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -13.00, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.86, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
GUGAUGGGCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.08, deficit  5.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CAAGUUAUCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -13.06, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
GGCCCAAAGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -13.53, deficit  6.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
UUCCGGAGACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -12.39, deficit  5.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.86, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CUUUUAAUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.15, deficit  5.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GACUAGAAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.65, deficit  3.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCGGUUGGAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.49, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.54, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
UAUAUCACACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.99, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.83, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CGGCUCUAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.47, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CUGUUUGGGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.29, deficit  5.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
UGUCAAGCUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -16.44, deficit  9.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CACCUUUUCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -11.38, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.21, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
CUGAAAUGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.89, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GUGUCGAAAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -10.34, deficit  2.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
GGAAAGCGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.29, deficit  7.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.50, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGUCAAAGAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.85, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAUCGAAUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -10.15, deficit  2.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GUAGAGCAUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.25, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAUUAGAUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.46, deficit  4.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGAAGAAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -14.65, deficit  7.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUAGGGCCUCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -11.19, deficit  2.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
AGACAAAGAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.35, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUGCCGAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.29, deficit  7.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCAGAAUAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -14.06, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUCUAAAACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -9.61, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GUAAAUCGGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.24, deficit  6.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GAAUGAGAGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -11.53, deficit  1.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
AAUCGAGCUAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -15.66, deficit  7.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CGAUAUAGUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.25, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAUUUACUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.14, deficit  5.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGAGGAGAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.79, deficit  4.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAUUCAGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -10.87, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
GCCCGUAAAUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -16.54, deficit  9.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCUGAGAUCUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.12, deficit  7.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
GUAAUUUGGAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.61, deficit  8.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CGACAAUAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.95, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAGACACACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -15.29, deficit  6.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCGGGACGAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.59, deficit  5.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.92, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCGGAAAACGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -16.76, deficit 10.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CAAAAGAAACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.50, deficit  8.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CACCUUUGCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -15.37, deficit  7.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.59, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CGUUAUAUAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -15.51, deficit  9.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CAACUCCUCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -15.37, deficit  6.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.13, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
UUCUCUUACGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -15.13, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CUGGGAAUGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.24, deficit  5.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.74, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAUCAUAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -15.46, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.29, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CAAAAAGUUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.44, deficit  7.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUACCGACAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -16.47, deficit  8.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GGAAGCUGCAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -13.02, deficit  4.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.57, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
AGAAGACCAGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.48, deficit  7.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AGUGACCAGAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.56, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.67, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUUUCGAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -16.29, deficit  9.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GGGGGAGAAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -10.85, deficit  2.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.54, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUGAAAUGGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.27, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUAAUUCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.67, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.05, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CUUCAGAAUAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -13.83, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.51, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
GUUUACCACGAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -13.40, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
GGAUAGAAAGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -17.33, deficit  9.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGAUGUAAUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.27, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.89, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAUUCGUUCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -15.24, deficit  5.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.79, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
CGCACUGAAAUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -19.68, deficit 10.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CGGAAGGCGUUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -14.92, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.80, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
GGGUGAAGACGUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -14.41, deficit  0.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.55, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
AUGUUACCUAAAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -16.29, deficit  8.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
GAAGACUGAUUAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12571.1, 13 NTs,       CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG,score     -16.60, deficit  7.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.16, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35
AGAAAAACUGAAAUUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90257.1, 15 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -18.99, deficit  7.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.30, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 85.5000	 78.3750	4
5	100.0000	 89.1250	 50.2500	23
6	100.0000	 87.5000	 51.5000	60
7	 99.6250	 54.2500	 16.0000	51
8	 99.6250	 28.1250	  5.0000	46
9	 98.5000	 18.0000	  1.7500	68
10	 95.0000	  6.6250	  0.1250	41
11	 83.2500	  3.6250	  0.0000	42
12	 43.3750	  0.3750	  0.0000	23
13	 17.7500	  0.5000	  0.0000	12
14	  5.7500	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.2500	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.3750	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.7500	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.5000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.1250	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  83 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 126 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 131 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 214 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 214 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 216 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 225 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 230 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 230 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 236 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 236 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 265 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 276 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 278 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 283 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 287 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 289 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 292 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 294 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 324 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 332 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 334 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 344 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 357 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 357 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 370 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 381 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 383 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 393 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 412 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 413 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 413 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 418 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 432 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 446 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 459 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 460 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 489 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 503 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 506 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 542 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 544 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 548 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 552 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 556 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 566 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 575 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 578 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 592 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 628 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 633 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 651 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 698 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 719 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 751 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 787 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 823 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 823 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 847 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 862 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 867 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 875 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 882 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 887 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 895 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 1180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 1190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1303 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1605 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.2865%
Number of models giving false positives is 303 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.46
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.57
