Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_19.mat
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -8.00, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.05, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.05, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -5.05, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
AGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.10, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UUGUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.53, deficit  2.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UUGCA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.89, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CCUUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.38, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UGGAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.37, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
ACAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
AGAGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.84, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90197.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35                             
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
AUCCU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.34, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.84, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -2.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UGUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.21, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UUCUA 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.91, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UAUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.21, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
UUUUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUGUA 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.57, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.38, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UGAAAA 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.18, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGGUAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.46, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
GAUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -7.41, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GUUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.90, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCUAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -8.88, deficit  7.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CUCCUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.00, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUAAC 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.90, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UAUUCA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -4.47, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-F                             
GAUUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -4.46, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-F                             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GCCAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.89, deficit  0.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UAUUGA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -5.25, deficit  0.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CGAUGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -6.03, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.73, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35                             
CCCUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.32, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GCUUAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -7.17, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CCAAAG 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.62, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAAGAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.72, deficit  0.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAUAC 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CACUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -6.60, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUAUCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.51, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
UGUGAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
AAAUGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_52240.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -5.51, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CCAUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.77, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CUCAUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -5.02, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UUUUCA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUGAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_29487.1,  6 NTs,                CUGAUG,score      -2.34, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s35-s55                       
CGGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.16, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UUCUCA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.59, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCUAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.51, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AUAACU 1  Matches 22; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.44, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGUAAC 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.90, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GAGGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CCACUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35                               
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CAACAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -3.46, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
GUCCUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -4.95, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CAUGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -4.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
GGGCGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.69, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.44, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CUCACG 1  Matches  9; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.49, deficit  4.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUCUCG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAUUGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAUCUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -5.04, deficit  0.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GCAGAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -8.27, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CCGAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -8.81, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
UGUCAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -7.27, deficit  4.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGCAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUAAACC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CUUUCUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -5.75, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
AGCAAAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.92, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AUAAACU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
UUUAUCA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -4.90, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.30, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CUACCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.26, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CAAAUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.06, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGUAAGC 1  Matches 19; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.46, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GCUCUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -5.03, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CACUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.94, deficit  1.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AGACGGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.75, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AUUAGUU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.83, deficit  1.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUUGAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.62, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GGCUAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.79, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AUGGCCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -7.30, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35                                 
CAGAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.28, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GGUUAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.11, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
UGGGAAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.27, deficit  2.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUCGAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -8.21, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
AACCUCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -11.61, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UGCUUGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.34, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
AGACGAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.73, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGGCGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGAGAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GCGAGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.30, deficit -0.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GAGUGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.55, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUAAACC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CAGGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -7.19, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
UGAUGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -4.65, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGUGAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.20, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
AUUCACU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.26, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GUCAUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -5.93, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
GGGAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAUUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.32, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GGCACAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.79, deficit  1.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGGUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.11, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
GCAUGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.37, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
CGACCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.19, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGCAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.00, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UAAAGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -7.64, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
CGAAUGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_40469.1,  4 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.06, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CCGUUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.66, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GAUUGCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -6.64, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AGAUUAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.83, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
CUACAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.15, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GUCGGUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -8.08, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GGAGAGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.66, deficit  6.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GCACGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUCCUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.42, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
GUGUCCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.54, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
CACAGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -8.48, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
AUUGAAUU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.84, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GAAGCUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -12.83, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GUUAGACC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.32, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
AACCCGAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.66, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GUGACAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.48, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUUGGACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -8.08, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CCGUCGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.10, deficit  2.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.14, deficit  2.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GCUGUGAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -9.20, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
CUCAGUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -12.20, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUGGUAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.43, deficit  4.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CUCCAUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.15, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CCAAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -11.12, deficit  7.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GGACGUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCUCAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.56, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAGAUACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.18, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
UGUGAUGA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -6.24, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUUAGAUA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.48, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CCCUCAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.21, deficit  4.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGAGGUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -6.93, deficit  3.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GCCGAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -8.61, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
GUGAAAUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.64, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGAGUCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.94, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GGCCGUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.86, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAUCGCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.57, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CAUUCGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.81, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
CAGACAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -7.34, deficit  4.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GGUGUUGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.99, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GGGGAAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GAAAAACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.01, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CGGAAAGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -4.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GGGCGCGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.43, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAAUCGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.99, deficit  3.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CAUAUGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.98, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GUUUACUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -8.57, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GGAUCAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -7.80, deficit  1.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCGAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -9.36, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GUAAAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.33, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GUACGUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
UGUCGGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.58, deficit  1.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUCCGUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.56, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
CGCGAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.45, deficit  1.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUAGUGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -8.84, deficit  4.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GUGGUUUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.12, deficit  0.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CACCGUUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.35, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CGGACUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGUUGCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.41, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGGAAAAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -8.37, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CUAUGAAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -9.75, deficit  2.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GCUCAAUAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.34, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
AGCAUCUGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.33, deficit  2.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUAGACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -8.01, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AGCCAAAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.35, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAAUCCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GUGGCAAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -9.27, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CGAAGUUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.39, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
AAGUUAAAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.13, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CAAAGAUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -9.41, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UGUGAAUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -12.73, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GAGCAUUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.85, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GUACUGCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.85, deficit  0.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGCACAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score     -10.78, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
UAGGACCCA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -13.04, deficit  5.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CGAUAAGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.16, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCAGAAUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -8.27, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAGUUGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.57, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CUUUUGUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score     -11.36, deficit  4.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
AUUCGAGUU 1  Matches 12; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -6.17, deficit  3.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.07, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
UUCAAGUUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -10.65, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
AAUGAGUCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -6.96, deficit  1.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUAGUCCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.31, deficit  1.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAAUUGAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -9.65, deficit  3.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
CGGUUAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -7.87, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CGGACAUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -7.81, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGAAAAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -8.37, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
UGAAGAGAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -9.93, deficit  4.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CCAAGUCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -7.19, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.41, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GGGCGAAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.16, deficit  0.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGGAGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -11.84, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGAAUCCGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.89, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CUAGGCACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.78, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUACUGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -13.39, deficit  7.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
UUUUGUCCA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.54, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
CAGAGAAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score     -10.95, deficit  4.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUCGAACCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score      -9.81, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAUAUCGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -5.78, deficit  0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CUCAACUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -9.78, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GGACGUUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -11.68, deficit  4.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
UCAACAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -11.19, deficit  5.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
UUCAUGACA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -11.71, deficit  5.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCAGGGGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -11.55, deficit  4.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CUCCUUGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.51, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CGAGAGAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.23, deficit  5.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUCCUUAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score      -9.08, deficit  1.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
CCAGACAUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CAUUGGAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -8.43, deficit  2.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CUUAGCGCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -11.54, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGCCACUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score      -7.13, deficit  2.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
AAAUGAUCAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.54, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
GAACUAUUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -14.50, deficit  9.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GUUUUAAACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.82, deficit  6.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CAAAUAAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -11.88, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
GAGAGAUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.28, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGAUACUCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.09, deficit  4.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUCUAGCGUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -10.48, deficit  1.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.96, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CAAGAUACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.37, deficit  3.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GUAUUGUCUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.08, deficit  6.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
GGAUUGAGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.37, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GGAUCAAUAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.48, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GGGCUAAAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -11.57, deficit  4.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CUGGAGUAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -9.98, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
CGAGCGUAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.57, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
GUAAUUACUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.26, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGACGUUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -16.17, deficit  7.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
UGUCGAGGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.56, deficit  0.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
ACGAGGAAUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.81, deficit  4.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGGAAAUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.58, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAAAGCCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.71, deficit  3.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGAUUCUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.59, deficit  7.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUGAAUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.42, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CCGCCAGCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.77, deficit  6.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
AAUGUCGGAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.07, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
AUAAGAAAUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -9.99, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
GUUGACUAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -7.20, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
AACCAUAAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -12.27, deficit  5.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGACAUAUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score     -11.67, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGAACGAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.80, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAUCGGACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.49, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAGAGUCAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.38, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GGUAAAGCGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.14, deficit  6.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CACGGUAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -12.48, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GACUGCCUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.63, deficit  9.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUUUCGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -12.12, deficit  8.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
UAGAUGUAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -15.41, deficit  9.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCUUGUUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -11.03, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCAAGAGCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -13.11, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CAAUCUGGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -10.97, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
GGGAUCGUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.16, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CAAAUUUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -17.14, deficit  9.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGCAAAACAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score      -8.95, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUAAAAAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.33, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.05, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GAAGACGAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.93, deficit  7.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAGACGUCAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -14.82, deficit  6.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CUCGAUGAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.39, deficit  6.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGGAAGUUGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -13.45, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.24, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GUUGAGUGCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -14.16, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CGUGAGCCGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -10.26, deficit  3.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUUGGUUCCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -10.94, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.88, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
CUCACACGCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -14.64, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
GUGAAAGAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.49, deficit  6.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUAAAAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score      -8.68, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUGCAAGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -13.34, deficit  8.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAAAAAGAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -11.67, deficit  3.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.36, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUCUGUCUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.60, deficit  5.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCCUCAAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -13.57, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CCGAAAAAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -13.79, deficit  7.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
UAUCCAAGAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_10751.2,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -13.99, deficit  8.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.90, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33                   
GAGCUAACCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -13.53, deficit  6.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
UUGAAUUCUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.91, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.73, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CCCUAUAUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.14, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
GGUCCCCGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.34, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAUGUUUAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -10.01, deficit -0.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.62, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CAGUGAUGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -12.75, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
UGAAACCCGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -16.42, deficit  8.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGGGACGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -12.11, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
GUUACAAAGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.27, deficit  5.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GAAAUGCAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -10.87, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
GGGUAAACGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -10.63, deficit  3.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGGUGAGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -14.51, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
CAAGGUUUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -10.81, deficit  0.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.34, ed 99, 5 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
GGUAGGAAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -10.55, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CCUCCUGAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.17, deficit  4.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
AGAGCAUUAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.35, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
GUUUAAAGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.29, deficit  2.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUGGAAAACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -12.61, deficit  6.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCGUAGAAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.92, deficit  7.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CCGAAGAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -12.45, deficit  6.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
UUGUGCAGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.91, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.73, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GUCUAAAUCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -16.39, deficit  6.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUCCAUACACA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -11.29, deficit  3.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.35, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CCAGUGGGCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -10.80, deficit  1.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
CGUUGCACAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -12.20, deficit  6.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GGGUGAAUUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -9.68, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGACCACAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.02, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUAUUAAUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.48, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CGGAAGGAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -14.23, deficit  7.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GGAAGAAUCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -11.09, deficit  6.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAUAGAAGCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -14.03, deficit  9.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCGUCUUCUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94032.1, 10 NTs,          UAGUCUCUUUCG,score     -15.90, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGGGCCGUGUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -15.69, deficit  5.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GUUAAAAAAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -11.74, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
GUGAGAUGAGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.47, deficit  5.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CUAGUGUCAGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.49, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
AAAAAUUUAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score      -9.78, deficit  2.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CAUUGGGAAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -13.27, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CAAAGCGCUGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -14.92, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
GGAAGCUGUGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -12.70, deficit  4.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
CAUAACCAUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.72, deficit  2.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
UCCAAAGAGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.15, deficit  6.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.47, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GGAAGACAUAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.10, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCAUUGAAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -15.83, deficit  7.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CGAAAUCACGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.28, deficit  5.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CAGAAAAAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score      -9.49, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CGACACGGAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -12.44, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUUAUGCAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.94, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGAAACCCAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.56, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUCUGUUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -12.44, deficit  3.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.41, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CUAUUCAAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.68, deficit  8.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGAAUCUCAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -13.75, deficit  5.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
CAAUUUGUAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -10.76, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
CGCACUUCAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -16.04, deficit  7.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GGCACCAACGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -15.70, deficit  8.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CAUCGAAAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -13.96, deficit  6.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAUCGGAAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -15.52, deficit  7.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCGAAGAAACUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.62, deficit  8.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CCAAACGAUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.87, deficit  6.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGCCUGCGUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_10751.2,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -10.50, deficit  4.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33                   
GUGCUCGCAAGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.26, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.16, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUUCGUUGUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20714.1, 11 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -12.99, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.61, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGACAGGUAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -16.05, deficit  7.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
GGAUUUAUCAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -15.62, deficit  7.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
GGCUGGUGCUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68863.1, 11 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -13.85, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.08, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F   
CAAUGAGAUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -13.06, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.60, ed 99, 5 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
CGAAAAGAUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.81, deficit  6.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGGGCGAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.34, deficit  7.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.99, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
AAAAUCAAUCACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.67, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.58, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAAUUCGUAACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.42, deficit  7.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAAGGAAAAUCCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.33, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.96, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGGGGUAAUUUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68863.1, 11 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -13.77, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.59, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F   
CGAGGAGAGAUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -14.66, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.85, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
GAAAACAAAACUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -15.89, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.77, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
UGAAGUAUAAAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -15.04, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.61, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
CGAAAAUGCUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -14.92, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.80, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
AAUUCAGGAGAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -14.90, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.51, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
UUCAGAAUGUCGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -16.55, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.34, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
CAGGAAUUGAUAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42211.1, 13 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -18.54, deficit  8.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35     
4	100.0000	 85.2632	 78.1053	4
5	100.0000	 88.9474	 50.9474	23
6	100.0000	 86.8421	 51.8947	60
7	 99.5789	 54.2105	 15.7895	51
8	 99.5789	 27.1579	  4.9474	46
9	 98.5263	 18.2105	  1.8947	68
10	 94.9474	  6.9474	  0.1053	41
11	 84.1053	  3.3684	  0.0000	42
12	 45.1579	  0.5263	  0.0000	23
13	 18.5263	  0.4211	  0.0000	12
14	  6.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.1579	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.3684	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.6316	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.4211	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.1053	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  95 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 150 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 154 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 202 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 214 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 216 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 224 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 227 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 230 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 236 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 236 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 238 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 239 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 242 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 243 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 245 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 246 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 246 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 253 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 257 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 260 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 261 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 262 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 262 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 266 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 268 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 272 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 276 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 277 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 278 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 281 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 282 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 322 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 324 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 341 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 344 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 345 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 346 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 348 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 359 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 382 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 391 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 395 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 404 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 423 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 425 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 443 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 448 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 448 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 472 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 478 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 485 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 490 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 497 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 507 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 526 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 541 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 554 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 571 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 584 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 614 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 644 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 652 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 654 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 654 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 668 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 668 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 677 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 694 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 709 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 745 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 758 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 781 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 836 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 870 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 897 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 925 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 970 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 977 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 1009 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 1035 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 1038 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 1039 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 1046 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 1050 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 1087 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 1404 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 1409 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1543 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1919 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.4211%
Number of models giving false positives is 303 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.49
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.50
