Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_2.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:03:45
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.5328 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.4440 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.7309 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.6628 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.6358 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.6025 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   5.2345 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.9595 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.2104 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.8305 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.6507 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.5064 minutes

ans =

    12

GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.69, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.87, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -8.00, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.87, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUCA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -7.73, deficit  4.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.71, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
ACGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.88, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.20, deficit  3.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.31, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -8.30, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UCAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -6.79, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
AGUAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.36, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90197.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35                             
UUGUA 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.57, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.09, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUCAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -5.08, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
AGCAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
ACCGU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.76, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -8.75, deficit  5.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.48, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -7.61, deficit  3.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.94, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GCAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
AGCAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
GGGCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -8.22, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UAUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -6.01, deficit  3.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
GUCAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -2.79, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CCUCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.38, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GAAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CCUUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.38, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UGUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.21, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.62, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GUCGC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.13, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GUAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.09, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CCGUAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.51, deficit  0.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
CAGUAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGCAAG 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -3.36, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAAUCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.34, deficit  0.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.24, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUGUUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.72, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CAAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.41, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAAACG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.30, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGCAGG 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.21, deficit  4.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGGAC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.41, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGGAC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.41, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AUCAAU 1  Matches 18; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.40, deficit  6.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUCGGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -6.34, deficit  0.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAACGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35                               
AAAGCU 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.13, deficit  6.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUGAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.11, deficit  0.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UGUGUA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.21, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.55, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CGGCAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_57204.1,  5 NTs,                UGGAAA,score      -5.59, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
CGCAAG 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -3.36, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUCUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -10.28, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGAAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.81, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.26, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAACAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -3.34, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
GCAAAC 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.45, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGCAAG 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -3.36, deficit  1.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCGG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
AUAUCU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.57, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AAACUU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -4.47, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-s35                               
CUUUCG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.95, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUGCCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGACAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.47, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUAGUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.23, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GAUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -7.41, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GAUAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.10, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUGCUU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.83, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GGAUUC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.03, deficit  0.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AAAAAU 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.96, deficit  5.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.01, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGGGGA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.41, deficit  1.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGGAAU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.96, deficit  6.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.15, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGUUUA 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.46, deficit  0.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GGGAUC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
GUGGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.73, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GGUGAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CAUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -7.49, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GGAAUC 1  Matches 38; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.66, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GAAAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.04, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
UCACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.99, deficit  2.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CAUCUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -5.27, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CUCAAG 1  Matches 20; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.86, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.11, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AACAAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.56, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CAAAGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.29, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CGAACAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UUCAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -8.98, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCUCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.99, deficit  2.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUAGUCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CGACGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.46, deficit  0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUAUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -5.83, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAAAUAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -5.89, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
GUAGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.11, deficit  1.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CAUCGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -6.33, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AGUUAGU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -5.23, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CUUGAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -6.79, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GGUAUAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.45, deficit  1.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCGUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -8.89, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGUCGGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.84, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
UGAACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.34, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUAGAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.20, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GGGAGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.58, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GCGCGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -4.97, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UUUAUGA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_33612.1,  6 NTs,               CUUUUGG,score      -5.46, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55                 
GUGAGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.56, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -6.23, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
AUAAAGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
AUGAUUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -7.03, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
AUAAUCU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -4.90, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.30, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CCGUCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.29, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
GUUUUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -5.29, deficit  0.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AAUGGGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.41, deficit  1.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CUCUAGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -6.79, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CGCAGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -8.13, deficit  0.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GUGCGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -4.93, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGAGUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.41, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GUAUCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUCCAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.71, deficit  0.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUAAGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.49, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGAGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.24, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UUUAAAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.16, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAAAUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -6.08, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CACUUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.95, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUCGGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -9.52, deficit  3.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGGGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.15, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AUUAGAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -8.24, deficit  3.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CCGCUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.18, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUAAGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.64, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CUAUAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.65, deficit  1.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UUUUUUA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -4.73, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
UAACGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -8.74, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
UACAUGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.13, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GGAACUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.14, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGAGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.32, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGCUUGUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score     -11.08, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
CCAGUAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.82, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
UAACACGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.09, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGUGAAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -6.92, deficit  1.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGCUGGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.69, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CCCGAGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.15, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
GUGAUAGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.66, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGUCUCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -9.49, deficit  5.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GUUCCAUC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.57, deficit  3.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
UUCUAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.86, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
GGAAUGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.97, deficit  0.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUGGUUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -7.11, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUCGAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -10.98, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CCCGGGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.06, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
AGGCAUAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -10.41, deficit  3.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GAAGAACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.69, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CAGUAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.37, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CUUGAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.54, deficit  0.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGAUAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -8.06, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
AUUCUAUU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -11.20, deficit  2.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGUGUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -6.54, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CAGCCUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.88, deficit  4.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GUAGAUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.78, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CAACAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -9.59, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAAACUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -11.10, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GAGAAUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -8.71, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
GAAAAGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.17, deficit  0.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.92, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCGAAAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -11.00, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
GUUUAAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.66, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AGUCAGCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -9.25, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
AUGAAAAU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.76, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CACAGCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.71, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGUUUUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -5.10, deficit  0.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CCUGGCAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.36, deficit  3.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGAUGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.05, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAAGGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.17, deficit  0.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUAGAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -8.15, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCUCAAAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGAAGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -7.78, deficit  0.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
UCAAUAAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -8.19, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GAACUAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
AUUAGGAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.61, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCGAAAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -11.00, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CCGAGCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.74, deficit  2.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUUCAAGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score     -10.12, deficit  5.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CCCAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.83, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
GGUCCUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.99, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GUGAAAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.64, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AUCAUUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -12.13, deficit  5.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
UUAAAAUUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -11.69, deficit  7.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
UUUGAAAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -9.12, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
CGCACAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -12.33, deficit  4.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUCGAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score      -8.54, deficit  4.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAAUUGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.30, deficit  7.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UAAUGGAGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -9.87, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
AGCCUGAUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.35, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGUCGGAGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -13.38, deficit  6.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GGCAAAUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.82, deficit  3.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGUUGAGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -8.20, deficit  2.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUCACGACA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -10.96, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
UGUAAAUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.49, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUGCGAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCGGGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.71, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CAAGAUAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -8.69, deficit  3.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CCUAAUCAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score      -9.33, deficit  4.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.08, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUAAACCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -9.89, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGUUCUGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -8.92, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
GUUUCGAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
ACAAUUAGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.80, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
UCAACGCUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -11.22, deficit  4.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGUGGCCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.52, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UCUGUGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -12.07, deficit  8.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
CGUCACUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -9.78, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
UGAAAGAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.39, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GUUGGAUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.38, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GUACCCCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.85, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGUUUCCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.14, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCCAAGACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -9.27, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
AUUAAAAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.63, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
CGAUUGCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.30, deficit  7.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAAUAGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -10.94, deficit  4.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CAUUCAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -11.06, deficit  7.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGCGGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score      -9.43, deficit  2.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GACCAAAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.34, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
AAGGCCUGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score      -9.31, deficit  1.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GAUAAAAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -6.61, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CCCGAAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -6.64, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
AACUGGUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -10.28, deficit  2.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GUGAAAGUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -5.65, deficit  1.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GCCUGUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -12.66, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GGGAAGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.11, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UCAAGAACA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.89, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CGCGUCCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -10.43, deficit  2.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUGUCCCCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.23, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCGAAACCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -9.64, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CGACGCCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -10.26, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CUGAAGGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -7.69, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CGGGCGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.81, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CGGUUUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.31, deficit  5.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGCGACUUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.74, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
AACGACUGUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.66, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
AAUCAACAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -12.74, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
CUCCGAGUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.79, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUUAGCGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.08, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUACUGUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -7.60, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
CGAUUAGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score      -7.22, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUAGAACAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.17, deficit  4.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UCAGGAGACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.03, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGAUGAAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -6.77, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
GUGAUGACCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -13.68, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CUUGAGUAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -7.27, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
UUAGGAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.87, deficit  8.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUCAGUUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.57, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CUUGCCGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -13.46, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUAGCUAGCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -12.58, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GGAAAACUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.04, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAGAGAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.50, deficit  4.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAAUAAGUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.61, deficit  6.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UGAGGAUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -14.73, deficit  6.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CAAAUUGGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -12.57, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.51, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CGAAAAGUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.09, deficit  4.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUUUAGUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.30, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CCUCUCAAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -11.93, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UAUCACCUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.67, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GGAGGCAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -8.71, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CGGAAAUGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -9.55, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CGACAGAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -14.26, deficit  6.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CGAGUCCGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.10, deficit  4.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUACCAAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.85, deficit  8.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GUUGCCUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -10.75, deficit  5.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
AUGACAUGAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.12, deficit  5.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CAAUCUUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.13, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CCGCGAUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -12.25, deficit  6.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
CAGGGAUUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -13.12, deficit  3.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
UGUACGAAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.05, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUACUAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.41, deficit  7.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CGAAAUUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.37, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGGGUGGCUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -15.58, deficit  7.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
CUGCAAAUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score      -6.96, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CUCAAAUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -12.07, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GCAAUCACAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.15, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
AUCUUUUGUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -10.57, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
CGAGUUUUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -12.98, deficit  5.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
AAGUGGGUGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.80, deficit  0.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CGCAACUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.29, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.19, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
GGGUGCAUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.87, deficit  5.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGUGGAUUUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -12.72, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAAGUGUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -11.08, deficit  4.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
GGGAAACAGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.66, deficit  6.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.23, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUCGCGGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.36, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GAUCUUGGGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -10.07, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
GUCUGAAACCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -16.83, deficit  8.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CGGGUGAACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score      -9.60, deficit  4.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
UUAAAGCAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -12.83, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
CAUCUUUCUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.04, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.13, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUUGAACUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.61, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGGUAUACGAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.87, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUUCCUGAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.66, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUAUCGAGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -16.15, deficit  9.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CUCUACUAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.93, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GUUUAGAUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -17.58, deficit 11.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUAUGGUCACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -13.93, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GGAAUCAUUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score      -9.79, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUUUGAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -13.21, deficit  2.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
UAAACAACGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -13.84, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.60, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
AGAUCAUUCUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -11.57, deficit  3.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GGACGAGAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.05, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
UAAUGAAUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -10.71, deficit  2.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CCACUCUUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.36, deficit  5.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUGCGUGGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score      -8.20, deficit  1.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGGGCAAGUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.64, deficit  4.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAUUUUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.46, deficit  8.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AGCGCGAGUCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.85, deficit  6.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
AGUCCCCAUAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.10, deficit  4.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UAUGAGCUCAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -10.72, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
UUGGUUCGGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.91, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.73, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CUACUAAUAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.40, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.19, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCAACGCGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -16.27, deficit 10.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGUGAAUCCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.53, deficit  8.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAUUUGCAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -11.99, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CUAAGGAUAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score      -9.63, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
AUUAAGUUUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -16.10, deficit 10.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGUUUGCAAUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score      -9.75, deficit  4.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CGGCCAAGGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -11.74, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
CGCGAAGUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.47, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.00, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CCGGAUGACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -13.49, deficit  8.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
UGUUCUCAAGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.47, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.19, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUGAUACACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.88, deficit  6.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUGCACAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score      -8.95, deficit  3.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
AGUCUAAGUAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.94, deficit  3.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGAGAAAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -11.21, deficit  6.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCGAAAAGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.40, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CAAUUUGAAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -10.86, deficit  0.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CUUGGCGCAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -11.69, deficit  5.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUGGAUGACAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20714.1, 11 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -13.31, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAACGUAAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -17.04, deficit  9.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GAAAAAAAGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.04, deficit  4.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CGAUAAAAUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.57, deficit  4.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.71, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAACCCAAGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.70, deficit  6.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.92, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GCCGAAAACAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -15.34, deficit  9.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
AGAAAGAAAUCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.22, deficit  9.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCGAGAUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -17.57, deficit  9.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUACAAGAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.27, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.30, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGUGUAAAUUGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -10.58, deficit  4.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.13, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GUCGGUCCUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.52, deficit  9.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAGGAAGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.13, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.93, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAAAUACCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -20.58, deficit  9.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCACAAGGAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -17.76, deficit 10.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
UCGAACAUAAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.79, deficit  5.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UCAAAUAAAACA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.30, deficit 10.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCAGGUUGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -13.42, deficit  4.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CUAAAGAGUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -18.74, deficit 11.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGAUGAUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.20, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAGACAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.93, deficit  7.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCCCAGAUAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -10.90, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CAUCAAGUGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -15.46, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.29, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
UGAAAAUAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -16.38, deficit  9.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CUAUAUGGAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -11.71, deficit  4.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUCAGGCAAUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -17.19, deficit 10.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
CGAGUGUGAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -14.13, deficit  5.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CUAUUCGCUAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.89, deficit  8.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAUGUGAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -13.01, deficit  4.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
UUCAAACUAGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -17.74, deficit  9.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CUCAGCGACGCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -15.64, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.86, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
CUUACAAAGAUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -17.32, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.41, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GUGAAGACGAAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -14.89, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.65, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
UAGCAGCCUCACCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93221.1, 13 NTs,        GACCUAGAUCACCC,score     -15.02, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.98, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35 
CGAGUCAUCUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -16.01, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.75, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
CGGAUCCAGAGUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -16.59, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
GUUUUAGAGUCCGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12773.1, 13 NTs,       GUAUUGCAGUACCUC,score     -14.66, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.35, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35
GGAACUCAGAGACACAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_52657.1, 15 NTs,     CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG,score     -21.27, deficit  9.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.58, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGGCUCACUUCAAAUAAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_00317.1, 19 NTs,  UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA,score     -24.40, deficit  9.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.02, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 83.0000	 66.0000	4
5	100.0000	 87.0000	 48.0000	23
6	100.0000	 88.0000	 53.0000	60
7	 99.0000	 52.0000	 16.0000	51
8	 98.0000	 24.0000	  2.0000	46
9	100.0000	 18.0000	  2.0000	68
10	 99.0000	  9.0000	  0.0000	41
11	 90.0000	  6.0000	  0.0000	42
12	 43.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	23
13	 13.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	12
14	  9.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  1.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  1.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  1.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence   7 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  15 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  21 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.6250%
Number of models giving false positives is 282 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.79
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.29
