Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_3.mat
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.21, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
ACGUU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -9.30, deficit  6.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUACU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.92, deficit  1.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UACAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -6.79, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
UAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.84, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GCUAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.22, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F-s35                             
AAAGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.07, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UGUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.21, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GCUAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.22, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GCGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -8.33, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.74, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAGA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.80, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
UUUCA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.26, deficit  1.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAAA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.95, deficit  0.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.10, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GUCCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
UAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -7.10, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCCCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.00, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAACG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.30, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GACUCC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F                             
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -4.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
UAAACA 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.01, deficit  5.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUACCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.80, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGCGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.62, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GUGGUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -3.74, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GGCGAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.31, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GUCCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.11, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCCUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -4.95, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCUAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -8.88, deficit  7.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
GGUAAC 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.90, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CCGAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.46, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.54, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GGUAGC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCGCAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -8.21, deficit  0.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
AUUGUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -5.64, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCCUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.00, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GCUGUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.47, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
GGGGAC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.41, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCAACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -8.27, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UGAAGG 1  Matches 22; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.48, deficit  4.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAUAC 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UGCAGG 1  Matches 13; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.09, deficit  6.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.34, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUGCCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCACC 1  Matches 11; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.32, deficit  5.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAAACC 1  Matches 25; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.13, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUCCUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.00, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCGCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.08, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GUUCUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -10.28, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAAAG 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.62, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUCUCG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UAGCAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.95, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
CAUCAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -2.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
GGGGAC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.41, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UUAUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -7.72, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCAUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -4.95, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GGUCGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.78, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UCGAAA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.19, deficit  2.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UUUCCA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_46463.1,  4 NTs,                UUUCGA,score      -5.06, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -6.60, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGCGAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.31, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
AUACCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.86, deficit  0.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
UCGCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.35, deficit  3.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
GUGAUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_29487.1,  6 NTs,                CUGAUG,score      -2.54, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.07, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s35-s55                       
CGAAUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUAAUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.46, deficit  2.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.17, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CACACAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.74, deficit  0.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
CAACGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -7.19, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
GGAUCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.97, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUAAACC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
UUCAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -8.82, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGCUGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.79, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UAAAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_77081.1,  5 NTs,               UGAAAAG,score      -4.88, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35             
GUGAACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.24, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
UGCCGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -8.81, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AAGAUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.31, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GUUGUCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CAAGAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.59, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
AUGUUCU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -5.69, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.46, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GUCUUCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.77, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
GAAAUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
AGUGCAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.88, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUUGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.32, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GUGUGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.77, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
UACUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -14.37, deficit  6.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CUCCCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -9.20, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AAAACAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.51, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.92, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
UUUCCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -7.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
AGAACAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.42, deficit  0.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.08, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GCUCGUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.20, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAGGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -8.92, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUAUCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.26, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UAUCAAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -8.01, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UAAAGAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.31, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
AAGUUCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GAUUAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -9.19, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GGUCAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.78, deficit  2.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GAAAAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.50, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GCCGAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.60, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAUAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.05, deficit  1.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.09, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUCAUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -6.93, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAGCGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.86, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GAAUUGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGGAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUUCUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -5.75, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GAUAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -6.69, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGGAGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.58, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUAAAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUAGGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -8.12, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GGGGAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -9.43, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGAGCAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.72, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUAUUUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -9.80, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CAAAAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.42, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAGAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.55, deficit  1.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.28, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAUUAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -6.89, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CGAUGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -7.63, deficit  4.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.07, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
CGCAGGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -7.90, deficit  0.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAAAAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.42, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGGCAUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -9.74, deficit  4.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CAGCUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.63, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CAGUGAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score     -10.57, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CACAGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -8.00, deficit  4.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUUCGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.82, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CGGAUUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.81, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUAAAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -9.37, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CUCUUAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -9.16, deficit  2.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CUAGACUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.56, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CUGUAUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.64, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
AGUGGGAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.57, deficit  2.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUAAGUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -9.58, deficit  4.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGGACAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CGCGUCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.31, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAAAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.08, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CUCGGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.01, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GGGCACAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -5.55, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAGACAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAGACACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.18, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
GUGCCUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -5.96, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
GUGAUAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -8.48, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUCGAAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -9.48, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUUGAAUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.72, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUGUAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.59, deficit  3.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGACUGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.30, deficit  0.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AUAUGGUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -9.21, deficit  5.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GUCAAUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.52, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
AGAUGGAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score     -11.08, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGAACGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CUAUUGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -8.67, deficit  4.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CGCAAAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.35, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGAUCAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -7.96, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCUUCUAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.65, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
CUAGCAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.48, deficit  3.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CACUCCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.27, deficit  2.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AGAACAGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -6.09, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GUGUUCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -11.73, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
CUGGUUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.05, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGUAAGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -7.01, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUCGUCUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score     -11.97, deficit  8.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CGAUCGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.74, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUGGUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.54, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GAUUCUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.45, deficit  3.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
UAAAUUUGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.89, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
UGACGAUGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -11.69, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GACGAAAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.59, deficit  3.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CAAUCUGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.13, deficit  5.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
UUCACGAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.54, deficit  5.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
AAAAAAAAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -7.23, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCGAAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.62, deficit  4.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GAGUCAAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.34, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CUGUAACUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.26, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CUGCUUUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.77, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GGCUUGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -10.91, deficit  4.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GCAGUUAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -5.66, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
GUCCAAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -9.80, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GGGUUCAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -10.28, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CGGCGAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.17, deficit  0.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.49, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UAGUCUGAA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score      -8.81, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
CGCUGAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -13.05, deficit  6.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
UGAAUGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -14.75, deficit  7.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUUUCUUA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -8.74, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
GUGUAAUCC 1  Matches  8; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -9.54, deficit  6.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GUCGAUGCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -10.06, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CUGGAAAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.18, deficit  1.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GUGCCAAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.17, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
UGCAAAUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.83, deficit  2.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UAAAUCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.83, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCCUAUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score      -9.80, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGAGGGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.49, deficit  3.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GAAGAAAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.53, deficit  3.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GGAAGACGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -9.28, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UCGUAACUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CGAUUUAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CACGACAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.78, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CUGAUGAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -7.93, deficit  1.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CAACAUUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -12.65, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
UUUGUCACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.36, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GGAGAUGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -8.40, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGAGCUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -6.00, deficit  0.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
CGUUGUAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -9.25, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
GGAAGAGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.47, deficit  7.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CAACUUUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.65, deficit  1.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GUAAGAUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.87, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GGGAGCAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -10.77, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUACGCGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -7.45, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.27, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
CGGUACCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.30, deficit  7.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAAAGCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.67, deficit  2.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAACGGAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.23, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CGUUAAAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -8.46, deficit  0.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGUUAAAGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -8.42, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGGUUGGGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -9.64, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
CUGCAGACG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.66, deficit  0.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAACAGAUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.02, deficit  2.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CGGAUUCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -11.86, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GUCUUUUGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -10.57, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
GAUCACACAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -11.56, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
CACCUUACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.70, deficit  8.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GCCUUUGCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -10.65, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUUCGCGGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGUCUGCAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.06, deficit  7.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGAAAUGGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -12.90, deficit  6.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGAUCUUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.78, deficit  9.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUAAAAGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -9.47, deficit  1.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
UGGAAAGCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.75, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUAACUCAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -15.39, deficit 10.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
UCGUAAUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -12.78, deficit  4.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CGUUCUGCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.07, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.62, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UAAAUCGGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.16, deficit  2.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
GAAAACUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.74, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CUUGAGACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -10.05, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
UGGGAGUGAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -11.94, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
AUUAAACGUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.09, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.64, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGCAAAAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.44, deficit  2.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.20, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UCGGGCAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -14.75, deficit  8.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CUCUCGUACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -13.39, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CACAUAGGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -13.06, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
GUGAAUAUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -6.65, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAAUAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -7.38, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUGAGAAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -19.00, deficit 11.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUCUGGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -13.06, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
GCUUUCUGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score      -9.86, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGUUAAGGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -15.64, deficit  9.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCUAGACUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -10.91, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CCGAAGGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -11.54, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UGGUGCUUAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -14.31, deficit  4.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GAUGCUCGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -12.03, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
GUGAGUGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -8.68, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.51, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUGAUGAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -8.30, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
CUGCAUGGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -13.03, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
CUUAAGCUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.61, deficit  6.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GUUAACUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.74, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GACGAUCGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.67, deficit  2.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CAAUGUGGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -8.31, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
CGUUAGGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.46, deficit  4.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUCGAAUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score     -10.75, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
CUGAGAUCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -11.59, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
CUAGAGGUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -12.32, deficit  4.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
GUCAGUAAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -9.49, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CAGUCUAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -9.94, deficit  0.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
GUUUAGACCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.33, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAGUCAAAGAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -11.28, deficit  4.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUGCUUUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.82, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.23, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CGUGGAUGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.73, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.17, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CCAGACGAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -15.76, deficit  9.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUGUGACAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -14.77, deficit  9.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
GAUAACAGAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -14.33, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.85, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CAAGCAAAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -15.29, deficit  7.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CCGCUGUGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -14.11, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
CGAACAAUGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -11.03, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CGAAGUUGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.29, deficit  4.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGGGAUUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.00, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUGGUGCAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.27, deficit  5.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GGAGCGCAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -10.18, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
AAAUCGGUGAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -10.37, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
GAAUUUCUGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.22, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
ACUCAGUUCCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -14.62, deficit  6.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.96, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
UUGAUGAUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.91, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UUUGAGAAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -11.98, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUGAAAUAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -14.44, deficit  7.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
CUCGGAAAGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -14.39, deficit  8.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CAUUAACUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.65, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
AUGAUUUGAUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -10.82, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UUGAGCCAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.91, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.73, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GUUCAUAAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.03, deficit  4.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CACUGGGACGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -12.42, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.84, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
CUGUGAAUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.85, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAGAGAGGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -14.05, deficit  7.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGCGAGAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.74, deficit  6.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.85, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUAAUAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -10.05, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGUUGAAUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.24, deficit  5.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UGUGAAAUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -15.21, deficit  7.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GUGCGUCCUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.39, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.07, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGACGAAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.35, deficit  2.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.23, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCAUUCAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -11.48, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
UGAAGAAUGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.09, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
UUGUGGUUGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -10.52, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GUCGAAAUAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.22, deficit  7.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GAACUACGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -14.43, deficit  7.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
CUGCGCAAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -14.26, deficit 10.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
GUGAUUGAUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.22, deficit  7.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CGCCAUUAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -11.38, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
AGAGACAAAUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.85, deficit  6.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAGGUGAAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -14.23, deficit  9.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
GUCCUAACGCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -16.81, deficit  9.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CAUAAAUUCCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -11.73, deficit  3.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.40, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
GUGACGUAUGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -12.67, deficit  5.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GAAGCGAUUGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -15.75, deficit  6.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
UAUGGAAGAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -13.38, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.54, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CGGAAACCAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -16.27, deficit  6.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAUAGCGUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -15.80, deficit  7.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
UGGAAACGACAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.24, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.01, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGCAAUAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.27, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAAAGAGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.27, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
AGAAAACCUAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.56, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUCCAACAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -12.60, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.16, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
CAUGUUUGUGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -13.80, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CAUUGCAACUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -10.47, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
GGUCCGAUUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.53, deficit  7.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CGCCCCUGAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -16.20, deficit  7.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.70, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CGAAAAGGAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -12.47, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.12, ed 99, 5 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAGUUUUUUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94032.1, 10 NTs,          UAGUCUCUUUCG,score     -14.00, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUAAUAGAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.54, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GUGUCGACUACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -15.21, deficit  7.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCAUCCAUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.72, deficit  2.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.90, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUUCGGUGUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20714.1, 11 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -15.13, deficit  6.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.88, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAGAGCGAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -15.38, deficit  8.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
GGGAUCGCACCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.40, deficit  6.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.20, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGACGUUGUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -14.88, deficit  6.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.28, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CGAGAAUUCGCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89082.1, 11 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -12.65, deficit  7.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.50, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35   
UUCCCAUGAAAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -13.73, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
AUUUUCAAAAAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score      -9.52, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
CCCAUUGCGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12870.1, 13 NTs,         GUCCUUGGGAAAC,score     -13.29, deficit  6.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35
CUAUACGACAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.15, deficit  8.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGUAAAAGAUCAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -14.99, deficit  4.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.96, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GAAUGCAUAAGUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -12.54, deficit -1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
CGGAGUUGAGAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42211.1, 13 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -16.36, deficit  6.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35     
4	100.0000	 84.6667	 74.6667	4
5	100.0000	 88.6667	 58.0000	23
6	100.0000	 87.3333	 51.3333	60
7	 98.6667	 58.0000	 12.0000	51
8	 99.3333	 31.3333	  4.0000	46
9	100.0000	 16.0000	  0.6667	68
10	 94.0000	  7.3333	  0.0000	41
11	 83.3333	  3.3333	  0.0000	42
12	 50.6667	  1.3333	  0.0000	23
13	 18.6667	  0.6667	  0.0000	12
14	  6.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.3333	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  3.3333	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  16 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  24 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  24 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 242 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 312 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.6389%
Number of models giving false positives is 288 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.36
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.78
