Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_9.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:14:05
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.3810 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.3770 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.7239 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.6462 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.6184 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5804 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   5.1441 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.9555 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.1915 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.8168 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.6491 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.5196 minutes

ans =

    12

CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.33, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.94, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.52, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.05, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.31, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.51, deficit -0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GACAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
UGAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90197.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35                             
UGGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -6.51, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UUUAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -6.04, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
AAAAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.96, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GACUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.12, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
AUUCU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.26, deficit  1.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAGA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.51, deficit -0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.84, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUUGC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.82, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GAUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.91, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CUUGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.12, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UUAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -6.38, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUGUU 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.57, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.90, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.84, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.28, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
UUCCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -6.81, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
GGGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CAAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.45, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
UUGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -6.91, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.51, deficit -0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.40, deficit  0.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUGAGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -5.29, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.92, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CUUGAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.85, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CGAUGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCAUUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.36, deficit -0.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUGAAU 1  Matches 25; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.35, deficit  7.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.86, deficit  1.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GUGAUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_29487.1,  6 NTs,                CUGAUG,score      -2.54, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.07, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s35-s55                       
CCAACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -8.27, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUCAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -3.80, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
UUAGUA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.36, deficit  0.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CACUUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.75, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CCCAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.32, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUAUCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.51, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
UGUUCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.32, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.49, deficit  0.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
UUACAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.63, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.86, deficit  1.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GAGUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_52240.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -5.60, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.70, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.95, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CACGAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.92, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UACUGA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -6.60, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGUGGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGUUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.72, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CUUCUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -9.74, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAGCG 1  Matches 18; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.58, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.93, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGAGC 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.98, deficit  6.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.43, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGACAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.47, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CACGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -7.13, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
GUGAAC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.63, deficit  6.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUAGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.29, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGCCAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -6.55, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.54, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CUCUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.92, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGUCAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.59, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GACGCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.75, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
ACUUUU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.83, deficit  0.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGCGCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.13, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CUUAAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.46, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GAGGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGCCUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -5.20, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
UGAGAA 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.15, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUGUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -5.55, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUACCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.86, deficit  0.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GUACAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.62, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGAUC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
GAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.24, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUGUUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.72, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
UACAAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.62, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAAGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.44, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGUAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -5.22, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CUGAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.62, deficit  3.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GGUUAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.11, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAGGUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -6.07, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUGAUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -6.93, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
AGCUCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.31, deficit  3.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UUGGUUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -7.29, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35                                 
GUAAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.50, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
CUAAGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.64, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CAAAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.77, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
AUGAAAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.04, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUUCCCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -7.78, deficit  3.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
UUUUUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.75, deficit  2.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GAACAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.16, deficit  1.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AUCUAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -6.80, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GGCCGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.88, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUUUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -5.10, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CUCCGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.59, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGGUGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -5.75, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCAAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.76, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUCUUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.33, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CGUUCGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.32, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
AAUCGAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.40, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.46, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
AUUAAAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.10, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UGCCGAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCUCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.99, deficit  2.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAGACC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -3.41, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CGAAGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -9.17, deficit  5.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CUCAGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.67, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
UGUUGUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
CUCGUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -7.21, deficit  1.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UACGAGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.90, deficit  1.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUCUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -7.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GGUUGAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.74, deficit  3.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
AUUAUUU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -5.93, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGCGCUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score     -10.60, deficit  4.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.42, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
UAUCAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.86, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CAGCUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.70, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CUAGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.16, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GUUUUGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_33612.1,  6 NTs,               CUUUUGG,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.38, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55                 
CAUAGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.19, deficit  1.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
AUUGAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -6.80, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
AUCAAGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.42, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -6.23, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CGAAACG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGUUUCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -8.46, deficit  2.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CACAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.50, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GAGCAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.57, deficit  3.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUAUAAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.07, deficit  2.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGUCACC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.32, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CAAAGGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -12.20, deficit  6.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
AAGGGGAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -10.66, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
AUAAGUAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.80, deficit  3.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGCAGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.83, deficit  2.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CUAAAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -8.97, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
UUAAUCUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score     -11.11, deficit  6.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
UAAGAAGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score     -12.47, deficit  6.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGAGUGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.61, deficit  4.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AUAGAAGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -9.50, deficit  6.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GGAACGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -5.27, deficit  2.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
CGAUGAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -8.99, deficit  4.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
UGCGUGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.83, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
UGGCCGCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.37, deficit  4.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGCAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -7.18, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
AUCCUACU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.24, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
UUGAAAAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.63, deficit  1.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CUCAUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -12.20, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAUGAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CCGCUUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.97, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUAAUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.03, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGGCAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -6.54, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CCGCUCAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.42, deficit  4.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCUGUCAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -9.20, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
CUUCCUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.81, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
CGUCAUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -10.91, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
CAAUUCGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -8.06, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
UGCAUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.38, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUCUUUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.81, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
AAUCGGAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -12.98, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GCAAGAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -8.12, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUCUAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -9.62, deficit  6.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCAAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.59, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGUUAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CAUAGAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -6.85, deficit  0.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGGAGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.50, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUCCCUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -8.95, deficit  3.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
CGCAUAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -8.11, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GCUGGAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -9.00, deficit  2.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
UGUUGGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -12.43, deficit  6.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAGGUUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.20, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGCGAGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.51, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUCUGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -16.25, deficit  9.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
CGAUGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -7.63, deficit  4.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.07, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GUCAAGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -7.71, deficit  0.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
AGAGGGGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -14.17, deficit  6.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
AGUUCACU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.26, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
CCCACAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -9.96, deficit  2.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GGGAAGGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.35, deficit  4.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUUUUCCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -5.94, deficit  1.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
UUACGGAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -10.80, deficit  3.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GGAGAGUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.37, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAGAGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.50, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCAAAAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.65, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CGUGAAAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.14, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCUUGCAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score     -11.08, deficit  5.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UCAUUUUCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.36, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GGGGCAGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.36, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
CUUUGACUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -6.96, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
CACUCGAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -13.07, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CUGACCAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -9.28, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CUUCGUUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -8.52, deficit  2.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
UCUCUCUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score     -10.30, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.21, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
GGACAGCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -9.50, deficit  6.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGGUGUAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.37, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAAACGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -12.15, deficit  6.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GACAAUGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -10.57, deficit  5.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAAUCCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.90, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GUCCAGUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.52, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCAAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -9.89, deficit  4.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CUCAAACUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.66, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CUGUUCCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -10.26, deficit  4.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.74, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
AUAAUGUAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.14, deficit  4.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGAAACACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
AGUAAACUU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score      -8.72, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGCCCGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.08, deficit  3.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GAGAUCAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GAGUGCACC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -10.38, deficit  3.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GUACACAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.23, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUCCUACC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -10.11, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
CCGGAUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.03, deficit  2.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUCACUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.15, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGUGGGAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.84, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GUCAAAACC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.34, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAUAAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -7.22, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AUUUAUGGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score      -6.86, deficit  1.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CGACAUAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.17, deficit  2.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GUUCGAACC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -6.77, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CUGUGUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -7.93, deficit  1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUGUAAUUC 1  Matches 15; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -7.33, deficit  4.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CAAGCAGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -11.19, deficit  5.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
UUCUUUUAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.61, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
AUGGGAUAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.15, deficit  2.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAAGCCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -14.50, deficit  9.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAUUAGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score     -11.75, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
ACUUCAGAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -6.97, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
UCUAAUCCA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.44, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
AGCUUCGAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -12.38, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CGUUACUUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.57, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CUCCUGAUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.23, deficit  6.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CGAUUUCCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score      -8.93, deficit  2.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGACAAAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.29, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUGUCUAUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -11.93, deficit  5.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GUACGUGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.39, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GAAUUCAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -10.34, deficit  4.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
ACUGAAACAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -11.71, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CUGAGAAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score     -13.29, deficit  6.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
ACAUGGUGCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CCGACCCUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CGGAGGAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.89, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAGACUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.75, deficit  7.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCGAGCUUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.15, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CUCGCAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.30, deficit  7.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGUCCCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.20, deficit  4.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUUCAAAUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.73, deficit  6.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CGGCAGAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -14.47, deficit  6.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGAACCAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.16, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAACCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
AUAAAAUCCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.34, deficit  7.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CGGCUUGUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -10.88, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGUUAACUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.91, deficit  3.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCCGUCAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.38, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GUGGUGAUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.82, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
UUAUGAGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.21, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CUCGACAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.30, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
UGAGCAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -14.52, deficit  6.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CGCCCGGGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -13.20, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
CUGUCUAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -12.78, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
CAGAAUAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -12.49, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GUUACACGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -12.98, deficit  7.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCACAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.45, deficit  9.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGGUGGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.26, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUUGAAAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -6.89, deficit  0.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.11, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
UAGAUCCAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -14.49, deficit  6.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CUAAACCUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UUUAAAACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -15.64, deficit  9.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UCUGAACCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -14.77, deficit 10.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
AGAACGUGAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CUCAAUAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -10.08, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GACGGUCAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.36, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GGAGGAAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score      -9.29, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
GUCUAUAAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -12.30, deficit  6.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAGGAGAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.20, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAAAAGGAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.62, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UGAAUGAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.72, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCUCCGUAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -11.84, deficit  5.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
GAGGAUCUGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.13, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.35, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAAGUCGGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -13.49, deficit  6.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.84, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CUUUAAAUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -11.40, deficit  6.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUGAGUCGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -11.80, deficit  4.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAGCGAACGAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -13.01, deficit  5.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.16, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CUUAGUCAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.60, deficit  5.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CAGAGAUAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.16, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GUGAGGACAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.60, deficit  7.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAGAACCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -10.85, deficit  6.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGACAGAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.91, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.73, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CUUUUGAAUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -10.52, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
AUAAUGGAUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -14.77, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
AGCCAAACUAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -13.38, deficit  6.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CGAUCCAGGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.13, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
CUAUAACAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.65, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
UGAACUUGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.91, deficit  7.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.90, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAUCGAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.86, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAGGAAAGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -10.75, deficit  2.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUUCAGAACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.40, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CGAAGUCUGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.46, deficit  9.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCCGUCUCGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -14.28, deficit  6.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CUAAGAGGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -12.18, deficit  4.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
GUUAAAAUGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -10.28, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.44, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GAACUAAUUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.51, deficit  1.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.51, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCCAGAAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -12.65, deficit  6.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CGAAAUCGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -16.45, deficit  6.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUAUCCGACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.80, deficit  8.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAACUCGUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.49, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAACUGAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -13.36, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUCACAAUAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -11.98, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
AUAUUGAUUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.75, deficit  4.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGCCAAUACAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -10.20, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.78, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
UGAUAUCAAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score      -9.03, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
UAUCCAUCCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.21, deficit  6.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.91, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGGAGUUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -10.98, deficit  3.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.70, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGUGUCAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -15.28, deficit 10.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
GGAAAAAUACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -19.17, deficit 11.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUUCGUAACUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -13.87, deficit  6.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
GGGAGAAAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.14, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCGGCACUCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -12.08, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
AGUCAGAAGAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -14.84, deficit  7.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUGUGAAUCCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -18.46, deficit  7.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUUAAAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -15.08, deficit  7.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUUAAGGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.80, deficit  8.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.39, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCAGAUAUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -13.93, deficit  5.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.63, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CUUGAAAUUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -10.97, deficit  4.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
UUGGAAAUAGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -15.88, deficit  7.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCUACACAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.38, deficit  7.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GUGAACUAAGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -14.24, deficit  8.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CCGAAAGAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -13.69, deficit  7.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.57, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CGGGCAAGAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.17, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.41, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGCCACCUACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -18.01, deficit  7.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGUGAACGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.38, deficit  6.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCGUAGAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -16.43, deficit  7.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.52, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
AAUCAAAUAGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.49, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
AAAGUCGUAAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -16.43, deficit  7.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
CGACCUUCCUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -13.09, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.01, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
GACUCCUGCCUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -19.07, deficit  9.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
CGCACGUAUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -13.74, deficit  5.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CGAUUAAGAUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.62, deficit  9.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GACGAAAAAGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.61, deficit  3.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.11, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAGACUACAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89082.1, 11 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score      -9.83, deficit  5.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.86, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35   
GCUAUAUAGGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.72, deficit  7.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GGGGAACAAGCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -12.76, deficit  1.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.72, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUUCGAGAAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -11.83, deficit  4.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
GGAAGUUGUUAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score      -9.28, deficit  1.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.78, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
UGAUAAGAGAUAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.12, deficit  6.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUAGGGAACCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -15.15, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.25, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
UGAAAAAGACAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.31, deficit  9.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGAGAAAAUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -14.92, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.80, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
UGACCAACGAGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -17.66, deficit  9.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AGAAACAGUAAACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.52, deficit 10.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUUUUCUCCAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07579.1, 14 NTs,      UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA,score     -18.01, deficit  9.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.48, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAACUCGGGUAAGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58539.1, 15 NTs,      UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG,score     -17.56, deficit  7.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.71, ed 99, 5 cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 82.8889	 69.1111	4
5	100.0000	 91.1111	 48.2222	23
6	100.0000	 86.8889	 49.3333	60
7	 99.7778	 49.5556	 15.7778	51
8	 98.8889	 28.4444	  4.0000	46
9	 99.1111	 18.8889	  1.7778	68
10	 94.4444	  9.3333	  0.4444	41
11	 84.4444	  3.7778	  0.0000	42
12	 43.7778	  0.6667	  0.0000	23
13	 16.6667	  0.2222	  0.0000	12
14	  6.4444	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.5556	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.7778	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.4444	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.2222	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  37 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  83 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  84 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 143 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 214 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 242 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 254 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 263 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 268 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 273 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 278 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 284 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 286 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 287 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 288 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 288 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 303 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 310 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 320 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 323 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 335 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 341 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 344 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 388 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 389 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 407 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 427 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 435 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 470 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 478 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 486 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 497 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 516 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 520 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 544 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 561 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 564 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 633 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 672 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 736 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 849 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.3426%
Number of models giving false positives is 298 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.86
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.49
